Fully Automated Valve Segmentation for Blood Flow Assessment From 4D Flow MRI Including Automated Cardiac Valve Tracking and Transvalvular Velocity Mapping.

BACKGROUND: Automated 4D flow MRI valvular flow quantification without time-consuming manual segmentation might improve workflow. PURPOSE: Compare automated valve segmentation (AS) to manual (MS), and manually corrected automated segmentation (AMS), in corrected atrioventricular septum defect (c-AVSD) patients and healthy volunteers, for assessing net forward volume (NFV) and regurgitation fraction (RF). STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: 27 c-AVSD patients (median, 23 years; interquartile range, 16-31 years) and 24 healthy volunteers (25 years; 12.5-36.5 years). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Whole-heart 4D flow MRI and cine steady-state free precession at 3T. ASSESSMENT: After automatic valve tracking, valve annuli were segmented on time-resolved reformatted trans-valvular velocity images by AS, MS, and AMS. NFV was calculated for all valves, and RF for right and left atrioventricular valves (RAVV and LAVV). NFV variation (standard deviation divided by mean NFV) and NFV differences (NFV difference of a valve vs. mean NFV of other valves) expressed internal NFV consistency. STATISTICAL TESTS: Comparisons between methods were assessed by Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and intra/interobserver variability by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, with multiple testing correction. RESULTS: AMS mean analysis time was significantly shorter compared with MS (5.3 ± 1.6 minutes vs. 9.1 ± 2.5 minutes). MS NFV variation (6.0%) was significantly smaller compared with AMS (6.3%), and AS (8.2%). Median NFV difference of RAVV, LAVV, PV, and AoV between segmentation methods ranged from -0.7-1.0 mL, -0.5-2.8 mL, -1.1-3.6 mL, and - 3.1--2.1 mL, respectively. Median RAVV and LAVV RF, between 7.1%-7.5% and 3.8%-4.3%, respectively, were not significantly different between methods. Intraobserver/interobserver agreement for AMS and MS was strong-to-excellent for NFV and RF (ICC ≥0.88). DATA CONCLUSION: MS demonstrates strongest internal consistency, followed closely by AMS, and AS. Automated segmentation, with or without manual correction, can be considered for 4D flow MRI valvular flow quantification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Evaluating a Phase-Specific Approach to Aortic Flow: A 4D Flow MRI Study.

BACKGROUND: Aortic flow parameters can be quantified using 4D flow MRI. However, data are sparse on how different methods of analysis influence these parameters and how these parameters evolve during systole. PURPOSE: To assess multiphase segmentations and multiphase quantification of flow-related parameters in aortic 4D flow MRI. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: 40 healthy volunteers (50% male, 28.9 ± 5.0 years) and 10 patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm (80% male, 54 ± 8 years). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 4D flow MRI with a velocity encoded turbo field echo sequence at 3 T. ASSESSMENT: Phase-specific segmentations were obtained for the aortic root and the ascending aorta. The whole aorta was segmented in peak systole. In all aortic segments, time to peak (TTP; for flow velocity, vorticity, helicity, kinetic energy, and viscous energy loss) and peak and time-averaged values (for velocity and vorticity) were calculated. STATISTICAL TESTS: Static vs. phase-specific models were assessed using Bland-Altman plots. Other analyses were performed using phase-specific segmentations for aortic root and ascending aorta. TTP for all parameters was compared to TTP of flow rate using paired t-tests. Time-averaged and peak values were assessed using Pearson correlation coefficient. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In the combined group, velocity in static vs. phase-specific segmentations differed by 0.8 cm/sec for the aortic root, and 0.1 cm/sec (P = 0.214) for the ascending aorta. Vorticity differed by 167 sec-1 mL-1 (P = 0.468) for the aortic root, and by 59 sec-1 mL-1 (P = 0.481) for the ascending aorta. Vorticity, helicity, and energy loss in the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending aorta peaked significantly later than flow rate. Time-averaged velocity and vorticity values correlated significantly in all segments. DATA CONCLUSION: Static 4D flow MRI segmentation yields comparable results as multiphase segmentation for flow-related parameters, eliminating the need for time-consuming multiple segmentations. However, multiphase quantification is necessary for assessing peak values of aortic flow-related parameters. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.

Comprehensive sex-specific and age-dependent analysis of 4D-flow MRI assessed aortic blood flow-related parameters in normal subjects using single-vendor MR systems and single-vendor software.

BACKGROUND: Aortic blood flow characterization by 4D flow MRI is increasingly performed in aneurysm research. A limited number of studies have established normal values that can aid the recognition of abnormal flow at an early stage. This study aims to establish additional sex-specific and age-dependent reference values for flow-related parameters in a large cohort of healthy adults. METHODS: 212 volunteers were included, and 191 volunteers completed the full study protocol. All underwent 4D flow MRI of the entire aorta. Quantitative values for velocity, vorticity, helicity, as well as total, circumferential, and axial wall shear stress [WSS] were determined for the aortic root [AoR], ascending aorta [AAo], aortic arch [AoA], descending [DAo], suprarenal [SRA], and infrarenal aorta [IRA]. Vorticity and helicity were indexed for segment volume (mL). RESULTS: The normal values were estimated per sex- and age-group, where significant differences between males (M) and females (F) were found only for specific age groups. More specifically, the following variables were significantly different after applying the false discovery rate correction for multiple testing: 1) velocity in the AAo and DAo in the 60-70 years age group (mean±SD: (M) 47.0 ± 8.2cm/s vs. (F) 38.4 ± 6.9cm/s, p=0.001 and, (M) 55.9 ± 9.9cm/s vs. (F) 46.5 ± 5.5cm/s, p=0.002), 2) normalized vorticity in AoR in the 50-59 years age group ((M) 27539 ± 5042s-1mL-1 vs. (F) 30849 ± 7285s-1mL-1, p=0.002), 3) axial WSS in the Aao in the 18-29 age group ((M) 1098 ± 203 mPa vs. (F) 921 ± 121 mPa, p=0.002). Good to strong negative correlations with age were seen for almost all variables, in different segments, and for both sexes. CONCLUSION: This study describes reference values for aortic flow-related parameters as acquired by 4D flow MRI. We observed limited differences between males and females. A negative relationship with age was seen for almost all flow-related parameters and segments.

Particle Tracing Based on 4D Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review into Methods, Applications, and Current Developments.

BACKGROUND: Particle tracing based on 4D Flow MRI has been applied as a quantitative and qualitative postprocessing technique to study temporally evolving blood flow patterns. PURPOSE: To systematically review the various methods to perform 4D Flow MRI-based particle tracing, as well as the clinical value, clinical applications, and current developments of the technique. STUDY TYPE: The study type is systematic review. SUBJECTS: Patients with cardiovascular disease (such as Marfan, Fontan, Tetralogy of Fallot), healthy controls, and cardiovascular phantoms that received 4D Flow MRI with particle tracing. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Three-dimensional three-directional cine phase-contrast MRI, at 1.5 T and 3 T. ASSESSMENT: Two systematic searches were performed on the PubMed database using Boolean operators and the relevant key terms covering 4D Flow MRI and particle tracing. One systematic search was focused on particle tracing methods, whereas the other on applications. Additional articles from other sources were sought out and included after a similar inspection. Particle tracing methods, clinical applications, clinical value, and current developments were extracted. STATISTICAL TESTS: The main results of the included studies are summarized, without additional statistical analysis. RESULTS: Of 127 unique articles retrieved from the initial search, 56 were included (28 for methods and 54 for applications). Most articles that described particle tracing methods used an adaptive timestep, a fourth order Runge-Kutta integration method, and linear interpolation in the time dimension. Particle tracing was applied in heart chambers, aorta, venae cavae, Fontan circulation, pulmonary arteries, abdominal vasculature, peripheral arteries, carotid arteries, and cerebral vasculature. Applications were grouped as intravascular, intracardiac, flow stasis, and research. DATA CONCLUSIONS: Particle tracing based on 4D Flow MRI gives unique insight into blood flow in several cardiovascular diseases, but the quality depends heavily on the MRI data quality. Further studies are required to evaluate the clinical value of the technique for different cardiovascular diseases. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 5. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

Age- and sex-specific reference values of biventricular flow components and kinetic energy by 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Advances in four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (4D flow CMR) have allowed quantification of left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) blood flow. We aimed to (1) investigate age and sex differences of 4D flow CMR-derived LV and RV relative flow components and kinetic energy (KE) parameters indexed to end-diastolic volume (KEiEDV) in healthy subjects; and (2) assess the effects of age and sex on these parameters. METHODS: We performed 4D flow analysis in 163 healthy participants (42% female; mean age 43 ± 13 years) of a prospective registry study (NCT03217240) who were free of cardiovascular diseases. Relative flow components (direct flow, retained inflow, delayed ejection flow, residual volume) and multiple phasic KEiEDV (global, peak systolic, average systolic, average diastolic, peak E-wave, peak A-wave) for both LV and RV were analysed. RESULTS: Compared with men, women had lower median LV and RV residual volume, and LV peak and average systolic KEiEDV, and higher median values of RV direct flow, RV global KEiEDV, RV average diastolic KEiEDV, and RV peak E-wave KEiEDV. ANOVA analysis found there were no differences in flow components, peak and average systolic, average diastolic and global KEiEDV for both LV and RV across age groups. Peak A-wave KEiEDV increased significantly (r = 0.458 for LV and 0.341 for RV), whereas peak E-wave KEiEDV (r = - 0.355 for LV and - 0.318 for RV), and KEiEDV E/A ratio (r = - 0.475 for LV and - 0.504 for RV) decreased significantly, with age. CONCLUSION: These data using state-of-the-art 4D flow CMR show that biventricular flow components and kinetic energy parameters vary significantly by age and sex. Age and sex trends should be considered in the interpretation of quantitative measures of biventricular flow. Clinical trial registration  https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov . Unique identifier: NCT03217240.

Comparison of Four-Dimensional Flow MRI, Two-Dimensional Phase-Contrast MRI and Echocardiography in Transposition of the Great Arteries.

Pulmonary artery (PA) stenosis is a common complication after the arterial switch operation (ASO) for transposition of the great arteries (TGA). Four-dimensional flow (4D flow) CMR provides the ability to quantify flow within an entire volume instead of a single plane. The aim of this study was to compare PA maximum velocities and stroke volumes between 4D flow CMR, two-dimensional phase-contrast (2D PCMR) and echocardiography. A prospective study including TGA patients after ASO was performed between December 2018 and October 2020. All patients underwent echocardiography and CMR, including 2D PCMR and 4D flow CMR. Maximum velocities and stroke volumes were measured in the main, right, and left PA (MPA, LPA, and RPA, respectively). A total of 39 patients aged 20 ± 8 years were included. Maximum velocities in the MPA, LPA, and RPA measured by 4D flow CMR were significantly higher compared to 2D PCMR (p < 0.001 for all). PA assessment by echocardiography was not possible in the majority of patients. 4D flow CMR maximum velocity measurements were consistently higher than those by 2D PCMR with a mean difference of 65 cm/s for the MPA, and 77 cm/s for both the RPA and LPA. Stroke volumes showed good agreement between 4D flow CMR and 2D PCMR. Maximum velocities in the PAs after ASO for TGA are consistently lower by 2D PCMR, while echocardiography only allows for PA assessment in a minority of cases. Stroke volumes showed good agreement between 4D flow CMR and 2D PCMR.

Echo planar imaging-induced errors in intracardiac 4D flow MRI quantification.

PURPOSE: To assess errors associated with EPI-accelerated intracardiac 4D flow MRI (4DEPI) with EPI factor 5, compared with non-EPI gradient echo (4DGRE). METHODS: Three 3T MRI experiments were performed comparing 4DEPI to 4DGRE: steady flow through straight tubes, pulsatile flow in a left-ventricle phantom, and intracardiac flow in 10 healthy volunteers. For each experiment, 4DEPI was repeated with readout and blip phase-encoding gradient in different orientations, parallel or perpendicular to the flow direction. In vitro flow rates were compared with timed volumetric collection. In the left-ventricle phantom and in vivo, voxel-based speed and spatio-temporal median speed were compared between sequences, as well as mitral and aortic transvalvular net forward volume. RESULTS: In steady-flow phantoms, the flow rate error was largest (12%) for high velocity (>2 m/s) with 4DEPI readout gradient parallel to the flow. Voxel-based speed and median speed in the left-ventricle phantom were ≤5.5% different between sequences. In vivo, mean net forward volume inconsistency was largest (6.4 ± 8.5%) for 4DEPI with nonblip phase-encoding gradient parallel to the main flow. The difference in median speed for 4DEPI versus 4DGRE was largest (9%) when the 4DEPI readout gradient was parallel to the flow. CONCLUSIONS: Velocity and flow rate are inaccurate for 4DEPI with EPI factor 5 when flow is parallel to the readout or blip phase-encoding gradient. However, mean differences in flow rate, voxel-based speed, and spatio-temporal median speed were acceptable (≤10%) when comparing 4DEPI to 4DGRE for intracardiac flow in healthy volunteers.

Whole-Heart 4D Flow MRI for Evaluation of Normal and Regurgitant Valvular Flow: A Quantitative Comparison Between Pseudo-Spiral Sampling and EPI Readout.

BACKGROUND: Pseudo-spiral Cartesian sampling with compressed sensing reconstruction has facilitated highly accelerated 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in various cardiovascular structures. However, unlike echo planar imaging (EPI)-accelerated 4D flow MRI, it has not been validated in whole-heart applications. HYPOTHESIS: Pseudo-spiral 4D flow MRI (PROUD [PROspective Undersampling in multiple Dimensions]) is comparable to EPI in robustness of valvular flow measurements and remains comparable as the undersampling factor is increased and scan time reduced. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Twelve healthy subjects and eight patients with valvular regurgitation. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0 T; PROUD and EPI 4D flow sequences, 2D flow and balanced steady-state free precession sequences. ASSESSMENT: Valvular blood flow was quantified using valve tracking. PROUD- and EPI-based measurements of aortic (AV) and pulmonary (PV) flow volumes and left and right ventricular stroke volumes were tested for agreement with 2D MRI-based measurements. PROUD reconstructions with undersampling factors (R) of 9, 14, 28, and 56 were tested for intervalve consistency (per valve, compared to the other valves) and preservation of peak velocities and E/A ratios. STATISTICAL TESTS: We used repeated measures ANOVA, Bland-Altman, Wilcoxon signed rank, and intraclass correlation coefficients. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: PROUD and EPI intervalve consistencies were not significantly different both in healthy subjects (valve-averaged mean difference [limits of agreement width]: 3.2 ± 0.8 [8.7 ± 1.1] mL/beat for PROUD, 5.5 ± 2.9 [13.7 ± 2.3] mL/beat for EPI, P = 0.07) and in patients with valvular regurgitation (2.3 ± 1.2 [15.3 ± 5.9] mL/beat for PROUD, 0.6 ± 0.6 [19.3 ± 2.9] mL/beat for EPI, P = 0.47). Agreement between EPI and PROUD was higher than between 4D flow (EPI or PROUD) and 2D MRI for forward flow, stroke volumes, and regurgitant volumes. Up to R = 28 in healthy subjects and R = 14 in patients with valvular regurgitation, PROUD intervalve consistency remained comparable to that of EPI. Peak velocities and E/A ratios were preserved up to R = 9. CONCLUSION: PROUD is comparable to EPI in terms of intervalve consistency and may be used with higher undersampling factors to shorten scan times further. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived energetics in the Fontan circulation correlate with exercise capacity and CMR-derived liver fibrosis/congestion.

AIM: This study explores the relationship between in vivo 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) derived blood flow energetics in the total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC), exercise capacity and CMR-derived liver fibrosis/congestion. BACKGROUND: The Fontan circulation, in which both caval veins are directly connected with the pulmonary arteries (i.e. the TCPC) is the palliative approach for single ventricle patients. Blood flow efficiency in the TCPC has been associated with exercise capacity and liver fibrosis using computational fluid dynamic modelling. 4D flow CMR allows for assessment of in vivo blood flow energetics, including kinetic energy (KE) and viscous energy loss rate (EL). METHODS: Fontan patients were prospectively evaluated between 2018 and 2021 using a comprehensive cardiovascular and liver CMR protocol, including 4D flow imaging of the TCPC. Peak oxygen consumption (VO2) was determined using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Iron-corrected whole liver T1 (cT1) mapping was performed as a marker of liver fibrosis/congestion. KE and EL in the TCPC were computed from 4D flow CMR and normalized for inflow. Furthermore, blood flow energetics were compared between standardized segments of the TCPC. RESULTS: Sixty-two Fontan patients were included (53% male, 17.3 ± 5.1 years). Maximal effort CPET was obtained in 50 patients (peak VO2 27.1 ± 6.2 ml/kg/min, 56 ± 12% of predicted). Both KE and EL in the entire TCPC (n = 28) were significantly correlated with cT1 (r = 0.50, p = 0.006 and r = 0.39, p = 0.04, respectively), peak VO2 (r = - 0.61, p = 0.003 and r = - 0.54, p = 0.009, respectively) and % predicted peak VO2 (r = - 0.44, p = 0.04 and r = - 0.46, p = 0.03, respectively). Segmental analysis indicated that the most adverse flow energetics were found in the Fontan tunnel and left pulmonary artery. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse 4D flow CMR derived KE and EL in the TCPC correlate with decreased exercise capacity and increased levels of liver fibrosis/congestion. 4D flow CMR is promising as a non-invasive screening tool for identification of patients with adverse TCPC flow efficiency.

Hemodynamic interplay of vorticity, viscous energy loss, and kinetic energy from 4D Flow MRI and link to cardiac function in healthy subjects and Fontan patients.

The purpose of this study was to directly assess (patho)physiology of intraventricular hemodynamic interplay between four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (4D Flow MRI)-derived vorticity with kinetic energy (KE) and viscous energy loss (EL) over the cardiac cycle and their association to ejection fraction (EF) and stroke volume (SV). Fifteen healthy subjects and thirty Fontan patients underwent whole heart 4D Flow MRI. Ventricular vorticity, KE, and EL were computed over systole (vorticity_volavg systole, KEavg systole, and ELavg systole) and diastole (vorticity_volavg diastole, KEavg diastole, and ELavg diastole). The association between vorticity_vol and KE and EL was tested by Spearman correlation. Fontan patients were grouped to normal and impaired EF groups. A significant correlation was found between SV and vorticity in healthy subjects (systolic: ρ = 0.84, P < 0.001; diastolic: ρ = 0.81, P < 0.001) and in Fontan patients (systolic: ρ = 0.61, P < 0.001; diastolic: ρ = 0.54, P = 0.002). Healthy subjects showed positive correlation between vorticity_vol versus KE (systole: ρ = 0.96, P < 0.001; diastole: ρ = 0.90, P < 0.001) and EL (systole: ρ = 0.85, P < 0.001; diastole: ρ = 0.84, P < 0.001). Fontan patients showed significantly elevated vorticity_vol compared with healthy subjects (vorticity_volavg systole: 3.1 [2.3-3.9] vs. 1.7 [1.3-2.4] L/s, P < 0.001; vorticity_volavg diastole: 3.1 [2.0-3.7] vs. 2.1 [1.6-2.8] L/s, P = 0.002). This elevated vorticity in Fontan patients showed strong association with KE (systole: ρ = 0.91, P < 0.001; diastole: ρ = 0.85, P < 0.001) and EL (systole: ρ = 0.82, P < 0.001; diastole: ρ = 0.89, P < 0.001). Fontan patients with normal EF showed significantly higher vorticity_volavg systole and ELavg systole, but significantly decreased KE avg diastole, in the presence of normal SV, compared with healthy subjects. Healthy subjects show strong physiological hemodynamic interplay between vorticity with KE and EL. Fontan patients demonstrate a pathophysiological hemodynamic interplay characterized by correlation of elevated vorticity with KE and EL in the presence of maintained normal stroke volume. Altered vorticity and energetic hemodynamics are found in the presence of normal EF in Fontan patients.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Physiologic intraventricular hemodynamic interplay/coupling is present in the healthy left ventricle between vorticity versus viscous energy loss and kinetic energy from four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (4D Flow MRI). Conversely, Fontan patients present compensatory pathophysiologic hemodynamic coupling by an increase in intraventricular vorticity that positively correlates to viscous energy loss and kinetic energy levels in the presence of maintained normal stroke volume. Altered vorticity and energetics are found in the presence of normal ejection fraction in Fontan patients.