Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Med Imaging ; 21(1): 90, 2021 05 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34034664

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dynamic PET with kinetic modeling was reported to be potentially helpful in the assessment of hepatic malignancy. In this study, a kinetic modeling analysis was performed on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) from dynamic FDG positron emission tomography/computer tomography (PET/CT) scans. METHODS: A reversible two-tissue compartment model with dual blood input function, which takes into consideration the blood supply from both hepatic artery and portal vein, was used for accurate kinetic modeling of liver dynamic 18F-FDG PET imaging. The blood input functions were directly measured as the mean values over the VOIs on descending aorta and portal vein respectively. And the contribution of hepatic artery to the blood input function was optimization-derived in the process of model fitting. The kinetic model was evaluated using dynamic PET data acquired on 24 patients with identified hepatobiliary malignancy. 38 HCC or ICC identified lesions and 24 healthy liver regions were analyzed. RESULTS: Results showed significant differences in kinetic parameters [Formula: see text], blood supplying fraction [Formula: see text], and metabolic rate constant [Formula: see text] between malignant lesions and healthy liver tissue. And significant differences were also observed in [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] between HCC and ICC lesions. Further investigations of the effect of SUV measurements on the derived kinetic parameters were conducted. And results showed comparable effectiveness of the kinetic modeling using either SUVmean or SUVmax measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic 18F-FDG PET imaging with optimization-derived hepatic artery blood supply fraction dual-blood input function kinetic modeling can effectively distinguish malignant lesions from healthy liver tissue, as well as HCC and ICC lesions.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagem , Colangiocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Adulto , Idoso , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/irrigação sanguínea , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/irrigação sanguínea , Colangiocarcinoma/irrigação sanguínea , Feminino , Artéria Hepática/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/irrigação sanguínea , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Veia Porta/diagnóstico por imagem
2.
EJNMMI Phys ; 8(1): 8, 2021 Jan 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33483880

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to establish a 68Ga-FAPI-04 kinetic model in hepatic lesions, to determine the potential role of kinetic parameters in the differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from non-HCC lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Time activity curves (TACs) were extracted from seven HCC lesions and five non-HCC lesions obtained from 68Ga-FAPI-04 dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) scans of eight patients. Three kinetic models were applied to the TACs, using image-derived hepatic artery and/or portal vein as input functions. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was taken for the lesions, the hepatic artery, and for the portal veins-the mean SUV for all healthy regions. The optimum model was chosen after applying the Schwartz information criteria to the TACs, differences in model parameters between HCC, non-HCC lesions, and healthy tissue were evaluated with the ANOVA test. RESULTS: A reversible two-tissue compartment model using both the arterial as well as venous input function was most preferred and showed significant differences in the kinetic parameters VND, VT, and BPND between HCC, non-HCC lesions, and healthy regions (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Several model parameters derived from a two-tissue compartment kinetic model with two image-derived input function from vein and aorta and using SUVmax allow a differentiation between HCC and non-HCC lesions, obtained from dynamically performed PET scans using FAPI.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA