A Review of Clinical Data on Salvage Therapy in Spinal Cord Stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Since its introduction in 1967, neuromodulation through spinal cord stimulation (SCS) or dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGs) has advanced significantly in both the technology and indications for use. There are now over 14,000 SCS implants performed worldwide every year. This review focuses on mechanisms behind the loss of efficacy in neuromodulation and current data on salvage therapy, defined as the conversion of a neuromodulation device to an alternative SCS or DRG stimulation, in the event of loss of efficacy or failure of a trial. STUDY DESIGN: A narrative review of clinical studies regarding habituation, explant data, and salvage therapy with SCS. METHODS: Available literature was reviewed on spinal cord stimulation technology and salvage therapy. Data sources included relevant literature identified through searches of PubMed, MEDLINE/OVID, SCOPUS, and manual searches of the bibliographies of known primary and review articles. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were to understand the mechanisms of loss of efficacy, provide a review of explants due to failure in treatment, and summarize the data on current salvage therapy in SCS. RESULTS: A total of eight studies and four abstracts/poster presentations were identified and reviewed. Of the eight studies, only one was a randomized controlled trial. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence for the appropriate treatment alternatives, but from data currently available the conversion from conventional tonic stimulation to burst, high frequency (10 kHz), multiple wave forms, and/or DRGs may be appropriate in select patients and will require further research to determine the most appropriate first line salvage in the context of the underlying pain pathology.

Efficacy and tolerability of oral morphine versus oxycodone/acetaminophen for analgesia in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: Oxycodone/acetaminophen is one of the most commonly prescribed medications for pain management in the emergency department (ED) despite its high abuse liability. Our objective was to determine whether oral immediate-release morphine is as effective and well tolerated as oral oxycodone/acetaminophen for pain relief in stable ED patients. DESIGN: This is a prospective comparative study in which stable adult patients with acute painful conditions who had either oral morphine (15 or 30 mg) or oxycodone/acetaminophen (5/325 mg or 10/650 mg) ordered for them at the discretion of a triage physician were recruited. SETTING: This study took place in an urban, academic ED from 2016 to 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-three percent of the subjects were between the ages of 18 and 59, 57 percent were female, and 85 percent were African American. Most presented with abdominal, extremity, or back pain. Patient characteristics were similar between treatment groups. INTERVENTIONS: Of the 364 enrolled patients, 182 were given oral morphine and 182 were given oxycodone/acetaminophen at the discretion of the triage provider. They were asked to rate their pain score prior to receiving analgesia and at 60 and 90 minutes after administration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We examined pain scores, adverse effects, overall satisfaction, willingness to accept the same treatment again, and the need for additional analgesia. RESULTS: There was no difference in satisfaction reported by patients who received morphine versus oxycodone/acetaminophen: 15.9 percent vs 16.5 percent were very satisfied, 31.9 percent vs 26.4 percent were somewhat satisfied, and 23.6 percent vs 22.5 percent were not satisfied, p = 0.56. Secondary outcomes also showed no significant difference: net change in pain score -2 vs -2 at 60 and 90 minutes, p = 0.91 and p = 0.72, respectively; adverse effects 20.9 percent vs 19.2 percent, p = 0.69; need for further analgesia 9.3 percent vs 7.1 percent, p = 0.44; willingness to accept analgesic again 73.1 percent vs 78.6 percent, p = 0.22. CONCLUSIONS: Oral morphine is a feasible alternative to oxycodone/acetaminophen for analgesia in the ED.

The Use of Radiofrequency in the Treatment of Pelvic Pain.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a procedure in which radio waves are used to destroy abnormal or dysfunctional tissue. It has been an increasingly utilized treatment option for a variety of medical conditions, such as chronic pain, wherein sensory nerves are targeted and ablated, eliminating their ability to transmit pain signals to the brain. There is a lack of clarity regarding the indications, technique, and efficacy of RFA for chronic pelvic pain. This article reviews recent literature and discusses these topics, including adverse events for different pelvic ablation and pulsed radiofrequency treatment of chronic pelvic pain.