Sex and Gender Differences in Psychosocial Risk Profiles Among Patients with Coronary Heart Disease - the THORESCI-Gender Study.

BACKGROUND: Psychosocial factors tend to cluster and exhibit differences associated with sex assigned at birth. Gender disparities, though, remain uncharted so far. The current study aimed to first explore the clustering of eight established psychosocial risk factors among patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), followed by examining how sex and gender differences characterize these psychosocial risk profiles, while adjusting for the effect of age. METHOD: In total, 532 patients with CHD (Mage = 68.2 ± 8.9; 84% male) completed the comprehensive psychosocial screener and questionnaires to gauge gender identity, traits, and sociocultural norm scores. A three-step latent profile analysis (LPA) was performed to identify latent profiles and their correlates. RESULTS: LPA revealed six psychosocial risk profiles: (1) somewhat distressed overall (32%); (2) low distress (27%); (3) anger, hostility, and Type D (15%); (4) emotional distress and trauma (11%); (5) anxiety (9%); and (6) high overall distress (7%). Masculine traits and older age increased the odds to belong to the low distress profile (#2), while feminine traits and a feminine gender norm score increased the chance to belong to profiles with moderate to high distress. The effects of gender identity and feminine traits were sex dependent. CONCLUSION: The current study's findings explain heterogeneity among patients with CHD by considering the joint occurrence of psychosocial risk factors, and the role of sex, age, and gender within those profiles. Being more sensitive to the roles that sex, gender, and an integrated set of risk factors play may ultimately improve treatment and adherence.

The importance, consequences and treatment of psychosocial risk factors in heart disease: less conversation, more action!

Psychosocial factors play a significant role in the incidence and prognosis of cardiovascular disease with a rapidly increasing body of knowledge, as acknowledged by their inclusion in the European Society of Cardiology cardiovascular prevention guideline since 2012. Nevertheless, psychosocial risk is not consistently assessed, acknowledged and treated in daily clinical practice. Therefore, adopting a multidimensional approach that encompasses biological, psychological, and social factors is crucial for understanding the dynamic nature of cardiovascular health and disease, delivering patient-centred care, and developing effective interventions to ultimately enhance health and satisfaction with contemporary medicine and care. The current review summarises the state-of-the-art evidence for screening and treating psychological risk factors in coronary heart disease, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation in the context of cardiac rehabilitation, along with accompanying recommendations. The limited adoption of routine screening, despite longstanding recommendations, highlights the importance of prioritising the implementation and expansion of routine screening in primary and secondary prevention. To advance psychosocial treatment, a standardised and personalised approach including comprehensive education, physical exercise, and psychosocial support with a focus on patient-reported outcomes is crucial. Treating heart and mind together has the potential to decrease psychosocial risk while enhancing the prognosis and quality of life, therefore delivering true patient-centred care.

A Network Analysis of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Patients With Heart Disease: The Role of Socioeconomic Status and Sex.

OBJECTIVE: Diverse risk factors influence the development and prognosis of coronary heart disease (CHD) independently and mutually. Low socioeconomic status (SES) seems to exacerbate these risk factors' influences. In addition, sex differences have been identified for individual risk factors. Network analysis could provide in-depth insight into the interrelatedness of the risk factors, their predictability, and the moderating role of sex, to ultimately contribute to more refinement in prevention and cardiac rehabilitation. METHODS: A total of 1682 participants (78% male; mean [standard deviation] age = 69.2 [10.6] years) with CHD completed questionnaires on psychosocial factors and health behaviors. Cardiometabolic data were retrieved through medical records. An SES index was created based on self-reported occupation, education, and area (i.e., postal code)-based median family income. Using R, we conducted a mixed graphical model network analysis on all risk factors combined with and without the moderating role of sex. RESULTS: SES belonged to the more influential risk factors with moderate to high levels of expected influence and degree centrality, indicating that it plays a considerable role in the risk factor network. When considering the moderating role of sex, relationships between SES and most risk factors were found to be stronger for women ( b = 0.06-0.48). CONCLUSIONS: The current study provided an insight into an interrelated network of psychosocial and medical risk factors among CHD patients. With SES belonging to the more influential risk factors and female sex influencing the strength of all the SES-risk factor relationships, cardiac rehabilitation and prevention techniques could be more refined by accounting for both influences.

Validity of a German Comprehensive Psychosocial Screening Instrument based on the ESC Cardiovascular Prevention Guidelines.

Background: Following guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention of the European Society for Cardiology (ESC), the current study validated the German Comprehensive Psychosocial Screening Instrument in participants who underwent coronary angiography. Methods: 314 participants (Mage = 69.7 ± 12.0; 69 % male) completed the German Comprehensive Psychosocial Screening Instrument and validated comparison scales to measure depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), Type D personality (DS14), work stress (ERI), family stress (SMSS), trauma (PC-PTSD), and anger and hostility (Z-scale of MMPI-2). Results: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed that the psychosocial risk factors were separate entities rather than a signs or symptoms of a single broad indication of distress (CFI = .872, RMSEA = .056, SRMR = .058). Intraclass coefficients (ICC), kappa and diagnostic accuracy indicators (receiver operator characteristic [ROC] curves, sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive values [PPV; NPV]) indicated that most screener scales were sufficient to good. We also compared patients with established coronary heart disease (CHD; n = 213) to those with no current CHD (n = 100) and found overall similar results. Discussion: The German version of the Comprehensive Psychosocial Screening Instrument has an acceptable performance. Aside from minor improvements, the screening instrument could be implemented in the cardiological practice to screen patients on multidimensional psychosocial risk.

Who develops long COVID? Longitudinal pre-pandemic predictors of long COVID and symptom clusters in a representative Dutch population.

OBJECTIVES: Prior studies show that long COVID has a heterogeneous presentation. Whether specific risk factors are related to subclusters of long COVID remains unknown. This study aimed to determine pre-pandemic predictors of long COVID and symptom clustering. METHODS: A total of 3,022 participants of a panel representative of the Dutch population completed an online survey about long COVID symptoms. Data was merged into 2018/2019 panel data covering sociodemographic, medical, and psychosocial predictors. A total of 415 participants were classified as having long COVID. K-means clustering was used to identify patient clusters. Multivariate and lasso regression was used to identify relevant predictors compared to a COVID-19 positive control group. RESULTS: Predictors of long-term COVID included older age, Western ethnicity, BMI, chronic disease, COVID-19 reinfections, severity, and symptoms, lower self-esteem, and higher positive affect (AUC = 0.79, 95%CI 0.73-0.86). Four clusters were identified: a low and a high symptom severity cluster, a smell-taste and respiratory symptoms cluster, and a neuro-cognitive, psychosocial, and inflammatory symptom cluster. Predictors for the different clusters included regular health complaints, healthcare use, fear of COVID-19, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and neuroticism. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of sociodemographic, medical, and psychosocial factors predicted long COVID. Heterogenous symptom clusters suggest that there are different phenotypes of long COVID-19 presentation.

Long COVID is not a uniform syndrome: Evidence from person-level symptom clusters using latent class analysis.

BACKGROUND: The current study aims to enhance insight into the heterogeneity of long COVID by identifying symptom clusters and associated socio-demographic and health determinants. METHODS: A total of 458 participants (Mage 36.0 ± 11.9; 46.5% male) with persistent symptoms after COVID-19 completed an online self-report questionnaire including a 114-item symptom list. First, a k-means clustering analysis was performed to investigate overall clustering patterns and identify symptoms that provided meaningful distinctions between clusters. Next, a step-three latent class analysis (LCA) was performed based on these distinctive symptoms to analyze person-centered clusters. Finally, multinominal logistic models were used to identify determinants associated with the symptom clusters. RESULTS: From a 5-cluster solution obtained from k-means clustering, 30 distinctive symptoms were selected. Using LCA, six symptom classes were identified: moderate (20.7%) and high (20.7%) inflammatory symptoms, moderate malaise-neurocognitive symptoms (18.3%), high malaise-neurocognitive-psychosocial symptoms (17.0%), low-overall symptoms (13.3%) and high overall symptoms (9.8%). Sex, age, employment, COVID-19 suspicion, COVID-19 severity, number of acute COVID-19 symptoms, long COVID symptom duration, long COVID diagnosis, and impact of long COVID were associated with the different symptom clusters. CONCLUSIONS: The current study's findings characterize the heterogeneity in long COVID symptoms and underscore the importance of identifying determinants of different symptom clusters.

The role of sex and gender in somatic complaints among patients with coronary heart disease: A longitudinal study on acute and long-term changes.

BACKGROUND: Somatic complaints are persistently reported in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Sex and gender influence health and well-being in a variety of ways, but it is unknown how they affect somatic complaints over time after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, we examined the association between sex and gender on somatic health complaints during the first month (acute) and the first two years (recovery) after PCI. METHODS: 514 patients (Mage = 64.2 ± 8.9, 84.2% male) completed the somatic scale of the Health Complaints Scale (including the subscales: cardiopulmonary complaints, fatigue, sleep problems) at baseline, one, 12-, and 24-months post-PCI. In a follow-up study, they filled in additional questionnaires to gauge gender norms, traits, and identity. Linear mixed modeling analyses were used to assess the influence of sex, gender, their interaction, and covariates on somatic complaints for the acute and recovery phases separately. RESULTS: A general decline in somatic complaints over time was observed during the acute phase, followed by a stabilization in the recovery phase. Females and individuals with more feminine traits, norms, and identities reported increased somatic complaints. Males with more pronounced feminine norms and females with more masculine norms likewise reported more somatic, cardiopulmonary, and fatigue complaints. Furthermore, age, cardiac history, and comorbid diseases partly explained the associations with somatic complaints. CONCLUSION: While somatic complaints improve post-PCI, there are still conspicuous sex and gender differences that need to be considered. Future research should further elaborate upon these discrepancies and incorporate sex and gender in prevention and develop tailored interventions to diminish somatic complaints.

Patient and healthcare professionals' perceived barriers and facilitators to the implementation of psychosocial screening in cardiac practice: A Delphi study.

BACKGROUND: Psychosocial risk factors contribute to the incidence and progression of coronary heart disease (CHD). Psychosocial screening may identify individuals who are at risk and aid them with getting appropriate care. To successfully implement psychosocial screening in the cardiology practice, the current study aims to identify key barriers and facilitators to its implementation and evaluate their perceived importance among health care professionals (HCPs) and patients. METHODS: We took a modified 3-round Delphi study approach to gain insight into key determinants that could either impede or ease implementation. Round 1 gathered data from HCPs (n = 9; cardiologists, medical psychologists, cardiac nurses) and CHD patients (n = 21), which we transcribed verbatim, coded, and processed into unique determinants. In rounds 2 and 3, participants were asked to select the most relevant determinants and rank them based on importance. Subsequently, determinants were classified by implementation level. RESULTS: Patients were generally more positive towards screening. HCP barriers included time-constraints, disruption of primary activities, and limited knowledge on psychosocial risk and screening, while patient barriers were commonly related to accessibility and patient characteristics (e.g., health literacy, motivation). Facilitators of both groups mainly pertained to the use of the screener and follow-up care, such as increasing the accessibility and the benefits of the screener. CONCLUSION: Barriers may be targeted by enhancing the effects of the facilitators. Increasing the accessibility to the screener and interventions, improving information provision, and appointing a contact person to oversee the screening process may ease the screening and care process for both patients and HCPs.

Validity of a multidimensional comprehensive psychosocial screening instrument based on the ESC cardiovascular prevention guidelines - Evidence from the general and cardiovascular patient population.

AIM: To evaluate the psychometric properties and validity of the updated version of the Dutch multidimensional Comprehensive Psychosocial Screening Instrument in patients with coronary heart disease and the general population, based upon guideline recommendations from the European Society for Cardiology. METHOD: 678 participants (Mage = 48.2, SD = 16.8; 46% male) of the Dutch general population and 312 cardiac patients (Mage = 65.9, SD = 9.9; 77% male) who recently received percutaneous coronary intervention completed the Comprehensive Psychosocial Screening Instrument and validated questionnaires for depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), Type D personality (DS14), hostility (CMHS), anger (STAS-T), trauma (SRIP), and chronic work and family stress (ERI, MMQ-6). RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed that the eight screened risk factors were best measured as separate entities, rather than broader indications of distress. Inter-instrument agreement, assessed with the intraclass coefficient (ICC) and the screening accuracy indicators (receiving operator characteristic [ROC] curves, sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive values [PPV; NPV]) were good for most screened risk factors. PPV was low in low prevalence risk factors like anxiety, trauma, and depression. CONCLUSION: Overall, the current version of the Comprehensive Psychosocial Screening Instrument has an acceptable performance in both populations, with a fair to excellent level of agreement with established full questionnaires. Besides a few suggestions for further refinement, the screener may be implemented in primary care and cardiological practice.

Chronic stress exposure in men and women, and implications for the course of fatigue after percutaneous coronary intervention; the THORESCI study.

BACKGROUND: Fatigue is a prevalent symptom in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Individual differences in chronic stress may affect the experience and persistence of fatigue, and this may vary between the sexes. Therefore, we studied the effect of chronic stress on the course of fatigue over a 2-year period after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and examined the moderating effects of sex. METHODS: 1682 patients (78% men, age = 67.1 ± 10.6) were recruited and filled out multiple self-report questionnaires at baseline, one, 12, and 24 months post-PCI, including questions on demographics, fatigue (HCS). Multiple chronic stressors were assessed at baseline: work stress (ERI16), marital stress (MMQ-6), early life events (Life Events Questionnaire) and social stress. Latent class factor analysis (LatentGOLD) was used to construct a comprehensive chronic stress index. Linear mixed modeling examined the predictive quality of predictors and covariates. RESULTS: Fatigue was found to substantially decrease over the first month post-PCI, then stabilized at a moderate level. Chronic stress impacted both the level and course of fatigue by increasing its level and delaying recovery. Overall and across time, women reported more fatigue than men. The level and course effects of chronic stress and sex were independent of demographic, health behavioral, and medical covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Individual differences in chronic stress impact both the level and course of fatigue post-PCI, with women being affected most. Future research could further explain the mechanisms underlying the observed relationships. Developing and testing interventions focusing on exercise and stress-reduction could be used to alleviate fatigue.