Novel Antimuscarinic Antidepressant-like Compounds with Reduced Effects on Cognition.

The cholinergic nervous system has been implicated in mood disorders, evident in the fast-onset antidepressant effects of scopolamine, a potent muscarinic antagonist, in clinical studies. One prominent disadvantage of the use of scopolamine in the treatment of depression is its detrimental effects on cognition, especially as such effects might aggravate cognitive deficits that occur with depression itself. Thus, the identification of antimuscarinic drugs that are free of such detrimental effects may provide an important avenue for the development of novel therapeutics for the management of depression. The present data in rats indicate that a historical muscarinic antagonist, L-687,306, and a muscarinic antagonist of our own design, CJ2100, were as or more effective than scopolamine in antagonizing both the bradycardic effects of the muscarinic agonist arecoline in cardiovascular studies and its discriminative stimulus and rate-decreasing effects in behavioral studies. Additionally, both novel muscarinic antagonists were as effective as scopolamine in decreasing immobility in the forced swim test, a preclinical indicator of potential antidepressant activity. However, at equieffective or even larger doses, they were considerably less disruptive than scopolamine in assays of cognition-related behavior. All three drugs displayed high specificity for the mAChRs with few off-target binding sites, and CJ2100 showed modest affinity across the mAChRs when compared with L-687,306 and scopolamine. These data emphasize the dissimilar pharmacological profiles that are evident across antimuscarinic compounds and the potential utility of novel antagonists for the improved treatment of depression. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Some clinical studies with the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine document its ability to produce antidepressant effects in patients with mood disorders; however, scopolamine also has well known adverse effects on both autonomic and centrally mediated physiological functions that limit its therapeutic use. This study characterizes the cardiovascular and discriminative stimulus effects of two novel muscarinic antagonists, L-687,306 and CJ2100, that produce antidepressant-like effects in a rodent model (forced swim test) without affecting touchscreen-based cognitive performance (titrating psychomotor vigilance and delayed matching-to-position).

Nicotinic aspects of the discriminative stimulus effects of arecoline.

Despite the evidence that the muscarinic agonist arecoline is a drug of abuse throughout Southeast Asia, its stimulus characteristics have not been well studied. The goal of this work was to understand more about the mediation of discriminative stimulus effects of arecoline. Arecoline (1.0 mg/kg s.c.) was trained as a discriminative stimulus in a group of eight rats. The ability of various cholinergic agonists and antagonists to mimic or antagonize the discriminative stimulus effects of arecoline and to modify its rate-suppressing effects was evaluated. A muscarinic antagonist, but neither of two nicotinic antagonists, was able to modify the discriminative stimulus effects of arecoline, suggesting a predominant muscarinic basis of arecoline's discriminative stimulus effects in this assay. However, both nicotine itself and two nicotine agonists with selective affinity for the α4ß2* receptor (ispronicline and metanicotine) produced full arecoline-like discriminative stimulus effects in these rats. The discriminative stimulus effects of the selective nicotine agonists were blocked by both the general nicotine antagonist mecamylamine and by the selective α4ß2* antagonist, dihydro-beta-erythroidine (DHßE). Surprisingly, only DHßE antagonized the rate-suppressing effects of the selective nicotine agonists. These data indicate a selective α4ß2* nicotine receptor component to the behavioral effects of arecoline. Although the nicotinic aspects of arecoline's behavior effects could suggest that abuse of arecoline-containing material (e.g. betel nut chewing) is mediated through nicotinic rather than muscarinic actions, further research, specifically on the reinforcing effects of arecoline, is necessary before this conclusion can be supported.

Nicotine-like discriminative and aversive effects of two α4ß2-selective nicotine agonists, ispronicline and metanicotine.

An attempt to determine the receptor selective nature of some of nicotine's behavioral effects was undertaken through the evaluation of the ability of two nicotinic α4ß2*-selective receptor agonists to produce nicotine-like effects and modify rates of responding in a discrimination assay and in an aversive stimulus assay. A group of eight rats was trained to discriminate the presence of 1 mg/kg nicotine base. Another group of 4-6 rats was trained to report the aversive effects of nicotine by selecting a lever that produced one food pellet over a second lever that produced two food pellets and an intravenous injection of nicotine. Ispronicline and metanicotine, two α4ß2*-selective receptor agonists, increased selection of the nicotine-appropriate lever in a dose-related manner, up to a maximum of approximately 75%. The α4ß2*-selective receptor antagonist, dihydro-beta-erythroidine blocked both the discriminative stimulus effects and the rate-suppressing effects of ispronicline, metanicotine, and small, but not large doses of nicotine. The nonselective antagonist, mecamylamine, antagonized the discriminative stimulus effects of each of the three nicotine agonists as well as the rate-decreasing effects of nicotine and metanicotine. Mecamylamine did not modify the rate-decreasing effects of ispronicline. Both ispronicline and metanicotine as well as nicotine were avoided in the drug + food vs. food choice situation. The receptor-selective nature of ispronicline and metanicotine was hereby confirmed in a behavioral assay, as were earlier reports that the discriminative stimulus effects of relatively small doses of nicotine are likely mediated by activity at the α4ß2* nicotine receptor.

Comparison of the muscarinic antagonist effects of scopolamine and L-687,306.

This study aimed to use central and peripheral assays to compare the effects of the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine with those of a novel muscarinic antagonist, L-687,306 [(3R,4R)-3-(3-cyclopropyl-1,2,4,oxadiazol[5-yl]-1-azabicyclo[2.2.1]heptane. Groups of rats were trained to discriminate the stimulus effects of the muscarinic agonist, arecoline (1.0 mg/kg); concomitant measures of response rate were recorded. Separate groups were prepared with telemetery devices for recording bradycardia induced by arecoline (10 mg/kg). Methyl arecoline and arecoline were nearly equally potent in producing a brief but profound bradycardia, indicative of an equivalent effect in the heart. L-687,306 and scopolamine were both able to block this peripheral effect of arecoline. L-687,306 produced a surmountable antagonism of both the discriminative and rate-suppressing effects of arecoline. Scopolamine, however, was unable to antagonize the rate-reducing effects of arecoline in the discrimination assay. This limited the number of rats that could respond to the discriminative stimulus effects of arecoline, as well as the amount of arecoline stimulus effects they were able to report. The data suggest that L-687,306 may be a more generally effective muscarinic antagonist than scopolamine and support earlier reports that this antagonist has less direct effect on behavior.

Self-administration of agonists selective for dopamine D2, D3, and D4 receptors by rhesus monkeys.

Dopamine receptor mechanisms are believed to play a role in the reinforcing effects of cocaine and other drugs of abuse. The lack of receptor-selective agonists has made it difficult to determine the role of the individual dopamine receptors in mediating these reinforcing effects. In this study, rhesus monkeys with a history of intravenous cocaine self-administration were tested for the reinforcing effects of several D(3)-preferring agonists, a D(2)-preferring agonist, and a D(4) agonist. The D(2)-preferring agonist did not maintain responding in any monkeys, and the D(4) agonist was self-administered at low rates, just above those maintained by saline, in one monkey. The D(3)-preferring agonists were self-administered by approximately half of the animals, although at lower rates than cocaine. These results indicate that the apparent limited reinforcing effectiveness of D(2)-like agonists requires activity at D(3) receptors. Previous data from this laboratory and others also suggest that these drugs may not serve as reinforcers directly; the behavior may be maintained by response-contingent delivery of stimuli previously paired with cocaine. The ability of drug-related stimuli to maintain responding apparently differs among monkeys and other organisms, and may be related to individual differences in drug-taking behavior in humans.

Individual differences in rhesus monkeys' demand for drugs of abuse.

A relatively small percentage of humans who are exposed to drugs of abuse eventually become addicted to or dependent on those drugs. These individual differences in likelihood of developing drug addiction may reflect behavioral, neurobiological or genetic correlates of drug addiction and are therefore important to model. Behavioral economic measures of demand establish functions whose overall elasticity (rate of decrease in consumption as price increases) reflects the reinforcing effectiveness of various stimuli, including drugs. Using these demand functions, we determined the reinforcing effectiveness of five drugs of abuse (cocaine, remifentanil, ketamine, methohexital and ethanol) in 10 rhesus monkeys with histories of intravenous drug-taking. There was a continuum of reinforcing effectiveness across the five drugs, with cocaine and remifentanil showing the most reinforcing effectiveness. There was also a continuum of sensitivity of the monkeys; two of the 10 animals, in particular, showed greater demand for the drugs than did the remaining eight monkeys. In addition, monkeys that demonstrated greater demand for one drug tended to show greater demand for all drugs but did not show a similar relatively greater demand for sucrose pellets. These findings suggest that the tendency to find drugs to be reinforcing is a general one, not restricted to particular drugs and also, that a minority of animals show a substantially enhanced sensitivity to the reinforcing effects of drugs. The possibility that differences in responsiveness to the reinforcing effects of drugs may form the basis of individual differences in drug-taking in humans should be considered.

Naltrexone decreases D-amphetamine and ethanol self-administration in rhesus monkeys.

Amphetamines are the second most highly abused illicit drugs worldwide, yet there is no pharmacological treatment for amphetamine abuse and dependence. Preclinical studies and, more recently, human studies, suggest that the opioid receptor antagonist, naltrexone, might be useful in the treatment of amphetamine abuse. Naltrexone, an opioid receptor antagonist, is currently used for the treatment of alcohol dependence. The aim of this study was to explore the ability of naltrexone to modify self-administration of amphetamine or ethanol in rhesus monkeys. Monkeys were trained to respond to intravenous injections of either D-amphetamine (0.003 mg/kg/injection) or ethanol (0.05 g/kg/injection) on a fixed ratio 30 schedule. Naltrexone (0.01-1 mg/kg) was administered intramuscularly 30 min before the start of treatment test sessions. Naltrexone dose-dependently decreased both amphetamine and ethanol self-administration. These findings support the potential use of naltrexone as therapy for amphetamine and polydrug abuse.

Modification of ethanol's reinforcing effectiveness in rhesus monkeys by cocaine, flunitrazepam, or gamma-hydroxybutyrate.

BACKGROUND: Although ethanol is frequently used in combination with other psychoactive drugs, the behavioral and pharmacological reasons for this form of polydrug abuse have not been well described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rhesus monkeys with indwelling intravenous catheters produced intravenous injections of ethanol (50, 100, or 200 mg/kg/inj), flunitrazepam (0.001-0.03 mg/kg/inj), cocaine (0.01 or 0.03 mg/kg/inj), or combinations of ethanol and these drugs or gammahydroxybutyrate (GHB) (1.0 or 3.2 mg/kg/inj) by lever pressing according to a fixed-ratio schedule. The response requirement for each drug or drug combination was increased across sessions (10, 32, 100, 320, or 1,000). The dependent variables were rates of responding maintained by the drug or drug combination and the elasticity of drug demand when consumption was expressed as a function of price. RESULTS: Elasticity (P (max)) values for each drug varied among the monkeys but retained the same rank order for the monkeys, suggesting a fundamental difference in the animals' apparent sensitivities to the reinforcing effects of the drugs. Combining ethanol with the other drugs did not increase their reinforcing effectiveness. GHB (ineffective in previous studies) did not modify ethanol's reinforcing effects; demand functions for the combination of ethanol and flunitrazepam were slightly less elastic than for ethanol alone, but no different from that for flunitrazepam alone; adding ethanol to cocaine detracted from the reinforcing effectiveness of cocaine. CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis that use of ethanol in combination with sedative and stimulant drugs is due to an ability of ethanol to enhance the reinforcing effects of these drugs is not supported.

A behavioral economic analysis of cocaine and remifentanil self-administration in rhesus monkeys.

RATIONALE: Behavioral economics can be used to evaluate the relative reinforcing effectiveness of drugs and the economic interaction between drugs, information which may help to explain patterns of polydrug abuse in humans. OBJECTIVES: In phase 1, the reinforcing effectiveness of the opiate remifentanil and the stimulant cocaine was compared using a demand-curve analysis. In phase 2, the economic relation between these drugs was determined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rhesus monkeys pressed levers according to fixed-ratio schedules for intravenous drug infusions. A demand-curve analysis was conducted (phase 1) in which drug consumption was measured as the response requirement, or price, was increased, and the rate at which consumption decreased with increases in price (demand elasticity) provided an index of the reinforcing effectiveness of each drug. Cocaine and remifentanil were then available concurrently (phase 2), and the price of one drug was increased (the manipulated-price alternative) while the price of the other drug was held constant (the fixed-price alternative). Consumption of the fixed-price alternative was measured as a function of increases in the price of the manipulated-price alternative, and demand for the manipulated-price alternative was assessed. RESULTS: The reinforcing effectiveness of cocaine and remifentanil did not significantly differ, and these drugs functioned as economic substitutes. As the price of the manipulated-price alternative increased, consumption of the fixed-price alternative increased. In addition, demand for the manipulated-price alternative became more elastic with the concurrent availability of the fixed-price alternative. CONCLUSION: Polydrug use involving stimulants and opiates may occur because these drugs are highly substitutable.

Aspartame demand in rhesus monkeys: effects of volume and concentration manipulations.

Three rhesus monkeys' lever presses produced aspartame-sweetened water according to a fixed-ratio schedule. The response requirement was increased across sessions and a demand-function analysis was used to assess the reinforcing effectiveness of different magnitudes of aspartame by manipulating reinforcer duration (1 and 3s) in Phase 1 and concentration (0.3, 0.5, 0.7, and 1.0mg/ml) in Phase 2. When duration was manipulated, the number of aspartame deliveries was mainly a function of the response requirement rather than unit price (responses/duration), suggesting that changes in duration did not significantly affect the reinforcing effectiveness of aspartame. When concentration was manipulated and the lowest concentration excluded, consumption was best described by unit price (responses/concentration) in two monkeys and by the response requirement in the third. Although results from the concentration manipulation provide some evidence that consumption was modulated by unit price, the results overall suggest that scalar equivalence does not exist between the components of unit price; specifically, the response requirement exerted a larger influence than duration or concentration on total consumption. Finally, a normalized demand analysis revealed that aspartame is a more elastic commodity than food and drug reinforcers.

Assessing unit-price related remifentanil choice in rhesus monkeys.

Given a commodity available at different prices, a unit-price account of choice predicts preference for the cheaper alternative. This experiment determined if rhesus monkeys preferred remifentanil (an ultra-short-acting micro-opioid agonist) delivered at a lower unit price over a higher-priced remifentanil alternative (Phases 1 and 3). Choice between equal-priced alternatives also was assessed (Phase 2). A discrete-trials procedure was arranged in which three monkeys chose between two remifentanil alternatives by responding on one of two levers. Different prices were arranged by manipulating drug dose (0.3 and 0.1 microg/kg/injection) and/or the ratio requirement. Monkeys usually chose the larger-dose alternative even when it was more expensive. Only when unit prices were relatively high (e.g., large response requirements) did monkeys choose the cheaper (or equally priced) smaller-dose alternative. Employing larger doses (0.9 and 0.3 microg/kg/injection) attenuated the larger-dose preference. The results demonstrate that choice was not determined simply by unit price. An alternative model that employs demand-function analysis to generate choice predictions is proposed.

Self-administration of methohexital, midazolam and ethanol: effects on the pituitary-adrenal axis in rhesus monkeys.

RATIONALE: There is disagreement in the literature with respect to how drugs of abuse affect the functioning of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, and whether these changes in endocrine function may be related to the rewarding effects of these drugs. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether reinforcing drugs with different mechanisms of action affect HPA axis function at doses at which they serve as reinforcers. METHODS: Seven monkeys (6 male) were randomly assigned to self-administer methohexital-a barbiturate (n=4), midazolam-a benzodiazepine (n=3), or ethanol (n=5). Each monkey had a surgically implanted indwelling venous catheter, and was trained to respond on a fixed ratio of 30 lever presses to receive an injection of drug or saline. Blood samples were obtained before, during, and after the self-administration sessions for the measurement of ACTH and cortisol by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: Although methohexital, midazolam, and ethanol all maintained self-administration behavior across a range of doses, they differed in their effects on ACTH and cortisol. Ethanol inhibited ACTH and cortisol secretion. Methohexital and midazolam both tended to decrease ACTH and cortisol at large doses, and increase these hormones at small doses, but the HPA effects of neither drug differed significantly from when saline was available. CONCLUSIONS: The neutral overall effect of methohexital and midazolam on HPA activity is consistent with other monkey and human studies, whereas the inhibitory effect of self-administered ethanol in the monkey contrasts with both the rat and human literature. The data in this study suggest that a change in HPA axis activity is not a requirement for drug-reinforced behavior in monkeys.

Behavioral perspectives on the neuroscience of drug addiction.

Neuroscientific approaches to drug addiction traditionally have been based on the premise that addiction is a process that results from brain changes that in turn result from chronic administration of drugs of abuse. An alternative approach views drug addiction as a behavioral disorder in which drugs function as preeminent reinforcers. Although there is a fundamental discrepancy between these two approaches, the emerging neuroscience of reinforcement and choice behavior eventually may shed light on the brain mechanisms involved in excessive drug use. Behavioral scientists could assist in this understanding by devoting more attention to the assessment of differences in the reinforcing strength of drugs and by attempting to develop and validate behavioral models of addiction.

Individual differences in the reinforcing and punishing effects of nicotine in rhesus monkeys.

RATIONALE: The relatively weak reinforcing effects of nicotine in experimental studies have been attributed to possible aversive effects or the need to space nicotine administrations over time to expose reinforcing effects. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine if the response-maintaining effects of nicotine are increased when availability is spaced through time, and whether nicotine is an effective punisher of remifentanil-maintained responding. METHODS: Compared to a cocaine reference dose, nicotine dose and timeout (TO) value were varied in eight rhesus monkeys responding for intravenous (i.v.) nicotine on varying fixed-ratio (FR) schedules of reinforcement.The aversive effects of nicotine were evaluated in four animals choosing between a standard dose of remifentanil alone or in combination with one of several doses of nicotine. RESULTS: In three of eight self-administration monkeys, 0.01 mg/kg/inj nicotine did not maintain responding at any FR value. In the other five animals, nicotine-maintained response rates increased with either FR or TO values to a certain point, and then slowed. Maximum nicotine-maintained response rates were much slower than those maintained by cocaine, and demand for nicotine was less than demand for cocaine. Nicotine was an effective punisher of remifentanil-maintained responding at doses ranging from 0.01 to 0.3 mg/kg/inj. Lower punishing dose seemed to be related to the absence of reinforcing effects within subject. CONCLUSION: There are an order of magnitude individual differences in sensitivity to both the reinforcing and punishing effects of nicotine, and this drug may be unique in being a weak positive reinforcer in small doses and aversive in large doses.

Corticotropin-releasing hormone antagonists, astressin B and antalarmin: differing profiles of activity in rhesus monkeys.

The present study compares the activity of two chemically distinct corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) antagonists at the level of the pituitary gland in rhesus monkeys, using exogenous CRH-stimulated increases in adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) and cortisol. Of chief interest was whether the CRH-R1-selective pyrrolopyrimidine, antalarmin, shown previously to have activity in the central nervous system (CNS), would differ in its antagonist profile from the CRH-R1- & 2-selective peptide, astressin B, which is unlikely to have access to the CNS following systemic administration. Nine rhesus monkeys (eight male), each with an indwelling venous catheter, were subjects in this study. Astressin B (0.001, 0.003, 0.03, 0.1, and 0.3 mg/kg) or antalarmin (1.0, 3.2, and 10 mg/kg) was administered as an intravenous (i.v.) pretreatment 15 min prior to administration of 1 or 10 microg/kg i.v. CRH. Antalarmin (10 mg/kg) was also administered alone on six occasions and its effects on behavior as well as on ACTH and cortisol levels were measured. Astressin B was assessed following i.v. and intracisternal (i.c.) administration. Astressin B dose-dependently abolished the CRH-stimulated ACTH and cortisol responses, with an antagonist effect lasting in excess of 24 h. Astressin B was approximately 300-times more potent when given i.c. than when it was administered via the i.v. route. By contrast, antalarmin antagonized the effects of CRH on ACTH but not cortisol at 1.0 and 3.2 mg/kg. At a larger dose, antalarmin stimulated ACTH and cortisol release and produced behavioral sedation. These latter effects diminished with repeated administration of antalarmin. The differences between astressin B and antalarmin may be due either to non-CRH receptor-mediated effects of antalarmin or to a complex interaction of antalarmin's effects at both central and peripheral CRH receptors.

Behavioral and neurochemical consequences of long-term intravenous self-administration of MDMA and its enantiomers by rhesus monkeys.

The effects of self-administered 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) on behavior and neurochemistry have not been previously studied in laboratory primates. We investigated the capacity of MDMA and its enantiomers to maintain contingent responding over an extended duration, whether any decrements in the reinforcing effects of these compounds would be observed over time, whether such decrements would be MDMA-selective, and whether any neurochemical correlates could be identified. Animals were previously trained to self-administer cocaine, then exposed to periodic substitutions of various doses of racemic MDMA and its enantiomers; full dose-effect curves were generated for each MDMA compound repeatedly over the duration of the study. After approximately 18 months of MDMA self-administration, drug exposure was halted and after at least 2 months drug abstinence, animals were scanned using positron emission tomography (PET) with the vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT) ligand dihydrotetrabenazine (DTBZ). Shortly thereafter, animals were euthanized, brains were dissected, and samples were assayed for brain monoamines and their metabolites using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and for VMAT using DTBZ binding. The reinforcing effects of racemic and R(-)-MDMA were reduced over a long series (months) of individual self-administration access periods; the reinforcing effects of S+-MDMA were more resistant to this effect, but were attenuated for one animal. The reinforcing effects of cocaine were not altered by chronic MDMA self-administration, nor was the VMAT binding potential as assessed by PET. Further, there were no measurable decrements in serotonin (5-HT), 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), dopamine (DA), 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) or VMAT in any brain regions assayed. The reinforcing effects of MDMA are selectively attenuated by chronic MDMA self-administration, although this behavioral change appears to occur in the absence of any frank neurochemical correlates of toxicity.

Self-administration of fentanyl, cocaine and ketamine: effects on the pituitary-adrenal axis in rhesus monkeys.

RATIONALE: Drugs of abuse can affect the functioning of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Acute administration of drugs that serve as reinforcers have been observed to stimulate the rat HPA axis, leading to the suggestion that these stimulatory effects may contribute to the development of drug-maintained behaviors. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether reinforcing drugs that are dissimilar with respect to their mechanisms of action have similar effects on HPA axis activity at doses that are self-administered. Rhesus monkeys were randomly assigned to self-administer the mu-opioid agonist fentanyl, the psychomotor stimulant cocaine, or the NMDA antagonist ketamine. METHODS: Each monkey was trained to press a lever in order to receive an intravenous injection of drug or saline. Blood samples were obtained before, during, and after the self-administration sessions and assayed for ACTH and cortisol by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: Fentanyl, cocaine, and ketamine were each self-administered across a range of doses. However, the three drugs differed in their effects on ACTH and cortisol. Cocaine stimulated ACTH and cortisol secretion, a finding that is consistent with previous rat and primate studies. Self-administration of both fentanyl and ketamine inhibited HPA axis activity. HPA inhibition by fentanyl is consistent with other monkey and human studies, and contrasts with the stimulatory effects of mu-opioids in rodents. The inhibitory effect of ketamine on ACTH and cortisol secretion contrasts with findings in the few primate studies that have evaluated NMDA antagonists. Neither fentanyl nor cocaine, at doses that maintained maximum rates of responding, produced significant changes in ACTH and cortisol levels. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be little commonality between different classes of abused drugs and their effects on the HPA axis, which calls into question the necessity for HPA axis stimulation in the reinforcement of drug-maintained behavior.

Antalarmin, a putative CRH-RI antagonist, has transient reinforcing effects in rhesus monkeys.

RATIONALE: During the course of our investigation of antalarmin, a corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) antagonist, in rhesus monkeys, we noticed that large, intravenous doses of antalarmin resulted in behavioral changes that resembled intoxication. OBJECTIVES: Antalarmin was evaluated in rhesus monkeys for its reinforcing effectiveness as well as for its effects on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity. METHODS: Twelve monkeys, each with a surgically implanted indwelling venous catheter, were trained to respond for and receive the short-acting barbiturate, methohexital. Monkeys responded on one of two schedules: a fixed ratio (FR) 10 (30 or 100), timeout (TO) 10 s schedule on which they received methohexital, antalarmin, vehicle or saline injections; or an FR30, TO 45 s during which saline, vehicle, or four different doses of methohexital or antalarmin were available. Each dose was available during a 25-min period separated by a 10-min TO. Blood samples were obtained from three monkeys before, during and after the self-administration sessions and assayed for ACTH and cortisol. RESULTS: Antalarmin initially served as a reinforcer in 11 of 12 monkeys, although its reinforcing effects dissipated after three to four exposures under both operant schedules. Self-injection of antalarmin did not produce any change in cortisol levels, although methohexital did attenuate ACTH and cortisol release. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first evidence for transient reinforcing properties of a putative centrally acting CRH-R1 selective antagonist.

3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, "ecstasy") and its stereoisomers as reinforcers in rhesus monkeys: serotonergic involvement.

RATIONALE: The reinforcing effects of MDMA and its enantiomers have not been extensively characterized in laboratory animals. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether MDMA and its stereoisomers would be self-administered intravenously by rhesus monkeys ( Macaca mulatta), and to assess the effects of serotonin(2) receptor antagonists on MDMA-maintained responding. METHODS: Four adult male rhesus monkeys were maintained on a fixed ratio 10, time-out 60-s schedule for 0.01 mg/kg cocaine or saline injections. Racemic MDMA and its stereoisomers, and racemic methamphetamine were periodically substituted for cocaine or saline. In subsequent antagonist experiments, five adult rhesus monkeys (three male, two female) were maintained on a multiple dose fixed ratio 30, time-out 45-s schedule for cocaine or saline injections. Racemic MDMA and its enantiomers were periodically substituted for cocaine or saline, with or without a pre-session injection of the serotonin(2) receptor antagonists ketanserin or MDL100907. RESULTS: In the initial self-administration experiments, MDMA and its stereoisomers generated "inverted U"-shaped self-administration curves across the dose range tested. Racemic MDMA doses between 0.01 and 0.1 mg/kg per injection, S(+)-MDMA doses between 0.003 and 0.1 mg/kg per injection, and R(-)-MDMA doses between 0.01 and 0.1 mg/kg per injection engendered more responding than saline; however, no dose of any form of MDMA maintained as much behavior as cocaine or methamphetamine. In subsequent antagonist experiments, pretreatments with 0.1 or 0.3 mg/kg ketanserin or MDL100907 attenuated responding for S(+)-MDMA, and completely abolished responding for R(-)-MDMA, but did not affect cocaine-maintained behavior. CONCLUSIONS: MDMA and its stereoisomers serve as reinforcers in rhesus monkeys. We suggest that stimulation of 5-HT(2A) receptors is integral to the reinforcing effects of MDMA.

Evaluation of the reinforcing and discriminative stimulus effects of 1,4-butanediol and gamma-butyrolactone in rhesus monkeys.

Metabolic precursors and prodrugs of gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), including 1,4-butanediol (BDL) and gamma-butyrolactone (GBL), have sedative and anesthetic effects and might have positive reinforcing effects. BDL and GBL were evaluated using behavioral procedures that measure positive reinforcing effects and discriminative stimulus effects of drugs that modulate gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) at the GABA(A) receptor complex. One group of rhesus monkeys could respond for saline or the barbiturate methohexital (i.v.) in a self-administration paradigm. Two other groups of monkeys discriminated the barbiturate pentobarbital (i.g.) or the benzodiazepine midazolam (s.c.) from saline in a drug discrimination paradigm; another group of monkeys was treated with the benzodiazepine diazepam (5.6 mg/kg/day, p.o.) and discriminated the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil (s.c.) from vehicle. In self-administration experiments, methohexital and not BDL (0.1-3.2 mg/kg/injection) or GBL (0.1-3.2 mg/kg/injection) reliably maintained responding above saline levels. BDL and GBL, up to doses that suppressed responding, did not substitute for pentobarbital, midazolam or flumazenil. The onset of action for both drugs to decrease response rate was delayed (90 min for GBL and 150 min for BDL). These results suggest that any abuse-related effects of BDL and GBL are qualitatively different from the abuse-related effects of GABA(A) receptor modulators and further indicate that BDL and GBL do not have positive reinforcing effects in rhesus monkeys experienced with self-administration of a short-acting sedative-hypnotic.