RESUMO
Can Escherichia coli be used as an indicator organism for transmission events in hospitals? Perineal and pharyngeal swabs were obtained from patients admitted to a medical or surgical intensive care unit within 24 h of admission and then twice per week. Escherichia coli isolates were typed by random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) typing. Based on the typing results, transmission rates for RAPD and AFLP typing were 8.5 and 6.6 per 100 patient-days. Requiring in addition to similarity in genotype parity in time and place for a transmission event, the incidence dropped to 3.8 (RAPD) and 1.7 (AFLP) per 100 patient-days. The two typing methods not only differed with respect to numbers of transmissions identified, but also to individuals involved in transmissions. This study identified a number of problems regarding the use of Escherichia coli as indicator organism for transmission events. The use of Escherichia coli for this purpose cannot be recommended at the moment.
Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Vigilância da População/métodos , Análise do Polimorfismo de Comprimento de Fragmentos Amplificados , Análise por Conglomerados , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Escherichia coli/genética , Hospitais , Técnica de Amplificação ao Acaso de DNA Polimórfico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Viés de SeleçãoRESUMO
The aims of this study were to determine whether a multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clone, known to be endemic in three tertiary-care Portuguese hospitals, had disseminated throughout Portugal, and whether this clone was related to one of the European clones I-III described previously. The isolates were first screened by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and/or M13 random amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprint analysis. Ten representative isolates were compared by amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis, and were also compared with isolates contained in the AFLP library of the Leiden University Medical Centre. All of the Portuguese isolates clustered in European clone II (clone delineation level >80%). Following AFLP analysis, seven isolates clustered at >96%, indicating a striking degree of genetic relatedness and suggesting recent spread of a (sub)clone. Three isolates were slightly more separated from this main group, but all isolates clustered at 87.4%. Thus, the Portuguese multidrug-resistant isolates formed a sub-cluster of European clone II, suggesting that they belong to a recent lineage within clone II.