RESUMO
Colonization of the upper respiratory tract by pneumococcus is important both as a determinant of disease and for transmission into the population. The immunological mechanisms that contain pneumococcus during colonization are well studied in mice but remain unclear in humans. Loss of this control of pneumococcus following infection with influenza virus is associated with secondary bacterial pneumonia. We used a human challenge model with type 6B pneumococcus to show that acquisition of pneumococcus induced early degranulation of resident neutrophils and recruitment of monocytes to the nose. Monocyte function was associated with the clearance of pneumococcus. Prior nasal infection with live attenuated influenza virus induced inflammation, impaired innate immune function and altered genome-wide nasal gene responses to the carriage of pneumococcus. Levels of the cytokine CXCL10, promoted by viral infection, at the time pneumococcus was encountered were positively associated with bacterial load.
Assuntos
Coinfecção/imunologia , Influenza Humana/imunologia , Mucosa Nasal/imunologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/imunologia , Quimiocina CXCL10/imunologia , Quimiotaxia de Leucócito/imunologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Imunidade Inata/imunologia , Inflamação/imunologia , Monócitos/imunologia , Neutrófilos/imunologia , Streptococcus pneumoniaeRESUMO
Rationale: Pneumococcal colonization is key to the pathogenesis of invasive disease but is also immunogenic in young adults, protecting against recolonization. Colonization is rarely detected in older adults, despite high rates of pneumococcal disease.Objectives: To establish experimental human pneumococcal colonization in healthy adults aged 50-84 years, to measure the immune response to pneumococcal challenge, and to assess the protective effect of prior colonization against autologous strain rechallenge.Methods: Sixty-four participants were inoculated with Streptococcus pneumoniae (serotype 6B; 80,000 cfu in each nostril). Colonization was determined by bacterial culture of nasal wash, and humoral immune responses were assessed by anticapsular and antiprotein IgG concentrations.Measurements and Main Results: Experimental colonization was established in 39% of participants (25/64) with no adverse events. Colonization occurred in 47% (9/19) of participants aged 50-59 compared with 21% (3/14) in those aged ≥70 years. Previous pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination did not protect against colonization. Colonization did not confer serotype-specific immune boosting, with a geometric mean titer (95% confidence interval) of 2.7 µg/ml (1.9-3.8) before the challenge versus 3.0 (1.9-4.7) 4 weeks after colonization (P = 0.53). Furthermore, pneumococcal challenge without colonization led to a drop in specific antibody concentrations from 2.8 µg/ml (2.0-3.9) to 2.2 µg/ml (1.6-3.0) after the challenge (P = 0.006). Antiprotein antibody concentrations increased after successful colonization. Rechallenge with the same strain after a median of 8.5 months (interquartile range, 6.7-10.1) led to recolonization in 5/16 (31%).Conclusions: In older adults, experimental pneumococcal colonization is feasible and safe but demonstrates different immunological outcomes compared with younger adults in previous studies.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Antibacterianos/imunologia , Portador Sadio/imunologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/imunologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/imunologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Infecções Assintomáticas , Técnicas de Cultura , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Imunidade Humoral/imunologia , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cavidade Nasal , Líquido da Lavagem Nasal , Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Rationale: Pneumococcal pneumonia remains a global health problem. Colonization of the nasopharynx with Streptococcus pneumoniae (Spn), although a prerequisite of infection, is the main source of exposure and immunological boosting in children and adults. However, our knowledge of how nasal colonization impacts on the lung cells, especially on the predominant alveolar macrophage (AM) population, is limited.Objectives: Using a controlled human infection model to achieve nasal colonization with 6B serotype, we investigated the effect of Spn colonization on lung cells.Methods: We collected BAL from healthy pneumococcal-challenged participants aged 18-49 years. Confocal microscopy and molecular and classical microbiology were used to investigate microaspiration and pneumococcal presence in the lower airways. AM opsonophagocytic capacity was assessed by functional assays in vitro, whereas flow cytometry and transcriptomic analysis were used to assess further changes on the lung cellular populations.Measurements and Main Results: AMs from Spn-colonized individuals exhibited increased opsonophagocytosis to pneumococcus (11.4% median increase) for approximately 3 months after experimental pneumococcal colonization. AMs also had increased responses against other bacterial pathogens. Pneumococcal DNA detected in the BAL samples of Spn-colonized individuals were positively correlated with nasal pneumococcal density (r = 0.71; P = 0.029). Similarly, AM-heightened opsonophagocytic capacity was correlated with nasopharyngeal pneumococcal density (r = 0.61, P = 0.025).Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that nasal colonization with pneumococcus and microaspiration prime AMs, leading to brisker responsiveness to both pneumococcus and unrelated bacterial pathogens. The relative abundance of AMs in the alveolar spaces, alongside their potential for nonspecific protection, render them an attractive target for novel vaccines.
Assuntos
Macrófagos Alveolares/imunologia , Nasofaringe/microbiologia , Nariz/microbiologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Adolescente , Adulto , Bactérias/imunologia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aspiração Respiratória , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Pneumococcal colonization is rarely studied in adults, except as part of family surveys. We report the outcomes of colonization screening in healthy adults (all were nonsmokers without major comorbidities or contact with children aged <5 years) who had volunteered to take part in clinical research. Using nasal wash culture, we detected colonization in 6.5% of volunteers (52 of 795). Serotype 3 was the commonest serotype (10 of 52 isolates). The majority of the remaining serotypes (35 of 52 isolates) were nonvaccine serotypes, but we also identified persistent circulation of serotypes 19A and 19F. Resistance to at least 1 of 6 antibiotics tested was found in 8 of 52 isolates.
Assuntos
Infecções Pneumocócicas/imunologia , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/imunologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/imunologia , Vacinas Conjugadas/imunologia , Adulto , Antibacterianos/imunologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/imunologia , Feminino , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Masculino , Sorogrupo , Reino Unido , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Asthma and pneumonia are common respiratory conditions globally, affecting individuals of all ages. Streptococcus pneumoniae is the predominant bacterial cause of pneumonia, with nasopharyngeal carriage an important step towards invasive and pulmonary disease. Vaccines provide individual protection, and also prevent nasopharyngeal carriage, providing herd immunity. Asthma is associated with an increased risk of pneumonia, but there is limited information on the underlying mechanism of this predisposition. Both asthma and its treatment may conceivably alter propensity to, and density of, carriage through an altered epithelial microenvironment driven by disease-related inflammation or treatment-related immunomodulation, for example with inhaled corticosteroids. The relative importance of these factors could impact the efficacy of vaccines in this vulnerable patient population. In this review, we summarize the evidence for an increased risk of pneumonia in asthma, and discuss factors affecting nasopharyngeal carriage in the context of current guidelines for pneumococcal vaccination.
Assuntos
Asma/fisiopatologia , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Suscetibilidade a Doenças/epidemiologia , Nasofaringe/microbiologia , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/epidemiologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Suscetibilidade a Doenças/microbiologia , Humanos , Vacinas Pneumocócicas , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Risco , VacinaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Broncho alveolar lavage (BAL) is widely used for investigative research to study innate, cellular and humoral immune responses, and in early phase drug trials. Conventional (multiple use) flexible bronchoscopes have time and monetary costs associated with cleaning, and carries a small risk of cross infection. Single use bronchoscopes may provide an alternative, but have not been evaluated in this context. METHODS: Healthy volunteers underwent bronchoscopy at a day-case clinical research unit using the Ambu® aScopeTM single-use flexible intubation bronchoscope. Broncho alveolar lavage was performed from a sub segmental bronchus within the right middle lobe; a total of 200 ml of warmed normal saline was instilled then aspirated using handheld suction. BAL volume yield, cell yield and viability were recorded. RESULTS: Ten volunteers, (mean age 23 years, six male) participated. Bronchoscopies were carried out by one of two senior bronchoscopists, experienced in the technique of obtaining BAL for research purposes. The results were compared to 50 (mean age 23, 14 male) procedures performed using the conventional scope by the same two bronchoscopists. The total volume yield was significantly higher in the disposable group median 152 ml (IQR 141-166 ml) as compared to conventional 124 ml (110-135 ml), p = <0.01. The total cell yield and viability were similar in both groups, with no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: With single use bronchoscopes, we achieved a larger BAL volume yield than conventional bronchoscopes, with comparable cell yield and viability. Better volume yields can potentially reduce post procedure side effects such as pleuritic chest pain and cough. The risk of cross infection can be eliminated, providing reassurance to researchers and participants. Reduced maintenance requirements can be cost effective. These could potentially be used for early phase drug development studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered prospectively in July 2015 with the National Clinical Trials register, with the following registration number assigned: NCT 02515591 .
Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/instrumentação , Lavagem Broncoalveolar/instrumentação , Broncoscópios , Adulto , Líquido da Lavagem Broncoalveolar/citologia , Sobrevivência Celular , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Equipamentos Descartáveis , Equipamentos Médicos Duráveis , Feminino , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Mãos/microbiologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/transmissão , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Líquido da Lavagem Nasal/microbiologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/genética , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Experimental Human Pneumococcal Challenge (EHPC) involves the controlled exposure of adults to a specific antibiotic-sensitive Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype, to induce nasopharyngeal colonisation for the purpose of vaccine research. The aims are to review comprehensively the safety profile of EHPC, explore the association between pneumococcal colonisation and frequency of safety review and describe the medical intervention required to undertake such studies. METHODS: A single-centre review of all EHPC studies performed 2011-2021. All recorded serious adverse events (SAE) in eligible studies are reported. An unblinded meta-analysis of collated anonymised individual patient data from eligible EHPC studies was undertaken to assess the association between experimental pneumococcal colonisation and the frequency of safety events following inoculation. RESULTS: In 1416 individuals (median age 21, IQR 20-25), 1663 experimental pneumococcal inoculations were performed. No pneumococcal-related SAE have occurred. 214 safety review events were identified with 182 (12.85%) participants presenting with symptoms potentially in keeping with pneumococcal infection, predominantly in pneumococcal colonised individuals (colonised = 96/658, non-colonised = 86/1005, OR 1.81 (95% CI 1.28-2.56, P = <0.001). The majority were mild (pneumococcal group = 72.7% [120/165 reported symptoms], non-pneumococcal = 86.7% [124/143 reported symptoms]). 1.6% (23/1416) required antibiotics for safety. DISCUSSION: No SAEs were identified directly relating to pneumococcal inoculation. Safety review for symptoms was infrequent but occurred more in experimentally colonised participants. Most symptoms were mild and resolved with conservative management. A small minority required antibiotics, notably those serotype 3 inoculated. CONCLUSION: Outpatient human pneumococcal challenge can be conducted safely with appropriate levels of safety monitoring procedures in place.
Assuntos
Infecções Pneumocócicas , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Adulto , Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/efeitos adversos , Nasofaringe , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Influenza virus infections affect millions of people annually, and current available vaccines provide varying rates of protection. However, the way in which the nasal microbiota, particularly established pneumococcal colonization, shape the response to influenza vaccination is not yet fully understood. In this study, we inoculated healthy adults with live Streptococcus pneumoniae and vaccinated them 3 days later with either tetravalent-inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) or live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV). Vaccine-induced immune responses were assessed in nose, blood, and lung. Nasal pneumococcal colonization had no impact upon TIV-induced antibody responses to influenza, which manifested in all compartments. However, experimentally induced pneumococcal colonization dampened LAIV-mediated mucosal antibody responses, primarily IgA in the nose and IgG in the lung. Pulmonary influenza-specific cellular responses were more apparent in the LAIV group compared with either the TIV or an unvaccinated group. These results indicate that TIV and LAIV elicit differential immunity to adults and that LAIV immunogenicity is diminished by the nasal presence of S. pneumoniae. Therefore, nasopharyngeal pneumococcal colonization may affect LAIV efficacy.
Assuntos
Imunidade nas Mucosas , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/imunologia , Vacinas Atenuadas/imunologia , Imunidade Adaptativa , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Linfócitos T CD4-Positivos , Linfócitos T CD8-Positivos , Citocinas , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina A/imunologia , Influenza Humana/imunologia , Pulmão/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nasofaringe/imunologia , Infecções por Orthomyxoviridae/prevenção & controle , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Colonization of the upper respiratory tract with Streptococcus pneumoniae is the precursor of pneumococcal pneumonia and invasive disease. Following exposure, however, it is unclear which human immune mechanisms determine whether a pathogen will colonize. We used a human challenge model to investigate host-pathogen interactions in the first hours and days following intranasal exposure to Streptococcus pneumoniae Using a novel home sampling method, we measured early immune responses and bacterial density dynamics in the nose and saliva after volunteers were experimentally exposed to pneumococcus. Here, we show that nasal colonization can take up to 24 h to become established. Also, the following two distinct bacterial clearance profiles were associated with protection: nasal clearers with immediate clearance of bacteria in the nose by the activity of pre-existent mucosal neutrophils and saliva clearers with detectable pneumococcus in saliva at 1 h post challenge and delayed clearance mediated by an inflammatory response and increased neutrophil activity 24 h post bacterial encounter. This study describes, for the first time, how colonization with a bacterium is established in humans, signifying that the correlates of protection against pneumococcal colonization, which can be used to inform design and testing of novel vaccine candidates, could be valid for subsets of protected individuals.IMPORTANCE Occurrence of lower respiratory tract infections requires prior colonization of the upper respiratory tract with a pathogen. Most bacterial infection and colonization studies have been performed in murine and in vitro models due to the current invasive sampling methodology of the upper respiratory tract, both of which poorly reflect the complexity of host-pathogen interactions in the human nose. Self-collecting saliva and nasal lining fluid at home is a fast, low-cost, noninvasive, high-frequency sampling platform for continuous monitoring of bacterial encounter at defined time points relative to exposure. Our study demonstrates for the first time that, in humans, there are distinct profiles of pneumococcal colonization kinetics, distinguished by speed of appearance in saliva, local phagocytic function, and acute mucosal inflammatory responses, which may either recruit or activate neutrophils. These data are important for the design and testing of novel vaccine candidates.
Assuntos
Infecções Pneumocócicas/microbiologia , Sistema Respiratório/microbiologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Streptococcus pneumoniae/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Animais , Citocinas , Interações Hospedeiro-Patógeno , Humanos , Cinética , Camundongos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neutrófilos , Nariz/microbiologia , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/imunologia , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/imunologia , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/microbiologia , Sistema Respiratório/imunologia , Saliva/microbiologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/genética , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nasopharyngeal colonisation by S. pneumoniae is a prerequisite for invasive pneumococcal infections. Influenza co-infection leads to increased susceptibility to secondary pneumonia and mortality during influenza epidemics. Increased bacterial load and impaired immune responses to pneumococcus caused by influenza play a role in this increased susceptibility. Using an Experimental Human Challenge Model and influenza vaccines, we examined symptoms experienced by healthy adults during nasal co-infection with S. pneumoniae and live attenuated influenza virus. METHODS: Randomised, blinded administration of Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine (LAIV) or Tetravalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (TIV) either preceded bacterial inoculation or followed it, separated by a 3-day interval. The presence and density of S. pneumoniae was determined from nasal washes. Participants completed a symptom questionnaire from the first intervention until 6 days post second intervention. RESULTS: The timing and type of influenza vaccination and presence of S. pneumoniae in the nasopharynx significantly affected symptom reporting. In the study where influenza vaccination preceded bacterial inoculation: nasal symptoms were less common in the LAIV group than the TIV group (OR 0.57, p < 0.01); with colonisation status only affecting the TIV group where more symptoms were reported by colonised participants compared to non-colonised participants following inoculation (n = 12/23 [52.17%] vs n = 13/38 [34.21%], respectively; p < 0.05). In the study where influenza vaccination followed bacterial inoculation: no difference was seen in the symptoms reported between the LAIV and TIV groups following inoculation and subsequent vaccination; and symptoms were unaffected by colonisation status. CONCLUSION: Symptoms experienced during live viral vaccination and bacterial co-infection in the nasopharynx are directly affected by the precedence of the pathogen acquisition. Symptoms were directly affected by nasal pneumococcal colonisation but only when TIV was given prior to bacterial exposure.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana , Nasofaringe/microbiologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/patogenicidade , Adulto , Coinfecção/microbiologia , Coinfecção/virologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza/classificação , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Tempo , Vacinação , Vacinas Atenuadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/administração & dosagemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Asthma attacks are common and have significant physical, psychological, and financial consequences. Improving the assessment of a child's risk of subsequent asthma attacks could support front-line clinicians' decisions on augmenting chronic treatment or specialist referral. We aimed to identify predictors for emergency department (ED) or hospital readmission for asthma from the published literature. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, PsycINFO, and CINAHL with no language, location, or time restrictions. We retrieved observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCT) assessing factors (personal and family history, and biomarkers) associated with the risk of ED re-attendance or hospital readmission for acute childhood asthma. RESULTS: Three RCTs and 33 observational studies were included, 31 from Anglophone countries and none from Asia or Africa. There was an unclear or high risk of bias in 14 of the studies, including 2 of the RCTs. Previous history of emergency or hospital admissions for asthma, younger age, African-American ethnicity, and low socioeconomic status increased risk of subsequent ED and hospital readmissions for acute asthma. Female sex and concomitant allergic diseases also predicted hospital readmission. CONCLUSION: Despite the global importance of this issue, there are relatively few high quality studies or studies from outside North America. Factors other than symptoms are associated with the risk of emergency re-attendance for acute asthma among children. Further research is required to better quantify the risk of future attacks and to assess the role of commonly used biomarkers.
Assuntos
Asma/terapia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , América do Norte , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fatores de Risco , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The morbidity and mortality related to respiratory tract diseases is enormous, with hundreds of millions of individuals afflicted and four million people dying each year. Understanding the immunological processes in the mucosa that govern outcome following pathogenic encounter could lead to novel therapies. There is a need to study responses at mucosal surfaces in humans for two reasons: (i) Immunological findings in mice, or other animals, often fail to translate to humans. (ii) Compartmentalization of the immune system dictates a need to study sites where pathogens reside. In this manuscript, we describe two novel non-invasive nasal mucosal microsampling techniques and their use for measuring immunological parameters: 1) using nasal curettes to collect cells from the inferior turbinate and; 2) absorptive matrices to collect nasal lining fluid. Both techniques were well tolerated and yielded reproducible and robust data. We demonstrated differences in immune populations and activation state in nasal mucosa compared to blood as well as compared to nasopharyngeal lumen in healthy adults. We also found superior cytokine detection with absorptive matrices compared to nasal wash. These techniques are promising new tools that will facilitate studies of the immunological signatures underlying susceptibility and resistance to respiratory infections.
Assuntos
Citocinas/metabolismo , Mucosa Nasal/microbiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Citometria de Fluxo , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mucosa Nasal/imunologia , Mucosa Nasal/metabolismo , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Junior doctors commonly prescribe inhaled medication for patients admitted to hospitals, and this may be a potential source of prescription error. Objective To determine the potential type, frequency and cost of prescription errors for inhaled medication, and ascertain if a simple educational intervention can improve junior doctors' knowledge and reduce these. METHODS: We carried out a prospective study looking at the types and cost of inhaled prescription errors. Simultaneously we tested knowledge of junior doctors' using a quiz. Both the studies were carried out before and after the introduction of inhaler flash cards (pictures of devices with, instructions on use and the medication they contain) on specific wards. This was followed by an electronic feedback survey. RESULTS: Error rates varied greatly (p = 6.8 × 10(-8)) by device, with 23 % of Evohaler and Accuhaler prescriptions being incorrect. The average cost of an erroneously prescribed medication was £45.50. There were 14 % incorrect prescriptions before the intervention. There was no significant improvement in junior doctors' knowledge of inhalers or the rate of prescription error after the intervention. CONCLUSION: Prescription errors of inhaled medication are common and costly to rectify. There is a need for improved teaching and training of junior doctors and medical students.
Assuntos
Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Erros de Medicação/prevenção & controle , Erros de Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Atenção Secundária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Erros de Medicação/economia , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores/economia , Médicos , Estudos Prospectivos , Atenção Secundária à Saúde/economia , Estudantes de Medicina , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Practical procedures play a crucial role in clinical outcome. High proportions of Mersey trainees report a lack of procedural confidence despite the fact that the majority want to perform more procedures. Training has to be carefully analysed to address these shortcomings.