Expanding the spectrum of low-grade sinonasal adenocarcinoma with biphasic seromucinous differentiation and activating HRAS/AKT1 mutations.

AIMS: Low-grade non-intestinal-type sinonasal adenocarcinoma (LGSNAC) is a rare heterogeneous and poorly characterised group of tumours, distinct from intestinal- and salivary-type neoplasms. Therefore, further characterisation is needed for clearer biological understanding and classification. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical, histological and molecular characterisation of four cases of biphasic, low-grade adenocarcinomas of the sinonasal tract was performed. All patients were male, aged between 48 and 78 years, who presented with polypoid masses in the nasal cavity. Microscopically, virtually all tumours were dominated by tubulo-glandular biphasic patterns, microcystic, focal (micro)papillary, oncocytic or basaloid features. Immunohistochemical staining confirmed biphasic differentiation with an outer layer of myoepithelial cells. Molecular profiling revealed HRAS (p.G13R, p.Q61R) mutations, and concomitant AKT1 (p.E17K, p.Q79R) mutations in two cases. Two cases showed potential in-situ/precursor lesions adjacent to the tumour. Follow-up periods ranged from 1 to 30 months, with one case relapsing locally after 12 and > 20 years. CONCLUSION: This study further corroborates a distinct biphasic low-grade neoplasm of the sinonasal tract with seromucinous differentiation. Although morphological and molecular features overlap with salivary gland epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma, several arguments favour categorising these tumours within the spectrum of LGSNAC.

Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Recipients: Correlating Maximum Response With Residual Hearing.

OBJECTIVES: Electrocochleography (ECochG) is increasingly recognized as a biomarker for assessing inner ear function in cochlear implant patients. This study aimed to objectively determine intraoperative cochlear microphonic (CM) amplitude patterns and correlate them with residual hearing in cochlear implant recipients, addressing the limitations in current ECochG analysis that often depends on subjective visual assessment and overlook the intracochlear measurement location. DESIGN: In this prospective study, we investigated intraoperative pure-tone ECochG following complete electrode insertion in 31 patients. We used our previously published objective analysis method to determine the maximum CM amplitude and the associated electrode position for each electrode array. Using computed tomography, we identified electrode placement and determined the corresponding tonotopic frequency using Greenwood's function. Based on this, we calculated the tonotopic shift, that is, the difference between the stimulation frequency and the estimated frequency of the electrode with the maximum CM amplitude. We evaluated the association between CM amplitude, tonotopic shift, and preoperative hearing thresholds using linear regression analysis. RESULTS: CM amplitudes showed high variance, with values ranging from -1.479 to 4.495 dBµV. We found a statistically significant negative correlation ( ) between maximum CM amplitudes and preoperative hearing thresholds. In addition, a significant association ( ) between the tonotopic shift and preoperative hearing thresholds was observed. Tonotopic shifts of the maximum CM amplitudes occurred predominantly toward the basal direction. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of objective signal analysis and the consideration of intracochlear measurement locations enhances the understanding of cochlear health and overcomes the obstacles of current ECochG analysis. We could show the link between intraoperative CM amplitudes, their spatial distributions, and preoperative hearing thresholds. Consequently, our findings enable automated analysis and bear the potential to enhance specificity of ECochG, reinforcing its role as an objective biomarker for cochlear health.

Trans-mastoid plugging of superior semicircular canal dehiscence: long-term follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of trans-mastoid plugging of superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD), focusing on complicated cases. METHODS: In this cohort study, we included all patients who underwent trans-mastoid plugging of SSCD between 2009 and 2019. We evaluated the symptoms (autophony, sound-/pressure-induced vertigo, disequilibrium, aural fullness and pulsatile tinnitus) before and 1 year after surgery in the medical records. We systematically assessed the current symptoms 6.2 ± 3 years postoperative (range 2.2-12.3 years) using questionnaires sent by post and validated by telephone interviews. We also documented any complications and the need for further procedures. We compared pure tone and speech audiometry before and 1 year after surgery. Finally, the degree of mastoid pneumatisation and mastoid tegmen anatomy were reviewed on preoperative CT scans. RESULTS: We included 24 ears in 23 patients. No complications were recorded, and none required a second procedure for SSCD. Following surgery, oscillopsia and Tullio phenomena resolved in all patients. Hyperacusis, autophony, and aural fullness were also settled in all patients except one. Balance impairment persisted to some degree in 35% of patients. No deterioration over the years was reported regarding the above symptoms. On average, bone conduction pure tone average pre- and 1 year postoperative were 13.7 ± 17 and 20.5 ± 18 dB, respectively (P = 0.002). Air bone gaps were reduced from 12.7 ± 8 to 5.9 ± 6 (P = 0.001). Two patients had a significant sclerotic mastoid, three had a prominent low-lying mastoid tegmen, and two had both. Anatomy had no effect on outcome. CONCLUSION: Trans-mastoid plugging of SSCD is a reliable and effective technique which achieves long-lasting symptom control, even in cases with sclerotic mastoid or low-lying mastoid tegmen.

[Application of extra- and intracochlear electrocochleography during and after cochlear implantation]. / Anwendung der extra- und intracochleären Elektrocochleographie während und nach der Cochleaimplantation.

Electrocochleography (ECochG) represents a promising approach for monitoring cochlear function during cochlear implantation and for investigating the causes of residual cochlear function loss after implantation. This paper provides an overview of the current research and application status of ECochG, both during and after cochlear implantation. Intraoperative ECochG can be conducted either via the implant itself or an extracochlear measuring electrode. Postoperative ECochG recordings are also feasible via the implant. Various studies have demonstrated that a significant decrease in ECochG amplitude during electrode insertion correlates with an increased risk of losing residual cochlear function, with critical cochlear events occurring primarily towards the end of the insertion. Postoperative data suggest that the loss of cochlear function mainly occurs in the early postoperative phase. Future research directions include the automation and objectification of signal analysis, as well as a more in-depth investigation into the underlying mechanisms of these signal changes.

[Patient-related outcome measures (PROM) in adult cochlear implant patients]. / Patientenbezogene Ergebnisindikatoren (PROMs) bei erwachsenen Cochleaimplantatpatienten.

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implants (CI) provide individuals with severe sensorineural hearing loss the opportunity for artificial auditory perception. The standardized documentation of speech intelligibility tests is widespread, while the systematic capture of patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) remains inconsistent. METHODOLOGY: Relevant PROM instruments were evaluated and selected based on the criteria of dissemination, clarity, and relevance, integrated into routine clinical practice, and tested at longitudinal time points. RESULTS: A total of three PROM instruments were selected and successfully integrated into the clinical routine. The comparison of 2 measurement points from 25 individuals showed improvements in subjective speech comprehension and tinnitus perception. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the clinical implementation and integration of PROMs in adult CI candidates and patients. The PROMs are a promising tool to support various phases of treatment, both as a decision aid for potential CI candidates and for monitoring after implantation.

Postoperative Impedance-Based Estimation of Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Depth.

OBJECTIVES: Reliable determination of cochlear implant electrode positions shows promise for clinical applications, including anatomy-based fitting of audio processors or monitoring of electrode migration during follow-up. Currently, electrode positioning is measured using radiography. The primary objective of this study is to extend and validate an impedance-based method for estimating electrode insertion depths, which could serve as a radiation-free and cost-effective alternative to radiography. The secondary objective is to evaluate the reliability of the estimation method in the postoperative follow-up over several months. DESIGN: The ground truth insertion depths were measured from postoperative computed tomography scans obtained from the records of 56 cases with an identical lateral wall electrode array. For each of these cases, impedance telemetry records were retrieved starting from the day of implantation up to a maximum observation period of 60 mo. Based on these recordings, the linear and angular electrode insertion depths were estimated using a phenomenological model. The estimates obtained were compared with the ground truth values to calculate the accuracy of the model. RESULTS: Analysis of the long-term recordings using a linear mixed-effects model showed that postoperative tissue resistances remained stable throughout the follow-up period, except for the two most basal electrodes, which increased significantly over time (electrode 11: ~10 Ω/year, electrode 12: ~30 Ω/year). Inferred phenomenological models from early and late impedance telemetry recordings were not different. The insertion depth of all electrodes was estimated with an absolute error of 0.9 mm ± 0.6 mm or 22° ± 18° angle (mean ± SD). CONCLUSIONS: Insertion depth estimations of the model were reliable over time when comparing two postoperative computed tomography scans of the same ear. Our results confirm that the impedance-based position estimation method can be applied to postoperative impedance telemetry recordings. Future work needs to address extracochlear electrode detection to increase the performance of the method.

Using a cochlear implant processor as contralateral routing of signals device in unilateral cochlear implant recipients.

PURPOSE: In unilateral cochlear implant (CI) recipients, a contralateral routing of signals (CROS) device enables to receive auditory information from the unaided side. This study investigates the feasibility as well as subjective and objective benefits of using a CI processor as a CROS device in unilateral CI recipients. METHODS: This is a single-center, prospective cohort study. First, we tested the directionality of the CROS processor in an acoustic chamber. Second, we examined the difference of speech perception in quiet and in noise in ten unilateral CI recipients with and without the CROS processor. Third, subjective ratings with the CROS processor were evaluated according to the Client Oriented Scale of Improvement Questionnaire. RESULTS: There was a time delay between the two devices of 3 ms. Connection of the CROS processor led to a summation effect of 3 dB as well as a more constant amplification along all azimuths. Speech perception in quiet showed an increased word recognition score at 50 dB (mean improvement 7%). In noise, the head shadow effect could be mitigated with significant gain in speech perception (mean improvement 8.4 dB). This advantage was reversed in unfavorable listening situations, where the CROS device considerably amplified the noise (mean: - 4.8 dB). Subjectively, patients who did not normally wear a hearing aid on the non-CI side were satisfied with the CROS device. CONCLUSIONS: The connection and synchronization of a CI processor as a CROS device is technically feasible and the signal processing strategies of the device can be exploited. In contra-laterally unaided patients, a subjective benefit can be achieved when wearing the CROS processor.

Cortical fNIRS Responses Can Be Better Explained by Loudness Percept than Sound Intensity.

OBJECTIVES: Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a brain imaging technique particularly suitable for hearing studies. However, the nature of fNIRS responses to auditory stimuli presented at different stimulus intensities is not well understood. In this study, we investigated whether fNIRS response amplitude was better predicted by stimulus properties (intensity) or individually perceived attributes (loudness). DESIGN: Twenty-two young adults were included in this experimental study. Four different stimulus intensities of a broadband noise were used as stimuli. First, loudness estimates for each stimulus intensity were measured for each participant. Then, the 4 stimulation intensities were presented in counterbalanced order while recording hemoglobin saturation changes from cortical auditory brain areas. The fNIRS response was analyzed in a general linear model design, using 3 different regressors: a non-modulated, an intensity-modulated, and a loudness-modulated regressor. RESULTS: Higher intensity stimuli resulted in higher amplitude fNIRS responses. The relationship between stimulus intensity and fNIRS response amplitude was better explained using a regressor based on individually estimated loudness estimates compared with a regressor modulated by stimulus intensity alone. CONCLUSIONS: Brain activation in response to different stimulus intensities is more reliant upon individual loudness sensation than physical stimulus properties. Therefore, in measurements using different auditory stimulus intensities or subjective hearing parameters, loudness estimates should be examined when interpreting results.

Toward a Better Understanding of Electrocochleography: Analysis of Real-Time Recordings.

OBJECTIVES: Real-time electrocochleography (ECochG) has been used as a monitoring tool during cochlear implantation (CI), whereby, amplitude drops have been correlated with postoperative acoustic hearing results. However, no consensus has been reached as to how a single event of an amplitude drop should be characterized. The aim of this study was to identify ECochG events that predict loss of hearing 1 month after surgery. DESIGN: Fifty-five patients were included in this prospective cohort study. Real-time ECochG measurements were performed during CI electrode insertion. Single ECochG events were characterized according to their amplitude loss and slope steepness. RESULTS: Using receiver operating characteristic analyses, the most efficient cut-off criterion for a relative hearing loss of 25% was an amplitude loss of 61% at a fixed slope steepness of 0.2 µV/sec. Three-quarters of our population had at least one such event during implantation. Most events occurred shortly before full insertion. With increasing number of events, median residual hearing thresholds deteriorated for all frequencies. Larger amplitude drops trended toward worse hearing preservation. Signal recovery after an ECochG event could not be correlated to acoustic hearing outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that amplitude drops exceeding 61% of the ongoing signal at a slope steepness of 0.2 µV/sec are correlated with worse acoustic hearing preservation. Clearly defined ECochG events have the potential to guide surgeons during CI in the future. This is essential if a fully automated data analysis is to be employed or benchmarking undertaken.

English translation and validation of the Zurich chronic middle ear inventory (ZCMEI-21-E) assessing quality of life in chronic otitis media: A prospective international multicentre study.

OBJECTIVES: To translate and validate the Zurich Chronic Middle Ear Inventory (ZCMEI-21) for the English language in order to provide an English instrument to assess health-related quality of life in chronic otitis media (COM). DESIGN: Pilot translation study including cognitive debriefings, prospective multicentre cross-sectional psychometric validation study. SETTING: Four tertiary referral centres in three different English-speaking countries (UK, USA and Australia). PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients suffering from COM. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The English translation of the ZCMEI-21 (ZCMEI-21-E) and the five-level version of the EQ-5D questionnaire. The EQ-5D, which constitutes a generic measure of health-related quality of life, consists of a descriptive system score and a visual analogue scale. Statistical outcomes included single-item descriptive statistics, internal consistency (Cronbach's α) as an indicator of reliability, as well as construct validity. RESULTS: A total of 124 patients suffering from COM were included. The mean age was 50.1 years (SD 16.9 years), and 72 (58.1%) were males. The Cronbach's α of the ZCMEI-21-E was 0.91, suggesting an excellent internal consistency. The Spearman's correlation coefficient of the ZCMEI-21-E total score was 0.55 (P < 0.0001) for convergent construct validity with EQ-5D descriptive system score and 0.57 (P < 0.0001) with the EQ-5D visual analogue scale. CONCLUSIONS: The ZCMEI-21-E is a new validated questionnaire that provides clinicians with a short, comprehensive and reliable instrument to quantify health-related quality of life in patients suffering from COM. The ZCMEI-21-E may be of use in clinical routine as well as in outcome research and monitoring.

Directional Microphone Contralateral Routing of Signals in Cochlear Implant Users: A Within-Subjects Comparison.

OBJECTIVES: For medical or financial reasons, bilateral cochlear implantation is not always possible in bilaterally deafened patients. In such cases, a contralateral routing of signals (CROS) device could complement the monaural implant. The goal of our study was to compare the benefit of three different conditions: (1) unilateral cochlear implant (CI) alone, (2) unilateral CI complemented with a directional CROS microphone, and (3) bilateral CIs. DESIGN: Twelve bilateral experienced CI users were tested. Speech reception in noise and sound localization were measured in the three above-mentioned conditions. Patients evaluated which condition they presumed to be activated and the subjective benefit on a hearing scale. RESULTS: Compared with the unilateral CI condition, the additional CROS device provided significantly better speech intelligibility in noise when speech signals came from the front or side of the CROS microphone. Only small subjective improvement was observed. Bilateral-activated CIs further improved the hearing performance. This was the only condition where sound localization was possible. Subjective evaluation showed a clear preference for the bilateral CI treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In bilateral deafened patients, bilateral implantation is the most preferable form of treatment. However, patients with one implant only could benefit from an additional directional microphone CROS device.

Benefit of a contralateral routing of signal device for unilateral cochlear implant users.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate objective and subjective effects of an adjunctive contralateral routing of signal (CROS) device at the untreated ear in patients with a unilateral cochlear implant (CI). DESIGN: Prospective study of 10 adult experienced unilateral CI users with bilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss. Speech in noise reception (SNR) and sound localization were measured with and without the additional CROS device. SNR was measured by applying speech signals at the untreated/CROS side while noise signals came from the front (S90N0). For S0N90, signal sources were switched. Sound localization was measured in a 12-loudspeaker full circle setup. To evaluate the subjective benefit, patients tried the device for 2 weeks at home, then filled out the abbreviated Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale as well as the Bern benefit in single-sided deafness questionnaires. RESULTS: In the setting S90N0, all patients showed a highly significant SNR improvement when wearing the additional CROS device (mean 6.4 dB, p < 0.001). In the unfavorable setting S0N90, only a minor deterioration of speech understanding was noted (mean -0.66 dB, p = 0.54). Sound localization did not improve substantially with CROS. In the two questionnaires, 12 of 14 items showed an improvement in mean values, but none of them was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Patients with unilateral CI benefit from a contralateral CROS device, particularly in a noisy environment, when speech comes from the CROS ear side.

Three-dimensional infrared scanning: an enhanced approach for spatial registration of probes for neuroimaging.

Significance: Accurate spatial registration of probes (e.g., optodes and electrodes) for measurement of brain activity is a crucial aspect in many neuroimaging modalities. It may increase measurement precision and enable the transition from channel-based calculations to volumetric representations. Aim: This technical note evaluates the efficacy of a commercially available infrared three-dimensional (3D) scanner under actual experimental (or clinical) conditions and provides guidelines for its use. Method: We registered probe positions using an infrared 3D scanner and validated them against magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans on five volunteer participants. Results: Our analysis showed that with standard cap fixation, the average Euclidean distance of probe position among subjects could reach up to 43 mm, with an average distance of 15.25 mm [standard deviation (SD) = 8.0]. By contrast, the average distance between the infrared 3D scanner and the MRI-acquired positions was 5.69 mm (SD = 1.73), while the average difference between consecutive infrared 3D scans was 3.43 mm (SD = 1.62). The inter-optode distance, which was fixed at 30 mm, was measured as 29.28 mm (SD = 1.12) on the MRI and 29.43 mm (SD = 1.96) on infrared 3D scans. Our results demonstrate the high accuracy and reproducibility of the proposed spatial registration method, making it suitable for both functional near-infrared spectroscopy and electroencephalogram studies. Conclusions: The 3D infrared scanning technique for spatial registration of probes provides economic efficiency, simplicity, practicality, repeatability, and high accuracy, with potential benefits for a range of neuroimaging applications. We provide practical guidance on anonymization, labeling, and post-processing of acquired scans.

Quantitative in-vitro assessment of a novel robot-assisted system for cochlear implant electrode insertion.

PURPOSE: As an increasing number of cochlear implant candidates exhibit residual inner ear function, hearing preservation strategies during implant insertion are gaining importance. Manual implantation is known to induce traumatic force and pressure peaks. In this study, we use a validated in-vitro model to comprehensively evaluate a novel surgical tool that addresses these challenges through motorized movement of a forceps. METHODS: Using lateral wall electrodes, we examined two subgroups of insertions: 30 insertions were performed manually by experienced surgeons, and another 30 insertions were conducted with a robot-assisted system under the same surgeons' supervision. We utilized a realistic, validated model of the temporal bone. This model accurately reproduces intracochlear frictional conditions and allows for the synchronous recording of forces on intracochlear structures, intracochlear pressure, and the position and deformation of the electrode array within the scala tympani. RESULTS: We identified a significant reduction in force variation during robot-assisted insertions compared to the conventional procedure, with average values of 12 mN/s and 32 mN/s, respectively. Robotic assistance was also associated with a significant reduction of strong pressure peaks and a 17 dB reduction in intracochlear pressure levels. Furthermore, our study highlights that the release of the insertion tool represents a critical phase requiring surgical training. CONCLUSION: Robotic assistance demonstrated more consistent insertion speeds compared to manual techniques. Its use can significantly reduce factors associated with intracochlear trauma, highlighting its potential for improved hearing preservation. Finally, the system does not mitigate the impact of subsequent surgical steps like electrode cable routing and cochlear access sealing, pointing to areas in need of further research.

Uncovering Vulnerable Phases in Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertion: Insights from an In Vitro Model.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to improve our understanding of the mechanics involved in the insertion of lateral wall cochlear implant electrode arrays. DESIGN: A series of 30 insertion experiments were conducted by three experienced surgeons. The experiments were carried out in a previously validated artificial temporal bone model according to established soft surgery guidelines. The use of an in vitro setup enabled us to comprehensively evaluate relevant parameters, such as insertion force, intracochlear pressure, and exact electrode array position in a controlled and repeatable environment. RESULTS: Our findings reveal that strong intracochlear pressure transients are more frequently caused during the second half of the insertion, and that regrasping the electrode array is a significant factor in this phenomenon. For choosing an optimal insertion speed, we show that it is crucial to balance slow movement to limit intracochlear stress with short duration to limit tremor-induced pressure spikes, challenging the common assumption that a slower insertion is inherently better. Furthermore, we found that intracochlear stress is affected by the order of execution of postinsertion steps, namely sealing the round window and posterior tympanotomy with autologous tissue and routing of the excess cable into the mastoid cavity. Finally, surgeons' subjective estimates of physical parameters such as speed, smoothness, and resistance did not correlate with objectively assessed measures, highlighting that a thorough understanding of intracochlear mechanics is essential for an atraumatic implantation. CONCLUSION: The results presented in this article allow us to formulate evidence-based surgical recommendations that may ultimately help to improve surgical outcome and hearing preservation in cochlear implant patients.

Development and Evaluation of a Reusable, Force Measuring Tool for the Robot-Assisted Insertion of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays.

OBJECTIVE: Limitations in human kinematics during cochlear implantation induce pressure transients and increased forces on intracochlear structures. Herein, we present a novel head-mounted surgical tool designed for the motorized insertion of cochlear implant electrode arrays. The tool integrates a force measurement feature to overcome the lack of haptic feedback in current robotic solutions. METHODS: Utilizing a prototype device, we compare force measurements with those exerted on intracochlear structures in a realistic temporal bone model. Furthermore, we test the tool on six temporal bone specimens in a surgical setting to assess its performance in various anatomies. RESULTS: Force measurements exhibit good agreement with intracochlear forces, offering significantly improved resolution over manual, tactile sensing. Successful electrode array insertions in six cadaver specimens affirmed the feasibility of tool setup, motorized insertion and tool removal in different anatomies. CONCLUSION: The tool allows the robot-assisted insertion of cochlear implant electrode arrays and offers valuable insights during the surgical procedure, demonstrating promise for application in clinical contexts. SIGNIFICANCE: This instrument has the potential to aid surgeons in achieving atraumatic placement of electrodes, consequently contributing to the improvement of hearing outcomes in cochlear implantation.

Objective evaluation of intracochlear electrocochleography: repeatability, thresholds, and tonotopic patterns.

Introduction: Intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) is increasingly being used to measure residual inner ear function in cochlear implant (CI) recipients. ECochG signals reflect the state of the inner ear and can be measured during implantation and post-operatively. The aim of our study was to apply an objective deep learning (DL)-based algorithm to assess the reproducibility of longitudinally recorded ECochG signals, compare them with audiometric hearing thresholds, and identify signal patterns and tonotopic behavior. Methods: We used a previously published objective DL-based algorithm to evaluate post-operative intracochlear ECochG signals collected from 21 ears. The same measurement protocol was repeated three times over 3 months. Additionally, we measured the pure-tone thresholds and subjective loudness estimates for correlation with the objectively detected ECochG signals. Recordings were made on at least four electrodes at three intensity levels. We extracted the electrode positions from computed tomography (CT) scans and used this information to evaluate the tonotopic characteristics of the ECochG responses. Results: The objectively detected ECochG signals exhibited substantial repeatability over a 3-month period (bias-adjusted kappa, 0.68; accuracy 83.8%). Additionally, we observed a moderate-to-strong dependence of the ECochG thresholds on audiometric and subjective hearing levels. Using radiographically determined tonotopic measurement positions, we observed a tendency for tonotopic allocation with a large variance. Furthermore, maximum ECochG amplitudes exhibited a substantial basal shift. Regarding maximal amplitude patterns, most subjects exhibited a flat pattern with amplitudes evenly distributed over the electrode carrier. At higher stimulation frequencies, we observed a shift in the maximum amplitudes toward the basal turn of the cochlea. Conclusions: We successfully implemented an objective DL-based algorithm for evaluating post-operative intracochlear ECochG recordings. We can only evaluate and compare ECochG recordings systematically and independently from experts with an objective analysis. Our results help to identify signal patterns and create a better understanding of the inner ear function with the electrode in place. In the next step, the algorithm can be applied to intra-operative measurements.

Comparison of auditory brainstem response and electrocochleography to assess the coupling efficiency of active middle ear implants.

Aim: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of auditory brainstem response (ABR) and extracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) in objectively evaluating the coupling efficiency of floating mass transducer (FMT) placement during active middle ear implant (AMEI) surgery. Methods: We enrolled 15 patients (mean age 58.5 ± 19.4 years) with mixed hearing loss who underwent AMEI implantation (seven ossicular chain and eight round window couplings). Before the surgical procedure, an audiogram was performed. We utilized a clinical measurement system to stimulate and record intraoperative ABR and ECochG recordings. The coupling efficiency of the VSB was evaluated through ECochG and ABR threshold measurements. Postoperatively, we conducted an audiogram and a vibrogram. Results: In all 15 patients, ABR threshold testing successfully determined intraoperative coupling efficiency, while ECochG was successful in only eight patients. In our cohort, ABR measurements were more practical, consistent, and robust than ECochG measurements. Coupling efficiency, calculated as the difference between vibrogram thresholds and postoperative bone conduction thresholds, was found to be more accurately predicted by ABR measurements (p = 0.016, R2 = 0.37) than ECochG measurements (p = 0.761, R2 = 0.02). We also found a non-significant trend toward better results with ossicular chain coupling compared to round window coupling. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that ABR measurements are more practical, robust, and consistent than ECochG measurements for determining coupling efficiency during FMT placement surgery. The use of ABR measurements can help to identify the optimal FMT placement, especially with round window coupling. Finally, we offer normative data for both techniques, which can aid other clinical centers in using intraoperative monitoring for AMEI placement.

A Sleeve-Based, Micromotion Avoiding, Retractable and Tear-Opening (SMART) Insertion Tool for Cochlear Implantation.

OBJECTIVE: In conventional cochlear implantation, the insertion of the electrode array is strongly affected by the local anatomy and human kinematics. Herein, we present a concept for an insertion tool that allows to optimize the insertion trajectory beyond anatomical constraints and stabilizes the electrode array in manual implantation. A novel sleeve-based design allows the instrument to be compliant and potentially protective to intracochlear structures, while a tear-open mechanism allows it to be removed after insertion by simply retracting the tool. METHODS: Conventional and tool-guided manual insertions were performed by expert cochlear implant surgeons in an analog temporal bone model that allows to simultaneously record intracochlear pressure, insertion forces and electrode array deformation. RESULTS: Comparison between conventional and tool-guided insertions demonstrate a substantial reduction of maximum insertion forces, force variations, transverse intracochlear electrode array movement, and pressure transients. CONCLUSION: The presented tool can be utilized in manual cochlear implantation and significantly improves key metrics associated with intracochlear trauma. SIGNIFICANCE: The instrument may ultimately help improve hearing outcomes in cochlear implantation. The versatile design may be used in both manual cochlear implantation and motorized and robotic insertion, as well as image-guided surgery.

Cochlear implant electrode impedance subcomponents as biomarker for residual hearing.

Introduction and objectives: Maintaining the structural integrity of the cochlea and preserving residual hearing is crucial for patients, especially for those for whom electric acoustic stimulation is intended. Impedances could reflect trauma due to electrode array insertion and therefore could serve as a biomarker for residual hearing. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between residual hearing and estimated impedance subcomponents in a known collective from an exploratory study. Methods: A total of 42 patients with lateral wall electrode arrays from the same manufacturer were included in the study. For each patient, we used data from audiological measurements to compute residual hearing, impedance telemetry recordings to estimate near and far-field impedances using an approximation model, and computed tomography scans to extract anatomical information about the cochlea. We assessed the association between residual hearing and impedance subcomponent data using linear mixed-effects models. Results: The progression of impedance subcomponents showed that far-field impedance was stable over time compared to near-field impedance. Low-frequency residual hearing demonstrated the progressive nature of hearing loss, with 48% of patients showing full or partial hearing preservation after 6 months of follow-up. Analysis revealed a statistically significant negative effect of near-field impedance on residual hearing (-3.81 dB HL per kΩ; p < 0.001). No significant effect of far-field impedance was found. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that near-field impedance offers higher specificity for residual hearing monitoring, while far-field impedance was not significantly associated with residual hearing. These results highlight the potential of impedance subcomponents as objective biomarkers for outcome monitoring in cochlear implantation.