[Diagnosis of loosening after knee arthroplasty]. / Lockerungsdiagnostik in der Knieendoprothetik.

BACKGROUND: Aseptic loosening is one of the most common reasons for revision in knee arthroplasty. Its pathogenesis is multifactorial, and early diagnosis is necessary to initiate appropriate therapy and to avoid serious complications, such as substantial bone loss or even periprosthetic fractures. OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the current standard in the diagnosis of aseptic loosening in total knee arthroplasty. Sensitivity and specificity of the individual diagnostic procedures are presented, and other causes for differential diagnoses of painful total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are discussed. RESULTS: In the case of suspected loosening in TKA, infection diagnostics should be performed to rule out periprosthetic infection, as this is crucial in terms of surgical strategy. The gold standard in diagnosing aseptic loosening is conventional radiography. Radiolucent lines at the cement-bone or metal-cement interface of more than 2 mm or increasing in translucency, migration of components, and cement fractures are obvious signs of loosening. Artifact-reduced computed tomography can bring additional information regarding periprosthetic osteolysis. A single bone scan is not reliable in diagnosing aseptic loosening, especially in the first 2 years after surgery. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT-CT) could be a useful extension in loosening diagnosis in the future. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of aseptic loosening poses a great challenge to the treating physician and requires a structured diagnostic algorithm. After exclusion of infection, conventional radiography is the basic examination, which should be supplemented by computed tomography and nuclear medicine examinations according to the clinical symptoms and the time course.

Local infiltration anaesthesia versus sciatic nerve and adductor canal block for fast-track knee arthroplasty: A randomised controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Local infiltration anaesthesia (LIA) was introduced as an innovative analgesic procedure for enhanced recovery after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, LIA has never been compared with analgesia based on an adductor canal catheter and a single-shot sciatic nerve block. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate two analgesic regimens for TKA comparing mobility, postoperative pain and patient satisfaction. DESIGN: Two-group randomised, controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Germany between April and August 2017. PATIENTS: Adults undergoing primary TKA under general anaesthesia were eligible for study participation. Exclusion criteria were heart insufficiency (New York Heart Association class >2), liver insufficiency (Child Pugh Score >B), evidence of diabetic polyneuropathy, severe obesity (BMI > 40 kg m), chronic opioid therapy for more than 3 months before scheduled surgery and allergy to local anaesthetics. INTERVENTIONS: Nerve block patients group (n=20) underwent surgery with two ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia blocks: a single-shot sciatic nerve block with 20 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% combined with an adductor canal block with a catheter placed for less than 4 days with an infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% at a rate of 6 ml h. LIA patients (LIA group, n=20) received LIA of the knee capsule at the end of surgery with 150 ml of ropivacaine 0.2%. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was postoperative time to patient mobilisation (ability to walk) on the ward. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in each study group. Patients in both groups were mobilised to walk after TKA in similar time frames (LIA 24.0 h versus nerve block 27.1 h, 95% CI of difference -9.6 to 3.3 h). Maximum postoperative pain scores on exertion were higher in LIA patients with a mean 1.3 of 10 numerical rating scale points (95% CI 0.3 to 2.3, P = 0.010) as were intra-operative opioid requirements (LIA median 107 [IQR 100 to 268] mg versus nerve block median 78 [60 to 98] mg, P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction, postoperative oral morphine-equivalents and resting pain levels were comparable between groups. Anaesthesia induction time was reduced in LIA patients (LIA 10 min versus nerve block 35 min, 95% CI of difference 13 to 38 min, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both analgesic regimens allow early mobilisation after TKA with high patient satisfaction. LIA shortened peri-operative time. Further research is required to optimise especially pain control during the later postoperative period with LIA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03114306.

Clinically Asymptomatic Patients Show a High Bacterial Colonization Rate of Osteosynthetic Implants Around the Knee but Not the Hip.

BACKGROUND: Patients with osteosynthetic implants around the hip and knee show higher infection rates after joint arthroplasty. Our aim was to evaluate the bacterial colonization of any osteosynthetic implants around the hip and knee in patients without clinical signs of infection. METHODS: Consecutive patients with osteosynthetic implant removal because of related soft tissue irritations or before elective total joint arthroplasty of the hip and knee were prospectively included. Patients with signs of infection were excluded. Based on sonication fluid cultures, implants were classified according to microbial growth as negative (no growth), contaminated (nonsignificant growth), or colonized (significant growth). RESULTS: Sonication cultures were positive in 54 of 203 implants (27%), including 8 of 34 (24%) after orthopedic and 46 of 169 (27%) after traumatological surgery. Of 203 sonication cultures, 22 (11%) grew significant bacterial counts. Most common microorganisms were coagulase-negative staphylococci (46%). Implants around the knee showed a significantly higher rate of positive sonication cultures compared with those around the hip (14% vs 2%, P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: We detected high bacterial implant colonization rates regardless of the initial type of surgery. Predominant pathogens were staphylococci, the most common causative agents of periprosthetic joint infections. Positive sonication results do not necessarily lead to postoperative surgical complications and thus do not equal infection. It remains unclear if patients with evidence of bacterial implant colonization show a higher risk of periprosthetic joint infection after adjacent subsequent total joint arthroplasty. Nevertheless, surgeons should be aware of a significantly higher colonization rate of implants around the knee and take this into consideration when total knee arthroplasty is scheduled in patients with osteosynthetic devices.

Outcome of short versus long interval in two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection: a prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: A two-stage exchange is the standard treatment approach for chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). While a 6-8 week interval is commonly used before reimplantation, the optimal length of the prosthesis-free interval has not yet been determined. We evaluated the influence of a short (< 4 weeks) and long (≥ 4 weeks) interval on reinfection rate and functional outcome of hip and knee PJI. METHODS: In this prospective cohort, patients undergoing two-stage revision for PJI were assigned to prosthesis reimplantation after a short (< 4 weeks) or long (≥ 4 weeks) interval. All patients received standardized antimicrobial therapy, which consisted of antibiogram-adapted, non-biofilm-active antibiotics during the interval and an antimicrobial combination therapy with biofilm-active antibiotics after reimplantation. Follow-up was performed for infection, joint function, pain, need for care and quality of life. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients undergoing two-stage revision for PJI (18 hips and 20 knees) were included. Short interval was used in 19 patients having a mean interval of 17.9 days (range 7-27 days), long interval in 19 patients having a mean interval of 63.0 days (range 28-204 days). At a mean follow-up of 39.5 months (range 32-48 months), 37 of 38 patients (97.4%) were infection-free. One failure occurred among patients with long interval and none among patients with short interval. Functional results (ROM, HHS, KSS, VAS) and quality of life (SF-36) were similar in both groups. Patients treated with long interval required cumulatively additional 204 inpatient days for nursing care compared to patients with short interval. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that two-stage exchange with short interval has a similar outcome than with long interval, when highly active antibiotic therapy is used. Patient inconvenience and care costs due to immobilization were lower when strategies with a short interval were used.

Modifications of femoral component design in multi-radius total knee arthroplasty lead to higher lateral posterior femoro-tibial translation.

PURPOSE: As the aims of changes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs are to reinstate more natural kinematics, the current study evaluated the in vivo kinematics in patients who underwent a cruciate retaining gradually changing femoral radius ("G-CURVE") against a cruciate retaining conventional changing femoral radius ("J-CURVE") geometry TKA design. The hypothesis of the study is that the G-CURVE design would allow a substantial increase in the femoral rollback compared to the J-CURVE design. METHODS: Retrospective study design. Thirty patients were included (G-CURVE, n = 20; J-CURVE, n = 10). Single-plane fluoroscopic analysis and marker-based motion capture gait analysis was performed to analyse dynamic tibiofemoral motion during weight-bearing and unloaded activities at 24 month after index surgery. RESULTS: The analysis of the medial and lateral points on the tibia plateau during the unloaded flexion-extension and the weight-bearing lunge activities revealed a significant difference in femoral rollback in G-CURVE TKA above 60° (p = 0.001) and 30° (p = 0.02) of knee flexion, respectively. Moreover, the lateral condyle of the G-CURVE showed a higher extent of femoral rollback while the lateral condyle of the J-CURVE rolled forward. CONCLUSION: At 2 years post-operative, the G-CURVE TKA showed significant differences in femoro-tibial translation in comparison with the J-CURVE system, in vivo. The G-CURVE resulted in an increased lateral rollback and simultaneously in an elimination of the paradoxical medial roll-forward present in the J-CURVE design. Moreover, knee kinematics analysis showed significant differences between unloaded and weight-bearing conditions revealing the impact of load and muscle force. The analysis conducted in this study contributes to further understand the principal movement characteristics in widely used older designs in comparison with recently developed concepts to get a better overview on their potential benefits on in vivo kinematics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Biomechanical performance of the Actifit® scaffold is significantly improved by selection of irrigation fluid.

PURPOSE: Clinical reports on meniscal scaffolds seem promising, albeit relatively paucity exists regarding their biomechanical behavior. The aim of the study is to delineate the impact of differing suture materials and the type as well as the temperature of the irrigation fluid on the pull-out strength of a polyurethane meniscal scaffold (Actifit®). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 128 specimens were utilized with horizontal sutures and uniaxial load-to-failure testing was performed. We compared two different suture materials-polydioxanone (PDS) and non-absorbable, braided polyester sutures (NABP)-as well as two common irrigation fluids-lactated Ringer's and electrolyte-free, hypotonic Mannitol-Sorbitol. All specimens were further evaluated according to two different temperatures [room temperature (20 °C) and near-core body temperature (37 °C)]. RESULTS: Mean load-to-failure was 53.3 ± 6.5 N. There was no significant difference between the NABP and the PDS group. Ringer group showed a significantly higher load-to-failure compared to Purisole (P = .0002). This was equivalent for both PDS (P = .0008) and NABP sutures (P = .0008). Significantly higher failure loads could be established for the 37° group (P = .041); yet, this difference was neither confirmed for the PDS or in in the NABP subgroup. Only the subgroup using Purisole at 37° showed significantly higher failure loads compared to 20° (P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: This study underlines the potential to improve pull-out strength during implantation of an Actifit® scaffold by alteration of the type of irrigation fluid. Lactated Ringer solution provided the highest construct stability in regard to load-to-failure testing and should be considered whenever implantation of a polyurethane meniscal scaffold is conducted.

Human memory T cells from the bone marrow are resting and maintain long-lasting systemic memory.

In the bone marrow, a population of memory T cells has been described that promotes efficient secondary immune responses and has been considered to be preactivated, owing to its expression of CD69 and CD25. Here we show that human bone marrow professional memory T cells are not activated but are resting in terms of proliferation, transcription, and mobility. They are in the G0 phase of the cell cycle, and their transcriptome is that of resting T cells. The repertoire of CD4(+) bone marrow memory T cells compared with CD4(+) memory T cells from the blood is significantly enriched for T cells specific for cytomegalovirus-pp65 (immunodominant protein), tetanus toxoid, measles, mumps, and rubella. It is not enriched for vaccinia virus and Candida albicans-MP65 (immunodominant protein), typical pathogens of skin and/or mucosa. CD4(+) memory T cells specific for measles are maintained nearly exclusively in the bone marrow. Thus, CD4(+) memory T cells from the bone marrow provide long-term memory for systemic pathogens.

What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position.

BACKGROUND: Numerous factors influence total hip arthroplasty (THA) stability including surgical approach and soft tissue tension, patient compliance, and component position. One long-held tenet regarding component position is that cup inclination and anteversion of 40° ± 10° and 15° ± 10°, respectively, represent a "safe zone" as defined by Lewinnek that minimizes dislocation after primary THA; however, it is clear that components positioned in this zone can and do dislocate. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We sought to determine if these classic radiographic targets for cup inclination and anteversion accurately predicted a safe zone limiting dislocation in a contemporary THA practice. METHODS: From a cohort of 9784 primary THAs performed between 2003 and 2012 at one institution, we retrospectively identified 206 THAs (2%) that subsequently dislocated. Radiographic parameters including inclination, anteversion, center of rotation, and limb length discrepancy were analyzed. Mean followup was 27 months (range, 0-133 months). RESULTS: The majority (58% [120 of 206]) of dislocated THAs had a socket within the Lewinnek safe zone. Mean cup inclination was 44° ± 8° with 84% within the safe zone for inclination. Mean anteversion was 15° ± 9° with 69% within the safe zone for anteversion. Sixty-five percent of dislocated THAs that were performed through a posterior approach had an acetabular component within the combined acetabular safe zones, whereas this was true for only 33% performed through an anterolateral approach. An acetabular component performed through a posterior approach was three times as likely to be within the combined acetabular safe zones (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.6) than after an anterolateral approach (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.7; p < 0.0001). In contrast, acetabular components performed through a posterior approach (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-1.9) had an increased risk of dislocation compared with those performed through an anterolateral approach (OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.7-0.9; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The historical target values for cup inclination and anteversion may be useful but should not be considered a safe zone given that the majority of these contemporary THAs that dislocated were within those target values. Stability is likely multifactorial; the ideal cup position for some patients may lie outside the Lewinnek safe zone and more advanced analysis is required to identify the right target in that subgroup. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Influence of the tourniquet on tibial cement mantle thickness in primary total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was whether the use of a tourniquet increases cement mantle thickness in primary total knee arthroplasty and influences the calculated blood loss and postoperative pain. METHODS: Ninety patients with a primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were enroled in this prospective randomised trial and divided into a group with (n = 45) and without tourniquet (n = 45). The radiological tibial cement mantle thickness was evaluated postoperatively in four zones on anteroposterior and two zones on lateral radiographs, and values were cumulated. Additionally, the calculated blood loss and postoperative pain levels were recorded. RESULTS: There was a median cumulative cement mantle thickness of 13 mm (range 8-19 mm) without tourniquet and of 14.2 mm (range 9-18 mm) with tourniquet (p = 0.009). The median calculated blood loss was 0.6 L (range 0.2-2.0 L) without and 0.9 L (range 0.3-1.5 L) (p = 0.02) with tourniquet. Patient-reported postoperative pain levels were significantly higher in the tourniquet group during mobilisation (p = 0.01) and at rest (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a tourniquet in primary TKA increased the tibial cement mantle thickness but also increased the postoperative calculated blood loss and postoperative pain. Surgeons might take this into consideration for decision-making whether to use a tourniquet during TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Fixation of stem in revision of total knee arthroplasty: cemented versus cementless-a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Revision of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is growing rapidly all over the world. The introduction of intramedullary stems for additional stability in revision is well accepted by most of the surgeons, while the philosophy of stem fixation is still under controversy. A meta-analysis was performed to compare the survivorship of revised implants with regard to a cemented or cementless stem fixation. METHODS: Publications with patients who underwent revision TKA with minimum 24-month follow-up were systematically reviewed. Type of intramedullary stem fixation, failure rate for any reason, incidence of aseptic loosening and infection were extracted with follow-up interval specified. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to aggregate incidence data, which was compared between different fixation groups by fitting of logistic regression model. RESULTS: Seventeen observational studies were included in this meta-analysis. There was a similar likelihood of failure for any reason (risk ratio, RR 0.97), general reoperation (RR 1.02), aseptic loosening (RR 1.0) and infection (RR 1.0) in cemented stem fixation group compared to cementless stem fixation group with follow-up <60 months. When follow-up period extend to more than 60 months, the same likelihood was observed as 0.98, 0.96, 0.97 and 0.98, respectively. There was no significant difference in any of these comparisons of survival-related indices. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in failure for any reason, reoperation, aseptic loosening and infection between revision TKA with cemented or cementless stem fixation. Based on the available literature, no superiority of any type of stem fixation was found. If follow-up period was neglected, aseptic loosening would be the leading reason for pain and dysfunction of patient undertaken revision TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review of Level IV, Therapeutic studies, Level IV.

Postoperative Increased Loading Leads to an Alteration in the Radiological Mechanical Axis After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Standing long-leg radiographs allow assessment of the mechanical axis in the frontal plane before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). An alteration in loading, and hence in the forces acting on the knee joint, occurs postoperatively. We therefore postulated that the mechanical axis measured in the long-leg standing radiograph would change within the first year after TKA. METHODS: Standing long-leg radiographs of 156 patients were performed 7 days, 3 months, and 12 months after TKA with determination of mechanical axis of the lower limb. RESULTS: Seven days after surgery, the mechanical axis amounted 0.8° ± 1.7° valgus. Three months after the operation, at 1.3° ± 1.3° varus, it was significantly different (P < .001) from the primary measurement. No further alteration in the mechanical axis occurred during the first year after TKA. This difference was even more pronounced (P < .001) in patients with a postoperative lack of complete extension. Seven days after surgery, they had a valgus axis deviation of 1.6° ± 1.6°; after 3 months, the measurement amounted 1.2° ± 1.3° varus. CONCLUSION: Measured by a standing long-leg radiograph, the frontal mechanical axis after TKA changes over time. The predictive power of a standing long-leg radiograph in the first week after surgery is limited because limb loading is altered because of pain and is therefore nonphysiological. The actual mechanical axis resulting after TKA can only be assessed in a standing long-leg radiograph at physiological loading.

Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty Provides Definitive Treatment for Femoral Neck Fractures at 20 Years and Beyond.

BACKGROUND: Displaced femoral neck fractures frequently are treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasties. Despite the frequency with which bipolar hemiarthroplasty is used to treat these fractures, there are few long-term data. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We sought to evaluate (1) the cumulative incidence of revision for any reason of bipolar hemiarthroplasties at 20 years, and the proportion of patients who lived more than 20 years who still have the prosthesis in situ from the index arthroplasty, (2) the cumulative incidence of aseptic loosening at 20 years, and (3) the Harris hip score of the surviving patients at long term. METHODS: We performed 376 cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasties for displaced femoral neck fractures in 359 patients between 1976 and 1985. At a minimum of followup of 20 years (mean, 24 years; range, 20-31 years), 339 of 359 patients (94%) were deceased, leaving 20 patients in the study group. Of those, one patient was confirmed to be lost to followup and two others had radiographic followup only. Three hundred fifty-nine patients (99.2%) (376 of the original 379 hips) were followed until death, revision of the hemiarthroplasty, or for at least 20 years (of clinical followup). Bipolar hemiarthroplasty was performed for displaced femoral neck fractures. Cemented fixation was the standard of care between 1976 and 1985 at our institution. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 79 years (range, 60-99 years). The cumulative incidence of revision, estimated with death as a competing risk, and radiographs were evaluated for signs of aseptic loosening by a surgeon not involved in the clinical care of the patients. Clinical function was evaluated with the Harris hip score. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 79 years. RESULTS: The 20-year cumulative incidence of revision for any reason was 3.5% (95% CI, 1.6%-5.3%). Of the 20 patients who survived more than 20 years, seven had the implant intact. The 20-year cumulative incidence of revision for aseptic loosening was 1.4% (95% CI, 0.2%-2.6%). The mean Harris hip score in patients who were still living and patient who did not have revision surgery was 63 ± 22, however 13 of the 20 patients had undergone revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term survivorship of bipolar hemiarthroplasty prostheses used to treat displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly was high, and the procedure can be considered definitive for the majority of elderly patients with a femoral neck fracture. In this series, 6% (20 patients, 339 of 359) of the patients survived more than 20 years after treatment of a femoral neck fracture with a bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Of those, 35% (seven of 20) survived with their index prosthesis in situ. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Intraoperative navigation of patient-specific instrumentation does not predict final implant position.

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to determine if intraoperative navigation predicted final implant position of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) performed with patient-specific instrumentation (PSI). We retrospectively reviewed 60 TKAs performed with PSI and imageless navigation. These values were compared to postoperative coronal alignment based on long-leg radiographs, as well as rotation and tibial slope based on CT scans. The intraoperative coronal position of the tibia as measured by the intraoperative navigation indicated a significantly higher deviation from the neutral mechanical axis than the actual final position (P=0.03). Similarly, tibial slope and femoral component rotation measured by intraoperative navigation significantly deviated from the final slope and femoral component rotation (P<0.0001). In conclusion, intraoperative navigation of PSI position showed a significantly high deviation from the true final implant position. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With a Prior Tibial Plateau Fracture: A Long-Term Report at 15 Years.

The goal of the current study was to determine the 15-year outcomes of 62 patients who underwent a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after a prior tibial plateau fracture. Mean age at the index surgical intervention was 63 years. At most recent followup, there were 11 revisions. The 15-year survivorship free from revision for aseptic loosening was 96%. In unrevised cases, the components were radiographically well-fixed. There were a total of 21 complications, 90% of which occurred at <2 years. While patients undergoing TKA after a tibial plateau fracture have an increased rate of complications, the 15-year results indicate that subsequent survivorship is similar to that of patients undergoing TKA for degenerative arthritis if early complications can be avoided.

Treatment algorithm of acetabular periprosthetic fractures.

Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum represent a rare incident in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. The management of these fractures can be challenging. At present, there are no reliable guidelines for the treatment of periprosthetic acetabular fractures. Periprosthetic acetabular fractures can occur intra-operatively, in particular during insertion of non-cemented cups or in the context of revision surgery. Post-operative causes for periprosthetic acetabular fractures are traumatic events or, more commonly, pelvic discontinuity due to severe bone loss related to osteolysis. Despite their aetiology, the main objective of surgery is to achieve a stable acetabular component and fracture. While stable fractures and implants could be treated non-operatively, unstable fractures require surgery to achieve component stability and allow appropriate biological fixation of the revision cup. Assessment of the stability plays a crucial role before determining the treatment strategy. There is a large variety of surgical techniques available for the management of these fractures. This review article outlines the epidemiology, aetiology and current classification systems, and provides a distinct diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for the treatment of periprosthetic acetabular fractures.

MALDI imaging mass spectrometry: discrimination of pathophysiological regions in traumatized skeletal muscle by characteristic peptide signatures.

Due to formation of fibrosis and the loss of contractile muscle tissue, severe muscle injuries often result in insufficient healing marked by a significant reduction of muscle force and motor activity. Our previous studies demonstrated that the local transplantation of mesenchymal stromal cells into an injured skeletal muscle of the rat improves the functional outcome of the healing process. Since, due to the lack of sufficient markers, the accurate discrimination of pathophysiological regions in injured skeletal muscle is inadequate, underlying mechanisms of the beneficial effects of mesenchymal stromal cell transplantation on primary trauma and trauma adjacent muscle area remain elusive. For discrimination of these pathophysiological regions, formalin-fixed injured skeletal muscle tissue was analyzed by MALDI imaging MS. By using two computational evaluation strategies, a supervised approach (ClinProTools) and unsupervised segmentation (SCiLS Lab), characteristic m/z species could be assigned to primary trauma and trauma adjacent muscle regions. Using "bottom-up" MS for protein identification and validation of results by immunohistochemistry, we could identify two proteins, skeletal muscle alpha actin and carbonic anhydrase III, which discriminate between the secondary damage on adjacent tissue and the primary traumatized muscle area. Our results underscore the high potential of MALDI imaging MS to describe the spatial characteristics of pathophysiological changes in muscle.

Small improvements in mechanical axis alignment achieved with MRI versus CT-based patient-specific instruments in TKA: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Patient-specific instrumentation in TKA has the proposed benefits of improving coronal and sagittal alignment and rotation of the components. In contrast, the literature is inconsistent if the use of patient-specific instrumentation improves alignment in comparison to conventional instrumentation. Depending on the manufacturer, patient-specific instrumentation is based on either MRI or CT scans. However, it is unknown whether one patient-specific instrumentation approach is more accurate than the other and if there is a potential benefit in terms of reduction of duration of surgery. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We compared the accuracy of MRI- and CT-based patient-specific instrumentation with conventional instrumentation and with each other in TKAs. The three approaches also were compared with respect to validated outcomes scores and duration of surgery. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted in which 90 patients were enrolled and divided into three groups: CT-based, MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation, and conventional instrumentation. The groups were not different regarding age, male/female sex distribution, and BMI. In all groups, coronal and sagittal alignments were measured on postoperative standing long-leg and lateral radiographs. Component rotation was measured on CT scans. Clinical outcomes (Knee Society and WOMAC scores) were evaluated preoperatively and at a mean of 3 months postoperatively and the duration of surgery was analyzed for each patient. MRI- and CT-based patient-specific instrumentation groups were first compared with conventional instrumentation, the patient-specific instrumentation groups were compared with each other, and all three approaches were compared for clinical outcome measures and duration of surgery. RESULTS: Compared with conventional instrumentation MRI- and CT-based patient-specific instrumentation showed higher accuracy regarding the coronal limb axis (MRI versus conventional, 1.0° [range, 0°-4°] versus 4.5° [range, 0°-8°], p < 0.001; CT versus conventional, 3.0° [range, 0°-5°] versus 4.5° [range, 0°-8°], p = 0.02), femoral rotation (MRI versus conventional, 1.0° [range, 0°-2°] versus 4.0° [range, 1°-7°], p < 0.001; CT versus conventional, 1.0° [range, 0°-2°] versus 4.0° [range, 1°-7°], p < 0.001), and tibial slope (MRI versus conventional, 1.0° [range, 0°-2°] versus 3.5° [range, 1°-7°], p < 0.001; CT versus conventional, 1.0° [range, 0°-2°] versus 3.5° [range, 1°-7°], p < 0.001), but the differences were small. Furthermore, MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation showed a smaller deviation in the postoperative coronal mechanical limb axis compared with CT-based patient-specific instrumentation (MRI versus CT, 1.0° [range, 0°-4°] versus 3.0° [range, 0°-5°], p = 0.03), while there was no difference in femoral rotation or tibial slope. Although there was a significant reduction of the duration of surgery in both patient-specific instrumentation groups in comparison to conventional instrumentation (MRI versus conventional, 58 minutes [range, 53-67 minutes] versus 76 minutes [range, 57-83 minutes], p < 0.001; CT versus conventional, 63 minutes [range, 59-69 minutes] versus 76 minutes [range, 57-83 minutes], p < .001), there were no differences in the postoperative Knee Society pain and function and WOMAC scores among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study supports that patient-specific instrumentation increased accuracy compared with conventional instrumentation and that MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation is more accurate compared with CT-based patient-specific instrumentation regarding coronal mechanical limb axis, differences are only subtle and of questionable clinical relevance. Because there are no differences in the long-term clinical outcome or survivorship yet available, the widespread use of this technique cannot be recommended.

Rotational laxity and collateral ligament laxity following total knee arthroplasty with rotating platform.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate laxity in knees with pre-operative (preop) valgus alignment compared to knees with pre-operative varus alignment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: This was a retrospective study including 81 patients, with six years follow-up, for pre-operative valgus- or varus alignment of the leg. All patients had been supplied with the same cruciate retaining (CR) TKA with rotating platform. Clinical findings were assessed by KSS, OKS and IKDC 2000 score. Rotational knee laxity was evaluated by a validated instrument (Laxitester®) with 2 Nm torque in 30° flexion. Collateral ligament laxity was tested manually in 30° flexion with a bending moment of approximately 5 Nm. Biomechanical results were compared to the contralateral side. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients had a preop valgus alignment of 8.96° and 50 patients a varus leg axis of 4.99° in the mean. In the preop valgus knees rotational analysis showed an increased laxity of 10.7° compared to preop varus knees (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in medial (valgus 2.6 mm, varus 2.5 mm) and lateral (valgus 2.8 mm, varus 2.7 mm) laxity. KSS and OKS showed no significant differences in the follow-up results. In the IKDC 2000 objective score 50 % of the preop varus knees and 25.8 % of the preop valgus knees were classified as nearly normal. The difference in the IKDC objective was highly significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Preop valgus knees show a significantly increased rotational laxity but no increased collateral ligament laxity compared to pre-operative varus knees six years after TKA with rotating platform. There is a significant difference in IKDC objective.

Intramedullary control of distal femoral resection results in precise coronal alignment in TKA.

INTRODUCTION: There is still a relevant rate of outliers in coronal alignment >3° when the conventional technique is used, potentially accompanied by a poorer long-term clinical outcome and a reduced longevity of the implant. Intraoperative implementation of preoperative planning and above all checking of the bone resections carried out are decisive for reinstating a straight leg axis. Intramedullary control of femoral resection has not been described to date. The objective of this study was to present a new technique for the intramedullary control of femoral resection and the results obtained using this method. METHODS: All patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty with the new intramedullary control of femoral resection were included in this retrospective study. The frequency of the need for correction of the saw cuts was documented. The radiological assessment included pre- and postoperative whole-leg standing radiographs. In the process, the whole-leg axis, AMA, entry point, LDFA and MPTA were evaluated preoperatively. On the postoperative radiographs, the whole-leg axis and the alignment of the femoral and tibial components were evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-two total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) were included in the study. The average age was 68.7 years. The preoperative malalignment was on the average 8.2° ± 4.7° (23.8° varus to 17.3° valgus). The postoperative whole-leg axis was on the average 1.3° ± 1.1° (5.5° varus to 4.3° valgus). The femoral component showed a deviation from the mechanical axis of 0.1° ± 1.2° (4.3° varus to 3.7° valgus) and the tibial component a deviation from the mechanical tibial axis of 0.3° ± 1.2° (4.2° varus to 2.5° valgus). CONCLUSIONS: The new technique of intramedullary control of distal femoral resection, together with preoperative planning, leads to a precise alignment of the femoral component in the coronal plane. Thus, for the first time, a simple and effective tool for checking distal femoral resection is available for standardized use.

[Prehabilitation before total knee arthroplasty]. / Prähabilitation vor Knieendoprothetik.

BACKGROUND: Prehabilitation before knee joint replacement surgery is gaining increasing importance due to the rising prevalence of knee osteoarthritis. The aim is to optimize the preoperative condition to improve postoperative recovery and reduce complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review is based on a systematic literature search in the databases Medline, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science on the topic of prehabilitation in knee joint replacement. RESULTS: The current evidence shows heterogeneous results regarding the effectiveness of prehabilitation before knee joint replacement; some studies report improved postoperative outcomes such as reduced pain, increased function, and shorter hospital stays through preoperative training measures, while others found no significant differences. Additional preoperatively modifiable risk factors such as reduced physical fitness, substance abuse, nutritional status, comorbidities, and psychological factors should already be addressed during prehabilitation. Digital therapy and education measures offer a promising solution for the implementation of prehabilitation programs and are well received by patients. CONCLUSION: Overall, the evidence for preoperative training before knee joint replacement remains heterogeneous. Despite positive indications, evidence on exercise content, duration, frequency, and setting remains incomplete, requiring a critical review of current meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Modern prehabilitation before knee joint replacement should include musculoskeletal training and address preoperative risk factors to improve postoperative outcomes.