Clinical safety and performance of a MRI conditional pacing system in patients undergoing cardiac MRI.

BACKGROUND: Utilization of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) as an imaging modality in clinical practice is rapidly increasing. More evidence from randomized studies establishing clinical safety and performance of pacing systems in patients undergoing a cMRI scan is needed. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this prospective, multicenter, randomized study was to demonstrate safety and efficacy of the Accent MRI™ conditional pacing systems (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) in patients undergoing cMRI scan. METHODS: Patients (n  =  283) indicated for dual-chamber pacemaker implant were randomized to either the MRI Group (MG) (n  =  140) or the Control Group (CG) (n  =  143) after successful device implantation of the Accent MRI™ system. Clinical evaluation and device interrogation were performed at pre- and post-MRI scan, and 1 month post-MRI for all patients. At 9-12 weeks postimplant, patients in MG underwent a nondiagnostic cMRI scan at 1.5 Tesla (T), while patients in CG underwent device interrogation and clinical evaluation twice with a 45-minute waiting period in between. The safety endpoint was freedom from MRI scan-related complications and that for efficacy was significant changes in right atrial/ventricular capture threshold and sensing amplitude between right before MRI, immediately after MRI, and 1 month post-MRI. RESULTS: Results showed 100% freedom from MRI scan-related complications. There were no significant changes in device performance between pre-MRI scan and 1 month post-MRI scan time points in both study groups. CONCLUSIONS: cMRI scanning with 1.5 T scanners is safe in patients implanted with the Accent MRI™ conditional pacing system and has no significant effect on the electrical parameters of the device and leads.

Innate immune response by ficolin binding in apoptotic placenta is associated with the clinical syndrome of preeclampsia.

BACKGROUND: Unidentified circulating factors derived from placenta are thought to be responsible for the exaggerated systemic inflammation leading to preeclampsia. Our aim was to identify the circulating factors present in preeclampsia and to investigate their relationship to the underlying systemic immune response responsible for the associated clinical manifestations. METHODS: We obtained blood samples from pregnant women with and without preeclampsia and performed comparative proteomic analyses to identify the abnormal circulating factors by 2-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight for protein separation and identification. In placentas from preeclamptic pregnancies, we evaluated the potential role of the candidate proteins identified by Western and immunohistochemical analysis. We also used proinflammatory cytokine antibody arrays to investigate local and systemic immune responses. RESULTS: We found that ficolins, the pattern-recognition proteins involved in the lectin-complement pathway, were differentially expressed in plasma from preeclamptic pregnancies. Ficolins were present in low concentrations in plasma but at high concentrations in the placenta, particularly in syncytiotrophoblasts undergoing apoptosis. The binding of ficolins in apoptotic trophoblasts induced innate immunity through local and systemic cytokine activation and correlated with the clinical manifestation of preeclampsia. CONCLUSIONS: We identified specific in vivo circulating factors derived from the placenta that are responsible for the local immune recognition and systemic inflammatory response in the development of clinical manifestations of preeclampsia. These findings may have predictive value and also therapeutic applications to lessen adverse clinical outcomes of preeclampsia.