Establishing Quality Control Metrics for Large-Scale Plasma Proteomic Sample Preparation.

Large-scale plasma proteomics studies have been transformed due to the multiplexing and automation of sample preparation workflows. However, these workflows can suffer from reproducibility issues, a lack of standardized quality control (QC) metrics, and the assessment of variation before liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis. The incorporation of robust QC metrics in sample preparation workflows ensures better reproducibility, lower assay variation, and better-informed decisions for troubleshooting. Our laboratory conducted a plasma proteomics study of a cohort of patient samples (N = 808) using tandem mass tag (TMT) 16-plex batches (N = 58). The proteomic workflow consisted of protein depletion, protein digestion, TMT labeling, and fractionation. Five QC sample types (QCstd, QCdig, QCpool, QCTMT, and QCBSA) were created to measure the performance of sample preparation prior to the final LC-MS/MS analysis. We measured <10% CV for individual sample preparation steps in the proteomic workflow based on data from various QC sample steps. The establishment of robust measures for QC of sample preparation steps allowed for greater confidence in prepared samples for subsequent LC-MS/MS analysis. This study also provides recommendations for standardized QC metrics that can assist with future large-scale cohort sample preparation workflows.

Establishing Quality Control Procedures for Large-Scale Plasma Proteomics Analyses.

Proteomics research has been transformed due to high-throughput liquid chromatography (LC-MS/MS) tandem mass spectrometry instruments combined with highly sophisticated automated sample preparation and multiplexing workflows. However, scaling proteomics experiments to large sample cohorts (hundreds to thousands) requires thoughtful quality control (QC) protocols. Robust QC protocols can help with reproducibility, quantitative accuracy, and provide opportunities for more decisive troubleshooting. Our laboratory conducted a plasma proteomics study of a cohort of N = 335 patient samples using tandem mass tag (TMTpro) 16-plex batches. Over the course of a 10-month data acquisition period for this cohort we collected 271 pooled QC LC-MS/MS result files obtained from MS/MS analysis of a patient-derived pooled plasma sample, representative of the entire cohort population. This sample was tagged with TMTzero or TMTpro reagents and used to inform the daily performance of the LC-MS/MS instruments and to allow within and across sample batch normalization. Analytical variability of a number of instrumental and data analysis metrics including protein and peptide identifications, peptide spectral matches (PSMs), number of obtained MS/MS spectra, average peptide abundance, percent of peptides with a Δ m/z between ±0.003 Da, percent of MS/MS spectra obtained at the maximum injection time, and the retention time of selected tracking peptides were evaluated to help inform the design of a robust LC-MS/MS QC workflow for use in future cohort studies. This study also led to general tips for using selected metrics to inform real-time troubleshooting of LC-MS/MS performance issues with daily QC checks.

Chitosan coatings to control release and target tissues for therapeutic delivery.

The natural biopolymer chitosan has versatile applications in therapeutic delivery. Coating drug delivery matrices or biomaterials with chitosan offers several advantages in drug delivery, including control of drug release, slowing degradation rate and improving biocompatibility. Advanced uses of chitosan in coating form include targeting drug delivery vehicles to specific tissue as well as providing a stimulus-controlled release response. The present review summarizes the current applications of chitosan coatings in the context of different biomaterial delivery technologies, as well as future directions of chitosan coatings for drug delivery technologies under development.