Serum IFNα2 levels are associated with disease activity and outperform IFN-I gene signature in a longitudinal childhood-onset SLE cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To study the association of serum IFNα2 levels measured by ultrasensitive single-molecule array (Simoa) and the IFN-I gene signature (IGS) with disease activity and determine whether these assays can mark disease activity states in a longitudinal cohort of childhood-onset SLE (cSLE) patients. METHODS: Serum IFNα2 levels were measured in 338 samples from 48 cSLE patients and 67 healthy controls using an IFNα Simoa assay. Five-gene IGS was measured by RT-PCR in paired whole blood samples. Disease activity was measured by clinical SELENA-SLEDAI and BILAG-2004. Low disease activity was defined by Low Lupus Disease Activity State (LLDAS) and flares were characterized by SELENA-SLEDAI flare index. Analysis was performed using linear mixed models. RESULTS: A clear positive correlation was present between serum IFNα2 levels and the IGS (r = 0.78, P < 0.0001). Serum IFNα2 levels and IGS showed the same significant negative trend in the first 3 years after diagnosis. In this timeframe, mean baseline serum IFNα2 levels decreased by 55.1% (Δ 201 fg/ml, P < 0.001) to a mean value of 164 fg/ml, which was below the calculated threshold of 219.4 fg/ml that discriminated between patients and healthy controls. In the linear mixed model, serum IFNα2 levels were significantly associated with both cSELENA-SLEDAI and BILAG-2004, while the IGS did not show this association. Both IFN-I assays were able to characterize LLDAS and disease flare in receiver operating characteristic analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Serum IFNα2 levels measured by Simoa technology are associated with disease activity scores and characterize disease activity states in cSLE.

The Dutch version of the Juvenile Arthritis Multidimensional Assessment Report (JAMAR).

The Juvenile Arthritis Multidimensional Assessment Report (JAMAR) is a new parent/patient reported outcome measure that enables a thorough assessment of the disease status in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). We report the results of the cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the parent and patient versions of the JAMAR in the Dutch language. The reading comprehension of the questionnaire was tested in ten JIA parents and patients. Each participating centre was asked to collect demographic, clinical data and the JAMAR in 100 consecutive JIA patients or all consecutive patients seen in a 6-month period and to administer the JAMAR to 100 healthy children and their parents. The statistical validation phase explored descriptive statistics and the psychometric issues of the JAMAR: the three Likert assumptions, floor/ceiling effects, internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha, interscale correlations, test-retest reliability, and construct validity (convergent and discriminant validity). A total of 209 JIA patients (14.3% systemic, 39.7% oligoarticular, 25.8% RF negative polyarthritis, 20.2% other categories) and 107 healthy children were enrolled in two centres. The JAMAR components discriminated well healthy subjects from JIA patients. All JAMAR components revealed good psychometric performances. In conclusion, the Dutch version of the JAMAR is a valid tool for the assessment of children with JIA and is suitable for use both in routine clinical practice and clinical research.

LLDAS is an attainable treat-to-target goal in childhood-onset SLE.

OBJECTIVES: To study whether clinical remission (CR) and Low Lupus Disease Activity State (LLDAS) are achievable goals in childhood-onset SLE. METHODS: Data on medication use and disease activity were prospectively collected. LLDAS was defined as Safety of Estrogen in Lupus Erythematosus National Assesment-SLE disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) ≤4 with zero scores for renal, Central Nervous System (CNS), serositis, vasculitis and constitutional components, no increase in any SLEDAI component since the previous visit, PGA ≤1, and prednisone dose ≤7.5 mg/day. CR on treatment (Tx) was defined as a Physician Global Assessment <0.5, SELENA-SLEDAI=0, with prednisone ≤5 mg/day and maintenance treatment with immunosuppressives. CR off Tx was the same but without prednisone or other immunosuppressive usage. RESULTS: 51 patients (700 visits) were included. Within 3 months after diagnosis, 94.1% of children were treated with hydroxychloroquine and 60.8% with prednisone. Prednisone dosage decreased from a median of 0.74 mg/kg/day at diagnosis to 0.44 mg/kg/day at 3 months and 0.16 mg/kg/day at 6 months after diagnosis. Use of mycophenolate mofetil increased from 25.5% to 56.9% within 6 months after diagnosis. All children achieved LLDAS (median 186 days) and 72.5% remained in LLDAS >50% of time. 52.9% children achieved CR on Tx, and only 21.6% children achieved CR off Tx. CONCLUSIONS: LLDAS is an attainable treat-to-target goal in contrast to CR on and off Tx. Even more, LLDAS can be reached with limited use of corticosteroids with early introduction of immunosuppressives.

Type I IFN signature in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: a conspiracy of DNA- and RNA-sensing receptors?

BACKGROUND: Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) is an incurable multi-systemic autoimmune disease. Interferon type I (IFN-I) plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of SLE. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of the IFN-I signature and the contribution of cytosolic nucleic acid receptors to IFN-I activation in a cohort of primarily white cSLE patients. METHODS: The IFN-I score (positive or negative), as a measure of IFN-I activation, was assessed using real-time quantitative PCR (RT-PCR) expression values of IFN-I signature genes (IFI44, IFI44L, IFIT1, Ly6e, MxA, IFITM1) in CD14+ monocytes of cSLE patients and healthy controls (HCs). Innate immune receptor expression was determined by RT-PCR and flow cytometry. To clarify the contribution of RNA-binding RIG-like receptors (RLRs) and DNA-binding receptors (DBRs) to IFN-I activation, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients were treated with BX795, a TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) inhibitor blocking RLR and DBR pathways. RESULTS: The IFN-I signature was positive in 57% of cSLE patients and 15% of the HCs. Upregulated gene expression of TLR7, RLRs (IFIH1, DDX58, DDX60, DHX58) and DBRs (ZBP-1, IFI16) was observed in CD14+ monocytes of the IFN-I-positive cSLE patients. Additionally, RIG-I and ZBP-1 protein expression was upregulated in these cells. Spontaneous IFN-I stimulated gene (ISG) expression in PBMCs from cSLE patients was inhibited by a TBK1-blocker. CONCLUSIONS: IFN-I activation, assessed as ISG expression, in cSLE is associated with increased expression of TLR7, and RNA and DNA binding receptors, and these receptors contribute to IFN-I activation via TBK1 signaling. TBK1-blockers may therefore be a promising treatment target for SLE.

Evaluation of immune responses to combined hepatitis A and B vaccine in HIV-infected children and children on immunosuppressive medication.

OBJECTIVE: A phase IV interventional study with a combined hepatitis A and B vaccine was conducted in HIV-infected children and children receiving immunosuppressive medication for treatment of rheumatic diseases to evaluate immune responses. METHODS: Both groups (1-16 years of age) received combined (inactivated) HAV and (rDNA) HBV vaccine Ambirix(®) at months 0 and 6. Serum samples were taken at four time points and tested for anti-HAV and anti-HBs antibodies. Anti-HAV concentrations ≥20 mIU/mL or anti-HBs concentrations ≥10 mIU/mL were considered protective. Seropositivity percentages were calculated and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) were compared by nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test or Kruskal-Wallis one-way-analysis-of-variance. RESULTS: Of 80 HIV-infected children who completed the study, 67 were HAV-susceptible and 68 HBV-susceptible at enrolment. Of 80 children with rheumatic diseases who completed the study, 65 were HAV-susceptible and 74 HBV-susceptible at enrolment. Immune responses to HAV after first dose of vaccine in both study groups were low: 71% and 55% respectively, whereas immune responses after the second dose were 99% and 100% respectively. Immune response to HBV after first dose of vaccine in both groups was also low: 27% and 17% respectively. Immune responses after the second dose were 97% and 93%, respectively. A larger proportion of children on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) and of children with viral load <50 copies/mL responded to HBV, and also showed a significantly higher GMC. CONCLUSIONS: Although immune response after full series of combined HAV and HBV vaccine in both groups was excellent and comparable to healthy children, a substantial proportion of both groups was not protected for HAV after first dose of vaccine. This protection gap is especially important for HAV in travel health and postexposure prophylactic treatment: both groups of children should be serologically tested for anti-HAV prior to travel to ensure protection if there is no time to await second dose of vaccine.