Detalhe da pesquisa
1.
High yield of reinfections by home-based automatic rescreening of Chlamydia positives in a large-scale register-based screening programme and determinants of repeat infections.
Sex Transm Infect
; 89(1): 63-9, 2013 Feb.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22728910
2.
Systematic selection of screening participants by risk score in a Chlamydia screening programme is feasible and effective.
Sex Transm Infect
; 88(3): 205-11, 2012 Apr.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22215696
3.
Who participates in the Dutch Chlamydia screening? A study on demographic and behavioral correlates of participation and positivity.
Sex Transm Dis
; 39(2): 97-103, 2012 Feb.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22249297
4.
Keeping participants on board: increasing uptake by automated respondent reminders in an Internet-based chlamydia screening in the Netherlands.
BMC Public Health
; 12: 176, 2012 Mar 09.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22404911
5.
Acceptability of the internet-based Chlamydia screening implementation in the Netherlands and insights into nonresponse.
Sex Transm Dis
; 38(6): 467-74, 2011 Jun.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21217416
6.
Rationale, design, and results of the first screening round of a comprehensive, register-based, Chlamydia screening implementation programme in the Netherlands.
BMC Infect Dis
; 10: 293, 2010 Oct 07.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20925966
7.
Evaluation design of a systematic, selective, internet-based, Chlamydia screening implementation in the Netherlands, 2008-2010: implications of first results for the analysis.
BMC Infect Dis
; 10: 89, 2010 Apr 07.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20374635
8.
Effectiveness of yearly, register based screening for chlamydia in the Netherlands: controlled trial with randomised stepped wedge implementation.
BMJ
; 345: e4316, 2012 Jul 05.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22767614