Hypoxic gene expression is a prognostic factor for disease free survival in a cohort of locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the uterine cervix.

INTRODUCTION: Tumour hypoxia in locally advanced squamous cervical cancer (LACC) has been shown to be of substantial prognostic importance. The aims of the present study were therefore to investigate if hypoxia could be identified by a newly validated hypoxic gene expression classifier and used as a prognostic factor for disease free survival (DFS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Paraffin embedded biopsies were obtained from 190 patients with LACC with squamous cell carcinoma treated 2005-2016 with chemo-radiation and image guided adaptive brachytherapy. Analysis of hypoxia was successful in 183 patients (96%). Hypoxic classification of tumours into 'more' or 'less' hypoxic was based on 15 genes using the same method as in a prospective head and neck cancer trial (NCT02661152). HPV was genotyped using INNO-LiPA. Local tumour invasion was evaluated by the T-score. Primary endpoint was DFS analysed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression. Events were death of any cause, persistent disease, or recurrence. RESULTS: The FIGO2009 stage distribution was IB-IIA 9%, IIB 64%, and III-IVA 27%, and mean T-score was 7.2. Pathological nodes were present in 53%. Median observation time was 5.2 years. Local control rate at 5 years was 96%, and pelvic (loco-regional) control 91%. Overall, 36% of the tumours were classified as 'more' hypoxic. The frequency of 'more' hypoxic tumours increased with local tumour intrusion (30% for T-score 0-9 vs. 55% for T-score ≥10, p = 0.004). Hypoxia was associated with decreased DFS in univariate, HR 1.71 (1.04-2.82), and multivariate analysis, HR 1.75 (1.04-2.92), and the effect was particularly observed among tumours with a T-score ≥10. HPV 16/18 was not associated with improved DFS in neither in univariate nor in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Hypoxic gene expression is a prominent prognostic factor for DFS in LACC with SCC histology and should be considered for treatment stratification in clinical trials.

Pharmacologic treatment options for advanced epithelial skin cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Epithelial skin cancers (ESCs), namely basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) and squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), are considered common skin malignancies, with rising incidence rates over the past few decades. A subgroup of patients with ESC present with advanced and 'difficult'-to-treat tumours, including locally advanced and metastatic tumours. Currently, there is no widely accepted staging system for locally advanced ESCs, while metastatic BCCs and SCCs share a staging system. Therefore, selecting an appropriate therapeutic regimen for these patients may be difficult. AREAS COVERED: The purpose of this review is to highlight the pharmacologic treatment options for advanced ESCs. These include 'conventional' chemotherapeutic regimens such as 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, vincristine, bleomycin and doxorubicin and newer, more 'targeted' therapies. EXPERT OPINION: Vismodegib, a Hedgehog (Hh) inhibitor, was recently approved for the treatment of advanced BCC showing a good efficacy rate and a relatively well-tolerated safety profile in clinical studies. In addition, a number of hedgehog inhibitors are now in Phase I and II trials of advanced BCC demonstrating encouraging results. Phase II studies with epithelial growth factor receptor inhibitors, such as cetuximab, gefitinib, panitimumab and erlotinib have been conducted in patients with advanced SCCs, used either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. However, there is still much knowledge to be gained about the treatment efficacies, optimal treatment durations, mechanisms of drug tolerance, adverse events and the ways in which these therapies influence patient outcomes and quality of life.