RESUMO
Policing domestic violence (DV) poses significant challenges in China due to cultural, legal, and organizational complexities. Policing DV in China favors mediation over assertive interventions, complicating law enforcement's role. While previous research has focused on coercive interventions by Chinese police, there is limited information on non-coercive, supportive approaches. This study investigates the relationship between police officers' knowledge and training regarding the Anti-DV law and their willingness to provide supportive services to DV victims in China. It also considers various individual and organizational factors. The data used in this study are derived from the Policing DV in China project, with a sample of 1,353 respondents who had experience dealing with DV cases within the past 3 years. The study focuses on three dependent variables representing supportive approaches to DV cases: Referral, Counseling, and Protection orders. Independent variables include officers' knowledge of the Anti-DV law and agency training. Control variables include the use of body-worn cameras (BWC) and attitudes toward Violence Tolerance, Male Dominance, and Gender Equality. Additionally, demographic variables, working environment, length of service, and police rank are considered. The analytical approach involves a three-step strategy, incorporating descriptive, bivariate analyses, and regression analyses. The results are interpreted using odds ratios and average marginal effects, and statistical software such as SPSS by IBM and R by Open-Source Model is utilized for data analysis. Key findings indicate that more than half of the officers referred intimate partner violence survivors to shelters and assisted victims in filing protection orders. Counseling practices varied across provinces and between male and female officers. Agency training and the use of BWC were positively associated with non-coercive and supportive approaches, while knowledge of the DV Act, male dominance score, and gender equality score did not predict the use of such approaches. Demographic characteristics, including police rank, length of service, and province of employment, influenced the utilization of non-coercive and supportive approaches. This study examines the challenges faced by Chinese police officers when responding to DV cases and their willingness to provide supportive interventions. The study highlights the complexities surrounding the initiation of protection orders due to officers' legal knowledge and discretion. The study emphasizes the importance of police support in addressing DV in China and the role of agency training in promoting non-coercive responses. It highlights regional variations in police support and underscores the need for addressing disparities in service provision across different provinces.
RESUMO
Background: Recent data suggest that restrictions related to COVID-19 resulted in changes in the prescribing patterns of opioids. Aims: We sought to analyze Ontario health data for changes in frequencies among new and continuing users for the following opioid prescription characteristics: the type of opioid, the average daily dose, and the prescriber's specialty. Methods: Utilizing data on the Ontario Health Data Platform, we defined two 149-day windows as "before" and "after" based on the initial COVID-19 provincial lockdown. A total of 882,268 individuals met our inclusion criteria and were classified as either "new" or "continuing" users. Chi-square tests and Fisher's exact tests were applied for each level of our primary outcomes to determine whether there were significant changes in prescription proportions before and after the lockdown. Results: A decline of 28% was observed for the number of new users after the lockdown. Statistically significant changes were observed for new users across almost all opioid prescription characteristics between the before and after windows. The proportion of new users who received at least one dispensing event from a pharmacist increased by 26.32%, whereas continuing users increased by 378.61%. There were no statistically significant shifts in opioid prescriptions among individuals with a reported toxicity event during the study period. Conclusions: In terms of opioid prescribing patterns, new users experienced greater change following the onset of the pandemic lockdown than continuing users. Our findings potentially showcase the unintended impacts that COVID-19-related restrictions had on non-COVID-19-related health services, which can inform future policy decisions.
Contexte: Des données récentes indiquent que les restrictions liées à la COVID-19 ont entrainé des changements dans la prescription des opioïdes.Objectifs: Nous avons cherché à analyser les données sur la santé de l'Ontario pour déceler les changements de fréquence chez les nouveaux utilisateurs et les utilisateurs prévalents pour les caractéristiques de prescription d'opioïdes suivantes : le type d'opioïde, la dose quotidienne moyenne, et la spécialité du prescripteur.Méthodes: En utilisant les données de la plateforme de données sur la santé de l'Ontario, nous avons défini deux fenêtres de 149 jours comme suit : « avant ¼ et « après ¼ le confinement provincial initial de la COVID-19. Un total de 882 268 personnes ont répondu à nos critères d'inclusion et ont été classées comme « nouveaux utilisateurs ¼ ou « utilisateurs prévalents ¼. Des tests de chi-carré et des tests exacts de Fisher ont été appliqués pour chaque niveau de nos résultats primaires afin de déterminer s'il y avait eu des changements importants dans les proportions prescrites avant et après le confinement.Résultats: Une baisse de 28 % a été observée pour le nombre de nouveaux utilisateurs après le confinement.Des changements statistiquement significatifs ont été observés pour les nouveaux utilisateurs pour presque toutes les caractéristiques de prescriptions d'opioïdes entre les fenêtres avant et après. La proportion de nouveaux utilisateurs ayant eu au moins une prescription remplie par un pharmacien a augmenté de 26,32 %, tandis que le nombre d'utilisateurs prévalents a augmenté de 378,61 %. Il n'y a pas eu de changements statistiquement significatifs dans les prescriptions d'opioïdes parmi les personnes ayant déclaré un évènement de â toxicité au cours de la période d'étude.Conclusions: En matière de modèles de prescription d'opioïdes, les nouveaux utilisateurs ont connu un changement plus important après le début du confinement de la pandémie que les utilisateurs prévalents. Nos résultats démontrent possiblement les répercussions inattendues des restrictions liées à la COVID-19 sur les services de santé non liés à la COVID-19, ce qui pourrait éclairer les décisions politiques futures.