One-Year Clinical Outcomes in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with angiography guidance is a common procedure. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive imaging method that uses light waves. This study from a single center aimed to compare 1-year outcomes in 75 patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent OCT-guided primary PCI, with 163 patients with acute STEMI who underwent PCI without OCT guidance from February 2019 to July 2021. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with acute STEMI were enrolled from February 2019 to July 2021. Seventy-five patients underwent OCT-guided PCI (OCT group), while 163 underwent PCI without OCT (control group). Baseline characteristics, in-hospital mortality, target lesion revascularization, post-MI heart failure, and 1-year all-cause mortality were compared between groups. RESULTS The OCT group had lower diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia prevalence. Additionally, they experienced longer procedures (OCT: 50.45±21.75 min; control: 33.80±14.44 min; P<0.001). After PCI, the control group had lower left ventricular ejection fractions (OCT: 53.4%±10.5%; control: 47.8%±12.4%; P<0.001) and higher post-MI heart failure rates (OCT: 2.7%; control: 11.0%; P=0.030). Notably, the 1-year all-cause mortality rate was significantly lower in the OCT group (OCT: 1.3%; control: 8.0%; P=0.043). CONCLUSIONS During the 1-year follow-up, patients who received OCT-guided primary PCI experienced a notably lower rate of post-MI heart failure than did those who underwent primary PCI without OCT guidance. Importantly, the application of OCT in primary PCI procedures did not result in a higher incidence of distal embolism, even in cases with a significant thrombus burden.

Cutting Balloon Combined with Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis.

Drug-coated balloon (DCB) has emerged as an alternative therapeutic choice for in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions. Cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) is also a strategy utilized to treat tight stenotic lesions or ISR lesions. Few studies have focused on whether CBA plus DCB could achieve a better result in lowering the incidence of recurrent ISR. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of CBA plus DCB for ISR lesions.Between August 2011 and December 2017, 681 patients (937 lesions) were diagnosed with ISR and treated with DCBs in our hospital. The CBA plus DCB group comprised 90 patients who underwent PCI with further CBA plus DCB, and the DCB alone group comprised 591 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with DCB alone.Baseline characteristics, the types of previous stents, lesion type, prevalence of ostial lesion and left main lesion, and pre-PCI and post-PCI stenotic percentage showed no significant difference between the two groups. Only post-PCI reference luminal diameter and size of DCB were larger in the CBA plus DCB group. During the one-year follow-up period, late loss and clinical outcomes did not differ between the two groups before and after propensity score matching. The incidence of subtotal/total occlusion with delay flow was lower in the CBA plus DCB group after propensity score matching (4.1% versus 10.9%; P = 0.030).In these patients with ISR lesions, the clinical outcomes and the incidence of repeat target lesion revascularization were similar after treatment with CBA plus DCB versus DCB alone. Further study is warranted, including prospective, randomized comparisons.

Antithrombotic Treatment of Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the leading causes of death in Taiwan. Despite the use of current guideline-recommended therapies for secondary prevention, the residual risk of recurrent cardiovascular events remains high in CAD, warranting the need for new treatment options. Antithrombotic drugs are one of the most important medical therapies for CAD. In this article, we review the unmet needs of the current antithrombotic agents and summarize the results of clinical trials with dual antiplatelet therapy in stable CAD. We also review data from a recent study demonstrating the benefits of a dual pathway inhibition strategy with antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy, a new option for CAD treatment. Finally, we propose a treatment algorithm for choosing different antithrombotic regimens for CAD based on current scientific evidence and expert opinions.

Intra-Coronary Administration of Tacrolimus Improves Myocardial Perfusion and Left Ventricular Function in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (COAT-STEMI) Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Ischemia-reperfusion injury following acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is strongly related to inflammation. However, whether intracoronary (IC) tacrolimus, an immunosuppressant, can improve myocardial perfusion is uncertain. METHODS: A multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted in Taiwan from 2014 to 2017. Among 316 STEMI patients with Killip class ≤ 3 undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), 151 were assigned to the study group treated with IC tacrolimus 2.5 mg to the culprit vessel before first balloon inflation, and the remaining 165 were assigned to the placebo group receiving IC saline only. The primary endpoint was percentage of post-PCI TIMI-3 flow. The primary composite endpoints included achievement of TIMI-3 flow, TIMI- myocardial perfusion (TMP) grade, or 90-min ST-segment resolution (STR). The secondary endpoints were left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and 1-month/1-year major adverse cardio-cerebral vascular events (MACCEs) (defined as death, myocardial infarction, stroke, target-vessel revascularization or re-hospitalization for heart failure). RESULTS: Although post-PCI TIMI-3 epicardial flow and MACCE rate at 1 month and 1 year did not differ between the two groups, TMP grade (2.54 vs. 2.23, p < 0.001) and 90-min STR (67% vs. 61%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the tacrolimus-treated group than in the placebo group. The STEMI patients treated with tacrolimus also had significantly higher 3D LVEF and less grade 2 or 3 LV diastolic dysfunction at 9 months compared to those without. CONCLUSIONS: IC tacrolimus for STEMI improved coronary microcirculation and 9-month LV systolic and diastolic functions. However, the benefit of tacrolimus on clinical outcomes remains inconclusive due to insufficient patient enrollment.

Evaluation of Bleeding Risk in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

We investigated the accuracy of various bleeding risk scores to estimate the bleeding risk in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) access via the radial artery.We retrospectively enrolled 1,651 patients who were definitively diagnosed with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-STEMI (NSTEMI). We assessed the predictive validities of 30-day bleeding events in various scoring systems using receiver operating characteristic curves.Overall, ACUITY-HORIZONS exhibited the highest area under the curve to predict 30-day bleeding, followed by ACTION and CRUSADE; HAS-BLED displayed the lowest score. With a cut-off of 17, ACUITY-HORIZONS demonstrated the best discrimination for the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 30-day serious bleeding rate. We observed significant differences among all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and major adverse cardiac events between the ACUITY-HORIZONS groups with a score of ≤ 17 and > 17. ACUITY-HORIZONS score > 17, initial systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 mmHg, and Killip III and IV upon admission positively predicted the 30-day bleeding risk, whereas myocardial infarction (MI) and TIMI major bleeding within 30 days, heart failure at admission, and initial SBP < 90 mmHg positively predicted the 30-day mortality.Comparatively, ACUITY-HORIZON is the most reliable system in predicting 30-day bleeding for patients with AMI via transradial PCI. In the transradial scenario, bleeding and MI within 30 days are substantially related to 30-day mortality.

The Five-Year Clinical and Angiographic Follow-Up Outcomes of Intracoronary Transfusion of Circulation-Derived CD34+ Cells for Patients With End-Stage Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease Unsuitable for Coronary Intervention-Phase I Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the clinical and angiographic long-term outcomes of intracoronary transfusion of circulation-derived CD34+ cells for patients with end-stage diffuse coronary artery disease unsuitable for coronary intervention. DESIGN AND SETTING: A single-center prospective randomized double-blinded phase I clinical trial. Thirty-eight patients undergoing CD34+ cell therapy were allocated into groups 1 (1.0 × 10 cells/each vessel; n = 18) and 2 (3.0 × 10 cells/each vessel; n = 20). PATIENTS: Those with end-stage diffuse coronary artery disease were unsuitable for percutaneous and surgical coronary revascularization. INTERVENTIONS: Intracoronary delivery of circulation-derived CD34+ cells. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We prospectively evaluated long-term clinical and echocardiographic/angiographic outcomes between survivors and nonsurvivors. By the end of 5-year follow-up, the survival rate and major adverse cardio/cerebrovascular event were 78.9% (30/38) and 36.8% (14/38), respectively. During follow-up period, 31.6% patients (12/38) received coronary stenting for reason of sufficient target vessel size grown-up after the treatment. Endothelial function was significantly reduced in the nonsurvivors than the survivors (p = 0.039). Wimasis image analysis of angiographic findings showed that the angiogenesis was significantly and progressively increased from baseline to 1 and 5 years (all p < 0.001). The 3D echocardiography showed left ventricular ejection fraction increased from baseline to 1 year and then remained stable up to 5 years, whereas left ventricular chamber diameter exhibited an opposite pattern to left ventricular ejection fraction among the survivors. The clinical scores for angina and heart failure were significantly progressively reduced from baseline to 1 and 5 years (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CD34+ cell therapy for end-stage diffuse coronary artery disease patients might contribute to persistently long-term effects on improvement of left ventricular function, angina/heart failure, and amelioration of left ventricular remodeling.

Risk and timing of clinical events according to diabetic status of patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting stent: 2-year results from a propensity score matched comparison of ABSORB EXTEND and SPIRIT trials.

OBJECTIVES: to compare the occurrence of clinical events in diabetics treated with the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Absorb BVS; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) versus everolimus-eluting metal stents (EES; XIENCE V; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) BACKGROUND: There are limited data dedicated to clinical outcomes of diabetic patients treated with bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) at 2-year horizon. METHODS: The present study included 812 patients in the ABSORB EXTEND study in which a total of 215 diabetic patients were treated with Absorb BVS. In addition, 882 diabetic patients treated with EES in pooled data from the SPIRIT clinical program (SPIRIT II, SPIRIT III and SPIRIT IV trials) were used for comparison by applying propensity score matching using 29 different variables. The primary endpoint was ischemia driven major adverse cardiac events (ID-MACE), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR). RESULTS: After 2 years, the ID-MACE rate was 6.5% in the Absorb BVS vs. 8.9% in the Xience group (P = 0.40). There was no difference for MACE components or definite/probable device thrombosis (HR: 1.43 [0.24,8.58]; P = 0.69). The occurrence of MACE was not different for both diabetic status (insulin- and non-insulin-requiring diabetes) in all time points up to the 2-year follow-up for the Absorb and Xience groups. CONCLUSION: In this largest ever patient-level pooled comparison on the treatment of diabetic patients with BRS out to two years, individuals with diabetes treated with the Absorb BVS had a similar rate of MACE as compared with diabetics treated with the Xience EES. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Impact of single-plane versus Bi-plane imaging on procedural time, fluorescence time, and contrast medium volume in retrograde chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of single-plane and bi-plane imaging on procedural time, fluorescence time, and contrast medium volume in retrograde chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2015, a total of 359 patients received scheduled retrograde CTO PCI and were enrolled in the study; 119 patients underwent PCI by single-plane imaging, and another 240 patients underwent PCI by bi-plane imaging. RESULTS: A 95.0% rate of technical success was noted in the single-plane imaging group, and a 95.8% rate of technical success was noted in the bi-plane imaging group. All patients received the CTO approach via the retrograde method, and the retrograde method success rate was 88.2% in single-plane imaging group, and 81.7% in the bi-plane imaging group. A longer procedural time (153.73 ± 53.15 vs 172.88 ± 61.30 min; P = 0.004), longer fluorescence time (71.40 ± 25.96 vs 80.95 ± 34.70 min; P = 0.008), and more contrast medium volume (342.77 ± 102.25 vs 394.58 ± 156.41 mL; P = 0.001) were noted in the bi-plane imaging group. After propensity score match, a longer procedural time, longer fluorescence time, and more contrast volume was noted in bi-plane group. CONCLUSION: Bi-plane imaging could not decrease procedural time, fluorescence time, and contrast medium volume in retrograde CTO PCI.

Acute Inferior Wall ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Caused Atrial Lead Dysfunction Reversed by Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

The mechanism of atrial lead dysfunction varies in patients receiving pacemaker implantation and this needs to be investigated, especially when the causes are reversible. We report and discuss a 76-year-old female who had atrial lead dysfunction caused by acute myocardial infarction and who was recovered after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The sequential electrocardiographic changes were demonstrated and the possible mechanisms were discussed.

The Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Drug-Eluting Balloon and Drug-Eluting Stent Use for Left Main Bifurcation In-Stent Restenosis.

Increasing evidence is available for the use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in selected patients with unprotected left main (LM) bifurcation coronary lesions. However, little data have been reported on recurrent in-stent restenosis (ISR) for LM bifurcation lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a drug-eluting balloon (DEB) for LM bifurcation ISR compared with that of a drug-eluting stent (DES).Between December 2011 and December 2015, 104 patients who underwent PCI for unprotected LM bifurcation ISR were enrolled. We separated the patients into 2 groups: (1) those underwent PCI with further DEB and (2) those underwent PCI with further DES. Clinical outcomes were analyzed.Patients' average age was 67.14 ± 7.65 years, and the percentage of male patients was 76.0%. A total of 75 patients were enrolled in the DEB group, and another 29 patients were enrolled in the DES group. Similar target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate and recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) rate were noted for both groups. A significantly higher cardiovascular mortality rate was found in the DES group (10.7% versus 0%, P = 0.020), and a higher all-cause mortality rate was noted in the DES group (21.4% versus 6.8%, P = 0.067).It is feasible to use DEB for LM bifurcation ISR. When comparing DEB with DES, similar TLR rates were found, but lower recurrent MI and lower cardiovascular death were noted for DEB treatment.

2018 Expert Consensus on the Management of Adverse Effects of Antiplatelet Therapy for Acute Coronary Syndrome in Taiwan.

Antiplatelet therapy is a key component in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The management of ACS has evolved considerably over recent years with the development of new and more potent antiplatelet agents. Clinical trials on ACS have demonstrated that potent antiplatelet agents can more effectively reduce cardiovascular events. However, there is a tipping point between safety and efficacy, beyond which the risk of bleeding and other adverse effects can outweigh the benefits of antiplatelet therapy. Striking a balance between safety and efficacy remains a major challenge. A consensus meeting of an expert panel composed of Taiwanese experts was held to provide recommendations for the management of adverse effects in patients with ACS receiving antiplatelet therapy. The common adverse effects of antiplatelet therapy include upper gastrointestinal bleeding, ecchymosis, hematuria, epistaxis and ticagrelor-related dyspnea. In this study, a literature review of these adverse events was performed and recommendations for the management were made.

Feasibility and Safety of Transulnar Catheterization in Ipsilateral Radial Artery Occlusion.

To investigate the postprocedural cardiovascular events and vascular outcomes, including hand ischemia and neurological compromise, after transulnar (TU) catheterization in ipsilateral radial artery occlusion.Previous randomized trials have shown that the transulnar (TU) approach for coronary angiogram and intervention has safety and outcomes similar to those of the transradial (TR) approach. However, the safety of the TU procedure when ipsilateral radial artery occlusion occurs is unknown.We retrospectively reviewed 87 TU cases with ipsilateral radial artery occlusion confirmed by a forearm angiogram. Eighty percent of these patients had a history of ipsilateral radial artery cannulation or surgery. We avoided the use of over-sized sheaths or applied a sheathless approach during surgery.No ulnar artery occlusion was observed by subsequent Doppler ultrasound or pulse oximetry. No patient developed hand ischemia or serious complications requiring surgery or blood transfusion during the follow-up period of 32.2 ± 24.0 months. Review of the preprocedural forearm angiograms showed that 95.7% of the patients possessed significant collaterals supplying flow from the interosseous artery to the occluded radial artery remnant. Thus, the blood circulation to the palmar arch and digital vessels was maintained even when the ulnar artery was temporarily occluded by an in-dwelling ulnar arterial sheath.TU catheterization was safe in patients with coexisting ipsilateral radial artery occlusions and feasible for use in complex intervention procedures. Cautious manipulation of ulnar artery cannulation and hemostasis helped decrease the risk of hand ischemia.

Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Stent Delivered to Tortuous Lesions by Using the "Five-in-Six" System.

A 5Fr ST01, which is a straight-tip guiding catheter with an inner lumen of 1.5 mm, is frequently used to perform the "child-in-mother" technique, which is also referred to as the "5-in-6" technique. A 6Fr or larger size guiding catheter can facilitate bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffold (BVS) delivery. For tortuous lesions, the 5-in-6 technique can facilitate balloon catheters and the BVS in crossing tortuous lesions by increasing the back-up support. However, this maneuver couldn't be used for the larger size of BVS like 3.5-mm. Besides, it is necessary to preload the BVS into 5Fr ST01 guiding catheter to check whether this could really be done. We present a case in which a 5Fr ST01 catheter and the 5-in-6 technique were successfully used in distal delivery of a BVS to cross a very tortuous right coronary artery lesion.

Thirty-Day and One-Year Clinical Outcomes of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Available data on the use of the Bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) in real-world patients is limited, particularly in Asian populations. The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcomes of patients treated with a BVS in real-world practice in Taiwan. METHODS: This study focused on 156 patients with coronary artery disease and a total of 249 lesions who received BVS implantation from October 2012 to October 2015. The study's primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac event (MACE), such as a myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), definite or possible scaffold thrombosis, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality during the thirty-day follow-up period. The secondary endpoint was MACE during the one-year follow-up period. Additionally, the composite clinical secondary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), which was called device-oriented composite endpoint. RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 60.34 ± 10.15 years, and 81.4% were male. The average of Syntax score was 12.42 ± 8.77 points. 44.2 % lesions were type B2 or C. At 31 days, one patient experienced a MACE (1/156) the composite of two TLF (2/249) with ST elevation MI, which was related to scaffold thrombosis. At one-year, 5.1 % (8/156) of the patients experienced a MACE and 3.6% (9/249) of the lesions experienced a TLF. There was no cardiovascular or all-cause mortality in the 30-day follow-up. The one-year cardiovascular and all-cause mortality rates were each 1.3%, respectively. Diabetes, ostial lesion, bifurcation lesion, and non-standard dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) were the strong associations of one-year TLF. CONCLUSIONS: Even with difficult and complex lesions of patients in this study, acceptable outcomes were achieved with low definite or possible scaffold thrombosis rates after BVS implantation. And despite anatomical issues, it is important to complete standard DAPT.

Clinical Outcomes Following Covered Stent for the Treatment of Coronary Artery Perforation.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes of polytetrafluoroethylene covered stent for patients with coronary artery perforation. METHODS: During April 2004 and February 2016, a total 48 patients underwent implantation using polytetrafluoroethylene-covered JOSTENT GraftMaster stents (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) in the native coronary arteries implantation for coronary artery perforation. Clinical outcomes such as target lesion revascularization (TLR), myocardial infarction (MI), definite or possible stent thrombosis, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: The average age of study patients was 68.02 ± 13.49 years, and the majorities were men (76.6%). The most frequent devices cause of perforation were stents (37.5%). Eighteen patients (37.5%) experienced cardiac tamponade and 20 patients (41.7%) underwent emergent pericardiocentesis. Only 1 patient (2.1%) experienced emergent surgical repair after covered stent. At the 30-day follow-up, the rate of all-cause mortality was 16.7% and cardiovascular mortality was 13.0%. At the 1-year follow-up, the rate of MI was 6.1%, the rate of TLR was 21.9%, the rate of definite or possible stent thrombosis was 15.6%, the rate of cardiovascular mortality was 22.0%, and the rate of all-cause mortality was 26.2%. Between the patients with and without cardiac tamponade, patients with cardiac tamponade had higher cardiovascular mortality in 30-day and also higher all-cause mortality in 30-day and 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: The covered stent could solve emergent condition for patients with coronary artery perforation with high TLR and stent thrombosis rate at long-term follow-up. The patients with cardiac tamponade had worse clinical outcomes in 30-day and 1-year follow-up.

Comparison of Clinical Results Following the Use of Drug-Eluting Balloons for a Bare-Metal Stent and Drug-Eluting Stent Instent Restenosis.

BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) have emerged as a potential alternative to current treatments of instent restenosis (ISR). The study aims to investigate the clinical outcomes of a DEB angioplasty to treat bare-metal stent (BMS) ISR and drug-eluting stent (DES) ISR at 1-year clinical follow-up period. METHODS: Between November 2011 and December 2014, 312 patients were diagnosed with coronary artery ISR at our hospital. A total of 426 coronary ISR lesions were treated with DEBs. The clinical outcomes, including target lesion revascularization (TLR), myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality were compared between the BMS-ISR group and DES-ISR group. Propensity score matched analysis was used to minimize bias. RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 64.99 ± 10.35 years, and 76.9% of the patients were male. After multivariate Cox regression analyses about 1-year recurrent restenosis in DES-ISR group, only end stage renal disease (ESRD) (P = 0.047) and previous DEB failure (P < 0.001) were identified with significant difference. After propensity score matched analysis, the bias of baseline characteristics showed no significant difference. The DES-ISR group experienced more myocardial infarctions (2.8% vs 8.3%, P = 0.075), more TLR (8.1% vs 15.4%, P = 0.051), especially at nonostial lesion (5.7% vs 14.9%, P = 0.030) than the BMS-ISR group. Higher incidence of major cardiac cerebral adverse events happened in the DES-ISR group. (11.7% vs 22.1 %, P = 0.038) CONCLUSION: During the 1-year follow-up period, DEBs angioplasty for BMS-ISR had better clinical outcomes and less TLR than DES-ISR. ESRD and previous DEB failure were associated to TLR in DES-ISR group.

Comparison of a Sheathless Transradial Access With Looping Technique and Transbrachial Access for Carotid Artery Stenting.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of sheathless transradial access (TRA) with the looping technique for carotid artery stenting (CAS) compared with the transbrachial approach (TBA). METHODS: Among 99 symptomatic patients with a history of transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke, 38 patients (mean age 69±10 years; 28 men) with documented internal carotid artery stenosis were selected for CAS via a sheathless TRA and compared with 61 patients who received CAS via the brachial artery. Routine assessments of radial artery patency using duplex ultrasound and clinical follow-up were performed at 1, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: The sheathless TRA technique offered 100% procedure success; only 1 patient in the sheathless TRA group and 2 patients in the TBA group experienced TIAs during the procedure. There were no major complications (major stroke or 30 day in-hospital death) in either group or radial access site complications. The incidence of radial artery occlusion in the sheathless TRA CAS group was 9% (3/33) at 1 year (5 patients died unrelated to the procedure). CONCLUSION: The sheathless TRA with looping technique may be an alternative to transbrachial access for CAS in patients who have small radial arteries and are unsuitable for the transfemoral approach.

Is Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenator a New Weapon to Improve Prognosis in Patients With Profound Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention?

Despite advancements in pharmacological therapy and refinement of the tools and technique of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass surgery, patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by profound cardiogenic shock (CS) still have unacceptably high in-hospital mortality and unfavorable long-term outcome. Thus, there is an imminent need of a new and safe treatment modality in the management of AMI complicated by profound CS. Growing evidence suggests that extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO)-supported primary PCI is an effective therapeutic option for saving lives under such conditions. In this review, we describe and interpret the potential role of circulatory mechanical support by ECMO in the setting of AMI complicated by profound CS for improving clinical outcomes. (Circ J 2016; 80: 572-578).

Timing of Staged Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for a Non-Culprit Lesion in Patients With Anterior Wall ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multiple Vessel Disease.

The optimal timing of a staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-culprit lesions in patients with STsegment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multi-vessel disease (MVD) remains controversial. We focused on patients with anterior wall STEMI with MVD and determined the clinical effects for timing of staged PCI.From November 2005 to December 2014, 258 patients were diagnosed with anterior wall STEMI with MVD in our hospital. Among them, 37 patients received staged PCI within 3 weeks, 50 patients received staged PCI during 3 weeks to one year, and 167 patients received only primary PCI for culprit lesions. Clinical outcomes such as admission for angina or heart failure, target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, and allcause mortality were compared among the 3 groups.Acute kidney injury (AKI) after PCI occurred in 18.9% of the 3-week group, 0% of the one-year group, and 7.6% of the control group (P = 0.005). Of the one-year and 3-year clinical outcomes, the one-year group had better results, such as fewer major adverse cardiac cerebral events (P = 0.028, P = 0.023), and lower recurrent MI (P = 0.065; P = 0.018), cardiovascular mortality (P = 0.043; P = 0.020), and all-cause mortality (P = 0.047; P = 0.005).In patients with anterior wall STEMI with MVD, staged PCI for a non-culprit lesion over 3 weeks to one year had a better clinical outcome. Staged PCI for a non-culprit lesion within 3 weeks may be related to the occurrence of AKI, may lead to worse clinical outcomes, and did not decrease the occurrence of angina or post-MI heart failure.

Intracoronary Transfusion of Circulation-Derived CD34+ Cells Improves Left Ventricular Function in Patients With End-Stage Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease Unsuitable for Coronary Intervention.

OBJECTIVE: This study tested the hypothesis that intra-coronary transfusion of circulation-derived autologous CD34+ cells can improve ischemia-related left ventricular dysfunction in patients with severe diffuse coronary artery disease refractory to medication and unsuitable for coronary intervention. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded phase I clinical trial. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Thirty-eight patients with severe diffuse coronary artery disease were randomized into group 1 and group 2 receiving CD34+ cell infusion with dosages of 1.0 x 107 and 3.0 x 107 cells/vessel, respectively, after subcutaneous G-CSF injection (5 µg/kg twice a day for 4 d). INTERVENTIONS: Cardiac catheterization and intra-coronary administration of CD34+ cells. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: This clinical trial was to test effectiveness and safety of these two different dosages of CD34+ cells in the setting of severe diffuse coronary artery disease. Blood samples were collected for endothelial progenitor cell culture before and after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor injection for matrigel-assay and comparison of levels of soluble angiogenesis factors (vascular endothelial growth factor, epithelial growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor, angiopoietin-1, and transforming growth factor-ß). Procedural safety was 100% with all patients uneventfully discharged. The numbers of endothelial progenitor cells in blood samples from coronary sinus after transfusion were higher than those in circulation, and the circulatory level was higher after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment (all p < 0.001). Cardiac MRI and three-dimensional echocardiography at 6 month and angiographic follow-up at 9 month showed improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (p < 0.001) and consistent increase in neovascularization (p < 0.001), respectively, in both groups. Despite good correlation in angiogenesis between 9-month angiography and matrigel-assay (p < 0.001), no significant correlation was noted in of soluble angiogenesis factor levels. Angina and heart failure were improved in both groups at 12-month follow-up (all p < 0.001). The survival rate at 18.5-month follow-up was 94.7% (n = 36). CONCLUSIONS: CD34+ cell therapy was safe and efficacious in improving heart function for patients with severe diffuse coronary artery disease unsuitable for coronary intervention and with poor response to pharmacotherapy.