Human cardiotoxic drugs delivered by soaking and microinjection induce cardiovascular toxicity in zebrafish.

Cardiovascular toxicity is a major challenge for the pharmaceutical industry and predictive screening models to identify and eliminate pharmaceuticals with the potential to cause cardiovascular toxicity in humans are urgently needed. In this study, taking advantage of the transparency of larval zebrafish, Danio rerio, we assessed cardiovascular toxicity of seven known human cardiotoxic drugs (aspirin, clomipramine hydrochloride, cyclophosphamide, nimodipine, quinidine, terfenadine and verapamil hydrochloride) and two non-cardiovascular toxicity drugs (gentamicin sulphate and tetracycline hydrochloride) in zebrafish using six specific phenotypic endpoints: heart rate, heart rhythm, pericardial edema, circulation, hemorrhage and thrombosis. All the tested drugs were delivered into zebrafish by direct soaking and yolk sac microinjection, respectively, and cardiovascular toxicity was quantitatively or qualitatively assessed at 4 and 24 h post drug treatment. The results showed that aspirin accelerated the zebrafish heart rate (tachycardia), whereas clomipramine hydrochloride, cyclophosphamide, nimodipine, quinidine, terfenadine and verapamil hydrochloride induced bradycardia. Quinidine and terfenadine also caused atrioventricular (AV) block. Nimodipine treatment resulted in atrial arrest with much slower but regular ventricular heart beating. All the tested human cardiotoxic drugs also induced pericardial edema and circulatory disturbance in zebrafish. There was no sign of cardiovascular toxicity in zebrafish treated with non-cardiotoxic drugs gentamicin sulphate and tetracycline hydrochloride. The overall prediction success rate for cardiotoxic drugs and non-cardiotoxic drugs in zebrafish were 100% (9/9) as compared with human results, suggesting that zebrafish is an excellent animal model for rapid in vivo cardiovascular toxicity screening. The procedures we developed in this report for assessing cardiovascular toxicity in zebrafish were suitable for drugs delivered by either soaking or microinjection.

Neoadjuvant therapy of cetuximab combined with chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: A single-arm meta-analysis of noncomparative clinical studies and randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy combined with radical resection has reduced local recurrence rates in rectal cancer. Cetuximab shows improvement in rectal cancer treatment. But the role for neoadjuvant therapy of cetuximab combined with chenmoradiotherapy in rectal cancer remains unclear. The present study aimed to use meta-analytical techniques to assess its benefit and risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase to identify the correlational non-comparative clinical studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary endpoints of interest were pathological complete response (pCR), complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease, progressive disease (PD), R0-resection, R1-resection, and R2-resection. The secondary included any grade of toxicity. RESULTS: Eleven investigations (9 noncomparative open-label cohort studies and 2 randomized controlled trials) involving 550 patients were ultimately included. The pooled estimates of pCR was 10% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7%-13%, I2 = 55.9%). Simultaneously, only a small amount of patients achieved CR (11%, 95% CI: 7%-15%, I2 = 44.0%), which was consistent with pCR. Besides, R0 resection (93%, 95% CI: 90%-96%, I2 = 16.5%) seemed to be increased but need further exploration. The safety was also calculated, and most of the toxicities were moderate. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant therapy of cetuximab combined with chemoradiotherapy could not improve pCR. The raise of R0-resection rate needed to be verified by more high-quality and well-designed RCTs. Meanwhile, the morbidity of toxicity was relatively mild and acceptable.

A zebrafish phenotypic assay for assessing drug-induced hepatotoxicity.

INTRODUCTION: Numerous studies have confirmed that zebrafish and mammalian toxicity profiles are strikingly similar and the transparency of larval zebrafish permits direct in vivo assessment of drug toxicity including hepatotoxicity in zebrafish. METHODS: Hepatotoxicity of 6 known mammalian hepatotoxic drugs (acetaminophen [APAP], aspirin, tetracycline HCl, sodium valproate, cyclophosphamide and erythromycin) and 2 non-hepatotoxic compounds (sucrose and biotin) were quantitatively assessed in larval zebrafish using three specific phenotypic endpoints of hepatotoxicity: liver degeneration, changes in liver size and yolk sac retention. Zebrafish liver degeneration was originally screened visually, quantified using an image-based morphometric analysis and confirmed by histopathology. RESULTS: All the tested mammalian hepatotoxic drugs induced liver degeneration, reduced liver size and delayed yolk sac absorption in larval zebrafish, whereas the non-hepatotoxic compounds did not have observable adverse effect on zebrafish liver. The overall prediction success rate for hepatotoxic drugs and non-hepatotoxic compounds in zebrafish was 100% (8/8) as compared with mammalian results, suggesting that hepatotoxic drugs in mammals also caused similar hepatotoxicity in zebrafish. DISCUSSION: Larval zebrafish phenotypic assay is a highly predictive animal model for rapidly in vivo assessment of compound hepatotoxicity. This convenient, reproducible animal model saves time and money for drug discovery and can serve as an intermediate step between cell-based evaluation and conventional animal testing of hepatotoxicity.