Best Practice for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab: Position Statement from the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody, has revolutionized the pharmacological management of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). This position statement critically reviews and examines existing data on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab in patients with IMIDs. It provides a practical guide on implementing TDM in current clinical practices and outlines priority areas for future research. METHODS: The endorsing TDM of Biologics and Pharmacometrics Committees of the International Association of TDM and Clinical Toxicology collaborated to create this position statement. RESULTS: Accumulating data support the evidence for TDM of infliximab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases, with limited investigation in other IMIDs. A universal approach to TDM may not fully realize the benefits of improving therapeutic outcomes. Patients at risk for increased infliximab clearance, particularly with a proactive strategy, stand to gain the most from TDM. Personalized exposure targets based on therapeutic goals, patient phenotype, and infliximab administration route are recommended. Rapid assays and home sampling strategies offer flexibility for point-of-care TDM. Ongoing studies on model-informed precision dosing in inflammatory bowel disease will help assess the additional value of precision dosing software tools. Patient education and empowerment, and electronic health record-integrated TDM solutions will facilitate routine TDM implementation. Although optimization of therapeutic effectiveness is a primary focus, the cost-reducing potential of TDM also merits consideration. CONCLUSIONS: Successful implementation of TDM for infliximab necessitates interdisciplinary collaboration among clinicians, hospital pharmacists, and (quantitative) clinical pharmacologists to ensure an efficient research trajectory.

Tocilizumab Dose Tapering Based on a Model-Based Algorithm is Feasible in Clinical Practice: A Short Communication.

BACKGROUND: Tocilizumab in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a potential candidate for concentration-guided tapering because the standard dose of tocilizumab results in a wide range of serum concentrations, usually above the presumed therapeutic window, and an exposure-response relationship has been described. However, no clinical trials have been published to date on this subject. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of the tapering of intravenous (iv) tocilizumab with the use of a pharmacokinetic model-based algorithm in RA patients. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial with a double-blind design and follow-up of 24 weeks was conducted. RA patients who received the standard of tocilizumab for at least the past 24 weeks, which is 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks, were included. Patients with a tocilizumab serum concentration above 5 mg/L at trough were randomized between concentration-guided dose tapering, referred to as therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), or the standard 8 mg/kg dose. In the TDM group, the tocilizumab dose was tapered with a recently published model-based algorithm to achieve a target concentration of 4-6 mg/L after 20 weeks of dose tapering. RESULTS: Twelve RA patients were included and 10 were randomized between the TDM and standard dose group. The study was feasible regarding the predefined feasibility criteria and patients had a positive attitude toward therapeutic drug monitoring. In the TDM group, the tocilizumab trough concentration within patients decreased on average by 24.5 ± 18.3 mg/L compared with a decrease of 2.8 ± 12 mg/L in the standard dose group. None of the patients in the TDM group reached the drug range of 4-6 mg/L. Instead, tocilizumab concentrations of 1.6 and 1.5 mg/L were found for the 2 patients who completed follow-up on the tapered dose. No differences in RA disease activity were observed between the 2 study groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study was the first to show that it is feasible to apply a dose-reduction algorithm based on a pharmacokinetic model in clinical practice. However, the current algorithm needs to be optimized before it can be applied on a larger scale.

EULAR points to consider for therapeutic drug monitoring of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.

OBJECTIVE: To develop EULAR points-to-consider for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). METHODS: The points-to-consider were developed in accordance with EULAR standardised operation procedures by a multidisciplinary task force from eight European countries, based on a systematic literature review and expert consensus. Level of evidence and strength of the points-to-consider were determined, and mean levels of agreement among the task force were calculated using a 10-point rating scale. RESULTS: Six overarching principles and 13 points-to-consider were formulated. The level of agreement among the task force for the overarching principles and points-to-consider ranged from 8.4 to 9.9.The overarching principles define TDM and its subtypes, and reinforce the underlying pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles, which are relevant to all biopharmaceutical classes. The points-to-consider highlight the clinical utility of the measurement and interpretation of biopharmaceutical blood concentrations and antidrug antibodies in specific clinical scenarios, including factors that influence these parameters. In general, proactive use of TDM is not recommended but reactive TDM could be considered in certain clinical situations. An important factor limiting wider adoption of TDM is the lack of both high quality trials addressing effectiveness and safety of TDM and robust economic evaluation in patients with RMDs. Future research should focus on providing this evidence, as well as on further understanding of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of biopharmaceuticals. CONCLUSION: These points-to-consider are evidence-based and consensus-based statements for the use of TDM of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory RMDs, addressing the clinical utility of TDM.

Single dose tocilizumab for COVID-19 associated cytokine storm syndrome: Less is more.

AIMS: We aim to evaluate the clinical pharmacokinetics of a single dose interleukin-6 (IL-6) antibody tocilizumab (TCZ) in methylprednisolone (MP)-treated COVID-19 patients with cytokine storm syndrome (CSS). METHODS: MP pre-treated patients with COVID-19-associated CSS, defined as at least two elevations of C-reactive protein (CRP) >100 mg/L, ferritin >900 µg/L or D-dimers >1500 µg/L, received intravenous TCZ (8 mg/kg, max. 800 mg) upon clinical deterioration. A nonlinear-mixed effects model was developed based on TCZ serum concentrations and dosing information. Population pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated and concentration-time profiles were plotted against individual predicted values. Fixed dose simulations were subsequently performed based on the final model. RESULTS: In total 40 patients (mean [SD] age: 62 [12] years, 20% female, body weight: 87 [17] kg) with COVID-19 induced CSS were evaluated on pharmacokinetics and laboratory parameters. A biphasic elimination of TCZ serum concentration was described by a homogeneous population pharmacokinetic model. Serum TCZ concentrations above the 1 µg/L target saturation threshold were covered for 16 days in all evaluated patients treated with a single dose of 8 mg/kg. In a simulation with TCZ 400 mg fixed dose, this condition of full IL-6 receptor occupancy at minimum serum concentration was also met. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose (8 mg/kg, max. 800 mg) is sufficient to cover a period of 16 days of IL-6-mediated hyperinflammation in COVID-19-induced CSS in MP-treated patients. Based on body weight PK simulations, a fixed-dose tocilizumab of 400 mg should be considered to prevent overtreatment, future drug shortage and unnecessary drug expenditure.

Adalimumab combined with methotrexate versus adalimumab monotherapy in psoriasis: Three-year follow-up data of a single-blind randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) are formed in patients treated with adalimumab (ADL). This might increase clearance of ADL, potentially causing a (secondary) non-response. Combination therapy of ADL and methotrexate (MTX) reduces ADA levels and has a clinical benefit in rheumatologic diseases. In psoriasis however, the long-term effectiveness and safety have not been studied. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the three-year follow-up data of ADL combined with MTX compared to ADL monotherapy in ADL-naive patients with moderate to severe plaque type psoriasis. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre RCT in the Netherlands and Belgium. Randomization was performed by a centralized online randomization service. Patients were seen every 12 weeks until week 145. Outcome assessors were blinded. We collected data on drug survival, effectiveness, safety, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of patients that started ADL combined with MTX compared to ADL monotherapy. We present descriptive analysis and patients were analysed according to the group initially randomized to. Patients becoming non-adherent to the biologic were excluded from analyses. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were included and 37 patients (ADL group n = 17, ADL + MTX group n = 20) continued in the follow-up study after 1 year. After 109 weeks and 145 weeks, there was a trend towards longer drug survival in the ADL + MTX group compared to the ADL group (week 109: 54.8% vs. 41.4%; p = 0.326, week 145: 51.6% vs. 41.4%; p = 0.464). At week 145, 7/13 patients were treated with MTX. In the ADL group, 4/12 patients that completed the study developed ADA, and 3/13 in the ADL + MTX group. CONCLUSIONS: In this small study, there was no significant difference in ADL overall drug survival when it was initially combined with MTX, compared to ADL alone. Discontinuation due to adverse events was common in the combination group. To secure accessible healthcare, combination treatment of ADL and MTX can be considered in individual patients.

Drug levels, anti-drug antibodies and B-cell counts were not predictive of response in rheumatoid arthritis patients on (ultra-)low-dose rituximab.

OBJECTIVES: The REDO trial (REtreatment with Rituximab in RhEumatoid arthritis: Disease Outcome after Dose Optimisation) showed that ultra-low-dose rituximab (500 mg or 200 mg) was similarly effective to a 1000 mg dosage in the majority of RA patients. This pre-planned secondary analysis investigated (1) associations between rituximab dosage, drug levels, anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) and B-cell counts and (2) the predictive value of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, and of patient, disease and treatment characteristics in relation to response to ultra-low-dose rituximab. METHODS: For 140 RA patients from the REDO trial, differences in drug levels, ADAs and B-cell counts were examined at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months after dosing. Treatment response was defined as absence of flare and no extra rituximab or >1 glucocorticoid injection received during follow-up. The association between potential predictors and response was investigated using logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Lower doses of rituximab resulted in lower drug levels but did not significantly affect ADA levels or B-cell counts, and 3 (10.7%), 12 (20.7%) and 7 (13.0%) patients failed to meet the response criteria in, respectively, the 1000 mg, 500 mg and 200 mg dosage groups. Drug levels, ADAs, B-cell counts, and patient, disease and treatment characteristics were not predictive for response to ultra-low-dose rituximab. CONCLUSION: The results of this study further support the hypothesis that continued treatment with 500 or 200 mg rituximab is similarly effective to a 1000 mg dosage in RA patients doing well on rituximab. These results, combined with lack of finding a clinical dose-response relationship in the original REDO study, suggest that 200 mg rituximab is not yet the lowest effective rituximab retreatment dose in RA.

Anti-rituximab antibodies affect pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rituximab in children with immune-mediated diseases.

OBJECTIVES: Rituximab (RTX) is a chimeric monoclonal CD20-antibody. Lack of efficacy has been suggested to be related to the presence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). The aims of this study were to determine if ADA impact the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of RTX in children, whether the formation of ADA differs between various immune-mediated diseases and if it is related to the occurrence of infusion-related reactions (IRR). METHODS: All children <18 years who had received RTX treatment in our centre between December 2006 and February 2020 with known ADA/RTX-levels, were retrospectively included. The presence of ADA was defined as a titre >8 AU/ml. RESULTS: Of twenty-six children treated with RTX for various immune-mediated diseases, six patients were ADA-positive (23.1%). In all ADA-positive patients, RTX concentrations were undetectable in contrast to ADA-negative patients (median RTX concentration 3.1 µg/ml; IQR 0.57-12.0; p<0.001). Failure of B cell depletion was found in 5/6 ADA-positive and 1/19 ADA-negative patients (p=0.003). In SLE-patients, 50.0% (n=4/8) had developed RTX-ADA. Severe anaphylaxis (n=3) occurred only in the ADA-positive group. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of paediatric patients, undetectable RTX concentrations were found in ADA-positive patients, indicative that these ADA have a PK impact. RTX-ADA also seem to affect the PD, as in the majority of these patients, B cell depletion failed. ADA were most present in SLE-patients and anaphylactic reactions occurred only in ADA-positive patients. With this knowledge, a change of drug might be considered in the presence of RTX-ADA.

Comprehensive evaluation of microneedle-based intradermal adalimumab delivery vs. subcutaneous administration: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

AIMS: To evaluate feasibility of intradermal (i.d.) adalimumab administration using hollow microneedles, and to compare a single i.d. dose of adalimumab using a hollow microneedle with a single subcutaneous (s.c.) dose using a conventional needle. METHODS: In this single-centre double-blind, placebo-controlled, double-dummy clinical trial in 24 healthy adults we compared 40 mg adalimumab (0.4 mL) administered i.d. using a hollow microneedle with a s.c. dose using a conventional needle. Primary parameters were pain, acceptability and local tolerability; secondary parameters safety, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity. We explored usability of optical coherence tomography, clinical photography, thermal imaging, and laser speckle contrast imaging to evaluate skin reaction after i.d. injections. In vitro protein analysis was performed to assess compatibility of adalimumab with the hollow microneedle device. RESULTS: While feasible and safe, injection pain of i.d. adalimumab was higher compared to s.c. adalimumab (35.4 vs. 7.9 on a 100-point visual analogue scale). Initial absorption rate and relative bioavailability were higher after i.d. adalimumab (time to maximum plasma concentration = 95 h [47-120]; Frel = 129% [6.46%]) compared to s.c. adalimumab (time to maximum plasma concentration = 120 h [96-221]). Anti-adalimumab antibodies were detected in 50% and 83% of the subjects after i.d. and s.c. adalimumab, respectively. We observed statistically significantly more erythema and skin perfusion after i.d. adalimumab, compared to s.c. adalimumab and placebo injections (P < .0001). Cytokine secretion after whole blood lipopolysaccharide challenge was comparable between administration routes. CONCLUSIONS: Intradermal injection of adalimumab using hollowing microneedles was perceived as more painful and less accepted than s.c. administration, but yields a higher relative bioavailability with similar safety and pharmacodynamic effects.

Efficacy of dashboard driven dosing of infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease patients; a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Loss of response (LOR) to infliximab (IFX) remains a challenge in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Proactive dosing strategies to achieve and maintain predefined IFX trough levels (TL) may prevent LOR. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of dashboard driven IFX dosing compared to standard dosing in a prospective trial in IBD patients. METHODS: In this multicentre 1:1 'PRECISION' trial, we randomized IBD patients in clinical remission (Harvey Bradshaw Index ≤4 for Crohn's disease (CD) or a partial Mayo score ≤2 for ulcerative colitis (UC)) receiving IFX maintenance treatment. The precision group (PG) received IFX dosing guided by a Bayesian pharmacokinetic model, aiming to achieve and maintain a TL of 3 µg/ml by treatment (de)escalation as indicated by the dashboard. Patients in the control group (CG) continued treatment without dose adaptations. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in sustained clinical remission after 1 year. RESULTS: Eighty patients were enrolled (66 CD, 14 UC), and the median [interquartile range] age was 37 years [27-51]). After one year, 28/32 (88%) of patients in the PG were in sustained clinical remission versus 25/39 (64%) in the CG (p = .017). PG patients had lower median faecal calprotectin levels after 1 year (p = .031), whereas no significant differences in median CRP levels were found. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that the use of a Bayesian dashboard for IFX dosing in maintenance treatment for IBD reduced the incidence of LOR compared to standard dosing. Precision dosing also resulted in lower FCP levels. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV NUMBER: NCT02453776.

Infliximab Level Between Venous and Capillary Blood Using Novel Device Strongly Correlate in Paediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Blood to measure infliximab (IFX) levels is typically obtained with venipuncture. Dried blood sampling (DBS), using capillary blood obtained from a finger prick, would be an alternative to measure IFX blood levels while being more patient friendly. The aim of this study is to compare IFX blood level measured by venipuncture versus DBS in patients with paediatric inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD) to assure accuracy. METHODS: A prospective clinical pilot study was performed in patients with PIBD. Before IFX infusion, blood was collected simultaneously through venipuncture and DBS from a finger prick, using Mitratips (Neoteryx). All IFX concentrations were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The Bland-Altman analysis was used to measure limits of agreement. The interrater reliability was measured with the interclass correlation coefficient and Cohen kappa. To calculate Cohen kappa, IFX levels were categorized into 3 groups; low <5 µg/mL, adequate 5 to 10 µg/mL, and high >10 µg/mL. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included. Median age was 12.1 year (interquartile range 8-16 year). The mean difference between the 2 methods was -0.14 as calculated with Bland-Altman plot. The limits of agreement were between -1.39 and 1.12. The interclass correlation coefficient was with 0.998 excellent. The Cohen kappa between 3 IFX level categories was strong K = 0.911 (P = 0.0001). There was a strong correlation between venous IFX serum levels and DBS (r = 0.991, P = 0.0001) in the included patients. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study in patients with PIBD to show that bloodspot technology is a patient friendly alternative method to measure IFX blood levels in PIBD.

Vedolizumab Induces Endoscopic and Histologic Remission in Patients With Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We evaluated the ability of vedolizumab to induce endoscopic and histologic remission in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 110 patients with active CD, based on CD activity index (CDAI) scores >220 and mucosal ulcerations, who received open-label vedolizumab (300 mg) infusions at weeks 0, 2, and 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter through week 52 at tertiary centers in Europe. Patients received an additional infusion at week 10 if their CDAI score had not decreased by 70 points. Patients underwent ileocolonoscopy with collection of biopsies at baseline and weeks 26 and 52; a local and central reader determined simple endoscopic index for CD (SES-CD) scores. Histologic features were assessed by a blinded pathologist at week 26. Serum concentrations of vedolizumab were measured at serial time points. The primary outcome was endoscopic and histologic remission in patients with active CD treated with vedolizumab for 52 weeks. RESULTS: At weeks 26 and 52, 36 patients (29%) and 34 patients (31%), respectively, were in corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CDAI score <150), respectively. Based on intent-to-treat analysis, endoscopic remission (SES-CD score <4) was achieved by 36 patients (33%) and 40 patients (36%) at weeks 26 and 52. Endoscopic responses (decrease in SES-CD score ≥50%) occurred in 44 patients (40%) at week 26 and 5 patients (45%) at week 52. Serum concentrations of vedolizumab were higher at weeks 2, 10, and 22 in patients with lower SES-CD scores. Histologic remission at week 26 was observed in 43 (64%) of 67 patients based on Geboes Score and 37 (66%) of 56 patients based on Robarts Histopathology Index scores in analyses of paired biopsies with inflammation at baseline. Serum concentrations of vedolizumab above 10 mg/L at week 22 were associated with endoscopic remission at week 26. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective trial, we found that approximately one-third of patients with CD achieve endoscopic remission after 52 weeks of treatment with vedolizumab and two-thirds achieve histologic remission at week 26. Higher serum concentrations of vedolizumab were associated with better outcomes. EUDRACT no: 2014-005376-29.

Monitoring of Adalimumab Concentrations at Home in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Using Dried Blood Samples.

BACKGROUND: Adalimumab (ADL) is a subcutaneously administered anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent used in the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Higher ADL trough concentrations are associated with improved clinical and endoscopic outcomes. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of ADL might be facilitated by using dried blood samples (DBSs) from capillary blood obtained at home. The study aimed to compare serum ADL concentrations obtained through venipuncture to ADL concentrations in DBSs. METHODS: Patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis receiving induction or maintenance ADL therapy were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Blood was obtained through venipuncture and through DBSs during a regular outpatient visit (time point 1). Just before the next ADL administration, patients performed DBSs at home (time point 2). For this time point, serum ADL concentrations were estimated by Bayesian analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients with inflammatory bowel disease were enrolled. During the outpatient visit, samples were obtained after a median (interquartile range) of 6 (4-10) days after the last ADL dose. A high correlation was found between DBSs and venipuncture results (Pearson correlation: ≥0.96), without any clinically relevant bias. For DBSs performed by patients at home, initial comparison showed a moderate correlation between DBS results and predicted ADL serum concentrations (Pearson correlation: 0.51), although no bias was present. In addition, DBS eluate results compared with predicted ADL serum concentrations showed a mean absolute percentage error (ie, accuracy) of 45%. CONCLUSIONS: High correlations were found between ADL serum concentrations obtained through conventional venipuncture and DBSs, which indicates that this home-based test can facilitate therapeutic drug monitoring-based ADL dose adjustments in daily practice.

The effect of certolizumab drug concentration and anti-drug antibodies on TNF neutralisation.

OBJECTIVES: Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors like certolizumab, elicit an immunogenic response leading to the formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). We sought to mechanistically investigate the relationship between certolizumab concentrations, ADAs, and the effective TNF neutralising capacity in sera of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. TNF neutralising capacity of certolizumab was compared to the neutralising capacity of adalimumab. METHODS: Serum samples were collected from 40 consecutive certolizumab-treated RA patients at baseline and 4, 16, 28 and 52 weeks after treatment initiation [Dutch Trial Register NTR (Nederlands Trial Register) Trial NL2824 no. 2965]. Certolizumab concentration and ADA titre were measured with a certolizumab bridging enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a drug-tolerant radioimmunoassay (RIA), respectively. TNF neutralisation by certolizumab and adalimumab, in presence or absence of ADAs, was analysed with the TNF-sensitive WEHI bioassay. RESULTS: Despite a high incidence of ADAs during one year of follow-up (65%; 26/40 patients), certolizumab levels of >10 µg/ml were measured in most patients. The capacity for TNF neutralisation highly correlated with certolizumab serum concentration, whereas no association with ADAs was observed. Similar results were obtained for adalimumab. The relative in vitro neutralising potency was higher for certolizumab compared to adalimumab. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-certolizumab antibodies were detected in a large proportion of patients, but in most cases where ADAs were detected, certolizumab was also present in high concentrations, directly correlating with in vitro neutralising capacity. These results indicate that measurement of certolizumab drug levels, rather than ADAs, have direct clinical significance.

Vedolizumab Trough Levels in Children With Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

OBJECTIVES: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can be successfully treated with vedolizumab. Studies in adult IBD patients have shown that differences in response to vedolizumab may be related to variability in vedolizumab trough levels, but in children with pediatric-onset IBD data regarding vedolizumab trough levels are not available. Thus far, the role of trough levels in pediatric-onset IBD treatment remains unclear. We aimed to investigate predictors of vedolizumab trough levels in pediatric-onset IBD patients. METHODS: Data from anti-tumor necrosis factor refractory pediatric-onset IBD patients who received vedolizumab were collected retrospectively. Vedolizumab trough levels were measured in serum samples collected before each infusion. A linear mixed model was conducted to analyze factors that influence trough levels. RESULTS: Twenty-six pediatric-onset IBD patients (14 ulcerative colitis [UC]), 9 Crohn Disease [CD], 3 IBD-unclassified [IBD-U]) received 258 vedolizumab infusions. Mean vedolizumab trough level at week 6 was 29.9 µg/mL (SD 17.8), and 11.5 µg/mL (SD 4.9) during maintenance therapy. CD patients had significantly lower trough levels than IBD-U patients (ß 15.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.1 to 29.2; P = 0.036). Higher fecal calprotectin (ß -0.009; 95% CI -0.02 to -0.003; P = 0.007) and C-reactive protein levels (ß -0.4; 95% CI -0.72 to -0.04; P = 0.027) were associated with lower trough levels, whereas shortening of time between infusions led to higher trough levels (ß -0.77; 95% CI -0.9 to 0.64; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this group of pediatric-onset IBD patients, trough levels were significantly lower in CD patients compared with UC/IBD-U patients. Higher levels of inflammatory markers were associated with lower vedolizumab trough levels.

Dried blood samples can support monitoring of infliximab concentrations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A clinical validation.

AIMS: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can optimize the efficacy of infliximab (IFX) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Because of the delay between blood samples taken at trough and availability of results, dose adjustments can only be carried out at the next infusion, typically 8 weeks later. Dried blood samples (DBS) performed at home to measure IFX concentrations can reduce the time to adapt dose/dosing interval. Here, we aimed to validate the clinical application of DBS for IFX in IBD patients and to evaluate the feasibility of home sampling. METHODS: DBS results from 40 IBD patients on IFX treatment were compared to serum sample results at trough, peak, and 3-5 weeks after IFX infusion. Subsequently, patients performed DBS home sampling one week before the next IFX infusion. These were compared to serum concentrations as predicted by Bayesian analysis. RESULTS: IFX concentrations from finger prick and venous puncture correlate well. DBS IFX concentrations showed high correlation with serum IFX concentrations (Spearman correlation: ≥0.965), without bias. Passing-Bablok regression for IFX concentrations in DBS from home sampling also showed no bias (intercept: 1.02 mg L-1 (95% CI -1.77-2.04 mg L-1 ), slope: 0.82 (95% CI 0.63-1.40)), with reasonable correlation (Spearman correlation: 0.671). CONCLUSIONS: Timely adjustment of IFX dose/dosing interval can be facilitated by IFX concentration measurement in home-sampled DBS. DBS is a reliable method to measure IFX and can be used to predict IFX trough concentrations.

Comparison of Immunoassays for Measuring Serum Levels of Golimumab and Antibodies Against Golimumab in Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Golimumab is a monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody, which is used in ulcerative colitis with an exposure-response relationship. The goal of this study was to compare results obtained with different immunoassays (golimumab and antigolimumab antibodies trough levels). METHODS: This study was based on samples from 78 ulcerative colitis patients on golimumab treatment. Golimumab was quantified by either an anti-IgG detection antibody (Theradiag, Marne la Vallée, France) or an antibody directed against golimumab (Sanquin, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, and Janssen R&D, San Diego, CA). Bridging drug-sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (Theradiag, Janssen R&D, and KU Leuven), a bridging drug-tolerant enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Janssen R&D), and a radioimmunoassay (Sanquin) were used to quantify antidrug antibody. RESULTS: Median serum golimumab levels were 4.5, 3.5, 4.9, and 2.4 mcg/mL with Theradiag, Sanquin, KU Leuven, and Janssen R&D assay, respectively (P < 0.05). Correlation coefficients between assays ranged from 0.9 to 0.97. When using the KU Leuven and Janssen R&D assays, 86% of samples were in the same quartile of distribution of values, and for Sanquin and Janssen R&D assays, this overlap was 80%. The concordance observed for the other pairs was 83% (Sanquin/KU Leuven R&D), 71% (Theradiag/KU Leuven), and 68% (Theradiag/Janssen R&D and Theradiag/Sanquin). The specificity of assays for golimumab was demonstrated. Antidrug antibodies were detected in 28.2% of the samples with the Janssen R&D drug-tolerant assay and in the same 2 patients by the 3 other assays. CONCLUSIONS: Performances of these immunoassays were similar in terms of quality, but differences in the quantitative results point to the importance of using the same assay consistently to monitor a patient's treatment.

Antidrug antibody detection for adalimumab depends on the type of assay used: an experimental approach to help clinicians interpret diagnostic data.

OBJECTIVES: To compare different methods of antidrug antibody (ADA) against adalimumab detection in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients and the impact of ADA on adalimumab drug levels and mean ASDAS-CRP. METHODS: We used the acid-dissociation-radioimmunoassay (ARIA), antidrug-binding-test (ABT) and a bridging Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) to detect ADA at 4, 12 and 24 weeks of treatment. Patients were divided into groups; all assays negative (All-neg), only ARIA positive (ARIA-only-pos), ARIA and ABT positive, bridging ELISA negative (ARIA/ABT-double-pos) and all assays positive (All-pos). RESULTS: Eighty-three consecutive AS patient were included. At week 4, 18% compared to 11% and 0% of the patients tested positive for ADA in the ARIA, ABT and bridging ELISA, respectively. At week 12 and 24, cumulative 52% and 69% patients tested positive in the ARIA, compared to 27% and 30% patients in the ABT and 2% patients in the bridging ELISA. Adalimumab levels between All-neg and ARIA-only-pos were 9.1 (5.5-12.5) and 8.5 (5.7-12.3). Drug levels differed between ARIA/ABT-double-pos (2.7 (1.3-4.4)) and All-neg (9.1 (5.5-12.5)). All-pos patients had undetectable drug levels. Mean ASDAS-CRP at week 24 differs between All-neg (1.9 (±1.2)), and All-pos (3.8 (±1.9)) and ARIA/ABT-double-pos (2.0 (±1.1)) and All-pos. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of AS patients had detectable ADA against adalimumab in the ARIA. The ARIA detects more ADA compared to the less drug tolerant ABT and bridging ELISA. The clinical relevance depends on the impact on the bio-availability of the drug. A drug level measurement therefore helps to interpret ADA data regardless of type of assay used.

The majority of natalizumab-treated MS patients have high natalizumab concentrations at time of re-dosing.

BACKGROUND: Natalizumab is efficacious in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. All patients receive the same treatment regimen of 300 mg every 4 weeks, despite differences in pharmacokinetics between individual patients. OBJECTIVE: To give neurologists insight into natalizumab concentrations at time of re-dosing, we investigated longitudinal natalizumab concentrations in 80 patients in relation to disease activity, with possible influencing factors. METHODS: In a prospective observational cohort study, natalizumab trough serum concentrations were measured in 80 patients. Data on demographics, duration of treatment, Expanded Disability Status Scale, clinical exacerbations, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and body weight were collected. RESULTS: We measured high (≥10 µg/mL) natalizumab trough concentrations in 94% of patients. Intra-individual concentrations were stable. The spread in concentrations was substantial and did not correlate with disease activity. We found a negative association between natalizumab concentration and body weight (ß = -0.30, p = 0.010). INTERPRETATION: The majority of patients showed high natalizumab serum concentrations at time of re-dosing. Alternative treatment regimens could lead to more efficient use of natalizumab, but caution is warranted regarding the possibility of recurrence of disease activity. Prospective clinical trials are needed to establish the safety of extended dose intervals in natalizumab treatment.

From natalizumab to fingolimod in eight weeks - Immunological, clinical, and radiological data in quest of the optimal switch.

Natalizumab (NZB) discontinuation during a treatment change is associated with recurrence of disease activity in a significant proportion of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. The immunological basis why disease reactivation occurs in selected patients is unresolved. In search of a prognostic biomarker for a safe and effective transition from NZB to fingolimod, we monitored five parameters related to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of the two drugs in 12 MS patients until six months on fingolimod. Clearance of free and cell-bound NZB, re-expression of alpha-4, and fingolimod-mediated changes on CD8+ and CD4+ T cell subsets showed pronounced interindividual variability. Higher frequencies of memory CD8+ T cells after six months on fingolimod were the sole association with disease reactivation. None of the investigated parameters thus had potential as prognostic biomarker for the outcome of the switch. Our findings rather support the thesis of broad interindividual differences in the immunopathogenesis of MS.