Synergistic effects of miR-708-5p and miR-708-3p accelerate the progression of osteoporosis.

BACKGROUND: Bone homeostasis is a tightly orchestrated process maintained by osteoblasts and osteoclasts, and a disruption of their steady-state equilibrium can lead to the occurrence of osteoporosis (OP). METHODS: We investigated the differential expression of micro (mi)RNAs in the bone tissues of a postmenopausal osteoporosis rat model induced by ovariectomy (OVX). Real-time PCR was used to verify the differentially expressed miRNAs in bone samples from OP patients and controls. The specific targets of two differentially expressed miRNAs in osteogenic or osteoclast differentiation were determined by bioinformatic prediction, and mRNA and protein detection. RESULTS: miR-708-5p and miR-708-3p were highly expressed in the bone tissue of OVX rats and OP patients. miR-708-5p negatively regulated osteoblast differentiation in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells by targeting SMAD specific E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 2, while miR-708-3p positively regulated osteoclast differentiation in bone marrow monocytes by targeting cerebellar degeneration associated protein 1 antisense RNA. miR-708-5p and miR-708-3p were shown to originate from the same precursor miRNA and to have a synergistic effect on the development of osteoporosis with different temporal and spatial patterns. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide a referential theoretical basis and targets for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

Comparisons of negative pressure wound therapy and ultrasonic debridement for diabetic foot ulcers: a network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: a network meta-analysis was performed to compare the strength and weakness of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) with ultrasound debridement (UD) as for diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). METHODS: PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane library databases, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database were searched till February 2015. Clinical compared studies of negative pressure wound therapy and ultrasound debridement were enrolled. The primary efficacy outcomes included healed ulcers, reduction of ulcer areas and time to closure. Secondary amputation including major and minor amputations was used to assess the safety profile. RESULTS: Out of 715 studies, 32 were selected which enrolled 2880 diabetic patients. The pooled analysis revealed that NPWT including vacuum assisted closure (VAC) and vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) were as efficacious as ultrasound debridement improving healed ulcers, odds ratio, 0.86; 95% CI 0.28 to 2.6 and 1.2; 95% CI 0.38 to 4, respectively. However, both were better to standard wound care in wound healing patients. Compared with the standard wound care treated diabetic foot ulcers, NPWT and UD resulted in a significantly superior efficacy in time to wound closure and decrement in area of wound. No significances were observed between NPWT and UD groups in both indicators. Fewer patients tended to receive amputation in NPWT and UD groups compared to standard wound care group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the network meta-analysis indicated that negative pressure wound therapy was similar to ultrasound debridement for diabetic foot ulcers, but better than standard wound care both in efficacy and safety profile.