Fewer systematic prostate core biopsies in clinical stage T1c prostate cancer leads to biochemical recurrence after brachytherapy as monotherapy.

BACKGROUND: After brachytherapy, fewer prostate biopsy cores at diagnosis can underestimate the pathological characteristics of prostate cancer (PCa) with lower concordance, resulting in improper treatment, particularly in patients with low-risk nonpalpable cT1c PCa. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between the number of biopsy cores at diagnosis and long-term clinical outcomes after brachytherapy for cT1c PCa. METHODS: We reviewed 516 patients with localized cT1c PCa with Gleason scores of 3 + 3 = 6 or 3 + 4 = 7 who underwent brachytherapy as monotherapy without hormonal therapy between January 2005 and September 2014 at our institution. Clinical staging was based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer manual for staging. Thus, the cT1c category is based solely on digital rectal examination. The primary outcome was biochemical recurrence (BCR). Based on the optimized cutoff value for biopsy core number obtained from receiver operating characteristic analysis, patients were divided into the biopsy cores ≤8 (N = 123) and ≥9 (N = 393) groups. The BCR-free survival rate was compared between the groups. Prognostic factors for BCR were evaluated, including age, initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, positive core rate, PSA density, prostate magnetic resonance imaging findings, and biopsy core number. RESULTS: The median patient age was 66.0 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 61.0-71.0 years), and the median follow-up time was 11.1 years (IQR: 9.5-13.3 years). The median number of core biopsies was 12 (IQR: 9-12). The area under the curve was 0.637 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-0.75), and the optimal biopsy core cutoff value for BCR prediction was 8.5 (sensitivity = 43.5%, specificity = 77.1%). Although fewer patients had Gleason scores of 3 + 4 = 7 (19/123 [15%] vs. 125/393 [32%], p < 0.02) in the biopsy cores ≤8 group, the 10-year BCR-free survival rate was significantly lower in the biopsy cores ≤8 group than in the biopsy cores ≥9 group (93.8% vs. 96.3%, p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that a lower biopsy core number (hazard ratio: 0.828, 95% CI: 0.71-0.97, p < 0.03) and a Gleason score of 3 + 4 = 7 (hazard ratio: 3.26, 95% CI: 1.37-7.73, p < 0.01) significantly predicted BCR. CONCLUSIONS: A low number of prostate core biopsies results in worse BCR-free survival after brachytherapy as monotherapy in patients with cT1c PCa.

Definitive radiotherapy consisting of external beam radiotherapy without central shielding and 3D image-guided brachytherapy for patients with cervical cancer: feasibility for Japanese patients and dose-response analyses for local control in the low-dose range.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of external beam radiotherapy without central shielding in definitive radiotherapy for Japanese patients with cervical cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the data of cervical cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy consisting of external beam radiotherapy without central shielding and three-dimensional-image-guided brachytherapy. RESULTS: The study included 167 patients (T1 + 2 = 108, T3 + 4 = 59) from eight Japanese institutions. For three-dimensional-image-guided brachytherapy, intra-cavitary and interstitial brachytherapy was utilized in 33 patients (20%). The median follow-up was 26.6 months (interquartile range, 20-43.2). The maximum rectal D2 (75 Gy)/bladder D2 (90 Gy) constraints were deviated by 6%/10% and 10%/5% for T1 + 2 and T3 + 4, respectively. The 2-year incidence of ≥grade 3 proctitis/cystitis was 4%/1% for T1 + 2 and 10%/2% for T3 + 4. The 2-year local progression-free survival was 89% for T1 + 2 and 82% for T3 + 4. For T1 + 2, the 2-year local progression-free survival for the high-risk clinical target volume D90 ≥ 68 Gy (indicated by receiver operating characteristic analysis; area under the curve = 0.711) was 92% versus 67% for <68 Gy (log-rank; P = 0.019). Cox multivariate analysis indicated that the high-risk clinical target volume D90 was one of independent predictors of local failure (P = 0.0006). For T3 + 4, the 2-year local progression-free survival was 87% for the high-risk clinical target volume <82 cm3 (area under the curve = 0.67) and 43% for ≥82 cm3 (P = 0.0004). Only the high-risk clinical target volume was an independent predictor of local failure (P = 0.0024). CONCLUSIONS: Definitive radiotherapy consisting of external beam radiotherapy without central shielding and three-dimensional-image-guided brachytherapy was feasible for Japanese patients with cervical cancer. Dose de-escalation from the current global standards is suggested for patients with T1 + 2 disease.

Large volume was associated with increased risk of acute non-hematologic adverse events in the hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced uterine cervical cancer: preliminary results of prospective phase I/II clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: This is the preliminary results of a multi-center prospective clinical trial evaluating the feasibility of the hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS: Patients with FIGO stage IB2, IIA2, IIB, IIIA, IIIB and IVA uterine cervical cancer pretreatment width of which was ≥5 cm measured by MRI were eligible. Protocol therapy consisted of 30-30.6 Gy in 15-17 fractions of whole pelvic radiotherapy concurrent with weekly CDDP, followed by 24 Gy in 4 fractions of hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial and pelvic radiotherapy with central shield up to 50-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions. The primary endpoint of phase I part was that the rate of grade ≥ 3 acute non-hematologic adverse events related to hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial would be <10%. RESULTS: Between October 2015 and October 2019, 74 patients underwent primary registration, with 52 patients eventually proceeding to the secondary registration. The median pretreatment tumor width was 5.7 cm, and FIGO Stages were IB2 10, IIA2 2, IIB 20 and IIIB 20, respectively. The median high-risk clinical target volume D90 was 72.0 Gy (54.8-86.6 Gy, EQD2), rectum D2cc was 53.7 Gy (29.3-80.3 Gy) and bladder D2cc was 69.8 Gy (38.9-84.8 Gy). The rate of grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic adverse events related to hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial was 1.9% (1/52), and 17.3% (9/52) of patients experienced non-hematologic adverse events related to hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial of any grade. In multivariate analysis, high-risk clinical target volume ≥ 35 ml was associated with an increased risk of any grade of acute non-hematologic adverse events related to hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial (P = 0.036). CONCLUSION: The feasibility and reproducibility of hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial were demonstrated from a multi-center prospective clinical trial.

Intracardiac metastasis from unknown uterine cervical cancer with severe thrombocytopenia.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac metastasis is relatively common in malignant neoplasms, such as lung cancers, breast cancers, melanomas, lymphomas, and leukemias. In contrast, cardiac metastasis of uterine cervical cancer, solitary metastasis to the heart, and tumors inducing severe thrombocytopenia are rare. CASE REPORT: The present patient was a 52-year-old female who was diagnosed with a solitary cardiac tumor prior to uterine cervical cancer and presented with severe thrombocytopenia. Our case had two remarkable aspects: 1) successful treatment under the condition of severe thrombocytopenia in association with the presence of a cardiac tumor, and survival without recurrence of the carcinoma one year after surgery; and 2) a solitary cardiac metastatic tumor larger than the primary uterine cervix carcinoma. COMMENT: we report an extremely rare case of solitary cardiac metastasis of uterine cervical cancer, which wassuccessfully treated. One year after cardiac surgery, the patient is alive without recurrence of the carcinoma.

Institutional patient accrual volume and the treatment quality of I­125 prostate seed implantation in a Japanese nationwide prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: It is unclear whether experience at high-volume institute improves the treatment quality of prostate seed implantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of institutional experience on postimplant dosimetric parameters in a nationwide prospective cohort study. METHODS: From July 2005 to June 2007, 2354 patients were registered in the Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent I­125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS), and 1126 patients treated with seed implantation alone were evaluated. As a surrogate for institutional experience, we classified the J­POPS institutions as high-volume (patient accrual volume was ≥120 patients per institution) or low-volume institutions (patient accrual volume was <120 patients per institution). To compare treatment quality between institutions, we evaluated the postimplant dosimetric parameters including D90, V100/150 (prostatic dose parameters), UD5/90, U200 (urethral dose parameters), and rectum R100/150 (rectal dose parameters). RESULTS: In the 5 high-volume institutions (n = 601 patients), most of the patients were treated with >144 Gy of D90, whereas in the 20 low-volume institutions (n = 525) some of the patients were treated with <144 Gy. The V100 of most of the high-volume institution patients were >90%, whereas in the low-volume institutions a considerable percentage of patients showed lower V100. Although there was no correlation between D90 and rectal dose parameters, UD90 had a moderate positive correlation with D90 in both the high- and low-volume institutions. U200 varied more widely in the low-volume institutions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the institutional patient accrual volume is associated with the treatment quality of I­125 prostate seed implantation.

Nationwide Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS): first analysis on survival.

BACKGROUND: Investigating oncological outcomes in patients registered in the Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS) in terms of biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) by the Phoenix and the newly developed J-POPS definitions, exploration of predictive factors for bRFS, and preliminary verification of pitfalls of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure definitions. METHODS: Between July 2005 and June 2007, 2316 clinically localized patients underwent permanent seed implantation. The primary endpoint was bRFS. One of the secondary endpoints was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The median age was 69 and performance status was 0 in 99.1% of participants. The median biologically effective dose (BED) was about 180 Gy2. During a median follow-up of 60.0 months, 8.4 and 5.9% had PSA failure by the Phoenix and the J-POPS definitions, respectively. The 5-year bRFSs based on the Phoenix and the J-POPS definitions were 89.1 and 91.6%, respectively. The 5-year OS was 97.3%. According to multivariate analyses, only age affected bRFS based on the Phoenix definition, whereas the risk group and BED independently affected bRFS based on the J-POPS definition. A spontaneous PSA decrease was seen in 91.1% of participants after PSA failure based on the Phoenix definition alone, but in only 22.2% after PSA failure based on the J-POPS definition alone. CONCLUSION: The world's largest registration study, J-POPS, consisted of patients with longevity, and a highly quality-controlled BED resulted in excellent bRFS and OS. The high likelihood of PSA bounce by the Phoenix definition should be taken into account, especially in younger patients. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: NCT00534196.

Assessment of sexual function in Japanese men with prostate cancer undergoing permanent brachytherapy without androgen deprivation therapy: Analysis from the Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation database.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate male sexual function in Japanese prostate cancer patients undergoing permanent brachytherapy without endocrine treatment, using quality of life measures of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite. METHODS: A total of 482 patients were selected as analysis subjects from the nationwide database for the Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation. The patients were asked to complete the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaires before and at 3, 12, 24, and 36 months after the permanent brachytherapy. Changes in their responses were analyzed, and any association of the outcomes was investigated. Furthermore, changes over time in their answers to Q18 (usual quality of your erections) were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients (14.9%) had received external beam radiation. A total of 68 patients (14.1%) had taken any 5-phosphodiesterase inhibitor medications. Regarding Q18, 232 patients (48.2%) selected either "There was no sexual activity" or "There was no desire for erection" before receiving permanent brachytherapy. Of all the 482 patients, sexual function was preserved in 138 patients (28.7%) 3 years after permanent brachytherapy. Overall satisfaction has significantly improved without regard for the deterioration of sexual function. Significant factors for maintaining sexual activity were patient age and sexual activity before permanent brachytherapy. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese patients undergoing permanent brachytherapy alone for prostate cancer, the sexual function is not well preserved. However, decreased sexual function does not seem to represent a major factor determining patients' overall satisfaction. These findings might be peculiar to Japanese patients, in whom elderly subjects account for the majority.

Nationwide Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS).

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of brachytherapy with permanent iodine-125 seed implantation (PI) for prostate cancer. The nationwide Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS) has continued since July 2005. This manuscript presents the rationale, J-POPS study design, and the characteristics of initial participants enrolled in this study from July 2005 to June 2007. METHODS: All participants were treated with PI in accordance with the American Brachytherapy Society recommendations. The primary outcome measure was biochemical progression-free survival. Progression-free survival, overall survival, cause-specific survival, longitudinal changes in health-related quality of life, disease-specific quality of life, the International Prostate Symptom Score, and the incidence of adverse events were also investigated as secondary outcome measurements. RESULTS: Overall, 6,927 patients were enrolled by the end of 2010, that is approximately 40 % of all cases treated around the country. During the first 2 years, 2,354 participants were enrolled and 2,339 were actually treated with PI. The age range of participants was 45 to 89 years (median 69 years) and their risk classifications were 1,037 (44.3 %) at low risk, 1,126 (48.1 %) at intermediate risk, and 134 (5.7 %) at high risk, in addition to 16 participants whose classification was unknown. Of all patients, 76.6 % were treated with PI without external beam radiation therapy and 49.3 % received neoadjuvant hormone therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The J-POPS, a nationwide prospective cohort study that enrolled approximately 40 % of all PI cases in Japan, will provide highly reliable evidence, including outcomes and quality of life, after long-term follow-up.

Patterns of practice in the radiation therapy for bladder cancer: survey of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group (JROSG).

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze the clinical outcomes of radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy for bladder cancer in Japan. METHODS: A questionnaire-based survey of patients with pathologically proven bladder cancer treated by definitive radiation therapy between 2002 and 2006 was conducted by the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group, and the clinical records of 159 patients were collected from 17 institutions. Concurrent intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy and concurrent systemic chemoradiotherapy were administered in 51 and 33 patients, respectively. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival and bladder preservation rates were 48 and 39%, respectively. Eighty-nine (56%) patients developed recurrence (bladder, 48; regional lymph nodes, 4; distant sites, 41). The results of multivariate analysis revealed that adoption of chemotherapy was the only significant prognostic factor for overall survival (relative risk = 0.615 [95% confidence interval: 0.439-0.862], P = 0.005). The type of chemotherapy administered did not significantly affect the local control or overall survival rates. The actuarial 5-year overall survival rates and bladder preservation in the radiation therapy combined with intra-arterial chemotherapy group were 64 and 58%, respectively, and the corresponding rates in the radiation therapy combined with systemic chemotherapy group were 67 and 42%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey revealed the current status of practice of radiation therapy for bladder cancer in Japan. A multi-institutional prospective study is needed based on the results of this study to determine the optimal radiotherapeutic approach, including the need for concurrent chemotherapy and the appropriate chemotherapy regimen for invasive bladder cancer.

Five-year potency preservation after iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate long-term erectile function following prostate brachytherapy, based on patient characteristics and treatment factors. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2006, 665 men with localized prostate cancer were treated with (125)I permanent seed implantation. None was given adjuvant hormone therapy. Erectile function was assessed before treatment, and at 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after implantation using the Mount Sinai Erectile Function Score (MSEFS) of 0-3 (0 = no erections, 1 = erections insufficient for intercourse, 2 = suboptimal erections but sufficient for intercourse, 3 = normal erectile function). Potency was defined as score 2 or 3, and 382 men were potent before treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on the data from these 382 patients to identify variables associated with potency preservation. RESULTS: In patients who were potent before treatment, the actuarial potency preservation rate fell to 46.2 % at 6 months after brachytherapy, and then slowly recovered reaching 52.0 % at 5 years after brachytherapy. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, patient age (p = 0.04) and pre-treatment MSEFS (p < 0.001) were predictors of 5-year potency preservation. Neoadjuvant hormone therapy affected potency preservation only at 6 months after brachytherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Patient age at implantation and pre-treatment erectile function are predictive factors for the development of erectile dysfunction following prostate brachytherapy.

Trimodality Therapy With Iodine-125 Brachytherapy, External Beam Radiation Therapy, and Short- or Long-Term Androgen Deprivation Therapy for High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: Results of a Multicenter, Randomized Phase 3 Trial (TRIP/TRIGU0907).

PURPOSE: This phase 3 randomized investigation was designed to determine whether 30 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was superior to 6 months of ADT when combined with brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for localized high-risk prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study was conducted at 37 hospitals on men aged 40 to 79 years, with stage T2c-3a, prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/mL, or Gleason score >7, who received 6 months of ADT combined with iodine-125 brachytherapy followed by EBRT. After stratification, patients were randomly assigned to either no further treatment (short arm) or 24 months of adjuvant ADT (long arm). According to the Phoenix definition of failure, the primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of biochemical progression. Secondary endpoints included clinical progression, metastasis, salvage treatment, disease-specific mortality, overall survival, and grade 3+ adverse events. An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted using survival estimates determined using competing risk analyses. RESULTS: Of 332 patients, 165 and 167 were randomly assigned to the short and long arms, respectively. The median follow-up period was 9.2 years. The cumulative incidence of biochemical progression at 7 years was 9.0% (95% CI, 5.5-14.5) and 8.0% (4.7-13.5) in the short and long arms, respectively (P = .65). The outcomes of secondary endpoints did not differ significantly between the arms. Incidence rates of endocrine- and radiation-related grade 3+ adverse events for the short versus long arms were 0.6 versus 1.8% (P = .62) and 1.2 versus 0.6% (P = .62), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both treatment arms showed similar efficacy among selected populations with high-risk features. The toxicity of the trimodal therapy was acceptable. The present investigation, designed as a superiority trial, failed to demonstrate that 30-month ADT yielded better biochemical control than 6-month ADT when combined with brachytherapy and EBRT. Therefore, a noninferiority study is warranted to obtain further evidence supporting these preliminary results.

Quality of palliative radiotherapy assessed using quality indicators: a multicenter survey†.

We sought to identify potential evidence-practice gaps in palliative radiotherapy using quality indicators (QIs), previously developed using a modified Delphi method. Seven QIs were used to assess the quality of radiotherapy for bone metastases (BoM) and brain metastases (BrM). Compliance rate was calculated as the percentage of patients for whom recommended medical care was conducted. Random effects models were used to estimate the pooled compliance rates. Of the 39 invited radiation oncologists, 29 (74%) from 29 centers participated in the survey; 13 (45%) were academic and 16 (55%) were non-academic hospitals. For the QIs, except for BoM-4, the pooled compliance rates were higher than 80%; however, for at least some of the centers, the compliance rate was lower than these pooled rates. For BoM-4 regarding steroid use concurrent with radiotherapy for malignant spinal cord compression, the pooled compliance rate was as low as 32%. For BoM-1 regarding the choice of radiation schedule, the compliance rate was higher in academic hospitals than in non-academic hospitals (P = 0.021). For BrM-3 regarding the initiation of radiotherapy without delay, the compliance rate was lower in academic hospitals than in non-academic hospitals (P = 0.016). In conclusion, overall, compliance rates were high; however, for many QIs, practice remains to be improved in at least some centers. Steroids are infrequently used concurrently with radiotherapy for malignant spinal cord compression.

Diffusion pattern of low dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer in Japan.

Permanent implant brachytherapy for prostate cancer using iodine-125 seeds was adopted in Japan in 2003. Here, we report on the diffusion pattern of this treatment in Japan since 2003. We examined the annual numbers of prostate cancer patients per hospital in Japan, who were treated with iodine-125 seed implant brachytherapy with or without external beam radiation therapy between 2003 and 2011. The hospitals were excluded from the count if brachytherapy was begun in a hospital within the given year, and thus was only available for part of the year. In 2004, 269 patients were treated by brachytherapy at only two hospitals. However, the numbers increased rapidly. A total of 1412 patients were treated at 23 hospitals in 2005, 2783 patients were treated at 83 hospitals in 2008, and 3793 patients were treated at 109 hospitals in 2011. The mean/median numbers of patients treated per hospital were 61.4/42 in 2005, 33.5/25 in 2008, and 35.0/24 in 2011. The number of hospitals where 24 or fewer patients were treated in a year increased. On the other hand, the number of hospitals with a volume of >48 patients per year was stable. Because a relationship between provider volume and outcomes following oncological procedures was shown, a careful evaluation of the effectiveness of permanent implant brachytherapy for prostate cancer is needed.

Comparison of preplanning and intraoperative planning for I-125 prostate brachytherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare two widely used permanent prostate brachytherapy techniques, preplanning and intraoperative planning, based on postimplant dosimetry, toxicity and biochemical outcomes. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2006, 665 men with localized prostate cancer were treated with permanent interstitial implantation. The first 227 consecutive men were treated with the preplanning technique, followed by 438 men treated with the intraoperative technique. Late toxicity was scored by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.4.0. Biochemical failure was defined as a prostate-specific antigen increase of more than 2 ng/ml above the nadir value excluding a benign bounce. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the variables associated with biochemical failure-free survival. RESULTS: Postimplant target coverage was similar in the two groups, with a small difference in risk organ doses. Mean V100 was 96.3 vs. 96.7% (P = 0.205), D90 was 119.6 vs. 119.4% (P = 0.884), urethral D10 was 157.5 vs. 146.1% (P = 0.010), rectal V100 was 0.57 vs. 0.43 cc (P = 0.002) in the preplanning and intraoperative planning groups, respectively. Acute and late Grade 3 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were <1% for both methods. The 5-year biochemical failure-free survival rate was 95.4% for the preplanning and 94.0% for the intraoperative planning group (P = 0.776). Multivariate analysis revealed Gleason score, biopsy positive rate and V100 to be predictors of biochemical failure-free survival, while the planning technique was not significant. CONCLUSION: This large-scale analysis of high-quality implants revealed similar postimplant dosimetry, toxicity profiles and biochemical failure-free survival for the preplanning and intraoperative planning methods.

Biochemical outcomes and toxicities in young men with prostate cancer after permanent iodine-125 seed implantation: Prospective cohort study in 6662 patients.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the effect of age, <60 and ≥60 years, on biochemical outcomes and toxicities in patients with prostate cancer who underwent permanent seed implantation (PI) ± external beam radiation therapy ± hormone therapy in a national Japanese prospective cohort study (J-POPS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The safety and efficacy analyses included 6721 and 6662 patients, respectively. We categorized patients into two age groups: <60 (n = 716) and ≥60 (n = 6,005) years. We used propensity score matching (PSM) to estimate the marginal effect of age on biochemical freedom from failure (bFFF) using a Phoenix definition and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: The median followup period was 60.0 months. Without PSM, men <60 years demonstrated similar 5-year bFFF (96.3%) compared with men ≥60 years (95.6%; p = 0.576); percent positive biopsies, biologically effective dose, Gleason score, risk classification, and supplemental external beam radiation therapy (p <0.001, <0.001, <0.001, 0.008, and <0.001) were significantly associated with bFFF while age was not (p = 0.576). With PSM, bFFF was not significantly different between age groups (p = 0.664); however, men <60 years showed a significantly lower incidence of declining erectile function, grade ≥2 all urinary toxicities, urinary frequency/urgency, and rectal bleeding (p <0.001, 0.024, 0.031, and 0.010) than men ≥60 years. CONCLUSIONS: After PI, men <60 years achieved a comparable 5-year biochemical control rate and showed a lower incidence of several toxicities compared to men ≥60 years. This suggests that PI should be an excellent treatment option for men <60 years with prostate cancer.

The prognosis of patients with prostate cancer receiving permanent seed implantation stratified by prostate volume: Should we be reluctant to treat with brachytherapy because of a very small prostate (<15 cc)?

PURPOSE: We evaluated the treatment outcomes of different prostate volumes (PVs), <15 cc, 15-20 cc, and > 20 cc, in patients with prostate cancer who underwent permanent seed implantation (PI) ± external beam radiation therapy ± hormone therapy in a national Japanese prospective cohort study (J-POPS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Of the 6721 patients in J-POPS from 2005 to 2011, 6652 were included in the analysis population. We categorized the patients into the following three PV groups: <15 cc, 15-20 cc, and > 20 cc. We evaluated the effect of PV on biochemical freedom from failure (bFFF), prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and all-cause mortality (ACM) using the Phoenix definition and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 60.0 months. Patients in each PV group was 491 (7.4%), 1118 (16.8%), and 5043 (75.8%), respectively. No difference was observed in bFFF (94.7%, 96.2%, and 95.7%, p = 0.407), PCSM (99.8%, 99.7%, and 99.8%, p = 0.682), and ACM (98.2%, 96.7%, and 97.2%, p = 0.119) at 5 years for each PV group. In univariate and multivariate analyses, PV was not associated with bFFF, PCSM, ACM, or grade 2 toxicity. The percentage of positive biopsies was the single most significant predictor for all treatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results obtained by analyzing a very large Japanese prospective database showed no difference in treatment outcomes according to PV (<15 cc, 15-20 cc, and ˃20 cc). Our study confirmed that PI in small prostates (even < 15 cc) remains an effective treatment option.

Evaluation of dose perturbations around iodine-125 seed sources in supplemental external beam prostate radiotherapy.

We investigated dose perturbations caused by 125I seeds in patients undergoing supplemental external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer. We examined two types of nonradioactive seed models: model 6711 and model STM1251. All experiments were performed using a water-equivalent phantom. Radiochromic film was used to measure the dose distributions adjacent to the seeds upstream and downstream of the external beam source. Single and clusters of multiple seeds were placed in slots in a solid water (SW) slab to measure dose perturbations with separate versus dense seed placement at beam energies of 6 or 10 MV. Monte Carlo simulations (MCSs) were also performed to include the theoretical basis against film dosimetry. Distinct patterns of dose enhancement (buildup [BU]) were upstream, and dose reduction (builddown [BD]) were downstream of the radiation source. Model 6711 with lower photon beam energies produced larger dose perturbations of BU and BD than the model STM1251. The results showed the same tendency with different seed placements and beam energies. However, these differences were not observed in the rotational irradiation measurement, which replicated a clinical plan. Dose perturbations around seeds result in dose enhancement and dose reduction with varying impact depending on the photon beam energy and seed type. This has the potential to cancel out these perturbations using multiple beam direction fields.

Pain Response Rates After Conventional Radiation Therapy for Bone Metastases Assessed Using International Consensus Pain Response Endpoints: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Initial Radiation Therapy and Reirradiation.

Previous meta-analysis of conventional radiation therapy for painful bone metastases showed overall response (OR) rates of 72% to 75% (evaluable patients), 61% to 62% (intent-to-treat patients) for initial radiation therapy, and 68% for reirradiation (evaluable patients). However, the definition of pain response differed among the studies included. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the pain response rates assessed by the International Consensus Pain Response Endpoints (ICPRE) for both initial radiation therapy and reirradiation. The PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for articles published between 2002 and 2021. The inclusion criteria were (1) prospective studies or studies based on prospectively collected data and (2) studies in which pain response was assessed using ICPRE. Our primary outcomes of interest were the OR rates (sum of the complete and partial response rates) for both initial radiation therapy and reirradiation. Of the 6470 articles identified in our database search, 32 and 3 met the inclusion criteria for the analysis of initial radiation therapy and reirradiation, respectively. The OR rates of initial radiation therapy in evaluable patients (n = 4775) and intent-to-treat patients (n = 6775) were 60.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55.2-65.4) and 45.4% (95% CI, 38.7-52.4), respectively. The OR rates of reirradiation in evaluable patients (n = 733) and intent-to-treat patients (n = 1085) were 70.8% (95% CI, 15.7-96.9) and 62.2% (95% CI, 5.3-98.0), respectively. Subgroup analyses of initial radiation therapy including the comparison of randomized and nonrandomized studies showed no significant differences in any comparison, indicating similar response rates across different study designs. For initial radiation therapy, we determined the ICPRE-assessed response rates, which were lower than previously reported. The OR and complete response rates should be benchmarks for future randomized and nonrandomized studies. For reirradiation, the wide CIs demonstrate that the response rates based on ICPRE require further investigation.

Current status and issues with the dosimetric assay of iodine-125 seed sources at medical facilities in Japan: a questionnaire-based survey†.

In conducting dosimetric assays of seed sources containing iodine-125 (125I), several major guidelines require the medical physicist to verify the source strength before patient treatment. Japanese guidelines do not mandate dosimetric assays at medical facilities, but since 2017, three incidents have occurred in Japan wherein seeds with incorrect strengths were delivered to medical facilities. Therefore, this study aimed to survey the current situation and any barriers to conducting the dosimetric assay of iodine-125 seeds at medical facilities in Japan. We conducted a questionnaire-based survey from December 2020 to April 2021, to examine whether seed assay and verification of the number of seeds delivered were being performed. We found that only 9 facilities (16%) performed seed assay and 28 (52%) verified the number of seeds. None of the facilities used an assay method that ensured traceability. The reasons for not performing an assay were divided into two categories: lack of resources and legal issues. Lack of resources included lack of instruments, lack of knowledge of assay methods, shorthand, or all of the above, whereas legal issues included the inability to resterilize iodine-125 seeds distributed in Japan and/or purchase seeds dedicated to the assay. Dosimetric assays, including simple methods, are effective in detecting calibration date errors and non-radioactive seeds. The study findings suggest that familiarization of medical personnel with these assay methods and investigation of the associated costs of labor and equipment should be recommended, as these measures will lead to medical reimbursement for quality assurance.

[Technical Report: Quality Assurance for 125I Seed Sources in Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy].

This technical report provides useful information on the current status and issues of quality control in 125I seed source strength measurement for Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy in Japan.With the spread of 125I seed brachytherapy, the traceability of source strength measurements with the single-seed assay was established in Japan. This allows medical facilities to measure reference air kerma rate of 125I seeds with their own well-type of ionization chamber. However, it is difficult to maintain the traceability chain because the 125I reference air kerma rate standards have been hardly utilized by medical facilities so far. Meanwhile, some serious incidents of contamination of the different source strengths and dead seeds were reported in Japan.To address the specific issues in Japan, JASTRO Brachytherapy Subcommittee established a working group (WG) in 2021. The goal of this WG is to investigate the management methods of source strength measurement used in medical facilities, and to discuss the ideal and practicable methods of source management such as verifying the number of seeds and source strength. Initially, a questionnaire survey was conducted to facilities offering 125I seed brachytherapy in Japan. Sixty-seven out of 95 facilities responded (response rate 70.5%). This survey revealed that 41% of facilities did not perform either confirmation of the number of seeds or measurement of source strength. There are several reasons why the source strength was not measured in those facilities. For example, 125I seeds are provided under the sterilized conditions; quality assurance by source suppliers is reliable; and there is not sufficient staff.The single-seed assay is regarded as an internationally standardized and the most reliable measurement method. Therefore, it is an essential measurement technique to ensure traceability of source strength measurements. However, our survey found that most Japanese facilities do not perform single-seed assays. Meanwhile, some facilities have performed batch assay as an alternative method, in which all of the multiple sources in a batch are measured while loaded into sterilized cartridges. Although the measurement by the batch assay is less accurate than the one by the single-seeded assay, the batch assay does not require re-sterilization of the source and can be performed quickly. It might be useful to detect unexpected errors such as differences in the number of sources and abnormalities in source strength.In this report, we will introduce several methods of source strength measurement that have been implemented in medical facilities. The quality assurance of 125I seed sources in prostate interstitial brachytherapy should be provided not only by the source suppliers but also by the medical facilities that use sources to treat patients. We hope that medical facilities will refer to this technical report and use it as an aid to quality assurance in their own facilities.