State of the Management of Infections Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Organisms.

In the past decade, the prevalence of multidrug-resistant gram-negative (MDR-GN) bacterial infections has increased significantly, leading to higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Treating these infections poses numerous challenges, particularly when selecting appropriate empiric therapy for critically ill patients for whom the margin for error is low. Fortunately, the availability of new therapies has improved the treatment landscape, offering safer and more effective options. However, there remains a need to establish and implement optimal clinical and therapeutic approaches for managing these infections. Here, we review strategies for identifying patients at risk for MDR-GN infections, propose a framework for the choice of empiric and definitive treatment, and explore effective multidisciplinary approaches to managing patients in the hospital while ensuring a safe transition to outpatient settings.

Recommendations From the 2016 Guidelines for the Management of Adults With Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia.

Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) continue to represent the most common nosocomial-associated infections, resulting in significant attributable mortality, increased length of hospital stay, and financial burden.1 The updated Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines provide guidance on the diagnosis and management of nonimmunocompromised hosts with HAP and VAP.

Unitary Tract Infection Treatment: When to Use What Agents including Beta-lactam Combination Agents.

In this study, the authors review antibiotic treatment options for both acute uncomplicated and complicated urinary tract infection (UTI). In addition, they also review regimens used in the setting of drug-resistant pathogens including vancomycin resistant Enterococcus, extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacterals, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterals and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas, which are encountered with increasing frequency.

Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Infective Endocarditis in Adults: A WikiGuidelines Group Consensus Statement.

Importance: Practice guidelines often provide recommendations in which the strength of the recommendation is dissociated from the quality of the evidence. Objective: To create a clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management of adult bacterial infective endocarditis (IE) that addresses the gap between the evidence and recommendation strength. Evidence Review: This consensus statement and systematic review applied an approach previously established by the WikiGuidelines Group to construct collaborative clinical guidelines. In April 2022 a call to new and existing members was released electronically (social media and email) for the next WikiGuidelines topic, and subsequently, topics and questions related to the diagnosis and management of adult bacterial IE were crowdsourced and prioritized by vote. For each topic, PubMed literature searches were conducted including all years and languages. Evidence was reported according to the WikiGuidelines charter: clear recommendations were established only when reproducible, prospective, controlled studies provided hypothesis-confirming evidence. In the absence of such data, clinical reviews were crafted discussing the risks and benefits of different approaches. Findings: A total of 51 members from 10 countries reviewed 587 articles and submitted information relevant to 4 sections: establishing the diagnosis of IE (9 questions); multidisciplinary IE teams (1 question); prophylaxis (2 questions); and treatment (5 questions). Of 17 unique questions, a clear recommendation could only be provided for 1 question: 3 randomized clinical trials have established that oral transitional therapy is at least as effective as intravenous (IV)-only therapy for the treatment of IE. Clinical reviews were generated for the remaining questions. Conclusions and Relevance: In this consensus statement that applied the WikiGuideline method for clinical guideline development, oral transitional therapy was at least as effective as IV-only therapy for the treatment of IE. Several randomized clinical trials are underway to inform other areas of practice, and further research is needed.

Sorting Out the Risks and Benefits of the #797 Recommended Intrapartum Vancomycin Dosing Approach.

ACOG Committee Opinion #797 proposed intrapartum vancomycin dosing guidelines in the absence of thorough evaluation of its risk versus benefit profile on the maternal and neonatal systems. The previously published serum and cord-blood concentration-time data of vancomycin given to mothers in the intrapartum period was analyzed in this work with a two-compartment pharmacokinetic (PK) model. Monte Carlo simulation was used to establish exposure for the studied population for doses of 1000 mg to 2000 mg every 8 h for gestational ages (GA) of 33 to 40 weeks and for birth times up to 4-h intervals. Probabilities of target attainment (PTA) were calculated for efficacy and toxicity indices unique to the peripartum maternal and neonatal population. Neonatal evaluations indicate uniformly high PTAs for the evaluated dosing regimens when the efficacy target is considered. On the other hand, the PTAs for potentially nephrotoxic exposure is expected to reach undesirable levels when three or more doses were to be administered. The risk is profoundly high in GA below 36 weeks and birth times beyond 20 h after the initiation of intrapartum prophylaxis and with doses greater than 1250 mg. Maternal vancomycin exposures seem reasonable up to two intrapartum doses given at 8 h intervals when the dose is kept to 1250 mg or less. Most mothers (up to 83%) who receive three or more doses of the commonly administered regimens are subjected to nephrotoxic exposures. Thus, it appears that the current recommendations by #797 for dosing of vancomycin pose considerable risk to mother and newborn alike, especially in cases with lengthy duration of preterm labor. Capping of doses at 1250 mg may be considered to minimize the need for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) interventions. Alternatively, and irrespective of the baseline maternal renal function, TDM for all cases requiring more than two doses of 1500 mg or higher must be assured.