The influence of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae on lumbar lordosis and the angle of pelvic incidence.

Pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis have only normative values for spines comprising five lumbar and five sacral vertebrae. However, it is unclear how pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis are affected by the common segmentation anomalies at the lumbo-sacral border leading to lumbosacral transitional vertebrae, including lumbarisations and sacralisations. In lumbosacral transitional vertebrae it is not trivial to identify the correct vertebral endplates to measure pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis because ontogenetically the first sacral vertebra represents the first non-mobile sacral segment in lumbarisations, but the second segment in sacralisations. We therefore assessed pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis with respect to both of these vertebral endplates. The type of segmentation anomaly was differentiated using spinal counts, spatial relationship with the iliac crest and morphological features. We found significant differences in pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis between lumbarisations, sacralisations and the control group. The pelvic incidence in the sacralised group was mostly below the range of the lubarisation group and the control group when measured the traditional way at the first non-mobile segment (30.2°). However, the ranges of the sacralisation and lubarisation groups were completely encompassed by the control group when measured at the ontogenetically true first sacral vertebra. The mean pelvic incidence of the sacraliation group thus increased from 30.2° to 58.6°, and the mean pelvic incidence of the total sample increased from 45.6° to 51.2°, making it statistically indistinguishable from the control sample, whose pelvic incidence was 50.2°. Our results demonstrate that it is crucial to differentiate sacralisations from lumbarisation in order to assess the reference vertebra for pelvic incidence measurement. Due to their significant impact on spino-pelvic parameters, lumbosacral transitional vertebrae should be evaluated separately when examining pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis.

Changes in spinal sagittal balance after a new osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

We conduct a longitudinal study to examine how new VCF alter spinal sagittal balance. New VCF increased SVA by an average of 2.8 cm. Sagittal balance deteriorates as a VCF develops in the lower lumbar spine. A new fracture below L1 increased the relative risk of a deterioration of sagittal balance 2.9-fold compared to one above Th12. PURPOSE: Studies on the relationship between osteoporotic vertebral fractures and spinal sagittal balance have all been limited to cross-sectional studies. The aim of this study is to conduct a longitudinal study to examine how new vertebral compression fracture (VCF) alter spinal sagittal balance. METHODS: Subjects were patients undergoing periodic examinations after treatment of a vertebral fracture or lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Forty patients who developed a new VCF were included in this study. Full-spine standing radiographs were compared before and after the fracture to examine changes in spinopelvic parameters and factors determining the changes in sagittal balance. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 79.0 years. The mean interval between pre- and post-fracture radiographs was 22.7 months, and the mean time between development of a fracture and post-fracture radiographs was 4.6 months. After a fracture, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) increased an average of 2.78 cm and spino-sacral angle (SSA) decreased an average of 5.3°. Both ⊿SVA and ⊿SSA were not related to pre-fracture parameters. The wedge angle of the fractured vertebra was not related to changes in sagittal balance. ⊿SVA increased markedly in patients with a fracture of the lower lumbar vertebrae. receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the relative risk of a deterioration of sagittal balance was 2.9 times higher for a new fracture below L1 than for a fracture above Th12. CONCLUSION: New VCF increased SVA by an average of 2.8 cm. Sagittal balance deteriorates as a new fracture develops in the lower lumbar spine. Early intervention in osteoporosis is vital for the elderly.

EOS® is reliable to evaluate spinopelvic parameters: a validation study.

BACKGROUND: Sagittal and coronal standing radiographs have been the standard imaging for assessing spinal alignment. However, their disadvantages include distortion at the image edges and low interobserver reliability in some parameters. EOS® is a low-dose biplanar digital radiographic imaging system that can avoid distortion by obtaining high-definition images. METHODS: This study aimed to evaluate spinopelvic parameters in conventional lateral C1S1 upright radiographs and EOS® images and compare them. Patients with non-deformity changes were subjected to routine clinical examinations. Plain AP and lateral X-ray radiographs were obtained along the entire spine length. Patients were also referred for full-length EOS® of the spine. Thoracic Kyphosis (TK), Lumbar Lordosis (LL), Pelvic Tilt (PT), Sacral Slope (SS), Pelvic Incidence (PI), and Sagittal Vertical Axis (SVA) were measured in the two studies by an orthopedic surgeon and a radiologist using PACS software. Also, the orthopedic surgeon evaluated the studies again after two weeks. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was then assessed using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Also, the coefficient of variation was used to assess intra- and inter-observer reliability. Bland-Altman plots were drawn for each parameter. RESULTS: The mean age was 48.2 ± 6.6 years. Among the 50 patients, 30 (60%) were female. The mean ICC for TK, LL, PT, SS, PI, and SVA in EOS® images are 0.95, 0.95, 0.92, 0.90, 0.94, and 0.98, respectively, and in C1S1 radiography images, it was 0.92, 0.87, 0.94, 0.88, 0.93, and 0.98, respectively which shows good to excellent results. The coefficient of variation for intraobserver reliability was relatively low (< 18.6%), while it showed higher percentages in evaluating interobserver reliability (< 54.5%). Also, the Bland-Altman plot showed good agreement for each parameter. CONCLUSION: Spinopelvic parameters, e.g., TK, LL, SS, PI, and SS, in EOS® are reliable and comparable to those in conventional lateral upright C1S1 radiographs.

Defining threshold for sagittal correction in lumbar fractures.

PURPOSE: Surgical indications for thoraco-lumbar fractures are driven both by neurological status, fractures instability and kyphotic deformity. Regarding kyphotic deformity, an angulation superior to 20° is considered by many surgeons as a surgical indication to reduce the disability induced by post-traumatic kyphosis. However, there is a lack of data reporting the ideal or theoretical lordosis that one must have in a particular lumbar segment on CT-scan. The main goal of this study was to determine the mean value for segmental lumbar lordosis according to pelvic incidence (PI) on a cohort of normal subjects. METHODS: The consecutive CT-scan of 171 normal adult subjects were retrospectively analyzed. The PI and the segmental lordosis (L4S1, L3L5, L2L4, L3L1, L2T12 and T11-L1) were measured on all CT-scan. The mean values were calculated for the global cohort and a sub-group analysis according to IP ranges (< 45°, 45 < IP < 60° and > 60°) was performed. RESULTS: The mean angular values for the whole cohort were IP: 54, 9°; L4S1: - 38, 1°; L3L5: - 30, 6°; L2L4: - 14, 1°; L1L3: - 4, 9°; T12L2: + 1, 9° and T11L1: + 5, 4°. The segmental values vary significatively with PI ranges, as for L3L5: - 26, 8° (PI < 45°); - 30° (45 < PI < 60°) and - 35, 1° (PI > 60°). CONCLUSION: These results provide a referential of theoretical values of segmental lordosis according to PI. This abacus may help spinal surgeon in their decision-making process regarding lumbar fractures, to determine the amount of sagittal correction needed, according to the PI range, to be adapted to the sagittal morphology of the patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Adult spinal deformity correction surgery using age-adjusted alignment thresholds: clinical outcomes and mechanical complication rates. A systematic review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery gives good clinical outcomes but has a high rate of mechanical complications (MC). In 2016, Lafage described the age-adjusted alignment thresholds (AAAT) to adapt the correction in relation to patient's age proposing less aggressive corrections for the elderly population. The aim of this review was to clarify the effectiveness of AAAT to achieve good health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and their relationship with post-operative MC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a review of the literature, including articles reporting data on post-operative HRQoL and MC rates in relation to the AAAT. Data were stratified according to whether they matched the AAAT, dividing the population in undercorrected (U), matched (M) and overcorrected (O). The quality of the included studies was assessed using the GRADE and MINORS systems. RESULTS: Six articles reporting data from 1,825 patients were included. The different categories (U, M and O) had homogeneous pre-operative sagittal parameters (p > 0.05) that became statistically different after surgeries (p < 0.05). Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) was more frequent in the O group compared to U (p = 0.05). Post-operative HRQoL parameters were similar in the 3 groups (p > 0.05). The quality of the included studies was generally low with a high bias risk. CONCLUSION: The results extrapolated from this review are interesting, as for the same HRQoL the U group had a lower MC rate. Unfortunately, the results are inconsistent, mainly because of the low quality of the included studies and the lack of reporting of some important patient- and surgery-related factors.

Deep learning algorithm for fully automated measurement of sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity.

AIM: Deep learning (DL) algorithms can be used for automated analysis of medical imaging. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of an innovative, fully automated DL algorithm for analysis of sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity (ASD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sagittal balance (sacral slope, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis and sagittal vertical axis) was evaluated in 141 preoperative and postoperative radiographs of patients with ASD. The DL, landmark-based measurements, were compared with the ground truth values from validated manual measurements. RESULTS: The DL algorithm showed an excellent consistency with the ground truth measurements. The intra-class correlation coefficient between the DL and ground truth measurements was 0.71-0.99 for preoperative and 0.72-0.96 for postoperative measurements. The DL detection rate was 91.5% and 84% for preoperative and postoperative images, respectively. CONCLUSION: This is the first study evaluating a complete automated DL algorithm for analysis of sagittal balance with high accuracy for all evaluated parameters. The excellent accuracy in the challenging pathology of ASD with long construct instrumentation demonstrates the eligibility and possibility for implementation in clinical routine.

Impact of deep brain stimulation therapy on the vertebral sagittal balance in Parkinson's disease patients.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by cardinal motor signs: 4-6 Hz resting tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia. In addition, 3-18% of PD patients have camptocormia, an abnormal forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine, which may have a negative impact on patients' quality of life. Different possible treatments have been suggested for such a condition, but no one is resolutive. This study aims to define the possible impact of DBS, with selective targeting on the dorsal-lateral region of the STN, on the sagittal balance of patients affected by PD. Among all patients that have undergone DBS procedures in our institution, we selected eight subjects, four females and four males, with selective targeting on the dorsal-lateral region of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) because of camptocormia and other severe postural changes. Radiological assessments of spinal balance parameters before surgery and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively were carried out. Comparison of preoperative and postoperative spine X-ray data showed a statistically significant improvement in dorsal kyphosis angle (D-Cobb) 12 months after the operation. Deep brain stimulation with selective targeting of the dorsal lateral part of the STN may induce changes of the posture in patients with Parkinson's disease 12 months after the operation, which appears to improve in this small sample size, but larger observational and controlled trials would be required to confirm this observation.

Sagittal realignment: surgical restoration of the global alignment and proportion score parameters: a subgroup analysis. What are the consequences of failing to realign?

INTRODUCTION: The Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score incorporates three domains directly modified with surgery (relative pelvic version-RPV, relative lumbar lordosis-RLL, lumbar distribution index-LDI) and one indirectly restored (relative spinopelvic alignment-RSA). We analyzed our surgical realignment performance and the consequences of domain-specific realignment failure on mechanical complications and PROMs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From an adult spinal deformity prospective multicenter database, we selected patients: fused to pelvis, upper instrumented vertebra at or above L1, and 2 years of follow-up. Descriptive, univariate and multivariate analyses were employed. RESULTS: The sample included 333 patients. RLL-6w showed the highest success rate (58.3% aligned), but 16.5% of patients were classified in the "Severe hypolordosis" and "Hyperlordosis" subgroups. RPV-6w was the most challenging to realign, with 51.6% moderate or severe retroversion. Regarding RSA-6w, 21.9% had severe positive malalignment. Correct alignment of RPV-6w (p = 0.025) and RSA-6w (p = 0.002) proved to be protective factors against the development of mechanical complications. Severe pelvic retroversion (p = 0.026) and severe positive malalignment (p = 0.007) were risk factors for mechanical complications. RSA-6w "Severe positive malalignment" was associated with less improvement in PROMs: ∆ODI (8.83 vs 17.2; p = 0.011), ∆SRS-22 total (0.54 vs 0.87; p = 0.007), and ∆SF-36PCS (3.47 vs 7.76; p = 0.04); MCID for ODI (37.0 vs 55.5%; p = 0.023), and SRS-22 (40.8 vs 60.1%; p = 0.015); and PASS for ODI (17.6 vs 31.7%; p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: RPV was the most underperformed modifiable parameter. Severe pelvic retroversion and severe positive malalignment influenced the occurrence of mechanical complications. Severe positive malalignment affected PROMs improvement.

Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: review of current classifications and proposal of a novel classification system.

PURPOSE: To review existing classification systems for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS), propose a novel classification designed to better address clinically relevant radiographic and clinical features of disease, and determine the inter- and intraobserver reliability of this new system for classifying DS. METHODS: The proposed classification system includes four components: 1) segmental dynamic instability, 2) location of spinal stenosis, 3) sagittal alignment, and 4) primary clinical presentation. To establish the reliability of this system, 12 observers graded 10 premarked test cases twice each. Kappa values were calculated to assess the inter- and intraobserver reliability for each of the four components separately. RESULTS: Interobserver reliability for dynamic instability, location of stenosis, sagittal alignment, and clinical presentation was 0.94, 0.80, 0.87, and 1.00, respectively. Intraobserver reliability for dynamic instability, location of stenosis, sagittal alignment, and clinical presentation were 0.91, 0.88, 0.87, and 0.97, respectively. CONCLUSION: The UCSF DS classification system provides a novel framework for assessing DS based on radiographic and clinical parameters with established implications for surgical treatment. The almost perfect interobserver and intraobserver reliability observed for all components of this system demonstrates that it is simple and easy to use. In clinical practice, this classification may allow subclassification of similar patients into groups that may benefit from distinct treatment strategies, leading to the development of algorithms to help guide selection of an optimal surgical approach. Future work will focus on the clinical validation of this system, with the goal of providing for more evidence-based, standardized approaches to treatment and improved outcomes for patients with DS.

Variation of cervical sagittal alignment parameters according to age and pelvic incidence in degenerative spinal deformity patients.

INTRODUCTION: In asymptomatic subjects, variations of cervical sagittal alignment parameters according to age and spinopelvic organization have been reported. A large range of compensation phenomena has been observed in degenerative spinal deformity in order to maintain horizontal gaze, but it remains unclear how age and spinopelvic morphology could additionally influence cervical alignment. The aim of this observational retrospective study was to describe the distribution of cervical sagittal alignment parameters according to age and pelvic incidence in subjects with and without degenerative spinal deformity in order to precisely evaluate cervical compensation phenomena in adult spinal deformity (ASD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Radiographs of 478 subjects (327 females and 151 males) were distributed into 235 asymptomatic and 243 deformed subjects. Occipito-cervical parameters were McGregor-C1, McGregor-C2, C1-C2 and occipito-C2 angles. The cervicothoracic inflection point (CTIP) was determined. Caudal cervical sagittal alignment parameters were: C2-C7 lordosis, C2-apex (superior arch), apex-CTIP (inferior arch), occipito-C3 and occipito-C4 angles, C7-slope and T1-slope. The distribution of parameters was analyzed using a Bayesian inference (significant when Pr > 0.975 or Pr < 0.025). Comparisons between asymptomatic and deformed subjects were done after matching on age (40-60 years; > 60 years) and on PI (< 45°; 45-60°; > 60°). RESULTS: Among occipito-cervical parameters, there was no significant change in McGregor-C1 angle. However, McGregor-C2 angle was significantly higher in the ASD group (Pr = 0.0029), with influence of age (Pr = 0.023), but PI influence. C1-C2 lordosis was significantly higher in the ASD group compared to the asymptomatic group (Pr < 0.0007), without influence of age or PI noticed. C2-C7 lordosis was also higher in the ASD group (Pr < 0.025) with a role of age and PI (Pr < 0.025). Cervical lordosis in the superior arch was significantly higher in the ASD group (Pr > 0.999), without influence of age or PI. In the inferior arch, the lordosis angle was not modified according to the group, but there was an influence of age (Pr < 0.0007). C7-slope and T1-slope were higher according the age group (Pr < 0.0012), without influence of the group or PI. CONCLUSION: This observational study highlights cervical sagittal alignment adaptations in degenerative spinal deformity, matched on age and pelvic incidence. The inferior cervical spine seemed to be modified with a higher lordosis, increasing with age responding to the age-related thoracic kyphosis increase. In addition to that, the superior cervical spine hyperextends more in adult degenerative deformity to maintain horizontal gaze. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The age-specific normative values of standing whole-body sagittal alignment parameters in healthy adults: based on international multicenter data.

PURPOSE: To investigate the age-specific normative values of whole-body sagittal alignment (WBSA) including global balance parameters in healthy adults and to clarify the correlations among parameters based on the data from three international multicenter. METHODS: Three hundred and seventeen healthy subjects (range: 20-84 y.o., mean: 43.8 ± 14.7 y.o.) were included and underwent whole-body biplanar X-ray imaging system. Spinopelvic parameters and knee flexion (KF), the center of acoustic meatus (CAM)-hip axis (HA), and C2 dentiform apophyse (OD)-HA, the cranial center (Cr)-HA were evaluated radiologically. Sub-analysis for correlation analysis between age and parameters and among parameters was performed to investigate age-specific change and compensatory mechanisms. RESULTS: For age-related change, C2-7 angle (r = .326 for male/.355 for female), KF (r = .427/.429), and SVA (r = .234/.507) increased with age in both male and female group. For global parameters related to the center of the gravity, correlations with age were not significant (r = .120/.161 for OD-HA, r = .163/.275 for Cr-HA, r = .149/.262 for CAM-HA). Knee flexion (KF) has correlation with global parameters (i.e., SVA, OD-HA, Cr-HA, CAM-HA) and does not have correlations with local spinopelvic alignment. CONCLUSION: While several local alignment changes with age were found, changes in global parameters related to the center of gravity were kept relatively mild by the chain of compensation mechanisms including the lower limbs. We showed the normative values for a comprehensive WBSA in standing posture from large international healthy subjects' database.

Does Laminectomy Affect Spino-Pelvic Balance in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis? A Study Based on the EOS X-Ray Imaging System.

PURPOSE: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a degenerative disorder causing the forward bending of the trunk and pelvic retroversion with the consequent loss of lumbar lordosis; surgical treatment is intended to enlarge the canal and foramina and decompress the nerve roots. The purpose of our study is to determine whether and to what extent facet-sparing laminectomy affects the spino-pelvic balance. METHODS: The spino-pelvic balance of 26 patients was analysed before and after surgery through the EOS X-ray Imaging System. The following parameters were considered: thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT) and sacral slope (SS). Clinical data were expressed in numeric values according to the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scoring system. RESULTS: Significant SS decreases and PT increases were noticed after surgery, without modification in LL, axial vertebral rotation (AVR) and the general alignment. Pain and disability had a significant improvement, as represented by a decrease in scores on the VAS and ODI scales and an increase in scores on the mJOA functional scale. CONCLUSION: The most important parameter seems to be a congruence between pelvic and spinal parameters, which achieves an economic posture with the physiologic position of the axis of gravity. According to the literature, a standard sagittal balance (SB) has not been defined.

Comparison Between Sagittal Balance Outcomes After Corpectomy, Laminectomy, and Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Matched Cohort Study.

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) can be successfully decompressed via either anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) or posterior laminectomy with fusion (LMF). However, few studies have compared the isolated effect of both techniques on cervical sagittal balance, a surrogate end point for clinical outcomes.We aimed to compare the sagittal balance radiological outcomes of ACCF against LMF. A case-matched controlled study of radiological cervical alignment parameters (C0-2, C2-3, index angles, T1 slope, and sagittal vertical axis (SVA)) in two groups of patients was performed by using pre- and postoperative neutral cervical X-rays.In total, 34 patients were enrolled (ACCF n = 17; LMF n = 17). The mean preoperative C2-7 angle was similar (11.58 ± 16.00° for ACCF; 13.36 ± 12.21° for LMF) in both cohorts. Both led to a loss of lordosis (-2.68 ± 13.8°, p = 0.43; -2.94 ± 11.5°, p = 0.31, respectively). At the C0-2, the two operations induced opposite variations (-0.9 ± 8.0°, p = 0.709 for ACCF; 3.5 ± 15.4°, p = 0.357 for LMF). ACCF led to a significant increase in SVA (7.1 ± 11.9 mm, p = 0.002). The C2-3 disk angle more pronouncedly increased with LMF.Both techniques show an equivalent kyphotic effect, with a greater disadvantage for ACCF. The negative impact on SVA changes is greater with ACCF. Both affect the C0-2 unit, with a tendency for kyphosis with ACCF and one for lordosis with LMF. When choosing the appropriate decompression and fusion technique, preoperative sagittal balance parameters should be included in the decision-making process.

Biomechanical investigation of long spinal fusion models using three-dimensional finite element analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study represents the first finite element (FE) analysis of long-instrumented spinal fusion from the thoracic vertebrae to the pelvis in the context of adult spinal deformity (ASD) with osteoporosis. We aimed to evaluate the von Mises stress in long spinal instrumentation for models that differ in terms of spinal balance, fusion length, and implant type. METHODS: In this three-dimensional FE analysis, FE models were developed based on computed tomography images from a patient with osteoporosis. The von Mises stress was compared for three different sagittal vertical axes (SVAs) (0, 50, and 100 mm), two different fusion lengths (from the pelvis to the second [T2-S2AI] or 10th thoracic vertebra [T10-S2AI]), and two different types of implants (pedicle screw or transverse hook) in the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV). We created 12 models based on combinations of these conditions. RESULTS: The overall von Mises stress was 3.1 times higher on the vertebrae and 3.9 times higher on implants for the 50-mm SVA models than that for the 0-mm SVA models. Similarly, the values were 5.0 times higher on the vertebrae and 6.9 times higher on implants for the 100-mm SVA models than that for the 0-mm SVA models. Higher SVA was associated with greater stress below the fourth lumbar vertebrae and implants. In the T2-S2AI models, the peaks of vertebral stress were observed at the UIV, at the apex of kyphosis, and below the lower lumbar spine. In the T10-S2AI models, the peaks of stress were observed at the UIV and below the lower lumbar region. The von Mises stress in the UIV was also higher for the screw models than for the hook models. CONCLUSION: Higher SVA is associated with greater von Mises stress on the vertebrae and implants. The stress on the UIV is greater for the T10-S2AI models than for the T2-S2AI models. Using transverse hooks instead of screws at the UIV may reduce stress in patients with osteoporosis.

Effect of spinal-pelvic sagittal balance on the clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion surgery.

BACKGROUND: Spinal-pelvic sagittal balance is important for maintaining energy-efficient posture in normal and diseased states.Few reports to date have evaluated the effect of spinal-pelvic sagittal balance on clinical outcomes after lumbar interbody fusion in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD). METHODS: A total of 303 patients treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative disease from January 2012 to December 2019 were enrolled in this retrospective study according to the inclusion criteria. Preoperative and postoperative spinal-pelvic sagittal parameters including pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS) and lumbar lordosis (LL) of the patients were evaluated and compared. 163 patients whose postoperative PI-LL ≤ 10° were divided into the spinal-pelvic match group (Group M), while 140 patients were divided into the spinal-pelvic mismatch group (Group MM). Preoperative and postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back pain of both groups were compared. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups in demographic and surgical data, except for blood loss in surgery. LL, PI, PT and SS of the patients at final follow-up were all statistically different from the preoperative values in the two groups(P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in LL, PI, PT and SS between the two groups before surgery. At the final follow-up, LL, PI and PT differed significantly between the two groups(P < 0.05). Compared with the preoperative results, ODI and VAS of low back in both groups decreased significantly at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). Significant differences in VAS and ODI were found between the two groups at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). The improvement rates of VAS and ODI of Group M are both significantly higher than Group MM. Regression analysis showed that age and spinal-pelvic match had significant effects on the improvement of patients' low back pain at the final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: lumbar interbody fusion can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with LDD. In terms of outcomes with an average follow-up time of more than 2 years, the spinal-pelvic match has a positive effect on patients' quality of life and the release of low back pain.

Cervical sagittal balance: a predictor of neck pain after anterior cervical spine surgery?

PURPOSE: To determine the possible relation between cervical sagittal balance and neck pain in patients having anterior cervical spine (ACS) surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective monocentric study on 85 patients who underwent ACS surgery between 2014 and 2016. Clinically, all patients were assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Radiological assessment was achieved by MRI or CT-scan of the cervical spine allowing measurement of radiological parameters for preoperative cervical sagittal balance. These same criteria were measured postoperatively using X-rays. RESULTS: There is a statistically significant increase in the Cobb angle postoperatively (10.34 degrees) compared to preoperatively (6.68 degrees) (p < 0.05). Concomitantly, there is a statistically significant decrease in NDI postoperatively (22.69%) compared to preoperatively (42.31%) (p < 0.01). There is a negative correlation between Cobb angle and NDI (r= -0.31) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: An improvement in the cervical sagittal balance after ACS surgery is accompanied by a reduction of neck pain. Radiological parameters of cervical sagittal balance may be taken into account when planning surgery in order to maintain cervical alignment and thereby limit the occurrence of neck pain.

Flexing a standard hinge-powered operating table for lumbosacral three-column osteotomy (3-CO) site closure in 84 consecutive patients.

Three-column osteotomy (3-CO) is a powerful technique in adult deformity surgery, and pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is the workhorse to correct severe kyphotic spinal deformities. Aging of the population, increasing cases of iatrogenic flat back deformities and understanding the importance of sagittal balance have led to a dramatic increase of this surgical technique. Surgery, however, is demanding and associated with high complication rates so that every step of the procedure requires meticulous technique. Particularly, osteotomy closure is associated with risks like secondary fracture, translation, or iatrogenic stenosis. This step is traditionally performed by compression or a cantilever maneuver with sometimes excessive forces on the screws or instrumentation. Implant loosening or abrupt subluxation resulting in construct failure and/or neurological deficits can result. The aim of this prospective registry study was to assess the efficacy and safety of our surgical PSO technique as well as the osteotomy closure by flexing a hinge-powered OR table. In a series of 84 consecutive lumbosacral 3-CO, a standardized surgical technique with special focus on closure of the osteotomy was prospectively evaluated. The surgical steps with the patients positioned prone on a soft frame are detailed. Osteotomy closure was achieved by remote controlled bending of a standard OR table without compressive or cantilever forces in all 84 cases. This technique carries a number of advantages, particularly the reversibility and the slow speed of closure with minimum force. There was not a single mechanical intraoperative complication such as vertebral body fracture, subluxation, or adjacent implant loosening during osteotomy closure, compared to external cohorts using the cantilever technique (p = 0.130). The feasibility of controlled 3-CO closure by flexing a standard OR table is demonstrated. This technique enables a safe, gentle closure of the osteotomy site with minimal risk of implant failure or accidental neurological injury.

How does magnetically controlled growing rods insertion affect sagittal alignment in ambulatory early onset scoliosis patients?

PURPOSE: The importance of sagittal alignment restoration in early onset scoliosis (EOS) management has rarely been investigated to date. The aim was to report the influence of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) insertion on the sagittal alignment of EOS patients. METHODS: All consecutive ambulatory patients operated with MCGR rods between 2011 and 2018 were retrospectively included in four institutions. Standing biplanar radiographs were performed preoperatively, in the early postoperative period and at latest follow-up. Global and local sagittal parameters, spinal global shape and harmony were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 37 ambulatory EOS patients were included (mean age at surgery 8.5 (± 2) years). 70% had a balanced construct postoperatively. Both MaxTK (- 17°, p = 0.02) and MaxLL (- 15°, p = 0.001) were significantly reduced, particularly at the instrumented levels. The number of vertebrae included in the lumbar lordosis significantly increased (+ 2 levels, p = 0.02), as well as the thoraco-lumbar inflexion point (+ 2 levels, p < 0.001) and the kyphosis apex (+ 1 level, p < 0.001). Overall mechanical failure rate was 40.5%, and radiological PJK was observed in 43% of the patients, with 11 remaining asymptomatic. Patients with initial hyperkyphosis (> 50°) developed more complications (62% vs. 28%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: MCGR insertion flattened the spine in EOS, at both instrumented and non-instrumented levels. Overall spinal harmony was modified, with a cranial shift of the thoraco-lumbar inflexion point and the thoracic kyphosis apex, associated with a lengthening of the lumbar lordosis. The rate of complication remained high, some explanations being found in the radiological changes reported such as the preoperative location of the TK apex. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Can artificial intelligence support or even replace physicians in measuring sagittal balance? A validation study on preoperative and postoperative full spine images of 170 patients.

PURPOSE: Sagittal balance (SB) plays an important role in the surgical treatment of spinal disorders. The aim of this research study is to provide a detailed evaluation of a new, fully automated algorithm based on artificial intelligence (AI) for the determination of SB parameters on a large number of patients with and without instrumentation. METHODS: Pre- and postoperative sagittal full body radiographs of 170 patients were measured by two human raters, twice by one rater and by the AI algorithm which determined: pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, L1-S1 lordosis, T4-T12 thoracic kyphosis (TK) and the spino-sacral angle (SSA). To evaluate the agreement between human raters and AI, the mean error (95% confidence interval (CI)), standard deviation and an intra- and inter-rater reliability was conducted using intra-class correlation (ICC) coefficients. RESULTS: ICC values for the assessment of the intra- (range: 0.88-0.97) and inter-rater (0.86-0.97) reliability of human raters are excellent. The algorithm is able to determine all parameters in 95% of all pre- and in 91% of all postoperative images with excellent ICC values (PreOP-range: 0.83-0.91, PostOP: 0.72-0.89). Mean errors are smallest for the SSA (PreOP: -0.1° (95%-CI: -0.9°-0.6°); PostOP: -0.5° (-1.4°-0.4°)) and largest for TK (7.0° (6.1°-7.8°); 7.1° (6.1°-8.1°)). CONCLUSION: A new, fully automated algorithm that determines SB parameters has excellent reliability and agreement with human raters, particularly on preoperative full spine images. The presented solution will relieve physicians from time-consuming routine work of measuring SB parameters and allow the analysis of large databases efficiently.

Relationship between hip joint proximity area and sagittal balance parameters: an upright computed tomography study.

PURPOSE: A close relationship between sagittal spinal alignment and hip osteoarthritis (OA) has been documented. This study aimed to examine the relationship between hip joint proximity area and sagittal balance parameters in healthy subjects. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled 47 healthy volunteers who underwent 320-detector row upright computed tomography. Acquired data were reconstructed in a virtual three-dimensional space. The proximity area was determined by < 1 mm of the Hausdorff distance between the acetabulum and the femoral head. Volunteers were divided into the anterior and posterior proximity groups depending on the position of the closest area. Sagittal balance parameters [sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 spinopelvic inclination (T1-SPi), T1-pelvic angle, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis), offset distance between the centre of the acoustic meati (CAM) and C7 plumb line (CAM-C7-offset), and offset distance between the CAM and hip axis (HA) (CAM-HA-offset)] were compared between the two groups using independent sample t test. RESULTS: The anterior proximity group (n = 24) had higher SVA (p = 0.016) and T1-Spi (p = 0.015) than the posterior proximity group (n = 23). CAM-HA-offset was higher in the posterior than in the anterior proximity group (p < 0.000). There was no difference in other parameters (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The anterior proximity group had a positive anterior spinal balance; the posterior proximity group may have a more posterior gravity line than the hip joint centre. The anterior spinal balance may contribute to the anterior loading of the hip joint, with known relation with the initiation and onset of hip OA.