Self-selection of gestational lumbopelvic posture and bipedal evolution.

BACKGROUND: Not all pregnant women seem to select the more curved lumbopelvic posture that their sexual dimorphic anatomy allows even though many previous researchers have assumed lumbopelvic curvature to be standard during pregnancy. This study is vital to understanding coevolution of lumbopelvic sexual dimorphism and bipedalism, and understanding some clinical implications of intervening in gestational posture changes. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: Are there anthropometric changes that correspond with selection of lumbopelvic curvature change during pregnancy? What are the biomechanical costs and benefits of gestational lumbopelvic curvature change? METHODS: Twenty pregnant women were tested at five different times in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters of pregnancy. Lumbopelvic posture, standing kinetics and gait kinetics were measured longitudinally. Additionally, we modeled the effects on standing and gait without lumbopelvic postural changes, but with anthropometric changes, for each individual. RESULTS: We found greater lumbopelvic angulation to correspond with a shorter body height (6 cm difference between groups, p = 0.048) and deeper 2nd trimester abdomen (2 cm difference between groups, p = 0.013). Lumbopelvic angulation lowers support requirements (in standing and walking (6% lower support impulse, p = 0.056), but at the cost of shifting the propulsive actions to a less efficient pulling action rather than pushoff (13 % reduction in pushoff time, p = 0.001). We observed minimal effects on walking kinematics and balance control. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest the evolutionary advantage of the female lumbopelvic unit is the adaptability it provides to adjust for the individual needs of the pregnant woman. We discuss multiple potential contributing factors that may have shaped hominin female lumbopelvic evolution and are involved in self-selecting lumbopelvic posture.

Anthropometry, standing posture, and body center of mass changes up to 28 weeks postpartum in Caucasians in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Anthropometric models are used when body center of mass motion is calculated for assessment of dynamic balance. It is currently unknown how body segments and posture change in the postpartum period. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the longitudinal changes in anthropometry, center of mass, and standing posture postpartum. METHODS: Seventeen pregnant women were tested at nine different times: 16-20 weeks and 36-40 weeks gestation, and then in 4-week intervals from childbirth to 28 weeks postpartum. Anthropometry was measured and then participants conducted a static standing and static laying trial. Force plate data and motion capture data were used in combination with anthropometry to calculate the masses of individual segments and the body center of mass. Change over time was determined through a linear mixed model analysis. RESULTS: Anthropometric changes related to the abdomen or fluid retention during pregnancy immediately regress to early pregnancy levels following childbirth. However, other changes related to breast tissue and fat deposits persist postpartum. As such, masses of different segments affect an anthropometric model for center of mass calculation, and body center of mass changes in the lateral and anterior directions postpartum. Vertical body center of mass position was unaffected. SIGNIFICANCE: Increased postpartum breast mass may be the cause of persistent lordotic curvature changes in the lumbar spine. There is potential that this affects postpartum back pain. Future research should explore how body center of mass changes postpartum for individuals that do not breast feed, and thus may not have significant breast mass postpartum.