RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The role of diabetes in the development of valvular heart disease, and, in particular, the relation with risk factor control, has not been extensively studied. METHODS: We included 715 143 patients with diabetes registered in the Swedish National Diabetes Register and compared them with 2 732 333 matched controls randomly selected from the general population. First, trends were analyzed with incidence rates and Cox regression, which was also used to assess diabetes as a risk factor compared with controls, and, second, separately in patients with diabetes according to the presence of 5 risk factors. RESULTS: The incidence of valvular outcomes is increasing among patients with diabetes and the general population. In type 2 diabetes, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, and renal function were associated with valvular lesions. Hazard ratios for patients with type 2 diabetes who had nearly all risk factors within target ranges, compared with controls, were as follows: aortic stenosis 1.34 (95% CI, 1.31-1.38), aortic regurgitation 0.67 (95% CI, 0.64-0.70), mitral stenosis 1.95 (95% CI, 1.76-2.20), and mitral regurgitation 0.82 (95% CI, 0.79-0.85). Hazard ratios for patients with type 1 diabetes and nearly optimal risk factor control were as follows: aortic stenosis 2.01 (95% CI, 1.58-2.56), aortic regurgitation 0.63 (95% CI, 0.43-0.94), and mitral stenosis 3.47 (95% CI, 1.37-8.84). Excess risk in patients with type 2 diabetes for stenotic lesions showed hazard ratios for aortic stenosis 1.62 (95% CI, 1.59-1.65), mitral stenosis 2.28 (95% CI, 2.08-2.50), and excess risk in patients with type 1 diabetes showed hazard ratios of 2.59 (95% CI, 2.21-3.05) and 11.43 (95% CI, 6.18-21.15), respectively. Risk for aortic and mitral regurgitation was lower in type 2 diabetes: 0.81 (95% CI, 0.78-0.84) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.98), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with type 1 and 2 diabetes have greater risk for stenotic lesions, whereas risk for valvular regurgitation was lower in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients with well-controlled cardiovascular risk factors continued to display higher risk for valvular stenosis, without a clear stepwise decrease in risk between various degrees of risk factor control.
Assuntos
Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica , Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral , Estenose da Valva Mitral , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/complicações , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/epidemiologia , Humanos , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/diagnóstico por imagem , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPDs) are increasingly recognized as episodes of heightened risk of cardiovascular events. It is not known whether exacerbation history is differentially associated with future myocardial infarction (MI) or pulmonary embolism (PE). RESEARCH QUESTION: Is the number and severity of AECOPDs associated with increased risk of MI or PE in a real-life cohort of patients with COPD? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified a cohort of 66,422 patients (≥ 30 years of age) with a primary diagnosis of COPD in the Swedish National Airway Register from January 2014 to June 2022, with complete data on lung function. Patients were classified by moderate (prescription of oral corticosteroids) and severe (hospitalization) exacerbations the year before index date and were followed until December 2022 for hospitalization or death from MI or PE, corresponding to > 265,000 patient-years, with a maximum follow-up time of 9 years. Competing risk regression, according to the Fine-Gray model, was used to calculate subdistribution hazard ratios with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Compared with no AECOPDs in the baseline period, AECOPD number and severity were associated with increased long-term risk of both MI and PE in a gradual fashion, ranging from a subdistribution hazard ratio of 1.10 (95% CI, 0.97-1.24) and 1.33 (95% CI, 1.11-1.60), respectively, for one moderate exacerbation, to 1.82 (95% CI, 1.36-2.44) and 2.62 (95% CI, 1.77-3.89), respectively, for two or more severe exacerbations. In a time-restricted follow-up sensitivity analysis, the associations were stronger during the first year of follow-up and diminished over time. INTERPRETATION: The risk of MI and PE increases with the frequency and severity of AECOPD in this large, real-life cohort of patients with COPD.