Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Surg Today ; 46(4): 437-44, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26003052

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The current study was performed to evaluate the effects of teaching surgical residents on the margin status after lumpectomy. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients from July 2006 to Nov 2009 was performed. The impact of the technical ability of surgical residents to perform lumpectomy was evaluated to determine if there was an effect on the margin status. A logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust for clinical variables known to affect the margin status. RESULTS: Of 106 patients, 19% had positive margins. Residents with unsatisfactory technical skills had a positive margin rate of 34% compared to 8% for residents with satisfactory skills (p = 0.004). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the operating surgeon remained significantly associated with a positive margin status. Operations performed by residents with satisfactory technical skills or by attending surgeons were less likely to have positive margins than those performed by residents with unsatisfactory technical skills (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08-0.86; p = 0.03). After a mean follow-up of 60 months, the breast cancer-specific survival rate was 94%, and there were no local recurrences as a first event. CONCLUSIONS: The technical ability of residents may affect the margin status after lumpectomy. The importance of teaching surgical residents needs to be considered in future quality of care evaluations.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mama/cirurgia , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Internato e Residência , Mastectomia Segmentar/educação , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Obstet Gynecol ; 125(4): 852-859, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25751204

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship of health literacy and screening mammography. METHODS: All patients seen at a breast clinic underwent prospective assessment of health literacy from January 2010 to April 2013. All women at least 40 years of age were included. Men and women diagnosed with breast cancer before age 40 years were excluded. Routine health literacy assessment was performed using the Newest Vital Sign. Demographic data were also collected. Medical records were reviewed to determine if patients had undergone screening mammography: women aged 40-49 years were considered to have undergone screening if they had another mammogram within 2 years. Women 50 years or older were considered to have undergone screening mammography if they had another mammogram within 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 1,664 consecutive patients aged 40 years or older were seen. No patient declined the health literacy assessment. Only 516 (31%) patients had undergone screening mammography. Logistic regression analysis that included ethnicity, language, education, smoking status, insurance status, employment, income, and family history found that only three factors were associated with not obtaining a mammogram: low health literacy (odds ratio [OR] 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.37; P<.001), smoking (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.85; P=.002), and being uninsured (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.85; P=.001). CONCLUSION: Of all the sociodemographic variables examined, health literacy had the strongest relationship with use of screening mammography.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Letramento em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Mamografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias como Assunto , Humanos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fumar
3.
Am Surg ; 78(10): 1105-8, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23025951

RESUMO

Pneumatosis intestinalis (PI) is the finding of air in the wall of the intestine. Clinical significance ranges from an incidental radiologic finding to an indicator of life-threatening disease requiring surgical intervention. We report the incidence and consequence of PI in a 7-year, single-surgeon, retrospective review. Data from demographics, imaging, and outcomes were analyzed. Two-tailed Fisher's exact test was performed to analyze the difference between groups. A total of 214 patients underwent a Whipple procedure with a routinely placed feeding tube during this period. Most had a gastrojejunal feeding tube, 80.4 per cent. Thirteen patients developed PI. Overall reoperation rate was nine of 201 versus four of 13 in the PI group (P<0.02). Three patients taken back to the operating room with peritonitis and PI had a necrotic bowel. A fourth patient was taken to surgery for unrelenting upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The remaining nine were managed nonoperatively with resolution of PI. The 90-day death rate in those without PI was 2.9 per cent versus 23.3 per cent with PI (P<0.02). Isolated PI can be managed nonoperatively; however, in the presence of peritonitis, it is a strong predictor of lethal complications.


Assuntos
Pancreaticoduodenectomia , Pneumatose Cistoide Intestinal/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA