Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Robot Surg ; 17(6): 2955-2962, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37864128

RESUMO

Robotic pyeloplasty has become a technique of choice for pyelo-ureteral junction syndrome treatment in children. Less invasive than open surgery, robotic pyeloplasty also has a lower learning curve than laparoscopic pyeloplasty. This is how a new generation of surgeons without previous laparoscopic pyeloplasty experience has begun training in robotics. To assess the robotic assisted pyeloplasty learning curve for a pediatric surgeon only trained in open pyeloplasty, and to investigate if that mode of practice is safe and effective. Data were collected from all children operated on for pyelo-ureteral junction syndrome by the same surgeon in our center between 2015 and 2021. Cases were divided into 4 groups of 14 consecutive procedures to analyze the learning curve. Fifty-six patients were operated on, with a median (IQR) age, weight, and hospital stay of 9 years and 1 month old (3.5), 29 kg (17.3), and 3 days (2), respectively. The mean ± SD operative times were 146.5 ± 39.3, 123.2 ± 48.1, 103.1 ± 29.5, and 141.7 ± 25.0 min, with a unique significant difference between groups 1 and 3 (p = 0.007**). Only two intraoperative and nine postoperative complications were observed. The surgery was successful in 98% cases. Our study shows that a significant improvement in surgical time could be achieved in the first 30 cases, safely and efficiently even without previous laparoscopic pyeloplasty experience.Level of evidence: III.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Cirurgiões , Obstrução Ureteral , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Pelve Renal/cirurgia , Curva de Aprendizado , Obstrução Ureteral/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Front Pediatr ; 10: 964147, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36313892

RESUMO

Objective: The objective of this study is to introduce a novel technique of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) with long proximal ureteral stricture in children. Materials and methods: Clinical information on patients who underwent a modified RALP between July 2018 and May 2019 in our center was collected retrospectively. Our surgical modifications mainly include "double-flap" tailoring of the renal pelvis and anastomosis of spatulate ureter with the double-flap. Demographic, perioperative, postoperative, and follow-up information was recorded in detail. Results: A total of 13 patients were included in the study. All the patients underwent a modified RALP without conversion to open surgery. They were followed up with a median time of 36 months. The anteroposterior diameter of the renal pelvis was 1.19 ± 0.21 at 6 months after the surgery, which was significantly lower than that on admission (3.93 ± 0.79). The split renal function of the children was also significantly improved from 0.37 ± 0.05) to 0.46 ± 0.02 at 6 months after surgery (p < 0.05). The diuretic renography revealed that all the patients have a T1/2 time less than 20 min postoperatively. The children were in good condition during the follow-up period. Conclusions: Modified RALP is an effective surgical treatment for children with UPJO with long proximal ureteral stricture. The success rate of this modification has been preliminarily confirmed.

3.
Front Pediatr ; 9: 590865, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33777859

RESUMO

Objective: To present our primary experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) for severe ureteropelvis junction obstruction (UPJO) infants under 3 months. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 9 infants under 3 months who underwent RALP for severe UPJO between April 2017 and March 2019 in our center. The severe UPJO was defined as infants with severe hydronephrosis (Society of Fetal Urology grades III or IV, anteroposterior diameter >3 cm or split renal function <40% or T 1/2 >20 min) involving bilateral, solitary kidney, or contralateral renal hypoplasia UPJO at the same time. All clinical, perioperative, and postoperative information was collected. Results: There were four bilateral UPJO cases, two solitary kidney UPJO cases and three unilateral UPJO with contralateral renal hypoplasia cases included. One single surgeon performed RALP on all of the infants. The mean age of the infants was 1.62 ± 0.54 months. The mean operative time was 109.55 ± 10.47 min. The mean estimated blood loss was 19.29 ± 3.19 ml, and the mean length of hospital stay was 5.57 ± 0.73 days. According to the ultrasonography results, all patients had a significant recovery of renal function at 12 months after the operation. Conclusions: To maximize the protection of renal function, early RALP is a safe and feasible option for the treatment of severe UPJO in infants under 3 months.

4.
Transl Androl Urol ; 9(3): 1278-1285, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32676411

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To analyze the perioperative parameters and outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) and compare them with our series of RALP for primary UPJO. Secondary pyeloplasty can be a challenging procedure because of ureteral devascularization, fibrosis and dense stricture formation. Robotic approach could be adjunct to these repairs. METHODS: Between August 2015 to March 2019, 96 patients in our hospital underwent RALP, with 32 patients as secondary intervention for recurrent UPJO. We compared the perioperative parameters of RALP for both primary UPJO and recurrent UPJO. Patient demographics, perioperative parameters, postoperative outcomes and complications from both groups were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: RALP was successfully performed for all cases in both groups. The median operating time was longer for secondary RALP than for primary RALP [125 (108.5-155) vs. 151 (120-190) minutes, P=0.004]. There were no conversions to open surgery or significant perioperative complications. No difference in blood loss, transfusion rate and perioperative complication rates was noted between the two groups. The success rates were 98.44% (63/64) and 96.88% (31/32) at a median follow up of 32 and 20 months (P=0.001) for the primary and secondary groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary RALP is associated with significantly longer operative time as compared to primary RALP, especially during the exposure of the UPJO, however it is a safe surgical modality for recurrent UPJO with durable outcome. RALP should be an alternative treatment modality for recurrent UPJO whenever the facility and expert are available.

5.
Front Pediatr ; 6: 411, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30666303

RESUMO

Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedures are becoming increasingly common. They have been shown to be safe in younger patients, including infants. Successful adoption of robotic-assisted surgery in infants requires an understanding of the technical factors unique to this patient population. This review will delineate the specific considerations to safely perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedures in infants, including physiological changes associated with pneumoperitoneum in infants, positioning, trocar placement, and docking.

6.
J Robot Surg ; 11(1): 63-67, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27342871

RESUMO

We sought to determine if the learning curve in pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) for an experienced open surgeon (OS) converting to robotics would be affected by proctoring from an experienced robotic surgeon (RS), and/or the experience of training within the framework of an established robotics program. We reviewed pediatric RALP cases by three surgeons at our institution, including the OS, RS, and a new fellowship-trained surgeon (FTS). We compared the first eight independent RALPs for the OS with the most recent ten RALPs for the RS. As an ancillary analysis, to isolate the impact of proctoring and of a robotics program, we reviewed the first ten cases of the FTS as well the first and last eight cases of the RS at a prior institution. A total of 44 patient charts were reviewed, with a mean follow-up time of 16 months (range 6.7-45 months). Radiologic improvement was seen in all patients with the exception of one who required reoperative pyeloplasty. The FTS, RS, and OS had similar mean operative times; however; when comparing robotic cases at the beginning of each of their learning curves, shorter operative times were achieved by the proctored surgeon (OS). Finally, comparing two RALP cohorts by the RS at his prior institution revealed longer operative times with an inexperienced robotics team. We demonstrate that an experienced open surgeon and fellowship-trained surgeon can quickly attain levels of expertise with pediatric RALP within an established robotic surgical program.


Assuntos
Bolsas de Estudo , Rim/cirurgia , Curva de Aprendizado , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/educação , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Bolsas de Estudo/métodos , Bolsas de Estudo/organização & administração , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Laparoscopia/educação , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Duração da Cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/educação , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/instrumentação , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Ensino/organização & administração , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA