RESUMO
Objectives: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion, while futile recanalization is the main factor influencing the prognosis. The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy of different infarct sites in predicting futile recanalization of patients with AIS. Methods: Data were obtained from two multicenter, prospective, randomized, and controlled trials, which were concurrently conducted in China. Cases achieving a successful recanalization and with complete data of preoperative Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS) and 90-day follow-up were included. The ASPECTS subregions were used to mark different infarct locations in the two cerebral hemispheres. First, the distribution of each ASPECTS subregion in the left and right hemispheres and the whole brain was analyzed, respectively. Then, the regions associated with futile recanalization were initially assessed by a univariate model. Afterward, a multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify the efficacy of different infarct sites in predicting futile recanalization. Results: A total of 336 patients were included in this study with a median age of 65 years (IQR: 51-74), of whom 210 (62.50%) patients were male, and 189 (56.25%) met the definition of futile recanalization. The correlation between each ASPECTS subregion and poor outcome was different when it was restricted to a specific cerebral hemisphere. Moreover, in the left hemisphere, the internal capsule region (OR: 1.42, 95%CI: 1.13-1.95, P = 0.03) and the M3 region (OR: 2.26, 95%CI: 1.36-3.52, P = 0.001), and in the right hemisphere, M6 region (OR: 2.24, 95%CI: 1.32-3.36, P = 0.001) showed significantly higher efficacy in predicting futile recanalization. Conclusion: The efficacy of different infarct locations in predicting futile recanalization is different. Different preoperative patterns of the high-efficiency regions in the infarction core or penumbra can guide the thrombectomy decision-making.
RESUMO
Background It was uncertain if direct endovascular thrombectomy (ET) was superior to bridging thrombolysis (BT) for patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by large-vessel occlusions. We aimed to examine real-world clinical outcomes of ET using nationwide registry data in China and to compare the efficacy and safety between BT and direct ET. Methods and Results Patients treated with ET from a nationwide registry study in China were included. Rapid neurological improvement, intracranial hemorrhage, and in-hospital mortality were compared between the 2 groups using multivariate logistic models and propensity-score matching analyses. A total of 7674 patients from 592 stroke centers were included. The median onset-to-puncture time, onset-to-door time, and door to puncture time were 290, 170, and 99 minutes, respectively. A total of 2069 (27.0%) patients received BT treatment. Patients in the BT group had a significantly shorter onset-to-puncture time (235 versus 323 minutes; P<0.001) and onset-to-door time (90 versus 222 minutes; P<0.001) compared with the direct ET group. The prior use of intravenous thrombolysis was associated with a higher rate of rapid neurological improvement (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.96) and higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.18-1.80) in multivariate analyses and propensity-score matching analyses. Conclusions This study reflects the current application of ET in China. More patients received direct ET than BT. Our results suggested that favorable short-term outcomes could be achieved with BT compared with direct ET. Higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage was observed in the BT group.