Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26525101

RESUMO

Tumors metastasizing to the head and neck region are uncommon. Metastasis of urothelial carcinoma to the maxillofacial region is exceedingly rare and mostly involves the jaw. We present a case of urothelial carcinoma metastasizing to the tongue. Immunohistochemistry in conjunction with fluorescent in situ hybridization was used to confirm the relation between the primary and metastatic lesions, making it the first such reported case employing the UroVysion (Catalogue number 02 J27-025, Abbott Molecular Inc., Des Plaines, IL, USA) fluorescent in situ hybridization probe in a metastatic lesion in the head and neck region.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células de Transição/secundário , Neoplasias da Língua/secundário , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biópsia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Diagnóstico por Imagem , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Hibridização in Situ Fluorescente , Masculino
2.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 97(1): 40-6, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23137666

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Even in experienced hands, the classification of some melanocytic lesions of the conjunctiva remains challenging. In skin pathology, the recent application of fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) has been demonstrated to be of use for the analysis and diagnosis of ambiguous melanocytic neoplasms of the skin. This study set out to evaluate this method on seven prospective conjunctival cases that were histologically equivocal. METHODS: 18 unequivocal retrospective melanocytic controls were exposed to FISH. Commercially available probes assessing copy numbers of RREB1 (6p25), MYB (6q23) and CCND1 (11q13) genes compared with CEP6 (a chromosome six centromeric reference point) were used. After control verification, seven prospective, equivocal cases were identified and exposed to FISH. RESULTS: There was complete correlation between FISH result and the control section histopathology report. Control cases of melanoma cases were all positive for FISH and control benign lesions were negative. Of the seven equivocal cases, five were positive and classed as invasive melanoma or melanoma-in situ, one was negative and one tetraploid, classed as negative (these last two cases were classed as naevi with careful clinical observation). CONCLUSIONS: FISH is very useful in classifying equivocal conjunctival melanocytic lesions, especially those with atypical junctional activity and naevoid melanocytic proliferations of the conjunctiva.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Túnica Conjuntiva/diagnóstico , Hibridização in Situ Fluorescente , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Nevo Pigmentado/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Túnica Conjuntiva/classificação , Neoplasias da Túnica Conjuntiva/genética , Ciclina D1/genética , Sondas de DNA , Proteínas de Ligação a DNA/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/classificação , Melanoma/genética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteínas de Neoplasias/genética , Nevo Pigmentado/classificação , Nevo Pigmentado/genética , Estudos Prospectivos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-myb/genética , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Transcrição/genética , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA