Dynamic Microcirculation Characteristics of Plantar Skin Under Metatarsal Head of Human Foot in Response to Life-Like Pressure Stimulus.

OBJECTIVE: Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a severe complication with high mortality. High plantar pressure and poor microcirculation are considered main causes of DFU. The specific aims were to provide a novel technique for real-time measurement of plantar skin blood flow (SBF) under walking-like pressure stimulus and delineate the first plantar metatarsal head dynamic microcirculation characteristics because of life-like loading conditions in healthy individuals. METHODS: Twenty young healthy participants (14 male and 6 female) were recruited. The baseline (i.e., unloaded) SBF of soft tissue under the first metatarsal head were measured using laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF). A custom-made machine was utilized to replicate daily walking pressure exertion for 5 min. The exerted plantar force was adjusted from 10 N (127.3 kPa) to 40 N (509.3 kPa) at an increase of 5 N (63.7 kPa). Real-time SBF was acquired using the LDF. After each pressure exertion, postload SBF was measured for comparative purposes. Statistical analysis was performed using the R software. RESULTS: All levels of immediate-load and postload SBF increased significantly compared with baseline values. As the exerted load increased, the postload and immediate-load SBF tended to increase until the exerted load reached 35 N (445.6 kPa). However, in immediate-load data, the increasing trend tended to level off as the exerted pressure increased from 15 N (191.0 kPa) to 25 N (318.3 kPa). For postload and immediate-load SBF, they both peaked at 35 N (445.6 kPa). However, when the exerted force exceeds 35 N (445.6 kPa), both the immediate-load and postload SBF values started to decrease. CONCLUSIONS: Our study offered a novel real-time plantar soft tissue microcirculation measurement technique under dynamic conditions. For the first metatarsal head of healthy people, 20 N (254.6 kPa)-plantar pressure has a fair microcirculation stimulus compared with higher pressure. There might be a pressure threshold at 35 N (445.6 kPa) for the first metatarsal head, and soft tissue microcirculation may decrease when local pressure exceeds it.

WHS guidelines for the treatment of pressure ulcers-2023 update.

The major populations at risk for developing pressure ulcers are older adults who have multiple risk factors that increase their vulnerability, people who are critically ill and those with spinal cord injury/disease. The reported prevalence of pressure ulcers in the United States is 2.5 million. However, this estimate is derived from acute care facilities and does not include people who are living at home or in nursing facilities. Despite the implementation of hospital and facility-based preventive measures, the incidence of pressure ulcers has not decreased in decades. In addition to the burden of pain, infection and death, it is estimated that hospital-acquired pressure ulcers cost the health system $26.8 billion annually with over 50% of the cost attributed to treating Stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries. Thus, it is critical to examine the literature and develop guidelines that will improve the outcomes of this complex and costly condition. This guideline update is a compendium of the best available evidence for the treatment of Pressure Ulcers published since the last update in 2015 and includes a new section based on changing demographics entitled 'Palliative wound care for seriously ill patients with pressure ulcers'. The overall goal of the Wound Healing Society Guideline project is to present clear, concise and commercial free guidelines that clinicians can use to guide care, that researchers can use to develop studies that will improve treatment and that both clinicians and researchers can use to understand the gaps in our knowledge base.

Performance of artificial intelligence chatbots in interpreting clinical images of pressure injuries.

To evaluate the accuracy of AI chatbots in staging pressure injuries according to the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) Staging through clinical image interpretation, a cross-sectional design was conducted to assess five leading publicly available AI chatbots. As a result, three chatbots were unable to interpret the clinical images, whereas GPT-4 Turbo achieved a high accuracy rate (83.0%) in staging pressure injuries, notably outperforming BingAI Creative mode (24.0%) with statistical significance (p < 0.001). GPT-4 Turbo accurately identified Stages 1 (p < 0.001), 3 (p = 0.001), and 4 (p < 0.001) pressure injuries, and suspected deep tissue injuries (p < 0.001), while BingAI demonstrated significantly lower accuracy across all stages. The findings highlight the potential of AI chatbots, especially GPT-4 Turbo, in accurately diagnosing images and aiding the subsequent management of pressure injuries.

Film-forming polymer solutions containing cholesterol myristate and berberine mediate pressure ulcer repair via the Wnt/ß-catenin pathway.

Pressure ulcer (PU) is a worldwide problem that is difficult to address because of the related inflammatory response, local hypoxia, and repeated ischaemia/reperfusion, causing great suffering and financial burden to patients. Traditional Chinese medicine turtle plate powder can treat skin trauma, but its composition is complex and inconvenient to use. Here, we combined cholesterol myristate (S8) with berberine (BBR), with anti-inflammatory and antibacterial effects, as a drug and used hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and polyvinylpyrrolidone K30 as carriers to construct a novel film-forming polymeric solution (S8 + BBR FFPS), comprehensively study its reparative effect on PU and explore the potential mechanism in rat PU models. The results showed that S8 + BBR FFPS inhibits excessive inflammatory response, promotes re-epithelialization, and promotes hair follicle growth during the healing process of PU, which may be related to the activation of the Wnt/ß-catenin signalling pathway by S8 + BBR FFPS to mediate hair follicle stem cell proliferation and maintain skin homeostasis. Therefore, S8 + BBR FFPS may be a potential candidate for the treatment of chronic skin injury, and its association with the Wnt/ß-catenin signalling pathway may provide new ideas to guide the design of biomaterial-based wound dressings for chronic wound repair.

Decreased proteasome function increases oxidative stress in the early stage of pressure ulcer development.

The aging process in the elderly results in heightened skin fragility associated with various disorders, including pressure ulcers (PUs). Despite the high incidence of PUs in the elderly population, there is a limited body of research specifically examining the impact of aging on the development of pressure ulcers. Therefore, investigating age-related physiological abnormalities is essential to elucidate the pathogenesis of PUs. Ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury and the subsequent oxidative stress caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) play essential roles in the early stage of PUs. In this study, we used a mouse model of proteasomal dysfunction with an age-related phenotype to examine the role of proteasome activity in cutaneous I/R injury in vivo. Decreased proteasome function did not affect the expression of inflammatory cytokines and adhesion molecules in the I/R area in transgenic mice; however, proteasome inhibition increased oxidative stress that was not attenuated by activation of the oxidative stress response mediated by NF-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2). In dermal fibroblasts (FCs) subjected to hypoxia-reoxygenation (H/R), proteasome inhibition induced oxidative stress and ROS production, and Nrf2 activation did not adequately upregulate antioxidant enzyme expression, possibly leading to antioxidant/oxidant imbalance. The free radical scavenger edaravone had protective effects against I/R injury in vivo and decreased oxidative stress in FCs treated with a proteasome inhibitor and subjected to H/R in vitro. The results suggest that the age-related decline in proteasome activity promotes cutaneous I/R injury-induced oxidative stress, and free radical scavengers may exert protective effects by preventing oxidative stress in the early stage of PUs.

L-PRF in extra-oral wound care.

Leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF), a by-product of centrifuged autologous whole blood, contains high concentrations of platelets, leukocytes, and fibrin (the latter spontaneously creating a strong 3-D network (a membrane)). L-PRF membranes possess several characteristics essential in wound healing, including a barrier function, an antibacterial and analgesic activity, and the release of growth factors enhancing tissue regeneration and neo-vasculogenesis. This review investigated the role of L-PRF in treating non-responding chronic wounds such as diabetic foot, venous leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, complex wounds, leprosy ulcers (Hansen's Disease), and other demanding wounds. Chronic wounds affect millions worldwide, negatively impacting their quality of life, productivity, and life expectancy while incurring high treatment costs for themselves and private and public health systems. L-PRF has demonstrated clear adjunctive advantages in treating chronic skin wounds, shortening the time to complete wound closure, and improving patient-reported outcome measures (including reducing pain and minimizing the need for analgesics). Also, in other demanding wounds, L-PRF facilitates healing. To help clinicians, this article also proposes recommendations for the use of L-PRF in the treatment of extra-oral wounds.

Implementation and evaluation of a system for assessment of the quality of long-term management of patients at a geriatric hospital.

BACKGROUND: The increasing aging population presents a significant challenge, accompanied by a shortage of professional caregivers, adding to the therapeutic burden. Clinical decision support systems, utilizing computerized clinical guidelines, can improve healthcare quality, reduce expenses, save time, and boost caregiver efficiency. OBJECTIVES: 1) Develop and evaluate an automated quality assessment (QA) system for retrospective longitudinal care quality analysis, focusing on clinical staff adherence to evidence-based guidelines (GLs). 2) Assess the system's technical feasibility and functional capability for senior nurse use in geriatric pressure-ulcer management. METHODS: A computational QA system using our Quality Assessment Temporal Patterns (QATP) methodology was designed and implemented. Our methodology transforms the GL's procedural-knowledge into declarative-knowledge temporal-abstraction patterns representing the expected execution trace in the patient's data for correct therapy application. Fuzzy temporal logic allows for partial compliance, reflecting individual and grouped action performance considering their values and temporal aspects. The system was tested using a pressure ulcer treatment GL and data from 100 geriatric patients' Electronic Medical Records (EMR). After technical evaluation for accuracy and feasibility, an extensive functional evaluation was conducted by an experienced nurse, comparing QA scores with and without system support, and versus automated system scores. Time efficiency was also measured. RESULTS: QA scores from the geriatric nurse, with and without system's support, did not significantly differ from those provided by the automated system (p < 0.05), demonstrating the effectiveness and reliability of both manual and automated methods. The system-supported manual QA process reduced scoring time by approximately two-thirds, from an average of 17.3 min per patient manually to about 5.9 min with the system's assistance, highlighting the system's efficiency potential in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: The QA system based on QATP, produces scores consistent with an experienced nurse's assessment for complex care over extended periods. It enables quick and accurate quality care evaluation for multiple patients after brief training. Such automated QA systems may empower nursing staff, enabling them to manage more patients, accurately and consistently, while reducing costs due to saved time and effort, and enhanced compliance with evidence-based guidelines.

Causal association of micronutrients and supplements with pressure ulcer: A Mendelian randomization study.

BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcer (PU) is known to be associated with abnormalities of micronutrient status. However, to date, it is not clear whether a causal relationship exists between circulating levels of micronutrients and their supplementations and PU. METHODS: A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study was conducted using summary statistics from Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS). Genetic instrumental variables (IVs) for 13 micronutrients were identified from a GWAS of 67 582 participants, IVs for supplement zinc were acquired from 18 826 cases and 44 255 880 controls, and IVs for PU were obtained from 663 PUs and 207 482 controls. The MR analysis was conducted using the MR base platform. The main analysis method was inverse variance weighted (IVW) analysis, supplemented by MR Egger, Weighted median, Weighted mode, and Simple mode analyses. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q statistic for MR-IVW and Rucker's Q statistic for MR-Egger. Pleiotropy was determined by the MR-Egger regression. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using the leave-one-out method, and publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots. RESULTS: Genetically predicted lower circulating zinc levels were found to be causally linked to the development of PU (OR = 0.758, 95%CI 0.583-0.987, P = 0.040). However, there was no significant evidence of a causal relationship between supplemental zinc intake and PU development (P > 0.05). Additionally, no causal association was observed between the other circulating micronutrients and the occurrence of PU. Furthermore, there was no indication of horizontal pleiotropy or heterogeneity among genetic variants (P > 0.05), and the robustness of the findings was confirmed through leave-one-out tests and funnel plots. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a potential causal association between circulating zinc levels and decreased risk of PU. However, zinc supplementation did not demonstrate a significant reduction in the risk of PU. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms through which zinc influences the pathogenesis of PU and evaluate the efficacy of zinc supplementation in the prevention and management of PU.

Medical device-related pressure injuries in the operating room: A scoping review.

AIMS: To map the existing literature describing medical device-related pressure injuries in patients during surgery, including investigation of the incidence, types of medical devices, risk factors and strategies for preventing medical device-related pressure injuries. DESIGN: A scoping review. DATA SOURCES: In April 2023, three databases were searched. Studies about adult patients undergoing surgery, from 2014 onwards, in English and Chinese were included. Data were extracted about study characteristics and data related to research questions. The Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice and Research recommendations framework were used to synthesize findings. RESULTS: Two different types of evidence were included in this review; 14 research studies and two quality improvement studies. The incidence of medical device-related pressure injuries in the operating room was 0.56%-24.5% and respiratory devices were the most common medical devices investigated. Length of surgery, age and BMI were risk factors for medical device-related pressure injuries in a few studies. The application of a prophylactic dressing and dressing maintenance was the most common prevention strategy. CONCLUSION: Ongoing research is needed to confirm the incidence of, and risk factors for, medical device-related pressure injuries in the operating room. Additionally, more high-quality evidence is needed to underpin current prevention strategies. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Operating room nurses need to be aware of the risks of medical device-related pressure injuries and assess and plan prevention strategies accordingly. Once more high-quality evidence is available, operating room nurses could implement prevention strategies like prophylactic dressings. REPORTING METHOD: Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Pressure injury risk assessment and prescription of preventative interventions using a structured tool versus clinical judgement: An interrater agreement study.

AIM: To assess agreement of pressure injury risk level and differences in preventative intervention prescription between nurses using a structured risk assessment tool compared with clinical judgement. DESIGN: Interrater agreement study. METHODS: Data were collected from November 2019 to December 2022. Paired nurse-assessors were allocated randomly to independently assess pressure injury risk using a structured tool (incorporating the Waterlow Score), or clinical judgement; then prescribe preventative interventions. Assessments were conducted on 150 acute patient participants in a general tertiary hospital. Agreement of risk level was analysed using absolute agreement proportions, weighted kappa and prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted kappa. RESULTS: Ninety-four nurse assessors participated. Absolute agreement of not-at-risk versus at-risk-any-level was substantial, but absolute agreement of risk-level was only fair. Clinical judgement assessors tended to underestimate risk. Where risk level was agreed, prescribed intervention frequencies were similar, although structured tool assessors prescribed more interventions mandated by standard care, while clinical judgement assessors prescribed more additional/optional interventions. Structured tool assessors prescribed more interventions targeted at lower-risk patients, whereas assessors using clinical judgement prescribed more interventions targeted at higher-risk patients. CONCLUSION: There were clear differences in pressure injury risk-level assessment between nurses using the two methods, with important differences in intervention prescription frequencies found. Further research is required into the use of both structured tools and clinical judgement to assess pressure injury risk, with emphasis on the impact of risk assessments on subsequent preventative intervention implementation. IMPACT: The results of this study are important for clinical practice as they demonstrate the influence of using a structured pressure injury risk assessment tool compared to clinical judgement. Whilst further research is required into the use of both structured tools and clinical judgement to assess pressure injury risk and prescribe interventions, our findings do not support a change in practice that would exclude the use of a structured pressure injury risk assessment tool. REPORTING METHOD: This study adhered to the GRRAS reporting guideline. PATIENT/PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public involvement in this study. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Educators and researchers can use the findings to guide teaching about pressure injury risk assessment and preventative intervention and to direct future studies. For clinical nurses and patients, a change in clinical practice that would exclude the use of a structured risk assessment tool is not recommended and further work is needed to validate the role of clinical judgement to assess risk and its impact on preventative intervention.

Use of a risk-based intervention bundle to prescribe and implement interventions to prevent pressure injury: An observational study.

AIM: To explore the relationship between the prescription and implementation of pressure injury preventative interventions following risk assessment combined with a risk-stratified intervention bundle. DESIGN: Single-centre, cross-sectional, observational, prospective. METHODS: The charts and bedsides of 341 adult inpatients were examined. Data collection included pressure injury risk level, prescribed preventative interventions and evidence of intervention implementation. RESULTS: Most patients (68.6%) were at risk of pressure injury, and most interventions were prescribed according to their risk level. However, evidence from direct observation and/or documentation indicated intervention implementation rates were relatively poor. Of nine interventions mandated for all patients, compliance with three patient-/carer-focused interventions was particularly poor, with evidence indicating they had been implemented for 3%-10% of patients. Also, nutritional screening-related interventions were implemented poorly. Clinically indicated implementation of heel-elevation devices and bariatric equipment was low for at-risk patients, and the implementation of interventions for patients with existing pressure injuries was suboptimal. Significant proportions of several interventions that were observed as having been implemented were not documented as such. CONCLUSION: While most interventions were prescribed according to patient risk level, the overall implementation of interventions was poor. However, the results may in part be due to failure to document interventions as opposed to omitting them. IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: Documentation of interventions is crucial as it provides evidence of the care provided. An increased focus on documentation of pressure injury preventative interventions is required, with a clear distinction between prescription and implementation. IMPACT: The results highlighted several deficiencies in care, particularly relating to evidence of implementation, patient involvement and nutritional screening. The results from this study will be used to inform and improve future pressure injury prevention practice within the study hospital and should be used to inform and benchmark pressure injury preventative practices in other hospitals. REPORTING METHOD: The study adheres to STROBE guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: None.

Use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy to treat a pressure ulcer complicated by osteomyelitis: a case report.

The development of a pressure ulcer (PU) following hospitalisation and immobility can lead to more severe complications, such as osteomyelitis. We report the case of a 60-year-old female patient with a PU complicated with osteomyelitis who was treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). The patient was diagnosed with an unstageable PU according to the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification. A total of 35 HBOT sessions were administered to manage her condition. HBOT is considered a safe and effective treatment for osteomyelitis and decreases mortality rate.

The value of epidemiological data for pressure ulcer/injury management.

Pressure ulcers/injuries (PU/Is) are a burden on healthcare systems worldwide. They are costly and have a negative impact on the quality of life of patients. PU/Is cause discomfort, prolong hospital stays and can even lead to death. Data on the incidence and prevalence of PU/Is are used to implement effective, tailored prevention practices. The aim of this paper is to highlight the importance and value of collecting epidemiological data in terms of its practical use in Slovakia. The prevalence of PU/Is was found to be low compared to global data. Shortcomings in the collection of epidemiological data are highlighted; however, the use of those available data in amending national standards, such as the mandatory reporting of PU/Is, is summarised. Several steps and activities related to the prevention and care of PU/Is have been carried out in Slovakia. It is important to know not only the prevalence in terms of field of care, time and provider, but also, more specifically, the risk characteristics and/or presence of PU/I in order to initiate more individualised and tailored patient care.

Pressure ulcer development in patients treated for acute ischaemic stroke.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of pressure ulcers (PUs) in patients treated for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) and to evaluate comorbid/confounding factors. METHOD: The study included patients treated for AIS who were divided into three treatment groups: those receiving intravenous tissue plasminogen activator therapy (tPA); patients receiving mechanical thrombectomy (MT); and those receiving both tPA and MT. PUs were classified according to the international classification system and factors that may influence their development were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 242 patients were included in this study. The incidence of PUs in patients treated for AIS was 7.4%. Most PUs were located on the sacrum (3.7%), followed by the gluteus (3.3%) and trochanter (2.9%). With regards to PU classification: 29% were stage I; 34% were stage II; and the remainder were stage III. Age was not a significant factor in the development of PUs (p=0.172). Patients in the tPA group had a lower PU incidence (2.3%) than patients in the tPA+MT group (15.7%) and MT group (12.1%) (p=0.001). Patients with PUs had a longer period of hospitalisation (18.5±11.92 days) than patients without a PU (8.0±8.52 days) (p=0.000). National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores at admission were higher in patients with PUs than in patients without a PU (14.33±4.38 versus 11.08±5.68, respectively; p=0.010). The difference in presence of comorbidities between patients with and without PUs (p=0.922) and between treatment groups (p=0.677) were not statistically significant. The incidence of PUs was higher in patients requiring intensive care, but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.089). CONCLUSION: In this study, patients treated for AIS with high NIHSS scores at admission and/or receiving MT were at higher risk for PUs, and so particular attention should be given to these patients in order to prevent PU development.

Determinants of pressure injury development in patients with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: Pressure injuries (PIs) often develop in critically ill patients due to immobility, and underlying comorbidities that decrease tissue perfusion and wound healing capacity. This study sought to provide epidemiological data on determinants and current managements practices of PI in patients with COVID-19. METHOD: A US national insurance-based database consisting of patients with coronavirus or COVID-19 diagnoses was used for data collection. Patients were filtered by International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes corresponding to coronavirus or COVID-19 diagnosis between 2019-2020. Diagnosis of PI following COVID-19 diagnosis was queried. Demographic data and comorbidity information was compared. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors for both PI development and likelihood of operative debridement. RESULTS: A total of 1,477,851 patients with COVID-19 were identified. Of these, 15,613 (1.06%) subsequently developed a PI, and 8074 (51.7%) of these patients had an intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The average and median time between diagnosis of COVID-19 and PI was 39.4 and 26 days, respectively. PI was more likely to occur in patients with COVID-19 with: diabetes (odds ratio (OR): 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.29-1.49; p<0.001); coronary artery disease (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.04-1.18, p=0.002), hypertension (OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.26-1.64; p<0.001); chronic kidney disease (OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.10-1.26; p<0.001); depression (OR: 1.45, 95% CI 1.36-1.54; p<0.001); and long-term non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.05-1.40; p=0.007). They were also more likely in critically ill patients admitted to the ICU (OR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.31-1.48; p<0.001); and patients requiring vasopressors (OR:1.25, 95% CI: 1.13-1.38; p<0.001), intubation (OR: 1.21, 95% CI 1.07-1.39; p=0.004), or with a diagnosis of sepsis (OR: 2.38, 95% CI 2.22-2.55; p<0.001). ICU admission, sepsis, buttock and lower back PI along with increasing Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (OR: 1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.08; p=0.043) was associated with surgical debridement. The vast majority of patients with COVID-19 did not undergo operative debridement or wound coverage. CONCLUSION: PIs are widely prevalent in patients with COVID-19, especially in those who are critically ill, yet the vast majority do not undergo operative procedures. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Should bone biopsy be the standard for suspected osteomyelitis in patients with pressure ulcers?

DECLARATION OF INTEREST: The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Healing an ischial tuberosity pressure ulcer in a patient with neurogenic heterotopic ossification: a case report.

Neurogenic heterotopic ossification (NHO) is widely recognised as an aberrant bone formation in soft tissue following central nervous system injury. It is most frequently associated with pain and limited movement, especially in the hip. However, it may be neglected in patients with paraplegia with a pressure ulcer (PU). We report the case of an 18-year-old male patient who presented with a hard-to-heal ischial tuberosity PU and who had undergone three operations at other hospitals during the previous six months, which had failed to repair the PU. There was a history of paraplegia as a consequence of spinal cord injury two years previously. Computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstruction showed massive heterotopic ossification (HO) in the wound bed and around the right hip. Histological findings were consistent with a diagnosis of HO. The HO around the wound was completely excised, negative pressure wound therapy was used to promote granulation, and a gluteus maximus musculocutaneous flap was used to cover the wound. We conclude that for patients with paraplegia, with a hard-to-heal PU, it should be determined whether it is associated with NHO. Surgical resection of HO surrounding the wound and improving the microcirculation are critical for repair and reconstruction of these PUs.

Biomarkers of local inflammation at the skin's surface may predict both pressure and diabetic foot ulcers.

This commentary considers the similarities which exist between pressure ulcers (PUs) and diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). It aims to describe what is known to be shared-both in theory and practice-by these wound types. It goes on to detail the literature surrounding the role of inflammation in both wound types. PUs occur following prolonged exposure to pressure or pressure in conjunction with shear, either due to impaired mobility or medical devices. As a result, inflammation occurs, causing cell damage. While DFUs are not associated with immobility, they are associated with altered mobility occurring as a result of complications of diabetes. The incidence and prevalence of both types of lesions are increased in the presence of multimorbidity. The prediction of either type of ulceration is challenging. Current risk assessment practices are reported to be ineffective at predicting when ulceration will occur. While systemic inflammation is easily measured, the presence of local or subclinical inflammation is harder to discern. In patients at risk of either DFUs or PUs, clinical signs and symptoms of inflammation may be masked, and systemic biomarkers of inflammation may not be elevated sufficiently to predict imminent damage until ulceration appears. The current literature suggests that the use of local biomarkers of inflammation at the skin's surface, namely oedema and temperature, may identify early tissue damage.

Effectiveness of a kinesio-taping-based treatment in stage IV sacral pressure ulcers in older patients: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: As reduced tissue vascularity is one of the mechanisms that prevent skin ulcers from healing, treatments that can improve local circulation could accelerate their clinical resolution. Given that kinesio-taping (KT) can improve tissue blood circulation and lymphatic drainage, we aimed to determine whether applying KT close to stage IV pressure ulcers (PUs) could improve their healing. METHOD: Older patients with stage IV sacral PUs, and impaired mobility and functional dependency who were consecutively admitted in a six-month period to the Home Care service of Galliera Hospital (Genoa, Italy) were screened for participation in this pilot clinical trial. Patients' PUs were divided into two treatment areas-in the experimental intervention, KT was applied close to a portion of the PU, while the contralateral portion of the same lesion was treated according to the standard protocol ('control'). The surface reduction of both portions was measured every four days, for a total of five examinations (timepoints (T2-T6) after the baseline evaluation (T1). RESULTS: A total of 12 patients (male=5, female=7; mean age 78.83±8.94 years) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. At all timepoints (T2-T6), the mean percentage reduction was significantly greater in KT-treated areas than in control areas: T2=20.66% versus 6.17%, respectively; p<0.001; T3=37.33% versus 17.31%, respectively; p<0.001; T4=57.01% versus 30.06%, respectively; p<0.001; T5=69.04% versus 40.55%, respectively; p<0.001; and T6=80.34% versus 51.91%, respectively; p<0.001. Furthermore, from T3 onwards, a significantly higher number of KT-treated areas than control areas had halved in size, the maximum difference being recorded at T5 (10 versus two, respectively; p=0.002). CONCLUSION: From the findings of this pilot study, KT would seem to be an effective, rapid, low-cost therapy for advanced sacral PUs in older patients with impaired mobility and functional dependency. Declaration of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

The unavoidable pressure injury/ulcer: a review of skin failure in critically ill patients.

Due to an ageing population and prolonged lifespan, pressure injury (PI) incidence is increasing. Patients with a PI typically endure longer hospital stays, which create a significant burden on healthcare resources and costs. With appropriate preventive interventions, most PIs can be avoided; however, skin failure may become inevitable in particular instances. These are classified as unavoidable PIs. Patients in a critical condition are exposed to a unique set of therapies, medications and bodily states. Oftentimes, these instances decrease tissue tolerance, which may promote PI formation. Patients who are critically ill, especially those with extended stays in the intensive care unit, are susceptible to skin failure due to: prolonged immobility; mechanical ventilation; acute respiratory distress syndrome; COVID-19; sepsis; multiorgan system dysfunction; vasopressor use; and treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Poor perfusion leading to skin breakdown results from the compounding factors of circulatory collapse, build-up of metabolites, compromised lymphatic drainage, patient comorbidities, and ischaemia via capillary blockage in patients who are critically ill. In addition, similar physiology is present during end-of-life multisystem organ failure, which creates unavoidable skin deterioration. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of circumstances which decrease tissue tolerance and ultimately lead to PI development, despite adequate preventive measures in patients who are critically ill.