Epigenetic Differences Arise in Endothelial Cells Responding to Cobalt-Chromium.

Cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr)-based alloys are emerging with important characteristics for use in dentistry, but the knowledge of epigenetic mechanisms in endothelial cells has barely been achieved. In order to address this issue, we have prepared a previously Co-Cr-enriched medium to further treat endothelial cells (HUVEC) for up to 72 h. Our data show there is important involvement with epigenetic machinery. Based on the data, it is believed that methylation balance in response to Co-Cr is finely modulated by DNMTs (DNA methyltransferases) and TETs (Tet methylcytosine dioxygenases), especially DNMT3B and both TET1 and TET2. Additionally, histone compaction HDAC6 (histone deacetylase 6) seems to develop a significant effect in endothelial cells. The requirement of SIRT1 seems to have a crucial role in this scenario. SIRT1 is associated with a capacity to modulate the expression of HIF-1α in response to hypoxia microenvironments, thus presenting a protective effect. As mentioned previously, cobalt is able to prevent HIF1A degradation and maintain hypoxia-related signaling in eukaryotic cells. Together, our results show, for the first time, a descriptive study reporting the relevance of epigenetic machinery in endothelial cells responding to cobalt-chromium, and it opens new perspectives to better understand their repercussions as prerequisites for driving cell adhesion, cell cycle progression, and angiogenesis surrounding this Co-Cr-based implantable device.

The molecular pathway triggered by zirconia in endothelial cells involves epigenetic control.

The requirement to achieve natural looking restorations is one of the most challenging aspects in dentistry. Although zirconia has provided new opportunities for achieving superior aesthetics and physicochemical outcomes, very little has been achieved for its cellular and molecular performance, especially considering angiogenesis and osteogenesis. As angiogenesis is a secondary event and concomitant to osteogenesis, an indirect effect of dental implant on endothelial cells could be the release of active molecules such as those already reported affecting osteoblasts. To better address this issue, we challenged human endothelial cells (HUVECs) with zirconia-conditioned medium up to 72 h to allow analysis specific gene expression and protein pattern of mediators of epigenetic machinery in full. Our data shows involvement of zirconia in triggering intracellular signaling through MAPK-ERK activation, leading the signal to activate histone deacetylase HDAC6 likely with concomitant well-modulated DNA methylation profile by DNMTs and TETs. These signaling pathways seem to culminate in cytoskeleton rearrangement of endothelial cells, an important prerequisite to cell migration expected in angiogenesis. Collectively, this study demonstrates for the first time epigenetic-related molecular mechanism involved in endothelial cells responding to zirconia, revealing a repertoire of signaling molecules capable of executing the reprogramming process of gene expression, which are necessary to drive cell proliferation, migration, and consequently angiogenesis. This set of data can further studies using gene editing approaches to better elucidate functional roles.

Osteogenic gene markers are epigenetically reprogrammed during contractile-to-calcifying vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype transition.

The understanding of vascular calcification-based mechanism is an urgent pending task in vascular biology and this prompted us to better address this issue by investigating whether DNA methylation mechanism might drive osteogenic marker genes modulation in primary human vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) responding to calcium and phosphate levels overload up to 72 h. Firstly, our data shows this calcifying process recapitulates the molecular repertory of osteogenic biomarkers and specifically requiring RUNX2, Osterix and ALP, BSP genes activations along 72 h in vitro, and this behavior was validated here using other lineages. Conversely, both BMPs 4 and 7 were significantly overexpressed, maybe already as a mechanism in response to RUNX2 and Osterix genes activities identified earlier in response to the calcifying condition, and taken into maintain the calcifying phenotype of VSMCs. Additionally, survival signaling was maintained active and accompanied by a dynamic cytoskeleton rearrangement signaling requiring MAPK and AKT phosphorylations. Moreover, during the contractile-to-calcifying transition phenotype of VSMCs, epigenetic machinery was finely modulated, requiring the translocation of DNMT3B and TET2 into nucleus and this prompted us evaluating whether the profile of osteogenic-related gene promoters' methylation might contribute with this process. By firstly estimating 5meC/5 hmeC ratio changes, we further specifically show the significance of the epigenetic modulation of Osterix and Bone sialoprotein related gene promoters, presenting a positive correlation between the epigenetic signature of their gene promoters and transcriptional patterns. Altogether, our results show for the first time the importance of epigenetic mechanism on modulating osteogenic gene markers reprogramming during calcifying VSMCs phenotype acquisition, which might drive the genesis of vascular ectopic calcification.

HOXA cluster gene expression during osteoblast differentiation involves epigenetic control.

The HOXA gene cluster is generally recognized as a pivotal mediator of positional identity in the skeletal system, expression of different orthologues conferring alternative locational phenotype of the vertebrate bone. Strikingly, however, the molecular mechanisms that regulate orthologue-specific expression of different HOXA cluster members in gestating osteoblasts remain largely obscure, but in analogy to the processes observed in acute lymphatic leukemia it is assumed that alternative methylation of HOXA promoter regions drives position specific expression patterns. In an effort to understand HOXA cluster gene expression in osteogenesis we characterize both expression and the epigenetic landscape of the HOXA gene cluster during in vitro osteoblast formation from mesenchymal precursors. We observe that osteoblast formation per se provokes strong upregulation of HOXA gene cluster expression, in particular of midcluster genes, and paradoxal downregulation of HOXA7 and HOXA10. These differences in expression appear related to promoter methylation. LnRNAs HOTAIR and HOTTIP, known to modulate HOXA expression, are also regulated by their promoter methylation processing, but do not correlate with HOXA cluster expression profile. We thus conclude that HOXA expression is profoundly regulated during osteoblast differentiation through canonical methylation-dependent mechanisms but not through the flanking lnRNAs.