Low-dose desmopressin combined with serum sodium monitoring can prevent clinically significant hyponatraemia in patients treated for nocturia.

OBJECTIVE: To explore risk factors for desmopressin-induced hyponatraemia and evaluate the impact of a serum sodium monitoring plan. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This was a meta-analysis of data from three clinical trials of desmopressin in nocturia. Patients received placebo or desmopressin orally disintegrating tablet (ODT; 10-100 µg). The incidence of serum sodium <130 mmol/L was recorded by age, sex and dose. Potential predictors of clinically significant hyponatraemia were identified using multivariate analysis in a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Dose, age, baseline serum sodium level and kidney function, according to estimated GFR clearance, were significant risk factors for hyponatraemia in both sexes; similar to the known risk factors associated with hyponatraemia in the general population. In men, arthritis and use of drugs for bone disease were also predictive of hyponatraemia, while in women, raised monocytes and absence of lipid-modifying drugs increased the risk of hyponatraemia. Use of the proposed monitoring scheme and the minimum effective dose would have omitted all patients with clinically significant hyponatraemia from further treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of hyponatraemia can be reduced by using minimum effective gender-specific dosing with the ODT formulation of desmopressin (25 µg in women, 50 µg in men). A sodium monitoring plan is proposed whereby baseline sodium must be ≥135 mmol/L (especially important in the elderly), with additional monitoring at week 1 and month 1 for those at elevated risk because they are aged ≥65 years or receiving concomitant medication associated with hyponatraemia. This monitoring plan would help to prevent some at-risk patients developing hyponatraemia; retrospective application of the monitoring plan showed that, once at-risk patients were appropriately screened out, only mild, non-clinically significant hyponatraemia was observed, within ranges of other drugs associated with hyponatraemia and similar to the background prevalence in the treatment population.

The Nocturia Impact Diary: a self-reported impact measure to complement the voiding diary.

BACKGROUND: Nocturia is a chronic, fluctuating disease that disrupts sleep and has a wide-ranging impact on quality of life. Valid tools to measure the patient-reported impact of nocturia are essential for evaluating the value of treatment, but the available tools are suboptimal. OBJECTIVES: This study reports the development and validation of the Nocturia Impact Diary-an augmented form of the Nocturia Quality of Life questionnaire designed to be completed in conjunction with the widely used 3-day voiding diary. METHODS: The process comprised three steps: Step 1: Development of a concept pool using the Nocturia Quality of Life questionnaire and data from relevant studies; Step 2: Content validity study; Step 3: Psychometric testing of construct validity, reliability, and sensitivity of the diary in a randomized, placebo-controlled study in patients with nocturia. RESULTS: Step 1: Fourteen items and 4 domains were included in the first draft of the diary. Step 2: Twenty-three patients with nocturia participated in the cognitive debriefing study. Items were adjusted accordingly, and the content validity was high. Step 3: Fifty-six patients were randomized to desmopressin orally disintegrating tablet or placebo. The diary demonstrated high construct validity, with good sensitivity and a good fit to Rasch model, as well as high internal consistency, discriminatory ability, and acceptable sensitivity to change. Results indicated that the diary was unidimensional. CONCLUSIONS: The Nocturia Impact Diary is a convenient, validated patient-reported outcome measure. It should be used in conjunction with a voiding diary to capture the real-life consequences of nocturia and its treatment.

Efficacy and safety of low dose desmopressin orally disintegrating tablet in men with nocturia: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study.

PURPOSE: We investigated the efficacy and safety of 50 and 75 µg desmopressin orally disintegrating tablets in men with nocturia (2 or more nocturnal voids). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this 3-month, randomized, double-blind, parallel study 50 and 75 µg desmopressin were compared with placebo. The co-primary efficacy end points were changes from baseline in mean number of nocturnal voids and proportions of patients achieving at least a 33% reduction from baseline in nocturnal voids (33% responders) during a 3-month treatment period. RESULTS: The full analysis set comprised 385 men (age range 20 to 87 years). The 50 and 75 µg doses significantly reduced the number of nocturnal voids (-0.37, p <0.0001 and -0.41, p = 0.0003, respectively) and increased the odds of a 33% or greater response (OR 1.98, p = 0.0009 and OR 2.04, p = 0.0004, respectively) compared with placebo during 3 months. Desmopressin 50 and 75 µg increased the time to first void from baseline by approximately 40 minutes compared to placebo (p = 0.006 and p = 0.003, respectively). The response to desmopressin was seen by 1 week of treatment and was sustained. Significant increases in health related quality of life and sleep quality were observed compared to placebo. Desmopressin was well tolerated as only 2 subjects (age 74 and 79 years) on 50 µg had a serum sodium level of less than 130 mmol/L (vs 9 subjects on 75 µg). CONCLUSIONS: Desmopressin (orally disintegrating tablet) is an effective and well tolerated treatment for men with nocturia. Treatment with 50 µg desmopressin, the minimum effective dose, provided sustained improvement of nocturia throughout the study and meaningful benefits to patients with an improved safety profile.

Efficacy and safety of low dose desmopressin orally disintegrating tablet in women with nocturia: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study.

PURPOSE: Previous studies suggest a lower dose of desmopressin orally disintegrating tablet may be effective in females compared to males with nocturia. We confirm the efficacy and safety of 25 µg desmopressin orally disintegrating tablet compared to placebo in female patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this 3-month, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study 25 µg desmopressin once daily was compared to placebo in women with nocturia (2 or more nocturnal voids). The co-primary efficacy end points were change from baseline in mean number of nocturnal voids and proportion of patients achieving at least a 33% reduction from baseline in the mean number of nocturnal voids (33% responders). RESULTS: The full analysis set comprised 261 patients (age range 19 to 87 years). Desmopressin significantly reduced the mean number of nocturnal voids and increased the odds of a 33% or greater response compared to placebo during 3 months, assessed by longitudinal analysis (-0.22, p = 0.028 and OR 1.85, p = 0.006, respectively). Desmopressin increased the mean time to first nocturnal void by 49 minutes compared to placebo at 3 months (p = 0.003). The response to desmopressin was seen by week 1 of treatment and was sustained throughout the trial. Significant increases in health related quality of life and sleep quality were observed compared to placebo. Desmopressin was well tolerated. Serum sodium levels remained greater than 125 mmol/L throughout the trial and 3 transient decreases to less than 130 mmol/L were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: At a dose of 25 µg, desmopressin orally disintegrating tablet is an effective and well tolerated treatment for women with nocturia. Treatment provides rapid and sustained improvement in nocturia and quality of life.

Degarelix versus goserelin (+ antiandrogen flare protection) in the relief of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to prostate cancer: results from a phase IIIb study (NCT00831233).

INTRODUCTION: No studies to date have assessed the efficacy/tolerability of degarelix in the relief of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to prostate cancer (PrCa). METHODS: Patients were randomised to degarelix 240/80 mg or goserelin 3.6 mg + bicalutamide flare protection (G+B); both treatments were administered for 3 months. The primary endpoint was change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at week 12 compared with baseline. RESULTS: This study was stopped early due to recruitment difficulties. 40 patients received treatment (degarelix n = 27; G+B n = 13); most had locally advanced disease and were highly symptomatic. Degarelix was non-inferior to G+B in reducing IPSS at week 12 in the full analysis set (p = 0.20); the significantly larger IPSS reduction in the per-protocol analysis (p = 0.04) was suggestive of superior reductions with degarelix. Significantly more degarelix patients had improved quality of life (IPSS question) at week 12 (85 vs. 46%; p = 0.01). Mean prostate size reductions at week 12 were 42 versus 25% for patients receiving degarelix versus G+B, respectively (p = 0.04; post hoc analysis). Most adverse events were mild/moderate; more degarelix patients experienced injection site reactions whereas more G+B patients had urinary tract infections/cystitis. CONCLUSION: In 40 men with predominantly locally advanced PrCa and highly symptomatic LUTS, degarelix was at least non-inferior to G+B in reducing IPSS at week 12.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone blockers and cardiovascular disease risk: analysis of prospective clinical trials of degarelix.

PURPOSE: We investigated associations of baseline cardiovascular disease risk profile, dosing regimen and treatment duration with incident cardiovascular disease events during androgen deprivation therapy with degarelix in patients with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on 1,704 men who participated in a total of 9 clinical trials were pooled for analysis. Patients received treatment with 1-month (20 to 240 mg) or 3-month (240 to 480 mg) doses of degarelix for an average of 22 months. End points were ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disorders, arterial thrombotic/embolic events and intermittent claudication. RESULTS: First time cardiovascular disease events were reported in 92 men in the year before study entry and in 168 after degarelix treatment. Event rates were similar before and after degarelix treatment in the total population (5.5 vs 6.1/100 person-years, p = 0.45) and in men without cardiovascular disease (5.6 vs 4.3/100 person-years, p = 0.11). In contrast, event rates appeared higher after degarelix treatment in men with cardiovascular disease at baseline (5.3 to 10.5 events per 100 person-years, p = 0.0013). On multivariate analysis cardiovascular disease at baseline was the strongest independent predictor of events, followed by older age, alcohol abstinence and obesity (each p <0.05). Degarelix dose and schedule were not independently associated with cardiovascular disease events. CONCLUSIONS: In men with prostate cancer observed rates of cardiovascular disease events were similar before and after degarelix treatment. Events were largely confined to men with preexisting cardiovascular disease and further modulated by age and modifiable risk factors. Randomized, controlled trials and longer followup are key to fully clarify the comparative safety of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists vs agonists.

Low-dose Desmopressin Orally Disintegrating Tablet: Suggested Clinically Meaningful Benefit in Patients with Nocturia Due to Nocturnal Polyuria.

BACKGROUND: Clinical benefit has not been evaluated much in patients with nocturia. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical benefit of desmopressin orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) in women (25µg) and men (50µg) with nocturia due to nocturnal polyuria (NP). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Patients with NP from two randomised, placebo-controlled trials in men (CS41) and women (CS40) with two or more nocturnal voids per night were included. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Change from baseline in nocturnal voids, 33% and 50% responder status (average reduction of ≤33% and ≤50%, respectively, in the mean number of nocturnal voids vs baseline), and percentage of nights with at most one void or no voids (ie, complete response) during 3-mo treatment period were assessed for clinical benefit. Two-sided test (5% significance level) was used for all endpoints. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Demographics and baseline characteristics of patients in CS41 (N=230) and CS40 (N=232) were similar. A greater reduction in the mean number of nocturnal voids was seen with desmopressin ODT in men (treatment difference [TD]: -0.37 voids) compared with women (TD: -0.29 voids). For 33% and 50% responder status, TD with ODT versus placebo were 21% and 12%, respectively, in men, and 12% and 17%, respectively, in women. For the number of nights with at most one void, TDs were 11% and 13% (p<0.009 for both) for men and women, respectively. For complete response, TD was significant in men (TD: 9%, p<0.001). Limitations inherent in this analysis were evident as the data for cotreatments (baseline) and quality of life were not collected. CONCLUSIONS: A stronger treatment effect with desmopressin ODT versus placebo and the magnitude of differences are indicative of clinical benefit in patients with NP. PATIENT SUMMARY: We looked at the clinical benefit of desmopressin ODT in patients with nocturnal polyuria. We conclude that clinical benefit was observed with desmopressin ODT in these patients.

Rationale and Design of an Adaptive Phase 2b/3 Clinical Trial of Selepressin for Adults in Septic Shock. Selepressin Evaluation Programme for Sepsis-induced Shock-Adaptive Clinical Trial.

Septic shock carries substantial morbidity and mortality. The failure of many promising therapies during late-phase clinical trials prompted calls for alternative trial designs. We describe an innovative trial evaluating selepressin, a novel selective vasopressin V1a receptor agonist, for adults with septic shock. SEPSIS-ACT (Selepressin Evaluation Programme for Sepsis-induced Shock-Adaptive Clinical Trial) is a blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-part, adaptive phase 2b/3 trial, evaluating up to four selepressin dosing strategies. The primary outcome is pressor- and ventilator-free days, with a value of zero assigned for death within 30 days. We calculate Bayesian probabilities of final trial success to guide interim decision-making. Part 1 (dose-finding) has an adaptive sample size based on response-adaptive randomization and prespecified rules to determine stopping for futility or selection of the best dosing regimen for Part 2. Part 2 (confirmation) randomizes a minimum of 1,000 patients equally to the selected dosing regimen or placebo. The final estimate of treatment effect compares all selepressin-treated patients with all placebo-treated patients. The sample size of 1,800 provides 91% power to detect an increase of 1.5 pressor- and ventilator-free days with a reduction in mortality of 1.5%. The trial received a Special Protocol Assessment agreement from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research and is underway in Europe and the United States. SEPSIS-ACT is an innovative trial that addresses both optimal dose and confirmation of benefit, accelerating the evaluation of selepressin while mitigating risks to patients and sponsor through use of response-adaptive randomization, a novel registration endpoint, prespecified futility stopping rules, and a large sample size. Clinical Trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02508649).

Delaying time to first nocturnal void may have beneficial effects on reducing blood glucose levels.

Experimental studies disrupting sleep and epidemiologic studies of short sleep durations indicate the importance of deeper and longer sleep for cardiometabolic health. We examined the potential beneficial effects of lengthening the first uninterrupted sleep period (FUSP) on blood glucose. Long-term data (≥3 months of treatment) were derived from three clinical trials, testing low-dose (10-100 µg) melt formulations of desmopressin in 841 male and female nocturia patients (90 % of which had nocturnal polyuria). We performed post hoc multiple regression with non-fasting blood glucose as dependent variable and the following potential covariates/factors: time-averaged change of FUSP since baseline, age, gender, race, ethnicity, baseline glucose, baseline weight, change in weight, patient metabolic status (normal, metabolic syndrome, type II diabetes), dose, follow-up interval, and time of random glucose sampling. Increases in FUSP resulted in statistically significant reductions in blood glucose (p = 0.0131), even after controlling for all remaining covariates. Per hour increase in time to first void was associated with glucose decreases of 1.6 mg/dL. This association was more pronounced in patients with increased baseline glucose levels (test of baseline glucose by FUSP change interaction: p < 0.0001). Next to FUSP change, other statistically significant confounding factors/covariates also associated with glucose changes were gender, ethnicity, metabolic subgroup, and baseline glucose. These analyses indicate that delaying time to first void may have beneficial effects on reducing blood glucose in nocturia patients. These data are among the first to suggest that improving sleep may have salutary effects on a cardiometabolic measure.

Delay of first voiding episode is associated with longer reported sleep duration.

OBJECTIVES: Time to first void is a common outcome in nocturia clinical trials, but its relationship to other conventional self-reported sleep measures is uncertain. We examined associations between change in time to first void and change in sleep duration over the course of such a trial. METHODS: Secondary data analyses were based on a previously published study of a medication treating nocturia in 757 adult patients studied for periods up to 5 months. We used repeated-measures logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations (GEE) to examine the odds ratios (ORs) for achieving 6.0, 6.5, or 7.0 hours of total sleep duration based on increases of time to first void of 1, 2, or 3 hours. RESULTS: Increases in time to first void were associated with longer sleep durations from beginning to end of study. A 1-hour increment in time to first void was associated with a higher likelihood of obtaining a total sleep duration of e6 (OR = 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-1.73), e6.5 (OR = 1.30; 95% CI, 1.16-1.47), or e7 (OR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.12-1.37) hours, after controlling for baseline time to first void, baseline sleep duration, time, and age (all Ps < .0001). Similar results were seen for 2- and 3-hour increments in time to first void. CONCLUSIONS: Time to first void may be an important supplementary variable about which to inquire in population-based studies.

The effect of baseline testosterone on the efficacy of degarelix and leuprolide: further insights from a 12-month, comparative, phase III study in prostate cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of baseline testosterone on testosterone control and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) suppression using data from a phase III trial (CS21) comparing degarelix and leuprolide in prostate cancer. METHODS: In CS21, patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer (all stages) were randomized to degarelix 240 mg for 1 month followed by monthly maintenance doses of 80 or 160 mg, or leuprolide 7.5 mg/month. Patients receiving leuprolide could receive antiandrogens for flare protection. Treatment effects on testosterone and PSA reduction, testosterone surge, and microsurges were investigated in 3 baseline testosterone subgroups: <3.5, 3.5-5.0, and >5.0 ng/mL. Data are presented for the groups receiving degarelix 240/80 mg (the approved dose) and leuprolide 7.5 mg. RESULTS: Higher baseline testosterone delayed castration with both treatments. However, castrate testosterone levels and PSA suppression occurred more rapidly with degarelix irrespective of baseline testosterone. With leuprolide, the magnitude of testosterone surge and microsurges increased with increasing baseline testosterone. There was no overall correlation between baseline testosterone and initial PSA decrease in either treatment group, although PSA suppression tended to be slowest with leuprolide and fastest with degarelix in the high baseline testosterone subgroup. CONCLUSION: Patients with high baseline testosterone may have greater risk of tumor stimulation (clinical flare) and mini-flares during gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist treatment and so the need for flare protection with antiandrogens in these patients is obvious, especially in metastatic disease. Although higher baseline testosterone delays castration, castrate testosterone and PSA suppression occur more rapidly with degarelix, irrespective of baseline testosterone, without the need for flare protection.

An update on the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists in prostate cancer.

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the main treatment approach in advanced prostate cancer and in recent years has primarily involved the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists. However, despite their efficacy, GnRH agonists have several drawbacks associated with their mode of action. These include an initial testosterone surge and testosterone microsurges on repeat administration. GnRH antagonists provide an alternative approach to ADT with a more direct mode of action that involves immediate blockade of GnRH receptors. Antagonists produce a more rapid suppression of testosterone (and prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) without a testosterone surge or microsurges and appear to offer an effective and well tolerated option for the hormonal treatment of prostate cancer. Comparisons with GnRH agonists have shown GnRH antagonists to be at least as effective in achieving and maintaining castrate testosterone levels in patients with prostate cancer. Furthermore, with antagonists, the lack of an initial testosterone surge (which may cause clinical flare) may allow more rapid relief of symptoms related to prostate cancer, avoid the need for concomitant antiandrogens to prevent clinical flare (so avoiding any antiandrogen-associated adverse events) and allow GnRH antagonist use in patients with high tumour burden and/or acute problems such as spinal cord compression. Although several antagonists have been investigated, only degarelix and abarelix are currently available for clinical use in prostate cancer. Currently, degarelix is the most extensively studied and widely available agent in this class. Degarelix is one of a newer generation of antagonists which, in a comprehensive and ongoing clinical development programme, has been shown to provide rapid, profound and sustained testosterone suppression without the systemic allergic reactions associated with earlier antagonists. This review examines the currently available data on GnRH antagonists in prostate cancer.

Longitudinal analysis of the suicidal behaviour risk in short-term placebo-controlled studies of mirtazapine in major depressive disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To examine suicidal behaviour risk in the short-term placebo-controlled studies of mirtazapine in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). METHOD: Longitudinal Generalized Estimating Equations analyses were performed on pooled data from 15 placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, short-term trials of mirtazapine, using the suicide item scores from the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) as a proxy outcome measure for suicidality risk. RESULTS: The overall analysis using the convention that a patient is at risk if the HAMD suicide item score is > or =3, and excluding patients at risk at baseline, demonstrated a statistically significantly lower risk for mirtazapine- compared to placebo-treated patients on the HAMD (odds ratio mirtazapine versus placebo 0.38; 95% confidence interval 0.21-0.66; P= 0.0008). CONCLUSION: Our results based on pooled data from 15 placebo-controlled, short-term studies of mirtazapine in MDD using the suicide item scores from the HAMD as a proxy outcome measure for suicidality risk, demonstrate that mirtazapine was associated with statistically significantly lower suicidality risk compared to placebo.

Treating depression with different galenical drug formulations: Does it make a difference? The comparison of mirtazapine fast dissolving formulation (FDT) with conventional mirtazapine tablets (CT).

Objective. To assess clinical advantages of fast dissolving tablet (FDT) formulation of mirtazapine by comparison to conventional (CT) mirtazapine tablets in the treatment of depressed patients. Methods. A posteriori analyses of pooled data of a total of 30 studies (of at least 6 weeks duration, total N=3510) with CT and FDT in depressed patients was performed. Weight changes were recorded at baseline and regular intervals until the end of the study. Patient preferences for the one or the other formulation, as well as the appraisal of the FDT qualities, were assessed by means of a global internet-based survey including 5,428 patients. Results. Compared with mirtazapine CT, the FDT was associated with an average 0.3 kg less weight increase (P=0.0015) during the 6 weeks of treatment. The qualities and preference for FDT (global survey) were positively evaluated by the majority of patients. Particular advantages of FDT over CT were: better compliance (47.3% of raters), taste, ease and overall convenience of use (>75% of raters). Conclusions. The FDT mirtazapine differed from conventional tablets (CT) not only regarding somewhat less weight increase and overall use preference, but more importantly, regarding better compliance with treatment.

Early improvement in the first 2 weeks as a predictor of treatment outcome in patients with major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis including 6562 patients.

OBJECTIVE: New evidence indicates that treatment response can be predicted with high sensitivity after 2 weeks of treatment. Here, we assess whether early improvement with antidepressant treatment predicts treatment outcome in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). DATA SOURCES: Forty-one clinical trials comparing mirtazapine with active comparators or placebo in inpatients and outpatients (all-treated population, N = 6907; intent-to-treat population, N = 6562) with MDD (DSM-III-R or DSM-IV Criteria) were examined for early improvement (>or= 20% score reduction from baseline on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D-17] within 2 weeks of treatment) and its relationship to treatment outcome. STUDY SELECTION: Data were obtained from a systematic search of single- or double-blind clinical trials (clinical trials database, Organon, a part of Schering-Plough Corporation, Oss, The Netherlands). All included trials (a total of 41) employed antidepressant treatment for more than 4 weeks and a maximum of 8 weeks. The studies ranged from March 1982 to December 2003. Trials were excluded if there were no HAM-D-17 ratings available, no diagnosis of MDD, or if the study was not blinded. Trials were also excluded if HAM-D-17 assessments were not available at week 2, week 4, and at least once beyond week 4. DATA SYNTHESIS: Early improvement predicted stable response and stable remission with high sensitivity (>or= 81% and >or= 87%, respectively). Studies utilizing rapid titration vs. slow titration of mirtazapine demonstrated improved sensitivity for stable responders (98%, [95% CI = 93% to 100%] vs. 91% [95% CI = 89% to 93%]) and stable remitters (100%, [95% CI = 92% to 100%] vs. 93% [95% CI = 91% to 95%]). Negative predictive values for stable responders and stable remitters were much higher (range = 82%-100%) than positive predictive values (range = 19%-60%). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that early improvement with antidepressant medication can predict subsequent treatment outcome with high sensitivity in patients with major depressive disorder. The high negative predictive values indicate little chance of stable response or stable remission in the absence of improvement within 2 weeks. A lack of improvement during the first 2 weeks of therapy may indicate that changes in depression management should be considered earlier than conventionally thought.

Are we really that blind?

In double-blind randomized clinical trials, it is common practice to randomize patients using randomly permuted blocks. In this article, it is demonstrated that before unblinding statistical inference of the treatment effects can be conducted, yielding consistent and rather precise estimates even in the presence of an additive block effect. With an even greater precision, the within-group standard deviation on which power calculation are usually based can be inferred from blinded data. The use of blocks of random lengths as suggested by ICH-E9 in the (unlikely) case that previous treatment allocation can be guessed by strong pharmacological effects, merely complicates the analysis but blinded inference can still be conducted without much extra loss of information. On the one hand, one might argue that this possibility of blinded inference takes away the need of conducting interim analyses for administrative or business reasons or for sample size reestimation. On the other hand, however, it most probably will have a disputable, positive or negative effect on the conduct of the remainder of the trial. If regulators and the pharmaceutical world at large want to avoid this possibility, then other unrestricted, biased coin, or more general dynamic allocation randomization procedures may be less controversial alternatives. It at least provides another strong argument in favor of using large blocks as the precision of blinded inference decreases with increasing block lengths. If blinded inferences are deemed a useful replacement of interim analyses in nonpivotal trials, then further guidelines will be needed on consequent decision-making aspects.