Comprehensive genomic profiling by liquid biopsy captures tumor heterogeneity and identifies cancer vulnerabilities in patients with RAS/BRAFV600E wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer in the CAPRI 2-GOIM trial.

BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence supports tumor tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Data on liquid biopsy-based circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) CGP are scarce and mainly retrospective. Prospective comparison between the two tests is not currently available. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CAPRI 2-GOIM trial investigates efficacy and safety of ctDNA-driven, cetuximab-based sequence of three treatment lines in patients with RAS/BRAFV600E wild-type (WT) mCRC, as determined by the local laboratory. Before first-line therapy, CGP is carried out with FoundationOne (F1) CDx and F1 Liquid (F1L) CDx (324 genes) on tumor tissue DNA and plasma ctDNA, respectively. RESULTS: For 2/207 (0.96%) patients, no ctDNA was detected by F1L CDx. No patient displayed tumor fraction (TF) below 1%, whereas elevated ctDNA (TF ≥ 10%) was detected among 140/205 (68.3%) patients. One thousand and thirteen genomic variants were identified. F1L CDx found KRAS, NRAS, or BRAFV600E alterations in 19 patients, whose tumors were classified as RAS/BRAFV600E WT by the local laboratory. Both F1 CDx and F1L CDx were available for 164/205 (80%) patients. A concordance of 61.4% between the two tests was observed. The concordance increased to 72.7% for F1L CDx with TF ≥ 10%. Concordance for genes potentially involved in anti-epidermal growth factor receptor resistance was found in 137/164 (83%) patients, increasing to 91.5% for F1L CDx with TF ≥ 10%. A higher number of genomic alterations was detected by F1L CDx compared with F1 CDx, including six cases with KRAS and NRAS alterations. Overall, 109/205 (53.2%) patients displayed at least one actionable genomic alteration (I to IIIB), according to the European Society for Medical Oncology Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT). CONCLUSION: Baseline liquid biopsy-based CGP is feasible, has high concordance with tumor tissue-based CGP, could better recapitulate tumor heterogeneity, and is clinically informative by identifying additional actionable genomic alterations in approximately half of RAS/BRAFV600E WT mCRC patients.

Evaluation of the additional prophylactic effect of topical steroid ointment to systemic minocycline against anti-epidermal growth factor antibody-induced skin toxicities in metastatic colorectal cancer treatment.

BACKGROUND: Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies often cause skin toxicities. Preemptive skin treatments using systemic antibiotics with or without topical steroid are reportedly effective although the most suitable method remains unclear. This study aimed to determine whether combination prophylaxis using systemic minocycline and topical steroid is superior to minocycline alone in a real-world metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment. METHODS: Patients with mCRC (n = 87) who received anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies were retrospectively assessed. The primary objective was to compare the incidence of grade ≥ 2 overall skin toxicities during all treatment periods between the control group receiving prophylactic minocycline 100 mg/day, and the combination prophylaxis group receiving minocycline 100 mg/day + topical steroid. The incidence of each skin symptom was also evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of grade ≥ 2 overall skin toxicities was 63.6% in the control and 56.9% in the combination groups, with no significant difference (P = 0.63). Similarly, the incidence of grade ≥ 2 dry skin, fissures, paronychia, and pruritus did not significantly differ. In addition, incidence of all-grade skin toxicities was not different. However, the incidence of grade ≥ 2 papulopustular rashes was significantly lower in the combination group (23.1% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.03). Propensity score-matched analysis supported these results. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed no significant association between combination prophylaxis and grade ≥ 2 overall skin toxicities, but it did show a reduction in grade ≥ 2 papulopustular rashes. CONCLUSION: Adding topical steroids to systemic minocycline did not mitigate grade ≥ 2 overall skin toxicities induced by anti-EGFR antibodies; however, it significantly improved papulopustular rashes.

Risk factor analysis for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody-induced skin toxicities in real-world metastatic colorectal cancer treatment.

PURPOSE: Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) monoclonal antibodies are effective in treating RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, their administration induces skin toxicity, markedly reducing patients' quality of life. This study is aimed at identifying the risk factors associated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody-induced skin toxicities. METHODS: Patients with mCRC (n = 116) who received anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody treatment were retrospectively evaluated. Primary endpoint was evaluation of the risk factors for grade ≥ 2 overall skin toxicities during all the treatment periods. Furthermore, factors associated with each grade ≥ 2 skin symptoms were assessed. RESULTS: Incidence of total grade ≥ 2 skin toxicity symptoms was 61.2%, and those of grade ≥ 2 rash, dry skin, fissures, and paronychia were 34.5%, 25.9%, 20.7%, and 25.0%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that liver metastasis was an independent risk factor for overall grade ≥ 2 skin toxicities (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-6.78; P = 0.02) and prophylactic administration of antibiotics as a preventive factor (OR 0.10; 95%CI 0.01-0.91; P = 0.04). For grade ≥ 2 rash, prophylactic use of systemic antibiotics and topical steroid ointment was a preventive factor (OR 0.37; 95%CI 0.16-0.89; P = 0.03). Moreover, liver metastasis (OR 8.37; 95%CI 1.98-35.47; P = 0.004) and prophylactic administration of antibiotics (OR 0.15; 95%CI 0.03-0.76; P = 0.02) were significantly associated with grade ≥ 2 paronychia. CONCLUSION: Liver metastasis was suggested to be a risk factor for the incidence of overall grade ≥ 2 skin toxicities; moreover, preemptive systemic antibiotic administration drastically decreased this risk during all periods of anti-EGFR treatment for mCRC.

The efficacy and safety of anti-EGFR target agents in patients with potentially resectable metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Adding anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) target agents to conversion therapy may improve the resection rates and survival of patients with potentially resectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This study aims to analyze the efficacy and safety of additional anti-EGFR target agents. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. And all relevant studies published in English before January 2023 were collected to explore the impact of additional anti-EGFR targeted agent on the efficacy and safety of patients with potentially resectable mCRC (PROSPERO: CRD42022340523, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ ). RESULTS: This study included a total of 8 articles, including 2618 patients. The overall response rate (ORR) and R0 resection rates of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group, while there was no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. In RAS/KRAS wild-type patients, the ORR (RR: 1.20, 95% Cl: 1.02-1.41, p = 0.03), R0 resection rate (RR: 1.60, 95% Cl: 1.17-2.20, p = 0.003), PFS (HR: 0.80, 95% Cl: 0.68-0.93, p = 0.003), and OS (HR: 0.87, 95% Cl: 0.76-0.99, p = 0.031) of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group. While in KRAS mutant patients, there was no statistical difference between the two groups in ORR, R0 resection rate, PFS, and OS. CONCLUSION: The addition of anti-EGFR targeted agents can improve the prognosis of RAS/KRAS wild-type patients with potentially resectable mCRC, while KRAS mutant patients may not benefit. In addition, the overall safety factor was controllable.

Safety and efficacy of depatuxizumab mafodotin in Japanese patients with malignant glioma: A nonrandomized, phase 1/2 trial.

INTELLANCE-J was a phase 1/2 study of a potent antibody-drug conjugate targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux-M), as a second- or first-line therapy, alone or combined with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in 53 Japanese patients with World Health Organization (WHO) grade III/IV glioma. In second-line arms, patients with EGFR-amplified recurrent WHO grade III/IV glioma received Depatux-M plus chemotherapy (temozolomide) or Depatux-M alone regardless of EGFR status. In first-line arms, patients with newly diagnosed WHO grade III/IV glioma received Depatux-M plus chemoradiotherapy. The study was halted following lack of survival benefit with first-line Depatux-M in the global trial INTELLANCE-1. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with EGFR-amplified tumors receiving second-line Depatux-M plus chemotherapy. Common nonocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with both second-line and first-line Depatux-M included lymphopenia (42%, 33%, respectively), thrombocytopenia (39%, 47%), alanine aminotransferase increase (29%, 47%), and aspartate aminotransferase increase (24%, 60%); incidence of grade ≥3 TEAEs was 66% and 53%, respectively. Ocular side effects (OSEs) occurred in 93% of patients receiving second-line Depatux-M plus chemotherapy and all patients receiving second-line Depatux-M alone or first-line Depatux-M plus chemoradiotherapy. Most OSEs were manageable with dose modifications and concomitant medications. The 6-month PFS estimate was 25.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.4-42.6), and median PFS was 2.1 months (95% CI 1.9-3.9) with second-line Depatux-M plus chemotherapy in the EGFR-amplified subgroup. This study showed acceptable safety profile of Depatux-M alone or plus chemotherapy/chemoradiotherapy in Japanese patients with WHO grade III/IV glioma. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02590263).

Identification of key genes involved in tumor immune cell infiltration and cetuximab resistance in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody introduces adaptable variations to the transcriptome and triggers tumor immune infiltration, resulting in colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment resistance. We intended to identify genes that play essential roles in cetuximab resistance and tumor immune cell infiltration. METHODS: A cetuximab-resistant CACO2 cellular model was established, and its transcriptome variations were detected by microarray. Meanwhile, public data from the Gene Expression Omnibus and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were downloaded. Integrated bioinformatics analysis was applied to detect differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the cetuximab-resistant and the cetuximab-sensitive groups. Then, we investigated correlations between DEGs and immune cell infiltration. The DEGs from bioinformatics analysis were further validated in vitro and in clinical samples. RESULTS: We identified 732 upregulated and 1259 downregulated DEGs in the induced cellular model. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analyses, along with Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and Gene Set Variation Analysis, indicated the functions of the DEGs. Together with GSE59857 and GSE5841, 12 common DEGs (SATB-2, AKR1B10, ADH1A, ADH1C, MYB, ATP10B, CDX-2, FAR2, EPHB2, SLC26A3, ORP-1, VAV3) were identified and their predictive values of cetuximab treatment were validated in GSE56386. In online Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) database, nine of twelve DEGs were recognized in the protein-protein (PPI) network. Based on the transcriptome profiles of CRC samples in TCGA and using Tumor Immune Estimation Resource Version 2.0, we bioinformatically determined that SATB-2, ORP-1, MYB, and CDX-2 expressions were associated with intensive infiltration of B cell, CD4+ T cell, CD8+ T cell and macrophage, which was then validated the correlation in clinical samples by immunohistochemistry. We found that SATB-2, ORP-1, MYB, and CDX-2 were downregulated in vitro with cetuximab treatment. Clinically, patients with advanced CRC and high ORP-1 expression exhibited a longer progression-free survival time when they were treated with anti-EGFR therapy than those with low ORP-1 expression. CONCLUSIONS: SATB-2, ORP-1, MYB, and CDX-2 were related to cetuximab sensitivity as well as enhanced tumor immune cell infiltration in patients with CRC.

Subgroup analysis by prior anti-VEGF or anti-EGFR target therapy in FRESCO, a randomized, double-blind, Phase III trial.

Background: FRESCO study demonstrated efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Impact of prior targeted therapy (PTT) on efficacy and safety of fruquintinib was evaluated. Materials & methods: In this subgroup analysis of FRESCO trial, patients were divided into PTT and non-PTT subgroups, and efficacy and safety of fruquintinib were assessed, respectively. Results: In non-PTT subgroup, fruquintinib significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients compared with placebo. In PTT subgroup, the median OS and PFS of patients in fruquintinib arm was significantly higher than those in placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) rates were similar in both subgroups. Conclusion: Fruquintinib demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in OS, PFS, objective response rate, and disease control rate with manageable TEAEs in both subgroups. Clinical trial registration: NCT02314819 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Lay abstract In this analysis of the FRESCO trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in two different groups of patients (subgroups) with metastatic colorectal cancer - patients who received prior targeted therapy (PTT) and patients who did not (non-PTT). Of the 278 patients treated with fruquintinib, 111 patients received PTT. Patients treated with fruquintinib had longer overall survival and it took longer for their disease to worsen in both PTT and non-PTT subgroups compared with placebo. Patients in both subgroups treated with fruquintinib showed measurable reduction in their tumor size and disease control with similar side effects in patients of both the subgroups. These results suggest that fruquintinib is safe and effective in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in both subgroups.

Withholding the Introduction of Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor: Impact on Outcomes in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Tumors: A Multicenter AGEO Study (the WAIT or ACT Study).

BACKGROUND: Patients with RAS wild-type (WT) nonresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) may receive either bevacizumab or an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) combined with first-line, 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Without the RAS status information, the oncologist can either start chemotherapy with bevacizumab or wait for the introduction of the anti-EGFR. Our objective was to compare both strategies in a routine practice setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective, propensity score-weighted study included patients with a RAS WT nonresectable mCRC, treated between 2013 and 2016 by a 5-FU-based chemotherapy, with either delayed anti-EGFR or immediate anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Primary criterion was overall survival (OS). Secondary criteria were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: A total of 262 patients (129 in the anti-VEGF group and 133 in the anti-EGFR group) were included. Patients receiving an anti-VEGF were more often men (68% vs. 56%), with more metastatic sites (>2 sites: 15% vs. 9%). The median delay to obtain the RAS status was 19 days (interquartile range: 13-26). Median OS was not significantly different in the two groups (29 vs. 30.5 months, p = .299), even after weighting on the propensity score (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-1.08, p = .2024). The delayed introduction of anti-EGFR was associated with better median PFS (13.8 vs. 11.0 months, p = .0244), even after weighting on the propensity score (HR = 0.74, 95% CI, 0.61-0.90, p = .0024). ORR was significantly higher in the anti-EGFR group (66.7% vs. 45.6%, p = .0007). CONCLUSION: Delayed introduction of anti-EGFR had no deleterious effect on OS, PFS, and ORR, compared with doublet chemotherapy with anti-VEGF. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: For RAS/RAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, patients may receive 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy plus either bevacizumab or an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). In daily practice, the time to obtain the RAS status might be long enough to consider two options: to start the chemotherapy with bevacizumab, or to start without a targeted therapy and to add the anti-EGFR at reception of the RAS status. This study found no deleterious effect of the delayed introduction of an anti-EGFR on survival, compared with the introduction of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor from cycle 1. It is possible to wait one or two cycles to introduce the anti-EGFR while waiting for RAS status.

Implementing anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: challenges and future perspectives.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors are valuable therapeutics in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs), such as cetuximab or panitumumab, in combination with chemotherapy are effective treatment options for patients with RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC. Nevertheless, several issues are still open concerning the optimal use of anti-EGFR drugs in the continuum of care of mCRC. Novel approaches for increasing the efficacy of anti-EGFR therapies include better molecular selection of EGFR-dependent mCRC, intensification of chemotherapy, combination of anti-EGFR MoAbs and immune checkpoint inhibitors, and reintroduction of EGFR blockade or 'rechallenge' in selected patients who have previously responded to anti-EGFR MoAb therapy. An extensive translational research program was conducted in the Cetuximab After Progression in KRAS wIld-type colorectal cancer patients-Gruppo Oncologico dell' Italia Meridionale (CAPRI-GOIM) study with the aims of determining which subgroups of patients could benefit from the continuous inhibition of EGFR, from evaluating the role of liquid biopsy-based and its concordance with tissue-based molecular testing, and from investigating novel potential mechanisms of resistance to anti-EGFR therapies. In this review, we summarize the translational and clinical findings of the CAPRI-GOIM program in the context of the current knowledge of therapeutic strategies and of ongoing research on more appropriate uses of anti-EGFR therapies in RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC patients.

Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody combined with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radical radiotherapy: a multicentre, open-label, phase II clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a single-arm phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects (AEs) of an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody, nimotuzumab, combined with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF) as first-line treatment in recurrent metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radical radiotherapy. METHODS: Patients who met the eligibility criteria were recruited from ten institutions (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01616849). A Simon optimal two-stage design was used to calculate the sample size. All patients received weekly nimotuzumab (200 mg) added to cisplatin (100 mg/m2 D1) and 5-fluorouracil (4 g/m2 continuous infusion D1-4) every 3-weekly for a maximum of six cycles. Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and AEs. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients were enrolled (13 in stage 1 and 22 in stage 2). Overall ORR and DCR were 71.4% (25/35) and 85.7% (30/35), respectively. Median PFS and OS were 7.0 (95% CI 5.8-8.2) months and 16.3 (95% CI 11.4-21.3) months, respectively. Unplanned exploratory analyses suggest that patients who received ≥2400 mg nimotuzumab and ≥4 cycles of PF had superior ORR, PFS and OS than those who did not (88.9% versus 12.5%, P < 0.001; 7.4 versus 2.7 months, P = 0.081; 17.0 versus 8.0 months, P = 0.202). Favourable subgroups included patients with lung metastasis [HROS 0.324 (95% CI 0.146-0.717), P = 0.008] and disease-free interval of >12 months [HROS 0.307 (95% CI 0.131-0.724), P = 0.004], but no difference was observed for metastatic burden. The only major grade 3/4 AE was leukopenia (62.9%). CONCLUSION: Combination nimotuzumab-PF chemotherapy demonstrates potential efficacy, and is well tolerated as first-line chemotherapy regimen in recurrent metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Incidence of second primary cancers after radiotherapy combined with platinum and/or cetuximab in head and neck cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The second primary cancer (SPC) incidence after treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy and cetuximab in combination with radiotherapy has not been previously reported. Our aim was to compare SPC risk following radiotherapy in combination with these agents for the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS: The charts of 296 cases treated for loco-regionally advanced HNSCC between 2009 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed for patient, tumor, and procedural characteristics. All patients were planned to undergo radiotherapy either with platinum compounds (group: Platinum) or monoclonal antibody cetuximab (group: Cetuximab). A third group of patients switched from platinum compounds to cetuximab due to toxicity (group: Switch). Treatment groups were evaluated for the incidence of SPC with log-rank test. Possible confounders were investigated with multivariate Cox's proportional hazards model. All tests were two-sided, and a p < 0.05 was set to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 36 months. Platinum, Cetuximab, and Switch groups consisted of 158, 101, and 37 patients, respectively. Three-year overall survival in the whole cohort was 70%. The rate of SPC was comparable between Platinum (9.2%) and Cetuximab (11.5%) groups (p = 0.98), whereas the patients in the Switch group were exposed to a significantly higher incidence of SPC (23.3%) in 3 years (p = 0.01). The multivariate model indicated Switch to be the only variable correlating with an increased risk for SPC. CONCLUSIONS: The Switch strategy may expose the patients to an increased risk of developing SPC. The use of switch should be advocated with caution until robust pre-clinical and clinical data are available.

PD-L1 Expression in Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Skin Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Agents.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent or metastatic (R/M) skin squamous cell carcinoma (sSCC) not amenable of surgery or irradiation may benefit from systemic therapies. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors and, more recently, immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) showed activity in R/M sSCC. In this study, we aimed at exploring the possible role of PD-L1 expression in predicting response to anti-EGFR agents. METHODS: Patients affected by R/M sSCC, treated with pan-HER inhibitor dacomitinib or with platinum-based chemotherapy with cetuximab (CT-cet) from 2010 to 2016, were considered. PD-L1 expression was assessed with immunohistochemistry on tumor cells (TCs) and on microenvironment (TC and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte [IC] scores, respectively). Prognostic role of PD-L1 and the correlation with response to EGFR inhibitors and survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight R/M sSCCs were analyzed (19 treated with dacomitinib, 9 with CT-cet). TC and IC were negative in 82 and 45% of cases, respectively; 15% sSCCs were both TC and IC positive. Progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in IC-positive cases (median 7.5 months vs. 2.1 in IC0, p = 0.02). No statistically significant differences were observed between PD-L1 expression and both overall survival and response rates. CONCLUSION: PD-L1 expression in microenvironment predicted better PFS. The combination of EGFR inhibitors and ICB could help deepening the knowledge about the interrelations between the EGFR and PD-1/PD-L1 pathways.

Nimotuzumab-containing regimen for pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas: a retrospective multicenter study and review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Nimotuzumab is an IgG1 antibody that targets epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Overexpression of EGFR is detected in some pediatric brain tumors including diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPG)s. METHODS: Since May 2010, nimotuzumab, combined with carboplatin or vinorelbine or Temozolomide (TMZ), was administered during progressive disease (PD) after the use of the institutional protocol consisting of radiotherapy (RT) + TMZ and adjuvant TMZ. After May 2012, children with newly diagnosed disease received TMZ during RT, and nimotuzumab and TMZ after RT. Nimotuzumab was given as 150 mg/m2/dose once a week for 12 weeks, and then every other week with TMZ until PD. PD patients were switched to nimotuzumab + vinorelbine combination until death. RESULTS: Nimotuzumab was used in 24 children with DIPG (seven in the PD group, 17 in the newly diagnosed patient group). In the PD group, median survival time was 12 months (7-42 months); 1-year and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 42.9 ± 18% and 14.3 ± 13%, respectively. The median survival in this group, after the initiation of nimotuzumab was 6 months (3-8 months). In the newly diagnosed patient group, median survival time was 11 months (3-35 months) and median progression free survival was 4 months (1-21 months). The 1-year OS in this group was 35.3 ± 11% and 2 year OS was 11.8 ± 7%. Nimotuzumab ± chemotherapy was well tolerated with no major adverse effect. CONCLUSION: Nimotuzumab-containing regimens are feasible and tolerable; it might be that some patients either with newly diagnosed DIPG or with progressive disease may benefit modestly from nimotuzumab-containing combinations.

BRAF Mutations as Predictive Biomarker for Response to Anti-EGFR Monoclonal Antibodies.

Recently, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) recommended that patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer could be treated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) cetuximab and panitumumab only in absence of Rat-Sarcoma (RAS) mutations. In addition to the previously established biomarker Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) exon 2, cumulative evidence also shows that patients whose tumors harbor KRAS exons 3 or 4 and neuroblastoma rat-sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (NRAS) exons 2, 3, and 4 mutations are found unlikely to benefit from anti-EGFR treatment.In line with the resistance of RAS mutated (mt) tumors, treatment response in BRAFmt tumors may also be altered given their important role in the EGFR signaling pathway. However, BRAF is not recommended as predictive biomarker yet because the evidence for the impact of BRAF mutations on treatment outcome is considered insufficient.This article summarizes the evidence for the impact of BRAF mutations on treatment outcome of anti-EGFR mAbs. Based on a review of literature, eight meta-analyses were included that consistently show that patients with BRAF mutations have a lack of treatment benefit of anti-EGFR mAbs. After discussing the quality and quantity of available evidence, we conclude that evidence is stronger than suggested by ESMO and ASCO. Additionally, we highlight that the quality of evidence for BRAF is even higher than for extended RAS as a biomarker. We therefore advise ESMO and ASCO to reconsider BRAF status as a predictive biomarker for response. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), therapy with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab is indicated in absence of RAS mutations. Cumulative evidence shows that patients with BRAF mutations, who comprise 10% of the mCRC population, do not benefit from anti-EGFR-antibody treatment. Although guidelines state that evidence for BRAF as a predictive marker is insufficient, we highlight that the quality and quantity of evidence is higher than suggested. We therefore encourage the use of BRAF as a predictive marker in order to exclude patients from therapy for whom limited treatment benefit is expected.

Potential biomarkers for anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy has established efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer, but a significant number of patients do not respond to such treatment. Recently, various biomarkers were reported to be useful in predicting resistance to anti-EGFR. All the potential biomarkers predicting resistance to anti-EGFR are reviewed herein from five aspects. First, upstream molecules, including epiregulin (EREG) and amphiregulin (AREG), might play different roles according to their abnormal levels in tumor tissue and serum. Second, the EGFR amplification and distinct polymorphisms may have roles in identifying patients for initial anti-EGFR mAbs therapy, while rare EGFR mutations have limited predictive values. Third, among the downstream molecularly related factors, rat sarcoma viral oncogene (Ras) has been identified as a successful predictor, while B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF) is considered as a prognostic factor rather than a predictor. Fourth, among the molecular bypass pathway components, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) may be potential biomarkers in the future, while activation of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/c-Met signaling confers resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. Fifth, many microRNAs and additional molecular biomarkers are promising in predicting the efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy. Applications of multiple biomarkers are more effective than the use of a single biomarker in selecting patients who might benefit from cetuximab- or panitumumab-based treatments. Comprehensive molecular analyses of the EGFR signaling pathways should be considered in the future. Subsequent prospective trials will be required to further confirm the clinical utility of these biomarkers.

Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy in upper gastrointestinal tract cancers: a meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatment of patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract cancers. A systematic search of multiple databases identified seven randomized controlled trials. Anti-EGFR combination therapy improved disease control rate (DCR) in all patients and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients receiving the same dose of standard therapy as patients receiving standard therapy alone. Combinations of anti-EGFR with non-capecitabine chemotherapy further improved DCR, whereas combinations with capecitabine masked the benefits of DCR and worsened PFS. Overall survival was apparently lower in patients without metastasis, and PFS was apparently improved in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction. Anti-EGFR treatment was associated with higher rates of cardiac events, hand-foot syndrome, rash, hypomagnesemia, diarrhea and mucositis and lower rates of neutropenia. Combinations of anti-EGFR agents with non-capecitabine chemotherapy or better supportive care may benefit patients with upper GI tract cancers.

Efficacy, safety and genomic analysis of SCT200, an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, in patients with fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin refractory RAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase â ¡ study.

BACKGROUND: Limited therapeutic options are available for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients after failure of first- and second-line therapies, representing an unmet medical need for novel therapies. METHODS: This is an open-label, single arm, multicenter, phase Ⅱ study aiming to perform the efficacy, safety and genomic analysis of SCT200, a noval fully humanized IgG1 anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody, in patients with fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin refractory RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC. SCT200 (6 mg/kg) was given weekly for the first six weeks, followed by a higher dose of 8 mg/kg every two weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was independent review committee (IRC)-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints included ORR in patients with left-sided tumor, disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), time to response (TTR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. FINDINGS: From February 12, 2018 to December 1, 2019, a total of 110 patients aged between 26 and 77 years (median: 55; interquartile range [IQR]: 47-63) with fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan refractory RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC were enrolled from 22 hospitals in China. As the data cut-off date on May 15, 2020, the IRC-assessed ORR and DCR was 31% (34/110, 95% confidence interval [CI] 22-40%) and 75% (82/110, 95% CI 65-82%), respectively. Thirty one percent (34/110) patients achieved confirmed partial response (PR). The median PFS and median OS were 5.1 months (95% CI 3.4-5.2) and 16.2 months (95% CI 11.1-not available [NA]), respectively. The most common ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were hypomagnesemia (17%, 19/110) and acneiform dermatitis (11%, 12/110). No deaths occurred. Genomic analysis suggested positive association between MYC amplification and patients' response (P = 0.0058). RAS/RAF mutation and MET amplification were the most frequently detected resistance mechanisms. Patients with high circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at baseline or without ctDNA clearance at the 7th week after the first dose of SCT200 administration before receiving SCT200 had worse PFS and OS. INTERPRETATION: SCT200 exhibited promising clinical efficacy and manageable safety profiles in RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC patients progressed on fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin treatment. The baseline ctDNA and ctDNA clearance status at the 7th week after the first dose of SCT200 administration before receiving SCT200 could be a potential prognostic biomarker for RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC patients with SCT200 therapy. FUNDING: This study was sponsored by Sinocelltech Ltd., Beijing, China and partly supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project for Key New Drug Development (2019ZX09732001-006, 2017ZX09304015).

Risk Factor Analysis for Anti-epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Monoclonal Antibody-induced Problematic Skin Toxicities in Patients With Liver Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: We previously reported that patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and baseline liver metastasis are at a higher risk of developing grade ≥2 overall skin toxicities when treated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody. This study aimed to identify additional factors associated with skin toxicities induced by anti-EGFR treatment in patients with liver metastatic CRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with liver metastatic CRC who initially received anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody-containing treatment (n=77) were retrospectively assessed. The primary endpoint was to identify the factor(s) responsible for the development of grade ≥2 overall skin toxicities. Additionally, factors for grade ≥2 rash and paronychia were evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of grade ≥2 overall skin symptoms, rash, and paronychia was 62.3%, 31.2%, and 28.6%, respectively. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses revealed that age <65 years and anemia were independent baseline risk factors for grade ≥2 overall skin toxicities (adjusted hazard ratio 2.09, 95% confidence interval=1.10-3.97, p=0.02 for age; 2.36, 1.20-4.61, p=0.01 for anemia). In contrast, combination prophylaxis using systemic minocycline and corticosteroid ointment was a preventive factor (0.47, 0.25-0.88, p=0.02). Males and age <65 years were baseline risk factors for grade ≥2 rash, and combination prophylaxis was identified as a preventive factor. No factors were identified for paronychia. CONCLUSION: Age <65 years and anemia were identified as independent baseline risk factors. Additionally, combination prophylaxis was found to be a preventive factor against anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody-induced grade ≥2 overall skin toxicities in patients with liver metastatic CRC.

Successful cetuximab rechallenge in metastatic colorectal cancer: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment has been evolving and increasingly driven by tumor biology and gene expression analysis. Rechallenge with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors (anti-EGFR) represents a promising strategy for patients with RAS wild-type (RAS-wt) mCRC and circulating tumor DNA has emerged as a potential selection strategy. Herein, we report the case of a RAS-wt mCRC patient who had a successful response to cetuximab rechallenge. CASE SUMMARY: Our patient was diagnosed with stage IV RAS-wt, microsatellite-stable rectosigmoid junction adenocarcinoma. He was started on first-line treatment with FOLFIRI and cetuximab and achieved partial response, allowing for a left hepatectomy (R0), followed by post-operative chemotherapy and an anterior resection; progression-free survival (PFS) of 16 months was obtained. Due to hepatic and nodal relapse, second-line treatment with FOLFOX and bevacizumab was started with partial response; metastasectomy was performed (R0), achieving a PFS of 11 months. After a 15 months anti-EGFR-free interval, FOLFIRI and cetuximab were reintroduced upon disease progression, again with partial response and a PFS of 16 months. Following extensive hepatic relapse, cetuximab was reintroduced and a marked clinical and analytical improvement was seen, after only one cycle. RAS-wt status was confirmed on circulating tumor DNA. The patient's overall survival exceeded 5 years. CONCLUSION: Our case provides real-world data to support cetuximab rechallenge in later lines of RAS-wt mCRC treatment.

Emerging role of liquid biopsy in rat sarcoma virus mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: A case report.

BACKGROUND: In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the treatment options are limited and have been proved to be affected by rat sarcoma virus (RAS) mutational status. In RAS wild-type (wt) patients, the combination of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies with chemotherapy (CT) is more effective than CT alone. On the other hand, RAS-mutated patients are not eligible for treatment with anti-EGFR antibodies. CASE SUMMARY: Eleven patients with initially RAS-mutated mCRC were followed from diagnosis to May 2022. At the time of cell-free DNA determination, five patients had undergone one CT line, five patients had undergone two CT lines, and one patient had undergone three CT lines (all in combination with bevacizumab). At the second and third treatment lines [second line (2L), third line (3L)], patients with neo-RAS wt received a combination of CT and cetuximab. In neo-RAS wt patients treated with anti-EGFR, our findings indicated an increase in progression-free survival for both 2L and 3L (14.5 mo, P = 0.119 and 3.9 mo, P = 0.882, respectively). Regarding 2L overall survival, we registered a slight increase in neo-RAS wt patients treated with anti-EGFR (33.6 mo vs 32.4 mo, P = 0.385). At data cut-off, two patients were still alive: A RAS-mutated patient undergoing 3L treatment and a neo-RAS wt patient who received 2L treatment with anti-EGFR (ongoing). CONCLUSION: Our case series demonstrated that monitoring RAS mutations in mCRC by liquid biopsy may provide an additional treatment line for neo-RAS wt patients.