Automated quantitative thin slice volumetric low dose CT analysis predicts disease severity in COVID-19 patients.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify predictive (bio-)markers for COVID-19 severity derived from automated quantitative thin slice low dose volumetric CT analysis, clinical chemistry and lung function testing. METHODS: Seventy-four COVID-19 patients admitted between March 16th and June 3rd 2020 to the Asklepios Lung Clinic Munich-Gauting, Germany, were included in the study. Patients were categorized in a non-severe group including patients hospitalized on general wards only and in a severe group including patients requiring intensive care treatment. Fully automated quantification of CT scans was performed via IMBIO CT Lung Texture analysis™ software. Predictive biomarkers were assessed with receiver-operator-curve and likelihood analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (44% female) presented with non-severe COVID-19 and 19 patients (32% female) with severe disease. Five fatalities were reported in the severe group. Accurate automated CT analysis was possible with 61 CTs (82%). Disease severity was linked to lower residual normal lung (72.5% vs 87%, p = 0.003), increased ground glass opacities (GGO) (8% vs 5%, p = 0.031) and increased reticular pattern (8% vs 2%, p = 0.025). Disease severity was associated with advanced age (76 vs 59 years, p = 0.001) and elevated serum C-reactive protein (CRP, 92.2 vs 36.3 mg/L, p < 0.001), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, 485 vs 268 IU/L, p < 0.001) and oxygen supplementation (p < 0.001) upon admission. Predictive risk factors for the development of severe COVID-19 were oxygen supplementation, LDH >313 IU/L, CRP >71 mg/L, <70% normal lung texture, >12.5% GGO and >4.5% reticular pattern. CONCLUSION: Automated low dose CT analysis upon admission might be a useful tool to predict COVID-19 severity in patients.

Are bicuspid aortic valves a limitation for aortic valve repair?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the mid-term results after aortic valve (AV) repair in bicuspid AVs with those in tricuspid AVs. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2010, 100 patients (mean age 47.2 years) underwent AV repair procedures for insufficient bicuspid AV (n=43) and tricuspid AV (n=57). Aortic regurgitation (AR) more than moderate was present in 31/43 and 21/57 patients in the bicuspid AV and the tricuspid AV group, respectively. Concomitant root replacement by either the reimplantation or the remodeling technique was performed in 42 patients (bicuspid AV 17/43, tricuspid AV 25/57). All patients were prospectively studied with postoperative and further annual clinical assessment and echocardiography. Follow-up was 99% complete with a mean follow-up time of 22 months. RESULTS: Three patients died during the initial hospitalization, all due to postoperative cardiac failure. Overall actuarial 3 years' survival was 93±4.2% without significant differences between the two groups. Overall actuarial 3 years' freedom from AV-related reoperation was 86±5.1% without significant differences between the groups (85±9.7% for bicuspid AV, 86±6.0% for tricuspid AV; log-rank test: p=0.98). Overall actuarial 3 years' freedom from recurrent AR≥moderate was 100% and AR>trace was 71.3±8.2% without significant differences between the groups (76.5±11.7% for bicuspid AV, 71.4±9.4 for tricuspid AV; log-rank test: p=0.97). CONCLUSIONS: The mid-term outcome in terms of survival, freedom from reoperation or recurrent AR is similar for both groups of patients after AV repair procedures. Therefore, we advocate valve repair also in patients presenting with an insufficient bicuspid AV.