Are there associations between hip geometry and bone quality? An analysis on 3074 adults from a general population.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with reduced bone mineral density and altered hip geometry are susceptible for hip pathologies. Knowledge on associations between bone properties and hip geometric parameters might facilitate identification of patients at risk for hip pathologies. The aim of the present study was to identify associations of bone properties assessed by quantitative ultrasound (QUS) at the heel and hip geometric parameters like center-edge angle (CE), neck-shaft angle (NSA) and alpha angle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hip geometric parameters (CE, NSA and alpha angle) of 3074 participants from the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania were assessed on magnetic resonance imaging. QUS was performed on both calcanei providing broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), speed of sound (SOS) and stiffness-index. Based on the stiffness-index the individual osteoporotic fracture risk (low, moderate or high) was determined. Associations between QUS-based and hip geometric parameters were calculated in linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, body height and weight. Interactions of QUS markers with age and sex on hip geometric parameters were tested. RESULTS: Significant inverse associations between BUA (ß = - 0.068), SOS (ß = - 0.024) as well as stiffness-index (ß = - 0.056) and CE were present, while fracture risk was positively associated with CE (ß for high = 1.28 and moderate = 2.54 vs. low fracture risk). Interactions between BUA and sex as well as between SOS and age were detected in the models for CE. Furthermore, there was an inverse relation between fracture risk and NSA that was restricted to the moderate risk (ß for moderate vs. low fracture risk = - 0.60). There were no significant associations between QUS parameters and alpha angle. CONCLUSIONS: In the general population, several associations between QUS-based bone properties or fracture risk and hip geometry are present. Less dysplastic hips had a lower stiffness-index and a higher fracture risk, whereas more valgus hips had a lower fracture risk.

Combination of Anterior Acetabular Coverage and Femoral Head Shape Predicts Femoroacetabular Impingement After Periacetabular Osteotomy.

BACKGROUND: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) may be affected by both anterior acetabular coverage and femoral head shape. This study aimed to radiographically evaluate the relationship of the combination of acetabular coverage and femoral head shape with the occurrence of FAI after curved PAO. METHODS: In this study, 76 hip joints from patients with symptomatic developmental dysplasia of the hip underwent curved PAO. The relationship between the combined postoperative anterior center-edge and alpha angles (ie, the combination angle) and the occurrence of postoperative FAI was evaluated. Clinical factors and the preoperative and postoperative 3-dimensional center-edge angles, acetabular versions, femoral versions, radiographic alpha angles of the femoral head, and the combination angle were measured and compared to clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The modified Harris Hip Scores, University of California, Los Angeles activity scores, and acetabular coverage angles were significantly improved following curved PAO. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the combination angle over 108° may be a predictive factor for the occurrence of FAI after curved PAO. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that an age <40 years (odds ratio 6.6, 95% confidence interval 1.2-36.4, P = .037) and a combination angle <108° (odds ratio 9.2, 95% confidence interval 1.7-50.0, P = .010) were significantly associated with modified Harris Hip Scores ≧90 points. CONCLUSION: A combination angle >108° may be a predictive factor for the occurrence of FAI after curved PAO and impaired clinical outcomes. To avoid postoperative FAI, we propose that osteochondroplasty of the femoral head should be performed for patients with preoperative combination angles >90°.

Characteristics of hip impingement syndrome in patients with multiple hereditary exostoses.

BACKGROUNDS: This study aimed to investigate the characteristic deformities of the hip in multiple hereditary exostoses patients (MHE) and its association with the hip impingement syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2001 and 2019, total 51 patients (102 hips) were evaluated in this study. Patients with MHE were classified to femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) symptom group, ischio-femoral impingement (IFI) symptom group and non-impingement symptom group by comparing the symptoms, clinical signs and imaging studies. To assess the morphometry of the hip in patients with MHE, the femoral neck-shaft angle, Sharp's acetabular angle and center-edge (CE) angle were evaluated. Alpha angle was further evaluated to investigate the FAI using radiographs, and the minimum ischio-femoral distance was further measured to investigate the IFI using computed-tomographic (CT) study. RESULTS: On hip impingement symptom analysis, FAI symptom and IFI symptom were confirmed in 14 hip joints and 18 hip joints, respectively. Unlike general population, the number of the hip with IFI-symptom was higher than those with FAI symptom in this study. In morphometric evaluation of MHE hips, coxa valga was most prominent deformity with occasional tendency of mild acetabular dysplasia. In a comparison of morphometric study between the impingement symptom group and non-symptom group, the FAI symptom showed significant differences of morphometric measure values than those of the non-symptom group (FAI symptom group vs. Non-FAI symptom group; Femoral neck-shaft angle (153.9 vs 142.6), Sharp's angle (45.0 vs 41.5), CE angle (21.1 vs 28.8) and alpha angle (76.7 vs 57.9)). Similarly, the IFI symptom group also showed significant differences of morphometric measure values than those of the non-symptom group (IFI-symptom vs. Non-IFI symptom; Femoral neck-shaft angle (150.9 vs 142.7), Sharp's angle (44.7 vs 41.4), CE angle (21.1 vs 29.3) and alpha angle (73.3 vs 56.8)). In addition, the minimum ischio-femoral distance measured using CT was significantly decreased in the IFI symptom group (IFI symptom group: 6.6, Non-IFI symptom group: 16.4). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the characteristic deformities represented by coxa valga in the MHE hip act as an offset for FAI symptoms, on the contrary, act as a trigger for IFI symptoms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Less hip range of motion is associated with a greater alpha angle in people with longstanding hip and groin pain.

PURPOSE: A higher alpha angle has been proposed to correlate with lower hip range of motion, but the association in people with longstanding hip and groin pain is currently unclear. The aims were to: (1) assess the association between range of motion and alpha angle in patients with longstanding hip and groin pain; (2) examine if a cut-off value in range of motion variables could identify patients with an alpha angle above or below 60°. METHODS: Seventy-two participants were consecutively recruited from an orthopaedic department after referral for hip- and groin-related pain. Passive hip range of motion was measured in flexion, internal rotation with 90° hip flexion, internal rotation in neutral hip position, external rotation with 90° hip flexion, and abduction. The alpha angle was calculated from a frog-leg lateral radiograph. Linear regression examined the association between range of motion and alpha angle, and an ROC-curve analysis was performed to identify the sensitivity and specificity of range of motion cut-offs. RESULTS: Lower range of motion in internal rotation in flexion, external rotation, and abduction were associated with higher alpha angle. Internal rotation of 27° or less displayed good sensitivity (81%) and specificity (85%) to detect an alpha angle above 60°, while a cut-off of 41° in external rotation and 27° in abduction showed a sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 50% and 60%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Less internal rotation in flexion, external rotation, and abduction are associated with a greater alpha angle in a cohort of people with longstanding hip and groin pain. A cut-off of 27° in internal rotation has good sensitivity and specificity to identify people with an alpha angle above or below 60° and have the potential to be used in the clinical setting to identify patients that require further imaging, or that are unlikely to have cam morphology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Correlation between indirect radiographic parameters of first metatarsal rotation in hallux valgus and values on weight-bearing computed tomography.

PURPOSE: To verify if indirect radiographic signs of first metatarsal pronation, determined by the head round sign, correspond to weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT) measurements. METHODS: In this case-control retrospective study, we analyzed 26 hallux valgus (HV) feet and 20 controls through conventional radiograph (CR) and WBCT images. Two blinded orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons performed the measurements. Pronation classification (head roundness), head diameter (HD), traditional HV angles, arthritis, sesamoid positioning, and first metatarsal rotation angle (MRA) (alpha angle) were evaluated. Comparisons were performed by Student's T-test and a multivariate regression was executed. P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Mean values were higher in HV patients than controls when evaluating MRA (11.51 [9.42-13.60] to 4.23 [1.84-6.62], 95%CI), HD (22.35 [21.52-23.18] to 21.01 [20.07-21.96]), and sesamoid rotation angle (SRA) (26.72 [24.09-29.34] to 4.56 [1.63-7.50]). The MRA had a low influence in head roundness classification (R2: 0.15). Changes in the pronation classification were explained chiefly by the sesamoid station (SS) (R2: 0.37), where stations 4 to 7 were found to be strong predictors of roundness classifications 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: Indirect signs of metatarsal pronation, determined by the head round sign, correlate weakly with the alpha angle measured in WBCT. The presence of arthritis and sesamoids displacement might modify the perception of first head roundness. The influence of MRA in the classification was low, where SS from 4 to 7 was strong predictors of a higher pronation classification.

MRI-based static and functional assessment of complex hip deformities in comparison with CT: a validation study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at investigating the agreement between predefined quantitative parameters of hip morphology derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and virtual range of motion (ROM) analysis using computed tomography (CT) as standard of reference. METHODS: Twenty patients (13 females, 7 males, 16-59 years) with hip deformities underwent MRI prior to surgery. Clockwise alpha angle, femoral head and neck diameter, collum caput diaphysis angle, femoral torsion, center-edge angles, acetabular coverage of the femoral head, sourcil angle, and acetabular anteversion were measured. Additionally, tern single and combined movements were simulated using a motion analysis program. The MRI findings were compared with the corresponding results obtained by CT. Correlation of MRI with CT was assessed using different statistical methods (intraclass correlation coefficient, Bland-Altmann plot, two one-sided t test), and linear regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: The results showed near-perfect intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for anteversion (0.95), acetabular sector angles (0.98-0.99), sourcil angle (0.95), and acetabular coverage (anterior 0.96, posterior 0.99). Intermethod correlation for femoral parameters showed almost perfect agreement except for the alpha angle (0.73-0.97). No significant proportional bias was detected for traditional acetabular and femoral parameters. ROM analysis was performed for 370 movements in 37 hips. For 78.4% (290/370) of the movements analysed, neither CT nor MRI detected impingement across the physiological ROM. For 18.6% (69/370) of the movements, impingement was detected by both CT and MRI, while 2.2% (8/370) of the movements with impingement in CT showed no impingement in MRI, and 0.8% (3/370) of the movements with impingement in MRI had no corresponding result in CT. CONCLUSION: Finally, it was concluded that MRI-based assessment of hip morphology and virtual ROM analysis is feasible and can be performed with good intermethod agreement in comparison to the gold standard (CT). Therefore, MRI appears to be substantially equivalent to CT for use in virtual ROM analysis and so may reasonably be used in place of CT for this purpose.

Interchangeability of CT and 3D "pseudo-CT" MRI for preoperative planning in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a 3D magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequence with postprocessing applied to simulate computed tomography (CT) ("pseudo-CT") images can be used instead of CT to measure acetabular version and alpha angles and to plan for surgery in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four readers retrospectively measured acetabular version and alpha angles on MRI and CT images of 40 hips from 20 consecutive patients (9 female patients, 11 male patients; mean age, 26.0 ± 6.5 years) with FAI. 3D models created from MRI and CT images were assessed by 2 orthopedic surgeons to determine the need for femoroplasty and/or acetabuloplasty. Interchangeability of MRI with CT was tested by comparing agreement between 2 readers using CT (intramodality) with agreement between 1 reader using CT and 1 using MRI (intermodality). RESULTS: Intramodality and intermodality agreement values were nearly identical for acetabular version and alpha angle measurements and for surgical planning. Increases in inter-reader disagreement for acetabular version angle, alpha angle, and surgical planning when MRI was substituted for CT were - 2.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], - 7.7 to + 3.5%; p = 0.459), - 0.6% (95% CI, - 8.6 to + 7.3%; p = 0.878), and 0% (95% CI, - 15.1 to + 15.1%; p = 1.0), respectively, when an agreement criterion ≤ 5° was used for angle measurements. CONCLUSION: Pseudo-CT MRI was interchangeable with CT for measuring acetabular version and highly favorable for interchangeability for measuring alpha angle and for surgical planning, suggesting that MRI could replace CT in assessing patients with FAI.

Validity of the alpha angle measurements on plain radiographs in the evaluation of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the correlation of two different alpha angle (a-angle) measurements ("anatomical method and "three-point method") with the anterior offset ratio (AOR), femoral head ratio (FHR), and lateral femoral head ratio (LFHR) in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 39 hips of 26 patients. The a-angles were measured on the frog-leg lateral view (Lat) and anteroposterior (Ap) view, FHR was measured on the Ap view, and LFHR and AOR were measured on the Lat view. A t test was performed to analyze the means of the alpha angles measured using the three-point method and the anatomical method, and also, a correlation was conducted to assess the association of the a-angles among the FHR, LFHR, and AOR. RESULTS: The mean a-angles in the Ap plane in the three-point method and anatomical method were 76° ± 15° and 64° ± 10° respectively (p < 0.001). The mean a-angles in the Lat plane in the three-point method and anatomical method were 67° ± 13° and 56° ± 11° respectively (p < 0.001). The AOR showed a significant correlation only with the anatomical method a-angle values in the Lat plane (p = 0.026). The a-angles in the three-point method in the Lat plane did not show any significant correlation with the AOR, FHR, and LFHR. Both the FHR and LFHR values correlated significantly with the Ap plane a-angles in the three-point method and anatomical method. However, none of these correlations was strong. CONCLUSIONS: The a-angle measurement methods described in patients without femoral head-neck axis disruption may not be valid in patients with a disorder such as SCFE.

Positive FABER distance test is associated with higher alpha angle in symptomatic patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of the flexion abduction external rotation (FABER) distance test (FDT) for the diagnosis of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) as defined by alpha angle. METHODS: For this study, 603 patients with symptomatic, unilateral femoroacetabular impingement were included. Patients with symptoms of hip instability, bilateral symptoms, bilateral surgery, or bilateral alpha angles over 55 were excluded from the analysis. A positive FDT was defined as a difference of 4 cm or more between hips. A pathological cam was defined as an alpha angle of 78° or greater. RESULTS: The average age was 36.4 ± 12 years, with 344 males and 259 females. Faber distance of the injured hip was correlated with age at surgery (rho = 0.148; p < 0.001). Alpha angle on the injured hip was positively correlated with injured hip FABER distance (rho = 0.276; p < 0.001). The average alpha angle in patients with a positive FABER distance test was 74° (SD = 11°) compared to 68° (SD = 8°) in patients with a negative distance test (p = 0.001). The sensitivity of the FDT to diagnose pathological cam was 0.848 (0.79-0.89) with a negative predictive value of 86% (81-90%). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the FABER distance test is correlated with the alpha angle and is a good diagnostic exam for pathological cam-type FAI as defined by and alpha angle equal to or greater than 78°. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: FABER distance test is a simple test that can be used as a screening test to decide if FAI should be suspected and further testing is needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Age and sex-related distribution of alpha angles and the prevalence of the cam morphology of the hip in Asians do not differ from those of other ethnicities.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the effects of age on the alpha angle and the incidence of asymptomatic cam morphology. METHODS: The radiographs of asymptomatic individuals between ages 8 and 22 were retrospectively collected. A total of 1417 individuals were included and grouped according to age: 8-12 (Group A), 13-18 (Group B), and 19-22 (Group C) years. Radiographic measurements of the alpha angles of the right hip were obtained from anteroposterior (AP) and frog-leg lateral (FL) radiographs. The correlations among alpha angles, the presence of cam morphology, and age were determined. RESULTS: The mean alpha angles of the three groups were statistically different (p < 0.001, each). The alpha angles on both radiographs were positively correlated with age. Intra-group analysis revealed that this correlation was only evident on the FL images of males in Group B. The presence of a radiographic cam morphology also positively correlated with age (p < 0.001 in both AP and FL images). The cam morphology on AP radiographs was 0 in Group A, 17(3.0%) in Group B, and 21(4.8%) in Group C; that on FL radiographs was 2(0.3%) in Group A, 45(7.9%) in Group B, and 103(23.6%) in Group C. Intra-group analysis revealed that the correlation was only significant in males in Group B. CONCLUSIONS: Higher alpha angles and the presence of cam morphology were positively correlated with age, particularly in males at or before the time of skeletal maturation. The prevalence of cam morphology did not differ from those in other ethnicities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Postoperative alpha angle not associated with patient-centered midterm outcomes following hip arthroscopy for FAI.

PURPOSE: The most commonly used parameter for defining cam-type femoroacetabular impingement(FAI) has been the alpha angle. The purpose of this study was to determine if patient-reported outcomes 5 years following hip arthroscopy for FAI were associated with postoperative alpha angle. We hypothesized that patient-reported outcomes would not be influenced by postoperative alpha angle in patients with FAI. METHODS: 230 patients had primary hip arthroscopy for FAI and chondrolabral dysfunction. The median age was 40 years (range 18-69). All patients had preoperative and 1 day postoperative alpha angles recorded. At minimum 5 years following arthroscopy, all patients completed an online questionnaire that included the modified Harris Hip score(MHHS), WOMAC, HOS ADL, HOS Sport, SF12 and patient satisfaction. This study was IRB approved. Patients were grouped into two, based on their postoperative alpha angle: <55° (n = 158) and ≥ 55° (n = 56). RESULTS: The median preoperative alpha angle was 72° (range 50°-105°) and the median postoperative alpha angle was 45° (range 30°-100°). The postoperative alpha angle did not correlate with any outcome measure. The median preoperative alpha angle in the < 55° group was 71° and in ≥ 55° group the median was 74° (p = 0.044). The median follow-up was 5.1 years (range 5-7). The median mHHS was 85 (range 47-100) in the < 55° and 85 (range 54-100) in the ≥ 55° group (n.s); WOMAC was 5 (range 0-73) in the < 55° and 4.5 (range 1-57) in the ≥ 55° group(n.s); HOS ADL was 95 (range 31-100) in the < 55° and 96 (range 50-100) in the ≥ 55° group (n.s); HOS Sport was 88 (range 0-100) in the < 55° and 88 (range 13-100) in the ≥ 55° group (n.s) Median patient satisfaction was 9 (range 1-10) in both groups. CONCLUSION: This study shows no statistically significant differences between the investigated patient-reported outcome scores at a 5 years postoperatively in relation to a correction of the alpha angle to 55°. While alpha angle has been shown to be an excellent preoperative diagnostic tool, the postoperative angle does not correlate with midterm outcomes or the development of osteoarthritis based on patient symptoms. The amount of osteoplasty should be based on dynamic examination at arthroscopy, and not by alpha angle. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III Case-control, retrospective comparative study.

Diminished femoral head-neck offset and the restricted hip range of motion suggesting a possible role in ACL injuries.

PURPOSE: Femoroacetabular impingement may be associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The purpose of this study was to determine the head-neck offset, as measured by 45° Dunn's view alpha angles, in patients with ACL injuries compared to control subjects. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 140 consecutive non-professional athletes with primary ACL ruptures confirmed with knee arthroscopy and 100 consecutive patients with non-ACL injury were enrolled. Hip range of motion was assessed in lower extremities in all participants, and alpha angle was calculated according to 45° Dunn's view radiographs. RESULTS: There is not any difference in age, gender distribution, height, weight, and BMI between groups. Internal rotation, abduction, and adduction of the hip were significantly decreased in ACL-injured patients comparing with control subjects (p < 0.001). ACL-injured patients had also a significantly higher alpha angle comparing to the control individuals (p < 0.001). The mean of alpha angle in the ACL-injured patients was 56.1 (SD 10.1) and in the non-ACL-injured group was 49.3 (SD 9.4). CONCLUSIONS: The patients in ACL-injured group showed a significant restriction in hip range of motion and also a diminished femoral head-neck offset suggesting a possible role of these findings in the outcome assessed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Femoro-acetabular impingement: anatomic study of reliability and accuracy of alpha angle and offset ratio on fifty consecutive peri-operatively resected femoral heads.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether X-ray attributes of the femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) - alpha angle (AA) and offset ratio (OR) reflect real measurements on resected femoral heads. METHODS: FAI AA and OR were assessed on 50 consecutively-resected femoral heads. The parameters were measured on heads cut through the maximum range of the deformity and compared to the same parameters on standardized X-ray projections (anterior-posterior [AP] and axial views). RESULTS: Mean AA was 76.47° on dissected heads vs. 75.81° on axial X-ray (p = 0.688). Mean OR was 0.132 on dissected heads vs. 0.220 on axial X-ray (p < 0.001). Mean AA on ideal AP X-ray was 79.46° vs. 81.51° on AP standing plain X-ray view (p = 0.431). AA measurements on plain X-ray AP and axial view of halved femoral heads correlated highly. CONCLUSIONS: AA on axial X-ray view reflected the real AA in our series, but the risk of cartilage damage cannot be predicted.

Assessment of the alpha angle and mobility of the hip in patients with noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the alpha angle of the hip in patients with noncontact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and compare it with patients without injury. In addition, external and internal rotation of the hip was assessed and correlated with the alpha angle. METHODS: The alpha angle of the ipsilateral hip was assessed in 41 subjects with non-contact ACL tear and compared with 39 subjects with no tear. The external and internal rotation of the ipsilateral hip was also evaluated. RESULTS: The alpha angle was larger in subjects with noncontact ACL injury. The mean was 70.31° (±13.92°) compared with 58.55° (±13.95°) in the control group (p < 0.001). The groups were similar when considering the external, internal, and sum of rotation of the ipsilateral hip. There was no correlation between the alpha angle and decreased rotational range of motion of the hip in either group (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with noncontact ACL injury presented a greater alpha angle when compared with the group without tear. There was no difference in the rotational mobility of the hip between groups, nor was there a correlation between the increase in the alpha angle and the decrease in the rotational mobility of the hip.

Osteoarthritic changes rather than age predict outcome following arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement in middle-aged patients.

BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to evaluate outcome following arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in middle-aged patients and to define risk factors for conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: This was a retrospective case series of 79 consecutive patients (40 to 65 years) undergoing arthroscopic treatment of FAI (follow-up ≥12 months). Outcome at follow-up was assessed using Hip outcome score (HOS). Alpha angle, Kellgren Lawrence grade (K-L grade), joint space width (JS), lateral center edge (LCE) angle, caput-collum-diaphysis (CCD) angle and acetabular index (AI) were analysed retrospectively. THA group and Non-THA group were compared. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients (mean age 48.6 years, mean follow-up 32 months) were included. 18 patients (22.8 %) were converted to THA. Mean HOS score in the Non-THA group at time point of follow-up was 80.2. Non-THA group and THA group showed no significant differences for mean age (48.2 years vs. 49.9 years, p = 0.278), alpha angel (p = 0.541), LCE (p = 0.294), CCD (p = 0.101) and AI (p = 0.661) in contrast to differences for JS (p = <0.001) and K-L grade (p = <0.001). Risk of conversion to THA was higher for patients with K-L grade 3 (p = 0.003) or joint space less or equal 2 mm (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: One fifth of the middle-aged patients required early conversion to THA. Advanced JS narrowing and K-L grade rather than age alone can be considered as risk factor for conversion to THA.

Femoral Morphology in Patients Undergoing Periacetabular Osteotomy for Classic or Borderline Acetabular Dysplasia: Are Cam Deformities Common?

BACKGROUND: The primary purpose of our study was to determine the prevalence of Cam deformity in patients with symptomatic acetabular dysplasia (SAD) who underwent periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 164 SAD PAO patients from 2 institutions. Preoperative anteroposterior and frog-lateral radiographs were analyzed for lateral center edge angle (LCEA), retroversion, alpha angles, and anterior femoral head-neck offset. Hips were classified as dysplastic (LCEA <20°, group A, n = 142) and borderline dysplastic (LCEA 20°-25°, group B, n = 22). There were 128 females and 36 males with an average age of 29 years (range 13-56). RESULTS: The overall prevalence of Cam deformity was 10% (17 of 164) in SAD patients. There was no difference in the prevalence of Cam deformity between the groups (P > .99). CONCLUSION: Prevalence of Cam deformities in our series of SAD patients having undergone PAO is less than prior reports. Careful radiographic measurement should be performed to avoid overtreating these hips with unnecessary osteochondroplasty procedures.

Modified head-neck offset for diagnosing anterior femoro-acetabular impingement.

PURPOSE: The head-neck offset described by Eijer et al. (eHNO), which is used to diagnose anterior femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI), can be difficult to measure. The aim of this study was to verify if a modified head-neck offset (mHNO) provides more accurate and reproducible values than those of the eHNO. METHODS: The eHNO, mHNO, cephalic radius and alpha angle were measured on frog-leg radiographs of a group of patients with FAI and a control group (T); three independent reviewers measured the 50 hips in each group twice. The comparison of the two HNOs focused on reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient), validity (correlation with alpha angle), practical utility (difference between means in the FAI and control groups) and accuracy of the diagnostic thresholds. RESULTS: The mHNO had better reproducibility (p < 0.05) within and between observers in all study subjects than that of the eHNO (0.938 and 0.979 vs 0.881 and 0.904). The correlation with the alpha angle was also better (p < 0.05) for the mHNO than that for the eHNO. The diagnostic performances of the mHNO and mAOR thresholds were higher than those of the eHNO, eAOR and alpha angle. CONCLUSIONS: The new HNO is easier to measure, more reproducible and more accurate. A modified HNO <5 mm and a modified AOR <0.100 on the frog-leg view argued in favour of a pathological cam-type head-neck junction.

Ultrasound is as reliable as plain radiographs in the diagnosis of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

INTRODUCTION: In the diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), plain radiographs are accepted as the initial imaging method. However, there is no consensus regarding the optimal lateral view, and radiographs can underestimate the asphericity of the head-neck junction. Our research question was if ultrasound has at least the same reliability as X-ray and can be used as an alternative or additional method in the initial imaging of FAI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients with a median age of 39 years were consecutively included after diagnosis of cam-type FAI on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All patients underwent radiography involving a plain anteroposterior-view, frog-leg lateral view, and ultrasound of the hip joint in the ventral longitudinal section at 20° internal rotation. Parameters measured by MRI, radiographs, and ultrasound were the alpha angle, anterior offset, offset ratio, and anterior femoral distance. RESULTS: No significant difference between the alpha angle on MRI (64.8°), the frog-leg view (66.3°), or ultrasound (65.6°) could be detected. Comparable correlation was found between the alpha angle on MRI and the frog-leg lateral view (r = 0.73; p < 0.0001) and between the alpha angle on MRI and sonograms (r = 0.77; p < 0.0001). The intra-class correlation coefficient for measurements using ultrasound was 0.81-0.98, and using radiographs was 0.83-0.99, with the exception of measurements involving the anterior offset on the frog-leg lateral view (0.61 and 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound is as reliable as plain radiographs in the diagnosis of cam-type FAI and can serve as an alternative or additional method in initial imaging.

Cam impingement: defining the presence of a cam deformity by the alpha angle: data from the CHECK cohort and Chingford cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Cam impingement is characterized by abnormal contact between the proximal femur and acetabulum caused by a non-spherical femoral head, known as a cam deformity. A cam deformity is usually quantified by the alpha angle; greater alpha angles substantially increase the risk for osteoarthritis (OA). However, there is no consensus on which alpha angle threshold to use to define the presence of a cam deformity. AIM: To determine alpha angle thresholds that define the presence of a cam deformity and a pathological cam deformity based on development of OA. METHODS: Data from both the prospective CHECK cohort of 1002 individuals (45-65 years) and the prospective population-based Chingford cohort of 1003 women (45-64 years) with respective follow-up times of 5 and 19 years were combined. The alpha angle was measured at baseline on anteroposterior radiographs, from which a threshold for the presence of a cam deformity was determined based on its distribution. Further, a pathological alpha angle threshold was determined based on the highest discriminative ability for development of end-stage OA at follow-up. RESULTS: A definite bimodal distribution of the alpha angle was found in both cohorts with a normal distribution up to 60°, indicating a clear distinction between normal and abnormal alpha angles. A pathological threshold of 78° resulted in the maximum area under the ROC curve. CONCLUSION: Epidemiological data of two large cohorts shows a bimodal distribution of the alpha angle. Alpha angle thresholds of 60° to define the presence of a cam deformity and 78° for a pathological cam deformity are proposed.

Cam-type hip morphology in asymptomatic patients.

BACKGROUND: The alpha angle has been widely used in the assessment of cam-type of impingement, but recent studies have shown that this angle may also be high in asymptomatic patients. The aim of this study is to report the prevalence of cam-type morphology in asymptomatic volunteers and explore its correlation with hip clinical and radiological parameters. METHODS: This single-centre prospective study included 48 asymptomatic male volunteers (96 hips). All candidates fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Physical examination and 1.5 -T MRI imaging were done for bilateral hips on the same day. Alpha angle measurements were obtained from 4 different positions and cam-type morphology was considered positive using 2 different cut points >55° and >60°. Descriptive statistics were analysed and correlations were performed where appropriate and p-value < 0.05 was considered to be significant. RESULTS: The prevalence of cam-type morphology using alpha angle >55° was 68.8%, 87.5%, 50% and 34.4% in the 12, 1, 2 and 3 o'clock positions respectively. While it was 38.5%, 69.8%, 26% and 12.5% in the 12, 1, 2 and 3 o'clock positions of the studied hips respectively using alpha angle >60°. The maximum alpha angle was more frequently prevalent at the 1 o'clock position in 71 (74%). Labral tear was detected in 26 (27.1%) hips and impingement test was positive in 12 (12.5%) hips. There was no correlation between the presence of cam-type morphology and range of motion of the hip, presence of positive impingement test nor labral tears. CONCLUSIONS: Cam-type morphology prevalence is high among asymptomatic males, and mostly pronounced at the 1 o'clock position. A correlation between high alpha angle and positive impingement test or labral tear was not found in our cohort. Future studies are required to determine the natural history of asymptomatic cam-type morphology and risk of hip derangement.