Primary Ewing sarcoma/peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors in the cranial bone and mobile spine: what is the difference?

BACKGROUND: Primary Ewing sarcoma (ES)/peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors (pPNETs) are aggressive bone tumors that rarely occur in the axial skeleton, including the cranial bone and mobile spine. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there were any differences in patient characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes between patients with ES/pPNETs of the cranial bone and those with ES/pPNETs of the mobile spine. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 33 patients with ES/pPNETs who had been surgically treated and pathologically confirmed at our institution between 2010 and 2020. Patient characteristics were compared using Fisher exact tests or independent t tests. Survival rates were estimated via Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and compared using log-rank tests. RESULTS: Thirteen patients had ES/pPNETs of the cranial bone (39.4%), while 20 patients had ES/pPNETs of the mobile spine (60.6%). Patients with ES/pPNETs of the cranial bone had a younger mean age (14.8 vs 22.6 years; p = 0.047) and longer mean disease duration (2.5 vs 1.9 months; p = 0.008) compared with those of patients with ES/pPNETs of the mobile spine. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that gross total resection (GTR) and radiotherapy resulted in a longer median survival time. The overall survival rates and progression-free survival rates of patients with ES/pPNETs of the cranial bone versus those of the mobile spine were not significantly different (p = 0.386 and p = 0.368, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ES/pPNETs of the cranial bone were younger compared to patients with ES/pPNETs of the mobile spine. There was no significant difference in the prognosis of patients with ES/pPNETs of the cranial bone versus those of the mobile spine. Taken together, our findings suggest that GTR and radiotherapy offer the best prognosis for improved long-term survival.

[Chevron osteotomy versus Scarf osteotomy for the efficacy of radiographic and clinical in moderate and severe hallux valgus:a systematic review].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy of radiographic and clinical of Chevron osteotomy versus Scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus at moderate and severe degree. METHODS: Randomized controlled trial (RCT) about Chevron and Scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus, in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, Wanfang Data were searched by computer from establishing database to June 2018. According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, two researchers independently screened the literatures, evaluated risk of bias and extracted related observation index, RevMan 5.3.5 software was used to perform Meta-analysis. Postoperative hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), AOFAS score, complications and patients' satisfaction degree between Chevron and Scarf osteotomy. RESULTS: Six RCT literatures were included, involving 507 patients, 92.5% patients were at moderate and severe degree, and 261 patients were performed by Chevron osteotomy and 246 patients were performed by Scarf osteotomy. Meta analysis results showed that Chevron osteotomy was better than Scarf osteotomy in correcting HVA [MD=-1.95, 95%CI(-2.64, -1.27), P<0.000 01]. While there were no statistical differences in IMA [MD=-0.42, 95%CI(-1.04, 0.21), P=0.19], DMAA[MD=0.78, 95%CI(-0.72, 2.29), P=0.31], AOFAS score [MD=2.47, 95%CI(-2.38, 7.33), P=0.32], complications [RR=1.09, 95%CI(0.54, 2.20), P=0.82], and patients' satisfaction degree [RR=1.00, 95%CI(0.96, 1.05), P=0.92]. CONCLUSIONS: Chevron osteotomy, which has advantages in simple operation, shorten metatarsal bone, less trauma, was better in correcting HVA of hallux valgus at moderate and severe degree, and had similar effects in IMA, DMAA, AOFAS score, complications and patients' satisfactory degree.

Comparison of small intestinal submucosa and polypropylene mesh for abdominal wall defect repair.

Abdominal wall defects are a common medical problem, and inadequate repair methods can lead to serious complications. Abdominal wall reconstruction using autologous tissue, or non-biological, biological, or composite patches is often performed to repair defective areas. In particular, composite patches containing both polymeric and biological materials have gained increasing attention due to their good mechanical properties and biocompatibility. However, it is still unclear whether the quality of repairs using composite patches is superior to that of a biological patch. Based on the limitations of previous studies, we compared small intestinal submucosa (SIS) patches with SIS + polypropylene mesh (PPM) patches for repairing abdominal wall defects in adult beagle dogs. Forty-five female dogs were subjected to surgical resection to produce abdominal wall defects. SIS or SIS + PPM was used as patch for the defects. Morphology, biomechanics, and histological evaluations were performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of such therapies. Our findings demonstrated that SIS had advantages over SIS + PPM considering biological activity and histocompatibility without increasing the risk of repair failure.

Efficacy and safety of small intestinal submucosa in dural defect repair in a canine model.

Dural defects are a common problem, and inadequate dural closure can lead to complications. Several types of dural substitute materials have recently been discarded or modified owing to poor biocompatibility or mechanical properties and adverse reactions. The small intestinal submucosa (SIS) is a promising material used in a variety of applications. Based on the limitations of previous studies, we conducted an animal study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the SIS in preclinical trials. Twenty-four male beagle dogs were subjected to surgical resection to produce dural defects. SIS or autologous dural mater was patched on the dural defect. Gross and histological evaluations were carried out to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the therapy. Our findings demonstrated that the SIS, which stimulated connective and epithelial tissue responses for dural regeneration and functional recovery without immunological rejection, could provide prolonged defect repair and prevent complications. The mechanical properties of the SIS could be adjusted by application of multiple layers, and the biocompatibility of the material was appropriate. Thus, our data suggested that this material may represent an alternative option for clinical treatment of dural defects.