Lap-band impact on the function of the esophagus.

BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) has been widely used to treat morbid obesity. There is conflicting data on its long-term effect on esophageal function. Our aim was to assess the long-term impact of the LAGB on esophageal motility and pH-metry in patients who had LAGB who had normal and abnormal esophageal function at baseline. METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for bariatric surgery were prospectively enrolled. A detailed medical history was obtained, and esophageal manometric and 24-h pH evaluations were performed in standard fashion preoperatively and 6 and 12 months postoperatively; patients served as their own controls. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients completed manometric evaluation. Ten patients had normal manometric parameters at baseline; at 6 months, mean lower esophageal sphincter (LES) residual pressure increased significantly from baseline (3.9 +/- 2 vs. 8.9 +/- 4 mmHg, p = 0.014). At 12 months, the mean peristaltic wave duration increased from 3.6 +/- 1 at baseline to 6.8 +/- 2 s, p = 0.025 and wave amplitude decreased during the same period (98.7 +/- 22 vs. 52.3 +/- 24, p = 0.013). LES pressure and percent peristalsis did not differ significantly pre- and post-LAGB. Twelve patients had one or more abnormal manometric findings at baseline; at 12 months, LES pressure in these 12 patients decreased significantly (31.1 +/- 10 vs 23.6 +/- 7, p = 0.011) and wave amplitude was significantly reduced (125.9 +/- 117 vs 103 +/- 107, p = 0.039). LES residual pressure did not change significantly pre- and post-LAGB. Twenty-two individuals were evaluated for impact of Lap-Band on esophageal acid exposure. Sixteen of these patients had normal esophageal pH-metry values at baseline and had no significant changes in 12 months in any pH-metry measurement. Six patients had abnormal pH-metry values at baseline. Among these patients, time with pH < 4.0 and Johnson/DeMeester score did not change significantly during follow-up. There was a significant decrease in the number of reflux episodes from baseline to 6 months (159 +/- 48 vs. 81 +/- 61, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal manometric findings are frequently encountered post-LAGB. Increases in LES residual pressure and peristaltic wave duration were the most significant changes. LAGB is not associated with an increase in total esophageal acidification time. Further evaluation of the clinical significance of manometric abnormalities is warranted.

Radiologic assessment of the upper gastrointestinal tract: does it play an important preoperative role in bariatric surgery?

BACKGROUND: The role of upper GI series (UGIS) before bariatric surgery is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and cost of routine UGIS prior to bariatric surgery. METHODS: The medical records of consecutive obese patients who underwent UGIS before bariatric surgery between April 2001 and October 2002 were reviewed. UGIS reports were reviewed by 2 experienced gastroenterologists, and the findings were divided into 4 groups based on predetermined criteria: group 0 (normal study), group 1 (abnormal findings that neither changed the surgical approach nor postponed surgery), group 2 (abnormal findings that changed the surgical approach or postponed surgery), and group 3 (results which were an absolute contraindication to surgery). Clinically important findings included lesions in groups 2 and 3. The cost of an upper GI series (154.80 USD) was estimated from the published 2002 New York State Medicare reimbursement schedule. RESULTS: During the 18-month study period, 171 patients were evaluated by UGIS prior to bariatric surgery. One or more lesions were identified in 48.0% of patients, with only 5.3% having clinically important findings. The prevalence of radiologic findings using the classification system above was as follows: group 0 (52.0%), group 1 (42.7%), group 2 (5.3%), and group 3 (0.0%). The most common findings identified were esophageal reflux (21.6%) and hiatal hernias (18.7%). The cost of performing routine UGIS on all patients before bariatric surgery was 2,941.20 USD per clinically important finding detected. CONCLUSIONS: Routine preoperative upper GI series before bariatric surgery had a low diagnostic yield, rarely revealing pathology that changed the surgical approach or postponed surgery.

Endoscopy plays an important preoperative role in bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: The role of upper endoscopy (EGD) in obese patients prior to bariatric surgery is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and cost of routine EGD before bariatric surgery. METHODS: The medical records of consecutive obese patients who underwent EGD prior to bariatric surgery between May 2000 and September 2002 were reviewed. Two experienced endoscopists reviewed all EGD reports, and findings were divided into 4 groups based on predetermined criteria: group 0 (normal study), group 1 (abnormal findings that neither changed the surgical approach nor postponed surgery), group 2 (abnormal findings that changed the surgical approach or postponed surgery), and group 3 (results that were an absolute contraindication to surgery). Clinically important findings included lesions in groups 2 and 3. The cost of EGD (430.72 US dollars) was estimated using the endoscopist fee under Medicare reimbursement. RESULTS: During the 28-month study period, 195 patients were evaluated by EGD prior to bariatric surgery. One or more lesions were identified in 89.7% of patients, with 61.5% having a clinically important finding. The prevalence of endoscopic findings using the classification system above was as follows: group 0 (10.3%), group 1 (28.2%), group 2 (61.5%), and group 3 (0.0%). Overall, the most common lesions identified were hiatal hernia (40.0%), gastritis (28.7%), esophagitis (9.2%), gastric ulcer (3.6%), Barrett's esophagus (3.1%), and esophageal ulcer (3.1%). The cost of performing routine endoscopy on all patients prior to bariatric surgery was 699.92 US dollars per clinically important lesion detected. CONCLUSIONS: Routine upper endoscopy before bariatric surgery has a high diagnostic yield and has a low cost per clinically important lesion detected.

Association of overexpression of TIF1γ with colorectal carcinogenesis and advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma.

AIM: To determine the expression and clinical significance of transcriptional intermediary factor 1 gamma (TIF1γ), Smad4 and transforming growth factor-beta (TGFßR) across a spectrum representing colorectal cancer (CRC) development. METHODS: Tissue microarrays were prepared from archival paraffin embedded tissue, including 51 colorectal carcinomas, 25 tubular adenomas (TA) and 26 HPs, each with matched normal colonic epithelium. Immunohistochemistry was performed using antibodies against TIF1γ, Smad4 and TGFßRII. The levels of expression were scored semi-quantitatively (score 0-3 or loss and retention for Smad4). RESULTS: Overexpression of TIF1γ was detected in 5/26 (19%) HP; however, it was seen in a significantly higher proportion of neoplasms, 15/25 (60%) TAs and 24/51 (47%) CRCs (P < 0.05). Normal colonic mucosa, HP, and TAs showed strong Smad4 expression, while its expression was absent in 22/51 (43%) CRCs. Overexpression of TGFßRII was more commonly seen in neoplasms, 13/25 (52%) TAs and 29/51 (57%) CRCs compared to 9/26 (35%) HP (P < 0.05). Furthermore, there was a correlation between TIF1γ overexpression and Smad4 loss in CRC (Kendall tau rank correlation value = 0.35, P < 0.05). The levels of TIF1γ overexpression were significantly higher in stage III than in stage I and II CRC (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that over-expression of TIF1γ occurs in early stages of colorectal carcinogenesis, is inversely related with Smad4 loss, and may be a prognostic indicator for poor outcome.

Prospective evaluation of the use and outcome of admission stool guaiac testing: the Digital Rectal Examination on Admission to the Medical Service (DREAMS) Study.

BACKGROUND: Although physicians often perform fecal occult blood testing at the time of hospital admission, the practice of admission stool guaiac (ASG) testing has not been evaluated prospectively. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and outcomes of digital rectal examination (DRE) and ASG testing in patients admitted to the hospital. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 2143 patients admitted to the medical service at our hospital over a 1-year period. A detailed clinical history was obtained, and the proportion of patients who had DRE and ASG testing, the frequency of positive tests, and the results of follow-up testing were determined. RESULTS: A DRE was performed in 1539 of the 2143 subjects (71.8%), and 1.8% had abnormal findings, 21.8% had a normal examination, and the result of ASG testing was the only documented finding in the remaining 76.4% of patients. ASG testing was performed in 1342 of the 2143 subjects (62.6%), and the ASG test was positive in 237 persons (17.7%). However, only 161 (67.9%) of those with a positive ASG test had further diagnostic testing and a colonic source of occult gastrointestinal blood loss was detected in 68 (42.2%) of these 161 persons. CONCLUSIONS: Although DRE and ASG testing are commonly performed on admission to the hospital, documentation of the findings and follow-up of positive tests are poor. These findings highlight the need to improve physician training on the appropriate use and documentation of the DRE and fecal occult blood testing.

Positive predictive value of fecal occult blood testing in persons taking warfarin.

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, some physicians discontinue warfarin prior to fecal occult blood testing (FOBT). Although anticoagulant use is associated with an increased risk of overt gastrointestinal bleeding, the impact of warfarin on the positive predictive value of FOBT is unknown. METHODS: During a 5-yr period, we prospectively studied all patients taking warfarin who were referred for the evaluation of a positive FOBT. For each patient taking warfarin, we enrolled one age- and gender-matched control subject with a positive FOBT who was not taking anticoagulants. A detailed clinical history was obtained, and all subjects underwent colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. RESULTS: Lesions consistent with occult bleeding were identified in 59.0% of the 210 patients in the warfarin group and 53.8% of the 210 control subjects (p= 0.27). Although more lesions were identified by colonoscopy in the warfarin group than in control subjects (36.2%vs 25.7%, p= 0.02), there was no difference in the frequency of lesions identified by esophagogastroduodenoscopy (35.2%vs 39.5%, p= 0.43). Overall, adenomas > or =1 cm in diameter (16.2%) and colorectal carcinoma (9.5%) were the most common lesions identified by colonoscopy, while erosive gastritis (15.5%) and erosive duodenitis (11.0%) were the most frequent lesions found by esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Among individuals with colorectal cancer, 83.3% of patients in the warfarin group had early cancers (Dukes' stage A or B) compared with 50.0% of control subjects (p= 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Warfarin use did not decrease the positive predictive value of FOBT. These findings suggest that warfarin should not be discontinued prior to FOBT.

Prevalence and predictors of herbal medication use in veterans with chronic hepatitis C.

OBJECTIVE: Herbal therapies are used by a substantial proportion of persons in the United States, and use of these supplements may be even higher in those with chronic liver disease. The aims of this study were to prospectively determine the proportion of US veterans with chronic hepatitis C that are currently taking vitamins and herbal medications and to evaluate factors associated with use of herbal preparations. METHODS: Patients with hepatitis C who were seen in the gastroenterology, infectious disease, and primary care clinics at the VA New York Harbor Healthcare System were invited to participate in this prospective study. For comparison, healthy patients without hepatitis C were enrolled from the primary care clinics at the same medical center. Patients were interviewed by trained research coordinators who obtained detailed demographic and clinical data, as well as information on the use of antioxidants (vitamin C and E), multivitamins, and herbal medications. RESULTS: Use of vitamin C (34.8% vs. 19.6%, P < 0.001), vitamin E (25.8% vs. 13.2%, P < 0.001), multivitamins (43.6% vs. 28.0%, P < 0.001), and herbal therapies (21.0% vs. 10.4%, P < 0.001) was significantly higher in the 500 patients with hepatitis C compared with the 250 healthy controls. The most common herbal medications taken by hepatitis C patients were milk thistle (12.2%), ginseng (4.6%), and echinacea (3.0%). After adjusting for age and gender, multivariate logistic regression identified 12 or more years of education (OR 2.7; 95% CI 1.6-4.3; P < 0.001) and annual income of at least 20,000 US dollars (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.3-3.2; P = 0.004) as the only significant predictors of herbal medication use in patients with hepatitis C. CONCLUSIONS: The use of herbal preparations is prevalent among veterans with chronic hepatitis C, especially those with higher levels of education and higher incomes. Obtaining a detailed medical history and documentation of the use of these supplements is critical to determine the potential for herbal-drug interactions and hepatotoxicity.

Outcomes of endoscopy in patients with iron deficiency anemia after Billroth II partial gastrectomy.

GOALS: To determine the frequency of gastrointestinal lesions detected by upper endoscopy and colonoscopy in patients who developed iron deficiency anemia after Billroth II surgery. STUDY: The authors reviewed the medical records of 116 consecutive patients with a Billroth II partial gastrectomy and 232 age- and gender-matched controls without gastric surgery who were referred for endoscopy to evaluate iron deficiency anemia over a 5-year period. RESULTS: Clinically important lesions were detected in 22.4% of the patients with gastric surgery and in 59.5% of those with intact stomachs (p < 0.001). In the gastric surgery group, clinically important lesions were found more often in the upper gastrointestinal tract than in the colon (19.0% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001). In the nonsurgical group, the diagnostic yields of upper endoscopy and colonoscopy were not significantly different (38.4% vs. 32.8%, p = 0.24). Synchronous lesions in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract were significantly less common in the group of patients with gastric surgery compared with those without gastric surgery (0.0% vs. 11.6%, p < 0.001). Small bowel biopsies and small bowel follow-through did not identify any additional lesions. In the gastric surgery group, multivariate analysis identified abdominal symptoms (OR = 11.2, 95% CI 3.2-39.2, p < 0.001), a positive result on fecal occult blood testing (OR = 6.4, 95% CI 2.0-20.3, p = 0.002), and Billroth II surgery at least 10 years before evaluation (OR = 5.4, 95% CI 1.7-16.7, p = 0.004) as independent predictors of identifying a clinically important lesion by endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Upper endoscopy had a significantly higher diagnostic yield than colonoscopy in patients who developed iron deficiency anemia after Billroth II surgery. Prospective studies are necessary to determine the role and cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in the evaluation of iron deficiency anemia in this patient population.

Systematic evaluation of complications related to endoscopy in a training setting: A prospective 30-day outcomes study.

BACKGROUND: The 30-day frequency of negative outcomes after outpatient endoscopy performed by gastroenterology fellows is unknown. METHODS: Questionnaires were mailed to 1000 consecutive patients 30 days after endoscopy to evaluate procedure-related negative outcomes (serious and minor adverse events) and patient satisfaction. Serious adverse events were defined as follows: oversedation requiring administration of a reversal agent, and those that resulted in a physician visit, emergency department visit, admission to the hospital, or death. Minor adverse events were defined as all problems other than serious adverse events that patients related to their endoscopic procedure. RESULTS: The 30-day frequency of negative outcomes in the 869 patients who responded was 14.3%, of which 0.6% were serious and 13.7% were minor adverse events. The frequency of negative outcomes was 17.1% for EGD, 15.0% for colonoscopy, 24.4% for combined EGD and colonoscopy, and 7.8% for flexible sigmoidoscopy. One hundred percent of the serious adverse events were known to us, but only 16.0% of minor adverse events (p < 0.001). Multiple logistic regression identified midazolam dose (OR for each 1 mg increase in dose 4.5; 95% CI [2.7, 7.3]; p < 0.001), treatment with warfarin (OR 3.0; 95% CI [1.4, 6.2]; p = 0.003), comorbid disease (OR 2.1; 95% CI [1.3, 3.4]; p = 0.001), endoscopy performed in July or August (OR 2.0; 95% CI [1.1,3.7]; p = 0.02), and age (OR for each 1 year increase in age 1.03; 95% CI [1.01, 1.05]; p = 0.01) as independent predictors of negative outcomes. There was a significant association between negative outcomes and decreased patient satisfaction, and patients who reported negative outcomes were less likely to agree to endoscopy in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Serious adverse events were rare after endoscopy performed by gastroenterology fellows. Contacting patients 30 days after outpatient endoscopy significantly improved the detection of negative outcomes. Although the majority of negative outcomes were minor, these adverse events were associated with decreased patient satisfaction.