RESUMO
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.
RESUMO
PurposeThe 2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics-Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) guidelines were a major step toward establishing a common framework for variant classification. In practice, however, several aspects of the guidelines lack specificity, are subject to varied interpretations, or fail to capture relevant aspects of clinical molecular genetics. A simple implementation of the guidelines in their current form is insufficient for consistent and comprehensive variant classification.MethodsWe undertook an iterative process of refining the ACMG-AMP guidelines. We used the guidelines to classify more than 40,000 clinically observed variants, assessed the outcome, and refined the classification criteria to capture exceptions and edge cases. During this process, the criteria evolved through eight major and minor revisions.ResultsOur implementation: (i) separated ambiguous ACMG-AMP criteria into a set of discrete but related rules with refined weights; (ii) grouped certain criteria to protect against the overcounting of conceptually related evidence; and (iii) replaced the "clinical criteria" style of the guidelines with additive, semiquantitative criteria.ConclusionSherloc builds on the strong framework of 33 rules established by the ACMG-AMP guidelines and introduces 108 detailed refinements, which support a more consistent and transparent approach to variant classification.
Assuntos
Testes Genéticos/normas , Variação Genética/genética , Genoma Humano , Genômica/métodos , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Análise de Sequência de DNA/normas , SoftwareRESUMO
Pathogenic variants in the mitofusin 2 gene (MFN2) are the most common cause of autosomal dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT2) disease, which is typically characterized by axonal sensorimotor neuropathy. We report on a 7-month-old white female with hypotonia, motor delay, distal weakness, and motor/sensory axonal neuropathy in which next-generation sequencing analysis identified compound heterozygous pathogenic variants (c.2054_2069_1170del and c.392A>G) in MFN2. A review of the literature reveals that sporadic and familial cases of compound heterozygous or homozygous pathogenic MFN2 variants have been infrequently described, which indicates that MFN2 can also be inherited in a recessive manner. This case highlights several clinical findings not typically associated with MFN2 pathogenic variants, including young age of onset and rapidly progressing diaphragmatic paresis that necessitated tracheostomy and mechanical ventilation, and adds to the growing list of features identified in autosomal recessive MFN2-related CMT2. Our patient with MFN2-related CMT2 expands the clinical and mutational spectrum of individuals with autosomal recessive CMT2 and identifies a new clinical feature that warrants further observation. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Assuntos
Doença de Charcot-Marie-Tooth/diagnóstico , Doença de Charcot-Marie-Tooth/genética , Diafragma/fisiopatologia , GTP Fosfo-Hidrolases/genética , Genes Recessivos , Proteínas Mitocondriais/genética , Debilidade Muscular/genética , Mutação , Alelos , Feminino , Estudos de Associação Genética , Genótipo , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Lactente , Linhagem , FenótipoRESUMO
Background: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is traditionally molecularly diagnosed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification or quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). SMA analyses are not routinely incorporated into gene panel analyses for individuals with suspected SMA or broader neuromuscular indications. Aim: We sought to determine whether a next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach that integrates SMA analyses into a multigene neuromuscular disorders panel could detect undiagnosed SMA. Materials and Methods: Sequence and copy number variants of the SMN1/SMN2 genes were simultaneously analyzed in samples from 5304 unselected individuals referred for testing using an NGS-based 122-gene neuromuscular panel. This diagnostic approach was validated using DNA from 68 individuals who had been previously diagnosed with SMA via quantitative PCR for SMN1/SMN2. Results: Homozygous loss of SMN1 was detected in 47 unselected individuals. Heterozygous loss of SMN1 was detected in 118 individuals; 8 had an indeterminate variant in "SMN1 or SMN2" that supported an SMA diagnosis but required additional disambiguation. Of the remaining SMA carriers, 44 had pathogenic variants in other genes. Concordance rates between NGS and qPCR were 100% and 93% for SMN1 and SMN2 copy numbers, respectively. Where there was disagreement, phenotypes were more consistent with the SMN2 results from NGS. Conclusion: Integrating NGS-based SMA testing into a multigene neuromuscular panel allows a single assay to diagnose SMA while comprehensively assessing the spectrum of variants that can occur in individuals with broad differential diagnoses or nonspecific/overlapping neuromuscular features.