[Myeloid neoplasms associated with rearrangement of PDGFRB: A rare and tricky disease]. / La néoplasie myéloïde associée à un réarrangement de PDGFRB : une pathologie rare de diagnostic difficile.

In the latest World Health Organization classification (WHO), eosinophilic disorders represent a group of rare pathologic conditions with highly heterogeneous pathophysiology. In this report, we describe a case of myeloid neoplasm associated with eosinophilia and rearrangement of PDGFRB gene in a 67-year-old-male patient hospitalized with cerebellous ataxia. Initial investigations showed a bicytopenia with hypereosinophilia varying from 1.1 to 1.6×109/L. Bone marrow aspiration was rich and showed a heterogeneous distribution of myeloid cells with clusters of promyelocytes and proerythroblasts associated with numerous eosinophils and spindle-shaped mast cells but without excess of blasts, dysplasia nor maturation skewing. These aspects suggested an atypical myeloproliferative neoplasm. Bone marrow biopsy was performed showing also a very high cellularity with area of myeloid and erythroid precursors associated with numerous spindle-shaped mast cells. Diagnoses of unclassified myeloid neoplasm and/or systemic mastocytosis were then proposed. Further chromosome analysis showed a t(5;8) translocation with PDGFRB rearrangement revealed in fluorescent in situ hybridization. Patient was treated with imatinib and intravenous immunoglobulin therapy allowing a significant improvement in neurological symptoms and biological results. Patient condition is currently stable after six lines of treatment. This rare hematopoietic neoplasm displays unusual histological and cytological features and can mimic other myeloproliferative neoplasm. Specific cytogenetics analysis should be considered for such cases with hypereosinophilia to select patients that may benefit from targeted therapy.

[Method comparison between two hemostasis analyzers: STA R Max3 and Cobas t 511]. / Comparaison de méthode entre deux analyseurs d'hémostase : STA R Max3 et Cobas t 511.

The STA R Max3 (Stago, France) and Cobas t511 (Roche Diagnostics, Germany) are two automated hemostasis analysers that can be used to perform a wide range of tests. The STA R Max3 uses a mechanical clot detection system to measure coagulation times, while the Cobas t511 uses optical detection. The aim of this study was to compare the analytical performance of these two analysers using fresh plasma samples with or without a risk of interference due to hemolysis or lipemia. For plasma samples without interference, acceptable agreement was observed for prothrombin time (PT) (n = 55), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) (n = 56), fibrinogen (n = 56) and factor II (n = 43) with R² of 0.907, 0.963, 0.979 and 0.968 respectively. For factor V (n = 43) and D-dimers (n = 45), agreement was less acceptable, with respective R² of 0.756 and 0.887, but with no clinical impact. For hemolysed samples, acceptable results were observed for PT, fibrinogen and D-dimers, but three results were clinically discordant for APTT, and STA R Max3 offered greater robustness for processing highly lipemic samples.