Oral candida lesions and Candida tropicalis: Potential prognostic markers in end-of-life cancer patients.

AIMS: Oral candidosis is common in patients with end-of-life cancer; however, its prognosis is unclear. We aimed to assess oral candidosis and Candida species as prognostic indicators in palliative care for these patients. METHODS: We consecutively included palliative care patients, assessed for candidosis via microbiological techniques, and classified into three groups by the extent of oral lesions. The association between oral candidosis and overall survival was assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted by performance status (PS). RESULTS: We studied 142 patients (median age 77; 52.8% women) with a 76.1% oral candidosis prevalence. Candida albicans (80.6%) was the most common species. Oral lesions were classified as none, grade 1 (28.7%), or ≥ grade 2 (14.8%). During follow-up, Cox models identified ≥grade 2 lesions (aHR = 2.04; 95% CI: 1.18-3.54; p = .011) and Candida tropicalis (aHR = 2.38; 95% CI: 1.03-5.55; p = .044) as predictors. CONCLUSION: The extent of oral candidosis lesions or the presence of C. tropicalis may serve as prognostic indicator in patients with end-of-life cancer. Therefore, solely concentrating on the prevalence and frequency of fungal species may be insufficient for predicting life prognosis; it is advisable to assess these parameters through both visual examination and culture.

Diabetic ketoacidosis after the second dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in a patient with pembrolizumab-induced fulminant type 1 diabetes.

We report a case of 77-year-old woman with fulminant type 1 diabetes (T1D) who developed diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) after the second dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine tozinameran. The patient had been diagnosed as having T1D associated with an immune-related adverse event caused by pembrolizumab at the age of 75. After the second dose of tozinameran, she developed DKA and needed intravenous insulin infusion and mechanical ventilation. Although the direct causal relationship between the vaccination and the DKA episode could not be proven in this case, published literatures had suggested the possibility of developing DKA after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with T1D. As the magnitude of the risk of the combination of the known adverse drug reactions of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine and T1D patients' vulnerability to sick-day conditions is not yet thoroughly assessed, future studies such as a non-interventional study with adequate sample size would be required to address this issue.