RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Different Circle of Willis (CoW) variants have variable prevalences of aneurysm development, but the hemodynamic variation along the CoW and its relation to presence and size of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) are not well known. PURPOSE: Gain insight into hemodynamic imaging markers of the CoW for UIA development by comparing these outcomes to the corresponding contralateral artery without an UIA using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). STUDY TYPE: Retrospective, cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: Thirty-eight patients with an UIA, whereby 27 were women and a mean age of 62 years old. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Four-dimensional phase-contrast (PC) MRI with a 3D time-resolved velocity encoded gradient echo sequence at 7 T. ASSESSMENT: Hemodynamic parameters (blood flow, velocity pulsatility index [vPI], mean velocity, distensibility, and wall shear stress [peak systolic (WSSMAX ), and time-averaged (WSSMEAN )]) in the parent artery of the UIA were compared to the corresponding contralateral artery without an UIA and were related to UIA size. STATISTICAL TESTS: Paired t-tests and Pearson Correlation tests. The threshold for statistical significance was P < 0.05 (two-tailed). RESULTS: Blood flow, mean velocity, WSSMAX , and WSSMEAN were significantly higher, while vPI was lower, in the parent artery relative to contralateral artery. The WSSMAX of the parent artery significantly increased linearly while the WSSMEAN decreased linearly with increasing UIA size. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamic parameters and WSS differ between parent vessels of UIAs and corresponding contralateral vessels. WSS correlates with UIA size, supporting a potential hemodynamic role in aneurysm pathology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
Assuntos
Aneurisma Intracraniano , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Aneurisma Intracraniano/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Transversais , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Hemodinâmica/fisiologia , ArtériasRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Patients with an unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) may experience scanxiety around follow-up imaging. We studied the prevalence and temporal pattern of scanxiety, and compared quality of life (QoL) outcomes in patients with and without scanxiety. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study in a tertiary referral center in the Netherlands between October 2021 and November 2022. We sent questionnaires to patients ≥ 18 years old undergoing UIA follow-up imaging 4 weeks before (T1), immediately after (T2), and 6 weeks after the scan (T3) to assess health-related QoL (HRQoL) and emotional functioning. At T3, we also assessed scanxiety with a purpose-designed questionnaire. We compared differences in QoL outcomes between respondents with and without scanxiety using mixed models. RESULTS: Of 158 eligible patients, 106 (67%) participated (mean age 61 years ± 11 [standard deviation], 84 women). Sixty of the 91 respondents (66%) who completed the purpose-designed questionnaire experienced scanxiety. Of the 49 respondents who experienced scanxiety after the scan, it resolved in 22 (45%) within a day after receiving the radiology report. HRQoL did not differ between respondents with or without scanxiety. Emotional functioning was worse for respondents with scanxiety (mean Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale sum score difference at T1, 3.6 [95% CI, 0.9-6.3]; T2, 4.1 [95% CI, 1.5-6.8]; and T3, 4.0 [95% CI, 1.5-6.5]). CONCLUSIONS: Two-thirds of the respondents experienced scanxiety around follow-up imaging, which often resolved within a day after receiving results. Patients with scanxiety had similar HRQoL but worse emotional functioning compared to patients without scanxiety. The time between the scan and receiving the results should be minimized to decrease the duration of scanxiety. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: We showed that scanxiety is common in UIA patients, and negatively associated with emotional functioning. Since scanxiety often disappears immediately after receiving the radiology report, it should be communicated to the patient as early as possible to alleviate patients' distress. KEY POINTS: ⢠Many patients with an unruptured intracranial aneurysm experience emotional distress around follow-up imaging, termed "scanxiety." ⢠Patients with scanxiety had worse emotional functioning compared to patients without scanxiety. ⢠Scanxiety often resolved within a day after receiving the radiology report.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Arterial calcification is thought to protect against rupture of intracranial aneurysms, but studies in a representative population of intracranial aneurysm patients have not yet been performed. The aim was to compare the prevalence of aneurysm wall calcification and intracranial carotid artery calcification (ICAC) between patients with an unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) and a ruptured intracranial aneurysm (RIA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We matched 150 consecutive UIA patients to 150 RIA patients on age and sex. Aneurysm wall calcification and ICAC were quantified on non-contrast enhanced computed tomography images with the modified Agatston score. We compared the prevalence of aneurysm wall calcification, ICAC, and severe ICAC (defined as a modified Agatston score in the fourth quartile) between UIA and RIA patients using univariate and multivariate conditional logistic regression models adjusted for aneurysm characteristics and cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: Aneurysm wall calcification was more prevalent in UIA compared to RIA patients (OR 5.2, 95% CI: 2.0-13.8), which persisted after adjustment (OR 5.9, 95% CI: 1.7-20.2). ICAC prevalence did not differ between the two groups (crude OR 0.9, 95% CI: 0.5-1.8). Severe ICAC was more prevalent in UIA patients (OR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.1-3.6), but not after adjustment (OR 1.0, 95% CI: 0.5-2.3). CONCLUSIONS: Aneurysm wall calcification but not ICAC was more prevalent in UIAs than in RIAs, which corresponds to the hypothesis that calcification may protect against aneurysmal rupture. Aneurysm wall calcification should be further assessed as a predictor of aneurysm stability in prospective cohort studies. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Calcification of the intracranial aneurysm wall was more prevalent in unruptured than ruptured intracranial aneurysms after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors. Calcification may therefore protect the aneurysm against rupture, and aneurysm wall calcification is a candidate predictor of aneurysm stability. KEY POINTS: Aneurysm wall calcification was more prevalent in patients with unruptured than ruptured aneurysms, while internal carotid artery calcification was similar. Aneurysm wall calcification but not internal carotid artery calcification is a candidate predictor of aneurysm stability. Cohort studies are needed to assess the predictive value of aneurysm wall calcification for aneurysm stability.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: In patients with an unruptured intracranial aneurysm, gadolinium enhancement of the aneurysm wall is associated with growth and rupture. However, most previous studies did not have a longitudinal design and did not adjust for aneurysm size, which is the main predictor of aneurysm instability and the most important determinant of wall enhancement. We investigated whether aneurysm wall enhancement predicts aneurysm growth and rupture during follow-up and whether the predictive value was independent of aneurysm size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multicentre longitudinal cohort study, individual patient data were obtained from twelve international cohorts. Inclusion criteria were as follows: 18 years or older with ≥ 1 untreated unruptured intracranial aneurysm < 15 mm; gadolinium-enhanced aneurysm wall imaging and MRA at baseline; and MRA or rupture during follow-up. Patients were included between November 2012 and November 2019. We calculated crude hazard ratios with 95%CI of aneurysm wall enhancement for growth (≥ 1 mm increase) or rupture and adjusted for aneurysm size. RESULTS: In 455 patients (mean age (SD), 60 (13) years; 323 (71%) women) with 559 aneurysms, growth or rupture occurred in 13/194 (6.7%) aneurysms with wall enhancement and in 9/365 (2.5%) aneurysms without enhancement (crude hazard ratio 3.1 [95%CI: 1.3-7.4], adjusted hazard ratio 1.4 [95%CI: 0.5-3.7]) with a median follow-up duration of 1.2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Gadolinium enhancement of the aneurysm wall predicts aneurysm growth or rupture during short-term follow-up, but not independent of aneurysm size. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Gadolinium-enhanced aneurysm wall imaging is not recommended for short-term prediction of growth and rupture, since it appears to have no additional value to conventional predictors. KEY POINTS: ⢠Although aneurysm wall enhancement is associated with aneurysm instability in cross-sectional studies, it remains unknown whether it predicts risk of aneurysm growth or rupture in longitudinal studies. ⢠Gadolinium enhancement of the aneurysm wall predicts aneurysm growth or rupture during short-term follow-up, but not when adjusting for aneurysm size. ⢠While gadolinium-enhanced aneurysm wall imaging is not recommended for short-term prediction of growth and rupture, it may hold potential for aneurysms smaller than 7 mm.
Assuntos
Aneurisma Roto , Meios de Contraste , Gadolínio , Aneurisma Intracraniano , Angiografia por Ressonância Magnética , Humanos , Aneurisma Intracraniano/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Longitudinais , Aneurisma Roto/diagnóstico por imagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Angiografia por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Idoso , Estudos de CoortesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Radiological screening for intracranial aneurysms (IAs) may identify other relevant intracranial findings. We investigated their prevalence on MR in persons screened for IAs. METHODS: We included all persons who were screened for the presence of IAs with brain MRI/MRA between 1996 and 2022 because of a family history of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) or autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). We reviewed radiology reports of initial and repeated brain MR to identify additional intracranial findings that needed follow-up or treatment, or carried a risk of becoming symptomatic. RESULTS: We included 766 persons (positive family history of aSAH: n = 681; ADPKD: n = 85) who had 1446 MRI/MRAs. At initial screening, 49 additional relevant intracranial findings were reported in 47 persons (6.1%, 95% CI 4.7-8.1%). Of all included persons, 338 (44%) underwent one (n = 154) or more (n = 184) follow-up screenings (total MRI/MRAs at follow-up: n = 680). In 15/338 persons (4.4%, 95% CI 2.7-7.2%), 16 new additional relevant findings were reported at a median follow-up duration of 10 years (IQR 5-12). CONCLUSIONS: Persons who are counselled for screening for IAs should be informed that there is a six percent chance of identifying an additional finding that requires follow-up or treatment, or may become symptomatic. Additionally, after 10-year follow-up screening there is a four percent chance of identifying a new additional relevant finding. The impact of such findings on quality of life needs further study.
RESUMO
General anesthesia is routinely used in endovascular thrombectomy procedures, for which volatile gas and/or intravenous propofol are recommended. Emerging evidence suggests propofol may have superior effects on disability and/or mortality rates, but a mode-of-action underlying these class-specific effects remains unknown. Here, a moderate isoflurane or propofol dosage on experimental stroke outcomes was retrospectively compared using serial multiparametric MRI and behavioral testing. Adult male rats (N = 26) were subjected to 90-min filament-induced transient middle cerebral artery occlusion. Diffusion-, T2- and perfusion-weighted MRI was performed during occlusion, 0.5 h after recanalization, and four days into the subacute phase. Sequels of ischemic damage-blood-brain barrier integrity, cerebrovascular reactivity and sensorimotor functioning-were assessed after four days. While size and severity of ischemia was comparable between groups during occlusion, isoflurane anesthesia was associated with larger lesion sizes and worsened sensorimotor functioning at follow-up. MRI markers indicated that cytotoxic edema persisted locally in the isoflurane group early after recanalization, coinciding with burgeoning vasogenic edema. At follow-up, sequels of ischemia were further aggravated in the post-ischemic lesion, manifesting as increased blood-brain barrier leakage, cerebrovascular paralysis and cerebral hyperperfusion. These findings shed new light on how isoflurane, and possibly similar volatile agents, associate with persisting injurious processes after recanalization that contribute to suboptimal treatment outcome.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with an unruptured intracranial aneurysm often undergo periodic imaging to detect potential aneurysm growth, which is associated with an increased rupture risk. Because prediction of rupture based on growth is moderate, morphological changes have gained interest as a risk factor for rupture. We studied 3-dimensional-quantified morphological changes over time during radiological monitoring before rupture and around rupture. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we identified aneurysms that ruptured during follow-up, with imaging available for at least 2 time points before rupture and one after rupture. For each time point, we obtained 8 morphological parameters: 2-dimensional size, volume, surface area, compactness 1 and 2, sphericity, elongation, and flatness. Morphological changes before rupture and around rupture were log-transformed, scaled, and analyzed with linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: We included 16 aneurysms in 16 patients who were imaged between 2004 and 2021. In the time period before rupture (median follow-up duration 1200 days, IQR 736-1340), 3 size-related morphological parameters increased: 2-dimensional size (estimated mean change 0.44, 95% CI 0.24-0.65), volume (estimated mean change 0.34, 95% CI 0.12-0.56), and surface area (0.33, 95% CI 0.11-0.54). In the period around rupture (median follow-up duration 407 days, IQR 148-719), these parameters further increased. In addition, 5 morphological parameters (compactness 1 and 2, sphericity, elongation, and flatness) decreased around rupture but not before rupture. CONCLUSION: Change in aneurysm volume and surface area may be novel risk factors for rupture. Because most morphological parameters changed around but not before rupture, morphological changes during these 2 periods should be regarded as different processes. This implies that postrupture morphology should not be used as a surrogate for prerupture morphology in rupture prediction models.