Solidification drug nanosuspensions into nanocrystals by freeze-drying: a case study with ursodeoxycholic acid.

To elucidate the effect of solidification processes on the redispersibility of drug nanocrystals (NC) during freeze-drying, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) nanosuspensions were transformed into UDCA-NC via different solidification process included freezing and lyophilization. The effect of different concentrations of stabilizers and cryoprotectants on redispersibility of UDCA-NC was investigated, respectively. The results showed that the redispersibility of UDCA-NC was RDI-20 °C < RDI-80 °C < RDI-196 °C during freezing, which indicated the redispersibility of UDCA-NC at the conventional temperature was better more than those at moderate and rigorous condition. Compared to the drying strengthen, the employed amount and type of stabilizers more dramatically affected the redispersibility of UDCA-NC during lyophilization. The hydroxypropylmethylcellulose and PVPK30 were effective to protect UDCA-NC from damage during lyophilization, which could homogeneously adsorb into the surface of NC to prevent from agglomerates. The sucrose and glucose achieved excellent performance that protected UDCA-NC from crystal growth during lyophilization, respectively. It was concluded that UDCA-NC was subjected to agglomeration during solidification transformation, and the degree of agglomeration suffered varied with the type and the amounts of stabilizers used, as well as different solidification conditions. The PVPK30-sucrose system was more effective to protect UDCA-NC from the damage during solidification process.

Combination of submicroemulsion and phospholipid complex for novel delivery of ursodeoxycholic acid.

The objective of this study was to prepare and characterize ursodeoxycholic acid submicron emulsion (UA-SME) loaded with ursodeoxycholic acid phytosomes (UA-PS) and optimize the process variables. A screening experiment with response surface methodology with Box-Behnken design (BBD) was used to optimize the process parameters of UA-SME. The blood concentrations of UA after oral administration of UA-SME and UA coarse drug were assayed. The optimum process conditions were finally obtained by using a desirability function. It was found that stirring velocity, homogenization pressure and homogenization cycles were the most important variables that affected the particles size, polydispersity index and entrapment efficiency of UA-SME. Results showed that the optimum stirring velocity, homogenization pressure and cycles were 16 000 rpm, 60 MPa and 10 cycles, respectively. The mean diameter, polydispersity index and entrapment efficiency of UA-SME were 251.9 nm, 0.241 and 74.36%, respectively. Pharmacokinetic parameters of UA and UA-SME in rats were Tmax 2.215 and 1.489 h, Cmax 0.0364 and 0.1562 µg/mL, AUC0-∞ 3.682 and 13.756 µg h/mL, respectively. The bioavailability of UA in rats was significantly different (p < 0.05) after oral administration of UA-SME compared to those of UA coarse drug. This was due to improvement of the hydrophilicity and lipophilic property of UA-SME.

The study on the entrapment efficiency and in vitro release of puerarin submicron emulsion.

The entrapment efficiency (EE) and release in vitro are very important physicochemical characteristics of puerarin submicron emulsion (SME). In this paper, the performance of ultrafiltration (UF), ultracentrifugation (UC), and microdialysis (MD) for determining the EE of SME were evaluated, respectively. The release study in vitro of puerarin from SME was studied by using MD and pressure UF technology. The EE of SME was 86.5%, 72.8%, and 55.8% as determined by MD, UF, and UC, respectively. MD was not suitable for EE measurements of puerarin submicron oil droplet, which could only determine the total EE of submicron oil droplet and liposomes micelles, but it could be applied to determine the amount of free drug in SMEs. Although UC was the fastest and simplest to use, its results were the least reliable. UF was still the relatively accurate method for EE determination of puerarin SME. The release of puerarin SME could be evaluated by using MD and pressure UF, but MD seemed to be more suitable for the release study of puerarin emulsion. The drug release from puerarin SME at three drug concentrations was initially rapid, but reached a plateau value within 30 min. Drug release of puerarin from the SME occurred via burst release.