Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neurology ; 100(21): e2155-e2169, 2023 05 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37019660

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Refugees and asylum seekers are at risk of head trauma. They endure blows to the head due to exigent circumstances necessitating resettlement (e.g., torture, war, interpersonal violence) and during their dangerous journeys to refuge. Our objective was to assess the global prevalence of head trauma in refugees and asylum seekers and describe its clinical characteristics in this population. METHODS: The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020173534). PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were searched for relevant studies. We included all studies in English that comprised refugees or asylum seekers of any age and examined the prevalence or characteristics of head trauma. We excluded studies that were not peer-reviewed original research. Information was recorded on the prevalence of head trauma, method of ascertaining head trauma, severity, mechanism of injury, other trauma exposures, and comorbidities. Descriptive analyses and narrative syntheses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies were included, of which 13 with 6,038 refugees and asylum seekers reported head trauma prevalence. Prevalence estimates ranged from 9% to 78%. Heterogeneity among studies precluded meta-analysis. Most studies were US based (n = 9, 41%), followed by the Middle East (n = 5, 23%). Most refugees or asylum seekers were from the Middle East (n = 9, 41%), with those from Latin America least represented (n = 3, 14%). Studies disproportionately involved younger (pooled mean age = 29 years) adult samples composed of men. Recruitment settings were predominantly hospitals/clinics (n = 14, 64%), followed by refugee camps (n = 3, 14%). The most common mechanism of injury was direct impact through a beating or blow to the head. Studies varied greatly in how head trauma was defined and ascertained; no study used a validated traumatic brain injury (TBI)-specific screening tool. Similarly, TBI severity was not uniformly assessed, although hospital-based samples captured more moderate-to-severe head injuries. Mental health comorbidities were more frequently documented rather than physical health ones. Only 2 studies included a comparison with local populations. DISCUSSION: Refugees and asylum seekers are vulnerable to head trauma, but studies using systematic approaches to screening are lacking. Increased attention to head trauma in displaced populations will allow for optimizing equitable care for this growing vulnerable population.


Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais , Refugiados , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , Refugiados/psicologia , Saúde Mental , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/epidemiologia
2.
Clin Neuropsychol ; 32(5): 891-921, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29609519

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Prospective memory (PM) deficits have emerged as an important predictor of difficulty in daily life for individuals with acquired brain injury (BI). This review examines the variables that have been found to influence PM performance in this population. In addition, current methods of assessment are reviewed with a focus on clinical measures. Finally, cognitive rehabilitation therapies are reviewed, including compensatory, restorative and metacognitive approaches. METHOD: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines were used to identify studies. Studies were added that were identified from the reference lists of these. RESULTS: Research has begun to elucidate the contributing variables to PM deficits after BI, such as attention, executive function and retrospective memory components. Imaging studies have identified prefrontal deficits, especially in the region of BA10 as contributing to these deficits. There are now several clinical measures available with good psychometric properties. Rehabilitation techniques have mostly focused on compensatory strategies, but, in addition, some restorative and metacognitive approaches have shown preliminary promise. CONCLUSIONS: PM deficits are a common and important deficit after BI. Clinical evaluation is recommended and further understanding of rehabilitation techniques is needed.


Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Lesões Encefálicas/psicologia , Transtornos da Memória/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Memória/psicologia , Memória Episódica , Atenção/fisiologia , Lesões Encefálicas/epidemiologia , Função Executiva/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos da Memória/epidemiologia , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Psicometria , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA