A Patient With Stage III Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Treated With Intra-Arterial Infusion FOLFIRINOX: Impressive Tumoral Response and Death due to Legionella pneumophila Infection: A Unique Case Report.

Patients affected by pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have very poor prognosis, whereby at a follow-up of 5 years, the mortality rate is very similar to the incidence rate. Globally, around 10% of patients are amenable to radical surgery at the time of diagnosis, which represents the only chance of cure or long-term survival for these patients. Almost 40% of patients with PDAC show locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). LAPC is not a metastatic disease, although it is not amenable to radical surgery. For these patients, systemic induction chemotherapy with intravenous FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, folic acid, irinotecan, oxaliplatin) regimen is administered, with the aim of conversion to surgery, although the conversion rate remains low, at approximately 10% to 15%. Pancreatic arterial chemotherapy has been explored to overcome the intrinsic tumor pancreatic resistance to systemic chemotherapy, where an intra-arterial port-a-cath is placed by means of interventional oncology techniques under angiographic guidance in the operating theater. Here, we treated a patient with an intra-arterially modified FOLFIRINOX regimen. Three courses were administered, and the patient experienced no adverse events. At the end of the third course, the patient rapidly developed lung failure due to nosocomial Legionella pneumophila infection, despite the impressive pathological tumor response shown in the autopsy report. This is a first and unique report that demonstrates that pancreatic intra-arterial FOLFIRINOX can be safe and efficacious. We believe that this preliminary result will be confirmed in the next patients to be enrolled and that it provides a glimmer of hope for patients with this lethal disease.

A pilot study employing hepatic intra-arterial irinotecan injection of drug-eluting beads as salvage therapy in liver metastatic colorectal cancer patients without extrahepatic involvement: the first southern Italy experience.

BACKGROUND: The main aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of drug-eluting beads with irinotecan (DEBIRI) for liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Secondary aims were to evaluate survival and toxicity. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with metastases in <50% of the liver and without extrahepatic involvement were enrolled. Treatment response assessment was performed by multidetector contrast enhancement computed tomography (MDCT) with evaluation of the enhancement pattern of the target lesion and tumor response rates according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST, Version 1.1). All adverse events were recorded by the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0. Associations of tumor response and variables were calculated using the chi-squared test. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons were made using the log-rank test. RESULTS: According to mRECIST, complete response (CR) was observed in 21.8% of patients, partial response (PR) in 13%, stable disease (SD) in 52.2% and progressive disease (PD) in 13% of patients. Response rate (RR = CR + PR) was 34.8%. No associations between treatment response and variables such as Dukes' classification, grading and Kras status were found (P>0.05). The median OS was 37 months (95% CI: 13.881 to 60.119). Cox regression model showed that neither site, Dukes' classification, grading, Kras status nor number of chemotherapy treatments pre-DEBIRI influenced the OS. The log-rank test showed no statistically significant difference in OS among patients who underwent 1, 2 or 3 DEBIRI treatments (χ2=2.831, P=0.09). In our study, the main toxicities included postembolization syndrome (PES), hypertransaminasemia and fever. CONCLUSION: The favorable tumor response and the favorable toxicity profile make DEBIRI treatment a potential third-line therapy. Although further larger studies are needed to confirm these data, we can state that DEBIRI is an attractive emerging treatment in these patients.

D-dimers are not always elevated in patients with acute aortic dissection.

In patients with acute aortic dissection, an early diagnosis is essential to anticipate aortic rupture, cardiac tamponade, organ ischemia and improve surgical results. A specific blood laboratory marker able to rule out the presence of aortic dissection has not been identified yet. Recently, several studies suggested using D-dimers as a negative predicting test to rule out diagnosis of acute aortic dissection in patients presenting with chest pain. In 61 patients with confirmed aortic dissection, preoperative D-dimers were assayed and correlated with time from symptom onset and extension of the false lumen dissection (according with De Bakey classification). Abnormal D-dimers values were considered those being greater than 400 microg/l. D-dimers values were above 400 microg/l in 50 patients (82%) and below 400 microg/l in 11 patients (18%). There was no correlation between preoperative D-dimers values and time from symptoms onset (r = -0.232; P = 0.1). We found that D-dimers are not always elevated in patients presenting with acute aortic dissection. Given the potential devastating effects of denying the diagnosis of acute aortic dissection with consequent delay of adequate treatment, a word of caution regarding the negative predictive value of D-dimer test in the diagnosis of aortic dissection seems warranted.