[Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of intrapulmonary lesions].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate real-time endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in the diagnosis of intrapulmonary lesions. METHODS: From October 2009 to November 2011, EBUS-TBNA was performed in 78 patients with parabrachial or parabronchial intrapulmonary lesions proved by CT scan. On-site cytological evaluation was not performed. Immunohistochemistry was applied to distinguish the type of malignant tumor when necessary. RESULTS: Sixty-five malignancies and 13 benign diseases were finally diagnosed in 78 intrapulmonary lesions, of which 62 malignancies and 13 benign diseases were distinguished by EBUS-TBNA, including 61 primary lung cancer (adenocarcinoma 36, squamous carcinoma 8, poorly-differentiated carcinoma 5, unknown type carcinoma 3, small cell carcinoma 9), one metastatic lung cancer, 7 pulmonary inflammation, 5 pulmonary tuberculosis and one fibrosis. There were 3 false negative cases which were diagnosed as pulmonary poorly-differentiated carcinoma, pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma and pulmonary lymphoma, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of EBUS-TBNA in distinguishing malignant from benign thoracic lesions was 95%, 100%, 81%, 100%, 96%, respectively. Immunohistochemistry was performed in 8 malignant tumors without definite type or origin, 5 primary lung cancer and one metastatic lung adenocarcinoma were further confirmed. Moderate bleeding from the puncture site during needle aspiration forming blood clot and obstructing the central airway was noted in 1 hypercoagulable subject. CONCLUSIONS: EBUS-TBNA is a minimally invasive, safe procedure with high sensitivity for distinguishing malignant from benign lesions. Immunohistochemistry can provide evidence for the definitive diagnosis of malignant lesions.

The value of tumor markers in evaluating chemotherapy response and prognosis in Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the value of tumor markers in monitoring chemotherapy response and predicting prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: We studied carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CYFRA21-1 and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) of 111 untreated patients with advanced NSCLC before and after 2 cycles of chemotherapy, meanwhile evaluating the response according to the image, and analyzed the relationship between tumor markers and response rate, time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The mean percentages of CEA decrease of the 111 patients with advanced NSCLC whose image response was partial response, no response and progressive disease were 22.8, -5.5 and -59.8% (p = 0.002), 28.1, 1.8 and -70.8% for CYFRA21-1 (p = 0.001), and 17.5, -3.1 and -16.9% for NSE, respectively (p = 0.03). The median TTP for all patients was 6.7 months, while the median TTP for CEA decrease and CEA elevated or stable patients was 9.2 and 4.3 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Radiologic and CYFRA21-1 responses were significant predictive factors for TTP on multivariate analysis (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). The median OS was 19.2 months for all patients, with a 1-year survival rate of 69.4%. Baseline CEA, baseline CYFRA21-1 and CEA response were significant predictive factors for OS on multivariate analysis (P = 0.004, P = 0.004 AND P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: CEA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE can be used in evaluating chemotherapy response, and CYFRA21-1 response was a significant predictive factor for TTP, while baseline CEA, baseline CYFRA21-1 and CEA response were significant predictive factors for OS in Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC.

Anlotinib or platinum-pemetrexed as second-line therapy in EGFR T790M-negative lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Clinical management of T790M-negative patients after first-line epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) treatment failure is controversial. Anlotinib is a novel multi-target TKI for tumor angiogenesis and tumor cell proliferation, and it has been approved as a thirdline or beyond treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The impact of anlotinib as a second-line therapy compared with platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy in T790M-negative patients after first-line EGFR-TKIs failed remains unclear. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed 20 patients who were given anlotinib and 42 patients who received platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy as a control after first-line EGFR-TKIs therapy progression. All the patients were confirmed to be T790M-negative using the cobas EGFR Mutation Test. The primary end point included progression-free survival (PFS) time, objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate. RESULTS: The duration of PFS was significantly longer in the platinum-pemetrexed group than in the anlotinib group (median, 4.5 vs. 3.0 months; HR, 1.972; 95% CI, 1.078 to 3.607; P=0.021). The response rate was significantly better in the platinum-pemetrexed group (30.9%) than that in the anlotinib group (15%), and disease control rate (DCR) of both groups was 70% and 83%, respectively. All the adverse events in anlotinib group appeared to be manageable. CONCLUSIONS: Anlotinib was less effective than platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy in T790M-negative NSCLC patients after disease progression with first-line EGFR-TKIs therapy failure.