Synchronous cardiocerebral infarction in the era of endovascular therapy: which to treat first?

A cardiocerebral ischemic attack (CCI) or a concurrent acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and myocardial infarction (AMI) is a severe event with no clear recommendations for ideal management because of the rarity of the scenario. The narrow time window for treatment and complexity of the treatment decision puts immense pressure on the treating physician. We evaluated this challenging situation at our tertiary center. Using our prospective stroke database out of a total of 555 patients with acute ischemic stroke between 2009 and 2014, we identified five consecutive cases with CCI (incidence 0.009%). Demography, risk factor characteristics, vascular occlusions and treatment approach were recorded. Good functional outcome was defined by the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0-2 points. Out of five patients, AIS was treated with endovascular treatment in three cases, while two were treated with intravenous thrombolysis only. One out of three patients had embolectomy of the brain performed prior to the coronary intervention, while the other two patients underwent coronary intervention first. One patient developed sudden cardiac arrest on day-2 and passed away. CCI is an uncommon and devastating clinical scenario, further research is needed for the ideal management strategy that provides the best outcomes. However, the rarity of the disease does not lend itself to the conduct of a trial easily. We have proposed a considered treatment algorithm based on the current literature and our experience.

Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke due to Cervical Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion.

BACKGROUND: Internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusions are poorly responsive to intravenous thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Most study populations have combined intracranial and extracranial ICA occlusions for analysis; few have studied purely cervical ICA occlusions. We evaluated AIS patients with acute cervical ICA occlusion treated with IV-tPA to identify predictors of outcomes. METHODS: We studied 550 consecutive patients with AIS who received IV-tPA and identified 100 with pure acute cervical ICA occlusion. We evaluated the associations of vascular risk factors, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, and leptomeningeal collateral vessel status via 3 different grading systems, with functional recovery at 90 days, mortality, recanalization of the primary occlusion, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH). Modified Rankin Scale score 0-1 was defined as an excellent outcome. RESULTS: The 100 patients had mean age of 67.8 (range 32-96) and median NIHSS score of 19 (range 4-33). Excellent outcomes were observed in 27% of the patients, SICH in 8%, and mortality in 21%. Up to 54% of the patients achieved recanalization at 24 hours. On ordinal regression, good collaterals showed a significant shift in favorable outcomes by Maas, Tan, or ASPECTS collateral grading systems. On multivariate analysis, good collaterals also showed reduced mortality (OR .721, 95% CI .588-.888, P = .002) and a trend to less SICH (OR .81, 95% CI .65-1.007, P = .058). Interestingly, faster treatment was also associated with favorable functional recovery (OR 1.028 per minute, 95% CI 1.010-1.047, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Improved outcomes are seen in patients with early acute cervical ICA occlusion and better collateral circulation. This could be a valuable biomarker for decision making.