Catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: patterns of recurrence and impact on quality of life and health care utilization.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patterns of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence post-catheter ablation for persistent AF (PsAF) are not well described. This study aimed to describe the pattern of AF recurrence seen following catheter ablation for PsAF and the implications for healthcare utilization and quality of life (QoL). METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis of the CAPLA study, an international, multicentre study that randomized patients with symptomatic PsAF to pulmonary vein isolation plus posterior wall isolation or pulmonary vein isolation alone. Patients underwent twice daily single lead ECG, implantable device monitoring or three monthly Holter monitoring. RESULTS: 154 of 333 (46.2%) patients (median age 67.3 years, 28% female) experienced AF recurrence at 12-month follow-up. Recurrence was paroxysmal in 97 (63%) patients and persistent in 57 (37%). Recurrence type did not differ between randomization groups (P = .508). Median AF burden was 27.4% in PsAF recurrence and .9% in paroxysmal AF (PAF) recurrence (P < .001). Patients with PsAF recurrence had lower baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (PsAF 50% vs. PAF 60%, P < .001) and larger left atrial volume (PsAF 54.2 ± 19.3 mL/m² vs. PAF 44.8 ± 11.6 mL/m², P = .008). Healthcare utilization was significantly higher in PsAF (45 patients [78.9%]) vs. PAF recurrence (45 patients [46.4%], P < .001) and lowest in those without recurrence (17 patients [9.5%], P < .001). Patients without AF recurrence had greater improvements in QoL as assessed by the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life (AFEQT) questionnaire (Δ33.3 ± 25.2 points) compared to those with PAF (Δ24.0 ± 25.0 points, P = .012) or PsAF (Δ13.4 ± 22.9 points, P < .001) recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: AF recurrence is more often paroxysmal after catheter ablation for PsAF irrespective of ablation strategy. Recurrent PsAF was associated with higher AF burden, increased healthcare utilization and antiarrhythmic drug use. The type of AF recurrence and AF burden may be considered important endpoints in clinical trials investigating ablation of PsAF.

Caudal fluoroscopic guidance for the insertion of transvenous pacing leads.

BACKGROUND: Pneumothorax is a well-recognized complication of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) insertion. While AP fluoroscopy alone is the most commonly imaging technique for subclavian or axillary access, caudal fluoroscopy (angle 40°) is routinely used at our institution. The caudal view provides additional separation of the first rib and clavicle and may reduce the risk of pneumothorax. We assessed outcomes at our institution of AP and caudal fluoroscopic guided pacing lead insertion. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing transvenous lead insertion for pacemakers, defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices between 2011 and 2023. Both de novo and lead replacement/upgrade procedures were included. Data were extracted from operative, radiology, and discharge reports. All patients underwent postprocedure chest radiography. RESULTS: Three thousand two hundred fifty-two patients underwent insertion of pacing leads between February 2011 and March 2023. Mean age was 71.1 years (range 16-102) and 66.7% were male. Most (n = 2536; 78.0%) procedures used caudal guidance to obtain venous access, while 716 (22.0%) procedures used AP guidance alone. Pneumothoraxes occurred in five (0.2%) patients in the caudal group and five (0.7%) patients in the AP group (p = .03). Subclavian contrast venography was performed less frequently in the caudal group (26.2% vs. 42.7%, p < .01). CONCLUSION: Caudal fluoroscopy for axillary/subclavian access is associated with a lower rate of pneumothorax and contrast venography compared with an AP approach.

Aberrancy masquerading as ventricular tachycardia: Importance of invasive electrophysiology study for diagnosis of wide complex tachycardias.

BACKGROUND: Differentiation between ventricular tachycardia (VT) and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with aberrancy based on the 12­lead ECG alone can be imprecise. Implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD) may be inserted for presumed VT, particularly in patients with syncopal presentation or atypical aberrancy patterns. Accurate diagnosis of these patients facilitated by an electrophysiology study (EPS) may alter diagnosis and management. METHODS: We present a prospective collection of cases across 3 cardiac centers of consecutive patients with WCT presumed to be VT who were referred for consideration of an ICD, and in whom further evaluation including an EPS ultimately demonstrated SVT with aberrancy as the culprit arrhythmia. RESULTS: 22 patients were identified (17 male, mean age 50±13 years. Available rhythm data at the time of referral was presumptively diagnosed as monomorphic VT in 16 patients and polymorphic VT in 6 patients. Underlying structural heart disease was present in 20 (91%). EPS resulted in a diagnosis of SVT with aberrancy in all cases: comprising AV nodal re-entry tachycardia (n=10), orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (n=3), focal atrial tachycardia (n=3), AF/AFL (n=3) and 'double fire' tachycardia (n=2). 21 (95%) patients underwent successful ablation. All patients remained free of arrhythmia recurrence at a median of 3.4 years of follow-up. ICD insertion was obviated in 18 (82%) patients, with 1 patient proceeding to ICD extraction. CONCLUSION: SVT with atypical aberrancy may mimic monomorphic or polymorphic VT. Careful examination of all available rhythm data and consideration of an EPS can confirm SVT and obviate the need for ICD therapy.

Diagnostic evaluation of unexplained ventricular tachyarrhythmias in younger adults.

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic work-up for cardiac arrest from ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurring in younger adults and structurally normal hearts is variable and often incomplete. METHODS: We reviewed records for all recipients of a secondary prevention implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) younger than 60 years at a single quaternary referral hospital from 2010 to 2021. Patients with unexplained ventricular arrhythmias (UVA) were identified as those with no structural heart disease on echocardiogram, no obstructive coronary disease, and no clear diagnostic features on ECG. We specifically evaluated the adoption rate of five modalities of "second-line" cardiac investigations: cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), exercise ECG, flecainide challenge, electrophysiology study (EPS), and genetic testing. We also evaluated patterns of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and device-detected arrhythmias and compared them with secondary prevention ICD recipients with a clear etiology found on initial assessment. RESULTS: One hundred and two recipients of a secondary prevention ICD under the age of 60 were analyzed. Thirty-nine patients (38.2%) were identified with UVA and were compared with the remaining 63 patients with VA of clear etiology (61.8%). UVA patients were younger (35.6 ± 13.0 vs. 46.0 ± 8.6 years, p < .001) and were more often female (48.7% vs. 28.6%, p = .04). CMR was performed in 32 patients with UVA (82.1%), whereas flecainide challenge, stress ECG, genetic testing, and EPS were only performed in a minority of patients. Overall, the use of a second-line investigation suggested an etiology in 17 patients with UVA (43.5%). Compared to patients with VA of clear etiology, UVA patients had lower rates of antiarrhythmic drug prescription (64.1% vs. 88.9%, p = .003) and had a higher rate of device-delivered tachy-therapies (30.8% vs. 14.3%, p = .045). CONCLUSION: In this real-world analysis of patients with UVA, the diagnostic work-up is often incomplete. While CMR was increasingly utilized at our institution, investigations for channelopathies and genetic causes appear to be underutilized. Implementation of a systematic protocol for work-up of these patients requires further study.

Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia Storm After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Form of 'Angry Purkinje Syndrome'.

BACKGROUND: Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (PMVT) is a highly lethal arrhythmia which is commonly caused by acute myocardial ischaemia. PMVT mediated by short-coupled ventricular ectopy patients with ischaemic heart disease but in the absence of acute ischaemia may relate to transient peri-infarct Purkinje fibre irritability and has been termed 'Angry Purkinje Syndrome'. METHODS: We present a case series of three patients with PMVT storm 3-5 days following coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). In all three cases, recurrent episodes of PMVT were initiated by monomorphic ventricular ectopy with a short coupling interval. Acute coronary ischaemia was excluded in all three patients with a coronary angiogram and graft study. Two out of three of the patients commenced oral quinidine sulphate with subsequent rapid suppression of arrhythmia. Implantable cardiac defibrillators were implanted in all three patients and revealed no recurrence of PMVT following hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: The Angry Purkinje Syndrome is a rare but important cause of ventricular tachycardia storm after CABG surgery and is mediated by short-coupled ventricular ectopy in the absence of acute myocardial ischaemia. This arrhythmia may be highly responsive to quinidine.

Vasoplegia Following Orthotopic Heart Transplantation: Prevalence, Predictors and Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing heart transplant are at high risk for postoperative vasoplegia. Despite its frequency and association with poor clinical outcomes, there remains no consensus definition for vasoplegia, and the predisposing risk factors for vasoplegia remain unclear. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence, predictors, and clinical outcomes associated with vasoplegia in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing heart transplantation. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing heart transplantation from January 2015 to December 2019. A binary definition of vasoplegia of a cardiac index of 2.5 L/min/m2 or greater and requirement for norepinephrine (≥5 µg/min), epinephrine (≥4 µg/min), or vasopressin (≥1 unit/h) to maintain a mean arterial blood pressure of 65 mm Hg, for 6 consecutive hours during the first 48 hours postoperatively, was used in determining prevalence. Given the relatively low threshold for the binary definition of vasoplegia, patients were divided into tertiles based on their cumulative vasopressor requirement in the 48 hours following transplant. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, intubation time, intensive care unit length of stay, and length of total hospitalization. RESULTS: After exclusion of patients with primary cardiogenic shock, major bleeding, or overt sepsis, data were collected on 95 eligible patients. By binary definition, vasoplegia incidence was 66.3%. We separately stratified by actual vasopressor requirement tertile (high, intermediate, low). Stratified by tertile, patients with vasoplegia were older (52.7 ± 10.2 vs 46.8 ± 12.7 vs 44.4 ± 11.3 years, P = .02), with higher rates of chronic kidney disease (18.8% vs 32.3% vs 3.1%, P = .01) and were more likely to have been transplanted from left ventricular assist device support (n = 42) (62.5% vs 32.3% vs 37.5%, P = .03). Cardiopulmonary bypass time was prolonged in those that developed vasoplegia (155 min [interquartile range 135-193] vs 131 min [interquartile range 117-152] vs 116 min [interquartile range 102-155], P = .003). Intubation time and length of intensive care unit and hospital stay were significantly increased in those that developed vasoplegia; however, this difference did not translate to a significant increase in all-cause mortality at 30 days or 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Vasoplegia occurs at a high rate after heart transplantation. Older age, chronic kidney disease, mechanical circulatory support, and prolonged bypass time are all associated with vasoplegia; however, this study did not demonstrate an associated increase in all-cause mortality LAY SUMMARY: Patients undergoing heart transplantation are at high risk of vasoplegia, a condition defined by low blood pressure despite normal heart function. We found that vasoplegia was common after heart transplant, occurring in 60%-70% of patients after heart transplant after excluding those with other causes for low blood pressure. Factors implicated included age, poor kidney function, prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time and preoperative left ventricular assist device support. We found no increased risk of death in patients with vasoplegia despite longer lengths of stay in intensive care and in hospital.

Long-Term Implications of Pacemaker Insertion in Younger Adults: A Single Centre Experience.

BACKGROUND: The long-term implications of pacemaker insertion in younger adults are poorly described in the literature. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive younger adult patients (18-50 yrs) undergoing pacemaker implantation at a quaternary hospital between 1986-2020. Defibrillators and cardiac resynchronisation therapy devices were excluded. All clinical records, pacemaker checks and echocardiograms were reviewed. RESULTS: Eighty-one (81) patients (median age 41.0 yrs IQR=35-47.0, 53% male) underwent pacemaker implantation. Indications were complete heart block (41%), sinus node dysfunction (33%), high grade AV block (11%) and tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome (7%). During a median 7.9 (IQR=1.1-14.9) years follow-up, nine patients (11%) developed 13 late device-related complications (generator or lead malfunction requiring reoperation [n=11], device infection [n=1] and pocket revision [n=1]). Five (5) of these patients were <40 years old at time of pacemaker insertion. At long-term follow-up, a further nine patients (11%) experienced pacemaker-related morbidity from inadequate lead performance managed with device reprogramming. Sustained ventricular tachycardia was detected in two patients (2%). Deterioration in ventricular function (LVEF decline >10%) was observed in 14 patients (17%) and seven of these patients required subsequent biventricular upgrade. Furthermore, four patients (5%) developed new tricuspid regurgitation (>moderate-severe). Of 69 patients with available long-term pacing data, minimal pacemaker utilisation (pacing <5% at all checks) was observed in 13 (19%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Pacemaker insertion in younger adults has significant long-term implications. Clinicians should carefully consider pacemaker insertion in this cohort given risk of device-related complications, potential for device under-utilisation and issues related to lead longevity. In addition, patients require close follow-up for development of structural abnormalities and arrhythmias.

Prediction of Pacemaker Requirement in Patients With Unexplained Syncope: The DROP Score.

BACKGROUND: Implantable loop recorders (ILR) are increasingly utilised in the evaluation of unexplained syncope. However, they are expensive and do not protect against future syncope. OBJECTIVES: To compare patients requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation during ILR follow-up with those without abnormalities detected on ILR in order to identify potential predictors of benefit from upfront pacing. METHODS: We analysed 100 consecutive patients receiving ILR: Group 1 (n=50) underwent PPM insertion due to bradyarrhythmias detected on ILR; Group 2 (n=50) had no arrhythmias detected on ILR over >3 years follow-up. Baseline clinical characteristics, syncope history, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters were assessed to identify predictors of ultimate requirement for pacing. RESULTS: Group 1 (64% male, median age 70.8 years; IQR 65.5-78.8) were older than Group 2 (58% male, median 60.2 years; IQR 44.0-73.0 p=0.001) and were less likely to have related historical factors such as overheating, posture and exercise (98% vs 70% p<0.001). PR interval was also longer in Group 1 (192±51 vs 169±23 p=0.006) with greater prevalence of distal conduction system disease (30% vs 4.3% p=0.002). Significant univariate predictors for PPM insertion were distal conduction disease (p=0.007), first degree atrioventricular (AV) block (p=0.003), absence of precipitating factors (p=0.004), and age >65 years (p=0.001). Injury sustained, recurrent syncope, history of atrial fibrillation (AF) or heart failure, left atrial (LA) size and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were not predictive. These significant predictors were incorporated into the DROP score1 (0-4). Using time-to-event analysis, no patients with a score of 0 progressed to pacing, while higher scores (3-4) strongly predicted pacing requirement (log-rank p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The DROP score may be helpful in identifying patients likely to benefit from upfront permanent pacemaker (PPM) insertion following unexplained syncope. Larger prospective studies are required to validate this tool.

Acute Cervical Radiculopathy Outcomes: Soft Disc Herniations vs Osteophytes.

OBJECTIVE: Prospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes of acute cervical radiculopathy with respect to soft disc herniations vs osteophytes. METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients who had had cervical radiculopathy for ≤1 month were enrolled in the study. Inclusion criteria were radicular pain greater than axial pain and a pain score ≥4 out of 10 on a numerical rating scale. Patients had at least one positive clinical finding: motor, sensory, or reflex changes. Plain films and magnetic resonance imaging were ordered. Follow-up was at 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months. Outcomes included pain scores (neck and upper limb), neck disability index, medication use, opioid use, and need for surgery. Two attending musculoskeletal radiologists reviewed imaging findings for osteophytes vs soft disc herniations at the symptomatic level. RESULTS: More than 75% reduction in pain was seen in 77% of patients with soft disc herniations and 66% of patients with osteophytes (P > 0.05) at 12 months. A pain score ≤2 out of 10 within 6 to 12 months was seen in 86% of patients with soft disc herniations and 81% of patients with osteophytes (P > 0.05). Moderate or marked improvement at 12 months was seen in 85% of patients with soft discs and 77% of patients with osteophytes (P > 0.05). Baseline-to-12-month numerical rating scale pain scores of patients with soft discs vs osteophytes had overlapping confidence intervals at each follow-up. At 12 months, very few had undergone surgery (7% of patients with soft discs, 11% of patients with osteophytes; P > 0.05) or were on opioids (7% of patients with soft discs, 9% of patients with osteophytes; P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients, but not all patients, with acute radiculopathies improved with time. This was seen with both soft disc herniations and osteophytes.

Use of an antimicrobial pouch/envelope in the treatment of Twiddler's syndrome.

BACKGROUND: "Twiddler's syndrome" occurs when a patient consciously or subconsciously manipulates their pacemaker/defibrillator pulse generator, often resulting in lead dislodgement and device system malfunction. Once dislodgement has occurred, corrective measures include resecuring the system to the pectoralis fascia with redundant anchoring sutures. Unfortunately, patients with Twiddler's syndrome tend to have a high rate of recurrence. This study presents a case series of patients with Twiddler's syndrome and evaluates the strategy of using a nonabsorbable antimicrobial pouch to prevent recurrent lead dislodgement events. METHODS: Pacemaker and defibrillator operative reports were reviewed at a single institution over a time period of 16 years. Historical, fluoroscopic, and intraoperative findings were used to identify 21 patients with strong evidence for Twiddler's syndrome. Patient charts were retrospectively analyzed, and a cohort of 13 patients who received a nonabsorbable antimicrobial pouch was compared to a cohort of eight patients who received other corrective measures. RESULTS: The rate of "retwiddling" events was 0% in the antimicrobial pouch group versus 50% in the suture-only group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients requiring device system revision for Twiddler's syndrome, the use of nonabsorbable antimicrobial pouches was associated with significantly fewer recurrences of lead dislodgement events.

Predictors of pacemaker requirement in patients receiving implantable loop recorders for unexplained syncope: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are increasingly used to evaluate patients with unexplained syncope. Identification of all predictors of bradycardic syncope and consequent permanent pacemaker (PPM) insertion is of substantial clinical interest as patients in the highest risk category may benefit from upfront pacemaker insertion. OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify risk predictors for PPM insertion in ILR recipients with unexplained syncope. METHODS: An electronic database search (MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane) was performed in June 2023. Studies evaluating ILR recipients with unexplained syncope and recording risk factors for eventual PPM insertion were included. A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratio (OR) for clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics with respect to future PPM requirement. RESULTS: Eight studies evaluating 1007 ILR recipients were included; 268 patients (26.6%) underwent PPM insertion during study follow-up. PPM recipients were older (mean age, 70.2 ± 15.4 years vs 61.6 ± 19.7 years; P < .001). PR prolongation on baseline electrocardiography was a significant predictor of PPM requirement (pooled OR, 2.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.63-5.20). The presence of distal conduction system disease, encompassing any bundle branch or fascicular block, yielded a pooled OR of 2.88 for PPM insertion (95% confidence interval, 1.53-5.41). Injurious syncope and lack of syncopal prodrome were not significant predictors of PPM insertion. Sinus node dysfunction accounted for 62% of PPM insertions, whereas atrioventricular block accounted for 26%. CONCLUSION: Approximately one-quarter of ILR recipients for unexplained syncope require eventual PPM insertion. Advancing age, PR prolongation, and distal conduction disease are the strongest predictors for PPM requirement.

Prognostic impact of diagnosis-to-ablation time on outcomes following catheter ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation and left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of catheter ablation in individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: We examined whether AF diagnosis to ablation time (DAT) influences outcomes following catheter ablation (CA) in patients with persistent AF (PsAF) and LVSD from the CAMERA-MRI and CAPLA randomized studies. METHODS: We evaluated clinical outcomes according to DAT < 1 year ("shorter DAT") and ≥1 year ("longer DAT"), comparing AF recurrence, AF burden, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and LV recovery (LVEF ≥ 50%) at 12 months. DAT was also compared according to the median (24 months). RESULTS: Two hundred and ten individuals with AF and LVSD were identified, with a median DAT of 24 months. Shorter DAT was associated with lower LA global and posterior wall scar (<0.05 mV; both P < .05). At 12 months, 69.4% with shorter DAT (<1year) were free from recurrent atrial arrhythmias vs 53.6% in longer DAT (hazard ratio [HR] 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-2.65, P = .040). Median AF burden was 0% in both groups (shorter DAT: interquartile range [IQR] 0.0-2.0% vs longer DAT: IQR 0.0-7.3%, P = .017). At 12 months, shorter DAT was associated with higher LVEF (55.3% vs 51.0%, P = .009), greater LVEF improvement (+20.8 ± 13.0% vs +13.9 ± 13.2% longer DAT, P < .001) and LV recovery (75.0% vs longer DAT: 57.2%, P = .011). Shorter DAT was associated with fewer hospitalizations and electrical cardioversions at 12 months. CONCLUSION: In individuals with AF and LVSD, shorter DAT was associated with greater LVEF improvement and arrhythmia-free survival with lower AF burden and rehospitalization at 12 months, highlighting the prognostic benefit of early CA in AF and LVSD.

Sex-specific outcomes after catheter ablation for persistent AF.

BACKGROUND: Sex-specific outcomes after catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) have reported conflicting findings. OBJECTIVE: We examined the impact of female sex on outcomes in patients with persistent AF (PsAF) from the Catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicentre Randomized Trial of Pulmonary Vein Isolation vs PVI with Posterior Left Atrial Wall Isolation (CAPLA) randomized trial. METHODS: A total of 338 patients with PsAF were randomized to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) or PVI with posterior wall isolation (PWI). The primary outcome was arrhythmia recurrence at 12 months. Clinical and electroanatomical characteristics, arrhythmia recurrence, and quality of life were compared between women and men. RESULTS: Seventy-nine women (23.4%; PVI 37; PVI + PWI 42) and 259 men (76.6%; PVI 131; PVI + PWI 128) underwent AF ablation. Women were older {median age 70.4 (interquartile range [IQR] 64.8-74.6) years vs 64.0 (IQR 56.7-69.7) years; P < .001} and had more advanced left atrial electroanatomical remodeling. At 12 months, arrhythmia-free survival was lower in women (44.3% vs 56.8% in men; hazard ratio 1.44; 95% confidence interval 1.02-2.04; log-rank, P = .036). PWI did not improve arrhythmia-free survival at 12 months (hazard ratio 1.02; 95% confidence interval 0.74-1.40; log-rank, P = .711). The median AF burden was 0% in both groups (women: IQR 0.0%-2.2% vs men: IQR 0.0%-2.8%; P = .804). Health care utilization was comparable between women (36.7%) and men (30.1%) (P = .241); however, women were more likely to undergo a repeat procedure (17.7% vs 6.9%; P = .007). Women reported more severe baseline anxiety (average Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS] anxiety score 7.5 ± 4.9 vs 6.3 ± 4.3 in men; P = .035) and AF-related symptoms (baseline Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life Questionnaire [AFEQT] score 46.7 ± 20.7 vs 55.9 ± 23.0 in men; P = .002), with comparable improvements in psychological symptoms (change in HADS anxiety score -3.8 ± 4.6 vs -3.0 ± 4.5; P = .152 (change in HADS depression score -2.9 ± 5.0 vs -2.6 ± 4.0; P = .542) and greater improvement in AFEQT score compared with men at 12 months (change in AFEQT score +45.9 ± 23.1 vs +39.2 ± 24.8; P = .048). CONCLUSION: Women undergoing CA for PsAF report more significant symptoms and poorer quality of life at baseline than men. Despite higher arrhythmia recurrence and repeat procedures in women, the AF burden was comparably low, resulting in significant improvements in quality of life and psychological well-being after CA in both sexes.

Predictors of Late Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) frequently occurs early after cardiac surgery, there is a paucity of data evaluating predictors and timing of late atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to evaluate predictors of late AF recurrence in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed cardiac surgery patients from 2010 to 2018 with no preoperative diagnosis of AF or atrial flutter. We recorded incidence and timing of late AF recurrence, defined as occurring ≥12 months following surgery. RESULTS: 1,031 patients were included (mean age at surgery 64 ± 12 years, 74% male). Early POAF was recorded in 445 patients (43%). POAF was usually transient, with total AF duration <48 hours in 72% and reversion to sinus rhythm at discharge in 91%. At 4.7 ± 2.4 years follow-up, late AF occurred in 139 patients (14%). Median time to AF recurrence was 4.4 years post-surgery (Q1-Q3: 2.6-6.2 years). Late AF was significantly more likely among patients with early POAF than those without (23% vs 6%; P < 0.001), with highest incidence (38%) in those with POAF duration >48 hours. In a multivariable analysis, early POAF duration >48 hours was a significant predictor of late AF recurrence (HR: 5.9). Surgery type and CHA2DS2-VASc score were not predictive of late AF events. CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative AF episodes of duration ≥48 hours predict recurrent AF episodes over long-term follow-up after cardiac surgery. Implications for arrhythmia surveillance and anticoagulation in patients with longer duration POAF episodes require further study.

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Phenotypes and Ablation Outcomes: Persistent From Outset vs Progression From Paroxysmal AF.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) have progressed from an initial paroxysmal phenotype; however, there are patients in whom atrial fibrillation (AF) is persistent at diagnosis. Relatively little is known about this subgroup, but prior observational studies have suggested these patients have worse outcomes with ablation. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to: 1) assess demographic and electrophysiologic characteristics of patients with PsAF at first diagnosis compared with those with who have progressed from paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF); and 2) assess the impact of pattern of AF at diagnosis on recurrence post ablation. METHODS: CAPLA (Catheter Ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: A Multicentre randomised trial of Pulmonary vein isolation [PVI] vs PVI with posterior Left Atrial wall isolation [PWI]) was a multicenter trial that randomized patients with PsAF to PVI plus PWI or PVI alone. Follow-up was 12 months. Outcomes were assessed after a 3-month blanking period. RESULTS: A total of 334 patients were included (median age 65.6 years, 23.1% female), 194 (58.1%) had PsAF at first AF diagnosis and 140 (41.9%) had PAF. Patients with PsAF at diagnosis were younger (age 64.0 vs 67.7 years, P = 0.005), had higher rates of heart failure (P < 0.001), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (54.5% IQR: 40-60 vs 60% IQR: 50-61, P = 0.007). AF recurrence occurred in 85 (43.8%) with PsAF at diagnosis and 70 (50%) with PAF at diagnosis. PsAF at diagnosis was not associated with risk of recurrence on univariable (HR: 0.802; 95% CI: 0.585-1.101; P = 0.173) or multivariable analysis (HR: 0.922; 95% CI: 0.647-1.312; P = 0.650). Median AF burden was 0% in both groups (P = 0.125). There was no difference in left atrial size (P = 0.337) or bipolar voltage (P = 0.579) between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the CAPLA cohort of patients, pattern of AF at first diagnosis did not influence post-ablation rate of AF recurrence or AF burden. (Catheter Ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: A Multicentre randomised trial of Pulmonary vein isolation [PVI] vs PVI with posterior Left Atrial wall isolation [PWI]; ACTRN12616001436460).

Diagnosis to Ablation in Persistent AF: Any Time Can Be a Good Time to Ablate.

BACKGROUND: Nonrandomized data suggest that longer diagnosis-to-ablation time (DAT) is associated with poorer outcomes; however, a recent randomized trial found no difference in recurrences when ablation was delayed by 12 months. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the impact of DAT on atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence in patients undergoing catheter ablation for persistent AF. METHODS: CAPLA (Effect of Catheter Ablation Using Pulmonary Vein Isolation With vs Without Posterior Left Atrial Wall Isolation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The CAPLA randomized clinical trial) was a multicenter trial that randomized patients with persistent AF to pulmonary vein isolation + posterior wall isolation or pulmonary vein isolation alone. Follow-up was 12 months. Outcomes were assessed after a 3-month blanking period. RESULTS: Median DAT in the 334 patients was 28 months (Q1-Q3: 12-66 months). Patients were divided into quartile groups: Q1 was DAT 0 to 12 months (n = 84, median DAT 7 months), Q2 was DAT 13 to 28 months (n = 85, median DAT 20 months), Q3 was DAT 29 to 66 months (n = 84, median DAT 41 months), and Q4 was DAT ≥67 months (n = 81, median DAT 119 months). AF recurrence rate was 36.9% for Q1, 44.7% for Q2, 47.6% for Q3, and 56.8% for Q4 (P = 0.082). On multivariable analysis, DAT Q4 was the only factor significantly associated with risk of recurrence (HR: 1.607; 95% CI: 1.005-2.570; P = 0.048). Median AF burden was 0% (Q1-Q3: 0%-0.47%) in Q1 and 0.33% (Q1-Q3: 0%-4.6%) in Q4 (P = 0.002). Quality of life (assessed by the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life questionnaire) improved markedly in all quartiles (Q1: Δ28.8 ± 24, Q2: Δ24.4 ± 23.4, Q3: Δ21.7 ± 26.6, Q4: Δ24.6 ± 21.4; P = 0.331). CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of patients with persistent AF undergoing ablation in a prospective trial with standardized entry criteria and intensive electrocardiogram monitoring, those with shorter DAT had lower rates of AF recurrence. However, differences were modest, and all quartiles demonstrated very low AF burden and improvements in quality of life.

Impact of Posterior Wall Isolation During AF Ablation on the Incidence of Left Atrial Flutter.

BACKGROUND: Linear and complex electrogram ablation (LCEA) beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is associated with an increase in left atrial macro-re-entrant tachycardias (LAMTs). Posterior wall isolation (PWI) is increasingly performed to improve AF ablation outcomes. However, the impact of PWI on the incidence of LAMT is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to establish the incidence of LAMT following PVI alone vs PVI + PWI vs PVI + PWI + LCEA. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF or LAMT post-AF ablation between 2008 and 2022 from 4 electrophysiology centers were reviewed with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. RESULTS: In total, 5,619 (4,419 index, 1,100 redo) AF ablation procedures were performed in 4,783 patients (mean age 60.9 ± 10.6 years, 70.7% men). Over a mean follow-up of 6.4 ± 3.8 years, 246 procedures for LAMT were performed in 214 patients at a mean of 2.6 ± 0.6 years post-AF ablation. Perimitral (52.8% of patients), roof-dependent (27.1%), PV gap-related (17.3%), and anterior circuits (8.9%) were most common, with 16.4% demonstrating multiple circuits. The incidence of LAMT was significantly higher following PVI + PWI (6.2%) vs PVI alone (3.0%; P < 0.0001) and following PVI + PWI + LCEA vs PVI + PWI (12.5%; P = 0.019). Conduction gaps in previous ablation lines were responsible for LAMT in 28.4% post-PVI alone, 35.3% post-PVI + PWI (P = 0.386), and 81.8% post-PVI + PWI + LCEA (P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of LAMT following PVI + PWI is higher than with PVI alone but significantly lower than with more extensive atrial substrate modification. Given a low frequency of LAMT following PWI, empiric mitral isthmus ablation is not justified and may be proarrhythmic.

Anomalous location of the vertebral artery in relation to the neural foramen. Implications for cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the prevalence of an anomalous posterior vertebral artery (VA) in the neural foramen and to see if any factors might correlate with proximity of the VA to needle location in a cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injection (CTFESI). METHODS: A radiologist with subspecialty training in neuroradiology documented VA location in relation to the neural foramen on axial views of 198 consecutive computed tomography angiograms done for various reasons, 11 were excluded because of poor imaging or occluded VA. The levels of C2-3 through C6-7 were evaluated, where the VA courses within the foramen. The distance was measured from VA to ideal needle location for a CTFESI. Other data were collected including severity of foraminal stenosis, loss of disc height, and medical history. Analysis was done to see if any factor correlated with anomalous VA location. RESULTS: The VA was in the posterior foramen and within 2 mm of ideal needle location in at least one location in 29% of patients. When looking at the more commonly injected levels of C4-5 through C6-7, the prevalence was 18%. Severity of foraminal stenosis and loss of disc height correlated with VA proximity to typical needle location (both with P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The VA can sometimes be in close proximity to the typical target location of a CTFESI. This proximity correlates with severity of foraminal stenosis and loss of disc height. Physicians should be mindful of this and evaluate the T2 axial magnetic resonance imaging before doing CFTESIs.

The Role of Posterior Wall Isolation in Catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation and Systolic Heart Failure: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Catheter ablation for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is associated with improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and survival compared with medical therapy. Nonrandomized studies have reported improved success with posterior wall isolation (PWI). Objective: To determine the impact of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with PWI vs PVI alone on outcomes in patients with HFrEF. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was an ad hoc secondary analysis of the CAPLA trial, a multicenter, prospective, randomized control trial that involved 11 centers in 3 countries (Australia, Canada, and UK). CAPLA featured 338 patients with persistent AF randomized to either PVI plusPWI or PVI alone. This substudy included patients in the original CAPLA study who had symptomatic HFrEF (LVEF <50% and New York Heart Association class ≥II). Interventions: Pulmonary vein isolation with PWI vs PVI alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia greater than 30 seconds, after a single ablation procedure, without the use of antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy at 12 months. Results: A total of 98 patients with persistent AF and symptomatic HFrEF were identified (mean [SD] age, 62.1 [9.8] years; 79.5% men; and mean [SD] LVEF at baseline, 34.6% [7.9%]). After 12 months, 58.7% of patients with PVI plus PWI were free from recurrent atrial arrhythmia without the use of AAD therapy vs 61.5% with PVI alone (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.54-1.91; P = .96). There were no significant differences in freedom from atrial arrhythmia with or without AAD therapy after multiple procedures (PVI plus PWI vs PVI alone, 60.9% vs 65.4%; P = .73) or AF burden (median, 0% in both groups; P = .78). Mean LVEF improved substantially in PVI plus PWI (∆ LVEF, 19.3% [13.0%; P < .01) and PVI alone (18.2% [14.1%; P < .01), with no difference between groups (P = .71). Normalization of LV function occurred in 65.2% of patients in the PVI plus PWI group and 50.0% of patients with PVI alone (P = .13). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this study indicate that addition of PWI to PVI did not improve freedom from arrhythmia recurrence or recovery of LVEF in patients with persistent AF and symptomatic HFrEF. Catheter ablation was associated with significant improvements in systolic function, irrespective of ablation strategy used. These results caution against the routine inclusion of PWI in patients with HFrEF undergoing first-time catheter ablation for persistent AF. Trial Registration: http://anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12616001436460.

Pre-hospital heparin use for ST-elevation myocardial infarction is safe and improves angiographic outcomes.

AIMS: This study aims to evaluate if pre-hospital heparin administration by paramedics is safe and improves clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the multicentre Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry, linked with state-wide ambulance records, we identified consecutive patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI between January 2014 and December 2018. Information on thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow at angiography was available in a subset of cases. Patients receiving pre-hospital heparin were compared to those who did not receive heparin. Findings at coronary angiography and 30-day clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Propensity-score matching was performed for risk adjustment. We identified a total of 4720 patients. Of these, 1967 patients had TIMI flow data available. Propensity-score matching in the entire cohort yielded 1373 matched pairs. In the matched cohort, there was no observed difference in 30-day mortality (no-heparin 3.5% vs. heparin 3.0%, P = 0.25), MACCE (no-heparin 7% vs. heparin 6.2%, P = 0.44), and major bleeding (no-heparin 1.9% vs. heparin 1.4%, P = 0.64) between groups. Propensity-score analysis amongst those with TIMI data produced 552 matched pairs. The proportion of cases with TIMI 0 or 1 flow in the infarct-related artery (IRA) was lower among those receiving pre-hospital heparin (66% vs. 76%, P < 0.001) compared to those who did not. CONCLUSION: In this multicentre, propensity-score matched study, the use of pre-hospital heparin by paramedics was safe and is associated with fewer occluded IRAs in patients presenting with STEMI.