Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Phys Ther Sci ; 28(4): 1219-27, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27190456

RESUMO

[Purpose] The aim of our study was to compare the initial effects of scapular proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques and classic exercise interventions with physiotherapy modalities on pain, scapular dyskinesis, range of motion, and function in adhesive capsulitis. [Subjects and Methods] Fifty-three subjects were allocated to 3 groups: scapular proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation exercies and physiotherapy modalities, classic exercise and physiotherapy modalities, and only physiotherapy modalities. The intervention was applied in a single session. The Visual Analog Scale, Lateral Scapular Slide Test, range of motion and Simple Shoulder Test were evaluated before and just after the one-hour intervention in the same session (all in one session). [Results] All of the groups showed significant differences in shoulder flexion and abduction range of motion and Simple Shoulder Test scores. There were statistically significant differences in Visual Analog Scale scores in the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and control groups, and no treatment method had significant effect on the Lateral Scapular Slide Test results. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups before and after the intervention. [Conclusion] Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation, classic exercise, and physiotherapy modalities had immediate effects on adhesive capsulitis in our study. However, there was no additional benefit of exercises in one session over physiotherapy modalities. Also, an effective treatment regimen for shoulder rehabilitation of adhesive capsulitis patients should include scapular exercises.

2.
Neurol Res ; 46(1): 14-22, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37712608

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN) causes various physical problems such as the increased risk of falling, loss of balance and coordination while standing or walking, susceptibility to injuries due to sensory loss. AIMS: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the effects of neuropathic pain (NP) in individuals with DPN on balance and gait. METHODS: This prospective controlled study was conducted on 42 adults aged between 40-65 years. The participants were divided into three groups; individuals with DPN and NP (DPN+NP/n = 14), individuals with DPN without NP (DPN-NP/n = 14), and the control group (n = 14), respectively. The Force Plate system and Core Balance System measured static and dynamic postural balance and stability limits. Gait and dynamic plantar pressure distribution analyses were performed with a computerized gait evaluation system. RESULTS: The score of LANSS, and VAS during gait were higher in DPN+NP group than in DPN-NP (p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between the groups in balance parameters (p > 0.05). The right-left heel maximum forces were lower in both groups with DPN compared to the control group (p < 0.05). In terms of spatiotemporal parameters of the gait, there was a difference between the groups only in step width and left single support line parameters (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that the individuals with DPN have an increased step width, their left single support line was shortened, and the maximum force on the heel decreased. The NP did not cause any change in balance and gait parameters.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Neuropatias Diabéticas , Neuralgia , Adulto , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Neuropatias Diabéticas/complicações , Estudos Prospectivos , Marcha , Caminhada , Equilíbrio Postural
3.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr ; 89: 104106, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32447125

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the physical fitness levels of nursing home residents and community-dwelling older adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 118 older adults aged between 65-85 living in a nursing home or community participated in the study. The Senior Fitness Test assessed the physical fitness levels of older adults. The older adults performed the chair stand test, arm curl test, 2-min step test, chair sit and reach test, back-scratch test, 8-foot up, and go test. RESULTS: The age, cognitive status, gender, body weight, height, smoking, and education status were similar between the groups (p > 0.05). Aerobic endurance, balance, and agility were higher in nursing home residents than in the community-dwelling older adults (p < 0.05). Strength, flexibility, and BMI did not differ between groups ​​(p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Aerobic endurance, balance, and agility may vary depending on the living environment of older adults. The determination of differences in physical fitness between community-dwelling older adults and nursing home residents could provide objective information to develop a physical activity program for older adults.


Assuntos
Vida Independente , Casas de Saúde , Aptidão Física , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Exercício Físico , Teste de Esforço , Humanos
4.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil ; 28(3): 489-95, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25322741

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Turkish version of the Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) may help to assess shoulder function in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome (SAIS). OBJECTIVE: To translate and cross-culturally adapted UEFI into Turkish and to assess its acceptability, reliability, validity in patients with SAIS. METHODS: This study conducted with 93 SAIS participants. UEFI, the short version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scale (Quick DASH), the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, and the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) were administered. Acceptability was assessed in terms of refusal rate, rates of missing responses, and administration time. Test-retest reliability was assessed with intra class correlation coefficient (ICC), internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Validity was assessed by floor and ceiling effects, skew of distributions and Pearson's correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the UEFI at Time 1 and Time 2 were as follows: α = 0.89 and α = 0.89. Average measure ICC was 0.80. The UEFI score demonstrated strong negative correlations with SPADI total score and Quick DASH score. There was not a significant correlation between the UEFI and mental health subscale score derived from SF-36. CONCLUSIONS: The Turkish version of UEFI is acceptable, valid, and reliable.


Assuntos
Avaliação da Deficiência , Síndrome de Colisão do Ombro/diagnóstico , Dor de Ombro/diagnóstico , Ombro/fisiopatologia , Extremidade Superior/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Síndrome de Colisão do Ombro/fisiopatologia , Dor de Ombro/fisiopatologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Turquia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA