Are Routine Postoperative Laboratory Tests Necessary After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Recently, the practice of ordering routine postoperative laboratory tests in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been challenged. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of routine postoperative laboratory tests after primary elective THA in an Asian population and identify the risk factors associated with abnormal postoperative laboratory test-related intervention. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 395 consecutive patients who underwent primary elective THA at a single tertiary academic center. Patient clinical information and laboratory test results were collected for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 349 (88.4%) patients had abnormal postoperative laboratory test results; most patients had anemia and hypoalbuminemia. Twenty-seven (6.8%) patients received clinical intervention. Of the 307 (77.7%) patients with postoperative anemia, 7 patients received blood transfusion. Factors associated with transfusion were female gender, low body mass index, long operation time, and low preoperative hemoglobin levels. Of the 149 (37.7%) patients with postoperative hypoalbuminemia, 16 received albumin supplementation. Factors associated with albumin supplementation were female gender, long operation time, and low preoperative albumin levels. Although 36 patients had abnormal postoperative creatinine, only 1 patient required specialist consultation. For electrolyte abnormalities, hyponatremia was noted; however, no patient received sodium supplementation. Moreover, 14 patients developed hypokalemia, of which 6 required potassium supplementation; 163 patients had hypocalcemia, of which 2 received calcium supplementation. CONCLUSION: Routine laboratory tests after primary elective THA are unnecessary for most of the patients in modern clinical practice. However, for those with identified risk factors, postoperative laboratory tests still should be performed.

The necessity of routine postoperative laboratory tests after total hip arthroplasty for hip fracture in a semi-urgent clinical setting.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that routine postoperative laboratory tests are not necessary after primary elective total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aims to evaluate the utility of routine postoperative laboratory tests in patients undergoing THA for hip fracture in a semi-urgent clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 213 consecutive patients who underwent primary unilateral THA for hip fractures. Patient demographics, clinical information, and laboratory tests were obtained from the electronic medical record system. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with abnormal laboratory test-related interventions. RESULTS: A total of 207 patients (97.18%) had abnormal postoperative laboratory results, which were mainly due to anemia (190/213, 89.20%) and hypoalbuminemia (154/213, 72.30%). Overall, 54 patients (25.35%) underwent a clinical intervention, 18 patients received blood transfusion, and 42 patients received albumin supplementation. Factors associated with blood transfusion were long operative time and low preoperative hemoglobin levels. Factors associated with albumin supplementation were long operative time and low preoperative albumin levels. Of the 33 patients with abnormal postoperative creatinine levels, 7 patients underwent a clinical intervention. For electrolyte abnormalities, sodium supplementation was not given for hyponatremia, three patients received potassium supplementation, and one patient received calcium supplementation. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a high incidence of abnormal postoperative laboratory tests and a significant clinical intervention rate in patients who underwent THA for hip fracture in a semi-urgent clinical setting, which indicates that routine laboratory tests after THA for hip fracture are still necessary for patients with certain risk factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. Trial registration Clinical trial registry number ChiCTR1900020690.

Efficacy of novel nano-hydroxyapatite/polyurethane composite scaffolds with silver phosphate particles in chronic osteomyelitis.

Recently, chronic osteomyelitis is still a challenging surgical problem. Unfortunately, the traditional clinical method using bone cement loaded antibiotics is restricted due to its non-biodegradability and limited release of antibiotics. Hydroxyapatite is a good adsorbent with good biocompatibility, an ideal bone repair material, and can avert the requirement for the secondary surgical procedure of removal. In this study, nano-hydroxyapatite combined with a polyurethane containing 3% silver (Ag/n-HA/PU) was synthesized, and investigated for its efficacy of treating chronic bone infection with bone defects. To clarify its silver ions release characteristics, the concentration of the Ag+ in the elution was analyzed every day after in vitro deionized water immersion. A chronic osteomyelitis of tibia in rabbit model was established, and 70 New Zealand rabbits were divided into 4 groups, including the blank control group, nano-hydroxyapatite combined with polyurethane (n-HA/PU) implant group, 3% Ag/n-HA/PU group and 10% Ag/n-HA/PU group after debridement. Routine blood tests, radiography, Micro-CT, and histological staining were conducted at 4 days, 3, 6 and 12 weeks post-treatment. The results showed that the released silver from the 3% Ag/n-HA/PU and 10% Ag/n-HA/PU exhibited an initial burst release and followed by a slow controlled release up to 39 days and 42 days respectively. A good repair of bone defects, an appropriate rate of degradation of scaffolds and no significant toxicity were observed in the 3% Ag/n-HA/PU group, indicating the advantages of this novel synthetic scaffold to be a potential option for the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis. A novel nano-composite, nano-hydroxyapatite combined with a polyurethane containing 3% silver (Ag/n-HA/PU) provide controlled release of Ag+, illustrated by its abilities of biodegradation, antimicrobial activity, and favorable repair of bone defects in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis.

Efficacy of prophylactic probiotics in combination with antibiotics versus antibiotics alone for colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

This meta-analysis aimed to determine whether prophylactic probiotics in combination with antibiotics are superior to antibiotics alone in the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) after colorectal surgery. Fourteen trials involving 1524 participants were included. Compared with antibiotics alone, prophylactic probiotics in combination with antibiotics reduced the risk of SSI as well as other complications, shortened the cumulative duration of antibiotic therapy. Current evidence suggested that probiotics in combination with antibiotics could be recommended.

CT- versus MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To determine whether computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is more suitable for the patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) systems for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to June 2016 for prospective comparative trials that compared CT- versus MRI-based PSI systems for TKA. Our predefined primary outcome was the outliers incidence of coronal overall limb alignment. RESULTS: Six studies with a total of 336 knees meeting the eligibility criteria, and four trials were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with MRI-based PSI systems, CT-based PSI systems were associated with a higher outliers incidence of coronal overall limb alignment (risk ratio: 1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-2.72; P = 0.04), more angular errors of coronal overall limb alignment (mean difference (MD): 1.01°; 95% CI: 0.47-1.56; P = 0.0003), and longer operation time (MD: 5.02 min; 95% CI: 1.26-8.79; P = 0.009). While no significant differences in the coronal/sagittal alignment of the femoral/tibial component outliers, the angular errors of coronal overall limb alignment, the angular errors of the femoral/tibial component in coronal plane, or incidence of change of implant size of the femoral/tibial component were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The current limited evidence suggests that MRI-based PSI systems exhibit higher accuracy for TKA regarding the coronal limb axis than CT-based PSI systems. However, well-designed studies comparing CT-versus MRI-based PSI systems for TKA are warrant to confirm these results before widespread use of this technique can be recommended.

Relationship between Annualized Case Volume and Mortality in Sepsis: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between annualized case volume and mortality in patients with sepsis is not fully understood. The authors performed a dose-response meta-analysis to assess the effect of annualized case volume on mortality among patients with sepsis in the intensive care unit, emergency department, or hospital, hypothesizing that higher annualized case volume may lead to lower mortality. METHODS: The authors searched PubMed and Embase through July 2015 to identify observational studies that examined the relationship between annualized case volume and mortality in sepsis. The predefined outcome was mortality. Odds ratios with 95% CIs were pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Ten studies involving 3,495,921 participants and 834,009 deaths were included. The pooled estimate suggested that annualized case volume was inversely associated with mortality (odds ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.89; P = 0.001), with high heterogeneity (I = 96.6%). The relationship was consistent in most subgroup analyses and robust in sensitivity analysis. Dose-response analysis identified a nonlinear relationship between annualized case volume and mortality (P for nonlinearity less than 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis confirmed the study hypothesis and provided strong evidence for an inverse and a nonlinear dose-response relationship between annualized case volume and mortality in patients with sepsis. Variations in cutoff values of category for annualized case volume across studies may mainly result in the overall heterogeneity. Future studies should uncover the mechanism of volume-mortality relationship and standardize the cutoff values of category for annualized case volume in patients with sepsis.

Variety of femoral anteversion and its measurement in cementless total hip arthroplasty: Does robotic technology improve accuracy?

BACKGROUND: High-performance total hip arthroplasty (THA) depends on the accurate position of components. However, femoral anteversion is variable, and current studies only used traditional instruments to evaluate it, such as protractor and spirit level with limited cases. This study aimed to identify the variability in the measured femoral native anteversion and intraoperative stem anteversion under different measurement methods, including intraoperative robotic method. We hypothesized that robotic technology was more accurate than traditional instruments for femoral anteversion evaluation. METHODS: This study included 117 hips of patients who underwent robotic-assisted THA between November 2019 and March 2021. Preoperative native femoral anteversion was measured using a robotic system. Intraoperative femoral stem anteversion was evaluated visually, and then measured with a goniometer and a robotic system, respectively. Variability in the measured femoral native anteversion and intraoperative femoral stem anteversion was calculated and compared. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Pearson correlation analysis were used to assess the consistency and correlation of anteversion of different measurements and postoperative CT-measured stem anteversion, respectively. RESULTS: The result of measurement for preoperative native femoral anteversion was more variable than the intraoperative robotic-measured stem anteversion. Intraoperative robotic-measured stem version showed the highest correlation with postoperative CT measurement of stem version (r = 0.806, P < 0.001), while intraoperative surgeon estimation had the lowest correlation coefficient (r = 0.281, P = 0.025). As for the consistency with postoperative CT measurement of femoral stem anteversion, the intraoperative robotic-measured femoral stem version also had the highest value (ICC = 0.892, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Native femoral anteversion was variable preoperatively. Using cementless stems, anteversion was also highly variable. Robotic assessment for stem anteversion during surgery was more consistent with the final position than the preoperative assessment and conventional intraoperative estimation.

Robotic-assisted revision total joint arthroplasty: a state-of-the-art scoping review.

Background: During the past decades, robotic-assisted technology has experienced an incredible advancement in the field of total joint arthroplasty (TJA), which demonstrated promise in improving the accuracy and precision of implantation and alignment in both primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, revision TJA remains a technically challenging procedure with issues of large-scale bone defects and damage to nearby anatomical structures. Thus, surgeons are trying to harness the abilities of robotic-assisted technology for revision TJA surgery. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were comprehensively searched to identify relevant publications that reported the application of robotic-assisted technology in revision TJA. Results: Overall, ten studies reported the use of the robotic system in revision TJA, including active (ROBODOC) and semi-active (MAKO and NAVIO) systems. One clinical case reported conversion from hip fusion to THA, and three studies reported revision from primary THA to revision THA. Moreover, four studies reported that robotic-assisted technology is helpful in revising unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to TKA, and two case reports converted primary TKA to revision TKA. In this study, we present the latest evolvements, applications, and technical obstacles of robotic-assisted technology in the revision of TJA and the current state-of-the-art. Conclusion: Current available evidence suggests that robotic-assisted technology may help surgeons to reproducibly perform preoperative plans and accurately achieve operative targets during revision TJA. However, concerns remain regarding preoperative metal artifacts, registration techniques, closed software platforms, further bone loss after implant removal, and whether robotic-assisted surgery will improve implant positioning and long-term survivorship.

The Necessity of Implant Removal after Fixation of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures-A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Thoracolumbar burst fractures are a common traumatic vertebral fracture in the spine, and pedicle screw fixation has been widely performed as a safe and effective procedure. However, after the stabilization of the thoracolumbar burst fractures, whether or not to remove the pedicle screw implant remains controversial. This review aimed to assess the benefits and risks of pedicle screw instrument removal after fixation of thoracolumbar burst fractures. METHODS: Data sources, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Clinical trials.gov, were comprehensively searched. All types of human studies that reported the benefits and risks of implant removal after thoracolumbar burst fractures, were selected for inclusion. Clinical outcomes after implant removal were collected for further evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 4051 papers were retrieved, of which 35 studies were eligible for inclusion in the review, including four case reports, four case series, and 27 observational studies. The possible risks of pedicle screw removal after fixation of thoracolumbar burst fractures include the progression of the kyphotic deformity and surgical complications (e.g., surgical site infection, neurovascular injury, worsening pain, revision surgery), while the potential benefits of pedicle screw removal mainly include improved segmental range of motion and alleviated pain and disability. Therefore, the potential benefits and possible risks should be weighed to support patient-specific clinical decision-making about the removal of pedicle screws after the successful fusion of thoracolumbar burst fractures. CONCLUSIONS: There was conflicting evidence regarding the benefits and harms of implant removal after successful fixation of thoracolumbar burst fractures, and the current literature does not support the general recommendation for removal of the pedicle screw instruments, which may expose the patients to unnecessary complications and costs. Both surgeons and patients should be aware of the indications and have appropriate expectations of the benefits and risks of implant removal. The decision to remove the implant or not should be made individually and cautiously by the surgeon in consultation with the patient. Further studies are warranted to clarify this issue. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level 1.

Correlation between tibial valgus deformity and aspect ratio of resected tibial surface in female Chinese patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

Background: Morphology of the resected tibial surface is the reference for tibial component design, selection, and implantation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This comparative study sought to answer whether valgus deformity of the tibia would affect the morphology of the resected tibial surface in TKA. Methods: Thirty-one female Chinese patients with valgus tibias were retrospectively and consecutively identified from a single-center registration database. Thirty-one patients with well-aligned tibias were matched in terms of gender, height, and weight. Weight-bearing full-length radiographs and computed tomography images of the whole lower limb were obtained for every case. Tibial resection was mimicked perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the tibia in the frontal plane with 3° of posterior slope and a cut level individualized by the actual intraoperative cut. On the resected surface, mediolateral dimension (MLD), medial anteroposterior dimensions (mAPD), and lateral anteroposterior dimensions (lAPD) were measured, and aspect ratios (AR) were calculated. We compared the AR between the two groups. Results: The aspect ratio of resected tibial surface positively correlated with tibial valgus alignment. Patients with valgus tibias had significantly smaller AR (MLD/mAPD) for the medial plateau (1.50 ± 0.06 vs. 1.54 ± 0.07, P = 0.032). However, the AR for the lateral plateau was similar between the two groups (1.63 ± 0.08 vs. 1.65 ± 0.07, P = 0.328). Conclusion: This difference in morphology of resected tibial surface between valgus and well-aligned tibias should be considered in tibial component design, as well as in the selection and placement of TKA implants for knees with valgus tibias.