Baseline functioning scales of EORTC QLQ-C30 predict overall survival in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: A consensus has not been reached on the value of quality of life (QoL) as a prognostic factor for survival in gastrointestinal cancer. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between functioning scales of the EORTC QoL Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and the overall survival (OS) in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases, until February 7, 2023. The studies included were those that investigated the association between baseline QoL measured by the functioning scales of EORTC QLQ-C30 and OS in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. The prognostic capacity of QoL was calculated by pooling the adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Twenty-four studies' analyses reported by 22 eligible articles involving 11,609 patients were included. When compared with good parameters of QoL, poor global QoL (HR 1.81; 95% CI 1.53-2.13), physical functioning (HR 1.51; 95% CI 1.31-1.74), social functioning (HR 1.67; 95% CI 1.30-2.15), and role functioning scale (HR 1.42; 95% CI 1.20-1.29) were significantly associated with decreased OS. For each 10-point increase in QLQ-C30 parameters, the pooled HR of OS was 0.87 (95% CI 0.83-0.92) for global QoL, 0.87 (95% CI 0.83-0.92) for physical functioning, and 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.97) for role functioning. However, each 10-point increase in social, emotional, or cognitive functioning scale did not significantly predict OS. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline health-related QoL defined by the physical functioning or global QoL scale of EORTC QLQ-C30 significantly predicts OS in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

Association between Risk of Malnutrition Defined by the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 and Postoperative Complications and Overall Survival in Patients with Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

The Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) has been applied as a nutritional screening tool in oncology patients. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the association between the risk of malnutrition defined by the NRS 2002 and adverse outcomes in patients with cancer. We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until May 7, 2023. Studies investigating the association between the risk of malnutrition defined by the NRS 2002 and overall survival or postoperative complications in adult patients with cancer were included. Patients were grouped as being at risk of malnutrition (NRS2002 ≥ 3) and not at risk (NRS 2002 < 3). Twenty-two studies involving 9,332 patients were identified. The reported prevalence of the risk of malnutrition ranged from 12.8% to 80.8%. Meta-analysis indicated that cancer patients with a risk of malnutrition had a poor overall survival (hazard ratio 1.66; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.40-1.97). Furthermore, the pooled adjusted odds ratio of postoperative complications was 2.27 (95% CI 1.81-2.84) for the risk of malnutrition. The risk of malnutrition defined by the NRS 2002 is independently associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications and worse overall survival in patients with cancer. NRS 2002 can serve as a promising risk stratification tool in cancer patients.

Presence of diabetes further heightens hepatocellular carcinoma risk in patients with hepatitis B or hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis: A meta-analysis.

Objective: Impact of diabetes mellitus on the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remained controversial in cirrhotic patients. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association of diabetes and the occurrence of HCC in patients with hepatitis B or hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. Methods: Two authors comprehensively searched PubMed and Embase databases until June 22, 2023, to identify studies that evaluated the association of diabetes with the occurrence of HCC in patients with hepatitis B or hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. Results: Sixteen retrospective/prospective cohort studies reporting on 15 articles (5357 cirrhotic patients) were included. The prevalence of diabetes in hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis patients ranged from 4 to 46%. Diabetes was associated with higher risk of HCC (risk ratio [RR] 1.74; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.24-2.45) in patients with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. However, no significant relationship of diabetes with the occurrence of HCC was present in studies with less than 48-month follow-up among patients with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis (RR 1.28; 95% CI 0.68-2.43). Moreover, diabetes also conferred an increased risk of HCC (RR 2.67; 95% CI 2.03-3.51) in patients with hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis. Conclusion: Presence of diabetes significantly predicted the occurrence of HCC in patients with hepatitis B or hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis.

Bortezomib synergizes TRAIL-induced apoptosis in gastric cancer cells.

Background/Aims Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) as a newly identified biological agent has shown promising antitumor effects in a wide range of cancers. However, gastric cancer cells are less sensitive than other cancer cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis.Here, we combined TRAIL with bortezomib, a proteasomal inhibitor to induce apoptosis in three gastric cancer cell lines.Methods After the cells were treated with TRAIL and/or bortezomib, the cell viability, apoptosis and cell cycle distribution were examined. The levels of death receptors and the mitochondrial membrane potential were also detected. The expression of apoptosis-associated proteins was determined by Western blot.Results Bortezomib at low concentration significantly(P<0.05) enhanced the cytotoxic effect of TRAIL by enhancing apoptosis as well as cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase. The enhancement of efficiency of TRAIL by bortezomib involved up-regulation of death receptor 4 and 5, as well as reduction of the mitochondrial membrane potential. Further study showed that combined treatment with TRAIL and bortezomib down-regulated anti-apoptotic protein cIAP-1, and over expression of cIAP-1 significantly(P\0.05) reduced the synergistic effect between TRAIL and bortezomib.Conclusions Bortezomib synergizes TRAIL-induced apoptosis in human gastric cancer cells. The synergistic effect between these two drugs is associated with up-regulation of death receptors and down-regulation of cIAP-1.The combination of TRAIL and bortezomib might be an effective regimen for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Pretreatment C-reactive protein/albumin ratio for predicting overall survival in pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Inconsistent findings have been reported regarding the association of C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) with survival outcome in patients with pancreatic cancer. We conducted the current meta-analysis to assess the prognostic utility of elevated baseline CAR in predicting overall survival (OS) in pancreatic cancer patients. METHODS: A comprehensively literature search was performed in the PubMed and Embase database until February 10, 2019. Studies evaluating the association between pretreatment CAR and OS among pancreatic cancer were selected. Study quality was evaluated by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Nine retrospective studies involving 1534 pancreatic cancer patients were identified. A meta-analysis using a random-effect model indicated that elevated CAR was associated with poor OS (hazard ratio 1.98; 95% confidence interval 1.58-2.48). Subgroup analysis produced similar prognostic values for OS in different geographical regions, sample sizes, thresholds of CAR, treating methods, and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale points. CONCLUSION: Elevated pretreatment CAR may independently predict poor OS in pancreatic cancer patients. Pretreatment CAR is possibly a simple and cost-effective blood-derived indicator for predicting survival outcome in patients with pancreatic cancer.