Real-time ultrasound to assist during a vaginal breech delivery.

We report a novel application of intrapartum sonography, herein used to assist the internal podalic version and the vaginal delivery of a transverse-lying second twin. Following the vaginal delivery of the first cephalic twin, the internal podalic version was performed under continuous ultrasound vision, leading to the uncomplicated breech delivery of a healthy neonate.

Cesarean delivery is associated with lower neonatal mortality among breech pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preterm deliveries ≤32 weeks of gestation.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between actual and planned modes of delivery, neonatal mortality, and short-term outcomes among preterm pregnancies ≤32 weeks of gestation. DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search was conducted in 3 main databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to November 16, 2022. The protocol was registered in advance in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022377870). STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Eligible studies examined pregnancies ≤32nd gestational week. All infants received active care, and the outcomes were reported separately by different modes of delivery. Singleton and twin pregnancies at vertex and breech presentations were included. Studies that included pregnancies complicated with preeclampsia and abruptio placentae were excluded. Primary outcomes were neonatal mortality and intraventricular hemorrhage. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Articles were selected by title, abstract, and full text, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Random effects model-based odds ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions-I was used to assess the risk of bias. RESULTS: A total of 19 observational studies were included involving a total of 16,042 preterm infants in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Actual cesarean delivery improves survival (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.9) and decreases the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage (odds ratio, 0.70; confidence interval, 0.57-0.85) compared to vaginal delivery. Planned cesarean delivery does not improve the survival of very and extremely preterm infants compared to vaginal delivery (odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-1.44). Subset analysis found significantly lower odds of death for singleton breech preterm deliveries born by both planned (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.98) and actual (odds ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.88) cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION: Cesarean delivery should be the mode of delivery for preterm ≤32 weeks of gestation breech births due to the higher mortality in preterm infants born via vaginal delivery.

Malpresentation and autism spectrum disorder in the study to explore early development.

BACKGROUND: An infant's presentation at delivery may be an early indicator of developmental differences. Non-vertex presentation (malpresentation) complicates delivery and often leads to caesarean section, which has been associated with neurodevelopmental delays, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, malpresentation could be an early sign of an existing developmental problem that is also an upstream factor from caesarean delivery. Little research has been done to investigate the association between malpresentation and ASD. OBJECTIVES: We examine the association between malpresentation at delivery and ASD and whether this association differs by gestational age. METHODS: We used data from the Study to Explore Early Development (SEED), a multi-site, case-control study of children with ASD compared to population controls. The foetal presentation was determined using medical records, birth records and maternal interviews. We defined malpresentation as a non-vertex presentation at delivery, then further categorised into breech and other malpresentation. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for the association between malpresentation and ASD. RESULTS: We included 4047 SEED participants, 1873 children with ASD and 2174 controls. At delivery, most infants presented vertex (n = 3760, 92.9%). Malpresentation was associated with higher odds of ASD (aOR 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02, 1.68) after adjustment for maternal age, poverty level, hypertensive disorder and smoking. The association was similar for breech and other types of malpresentation (aOR 1.28, 95% CI 0.97, 1.70 and aOR 1.40, 95% CI 0.87, 2.26, respectively) and did not differ markedly by gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: Malpresentation at delivery was modestly associated with ASD. Early monitoring of the neurodevelopment of children born with malpresentation could identify children with ASD sooner and enhance opportunities to provide support to optimise developmental outcomes.

How do physicians respond to new medical research?

What happens when the findings of a prominent medical study are overturned? Using a medical trial on breech births, we estimate the effect of the reversal of such a medical study on physician choices and infant health outcomes. Using the United States Birth Certificate Records from 1995 to 2010, we employ a difference-in-differences estimator for C-sections, low Apgar, and low birth weight measures. We find that the reversal of a multi-site, high profile, randomized control trial on the appropriate delivery of term breech births, the Term Breech Trial, led to a 15%-23% decline in C-sections for such births at a time when the overall trend in C-sections was rising. We find our largest estimated effects amongst traditionally disadvantaged groups (i.e., non-white, and minimal education). However, we do not find that such a change in practice had significant impacts on infant health. Contrary to prior studies, we find that physicians updated their beliefs quickly, and do indeed adjust to new medical research, particularly young physicians, prior to mandatory policy or professional guidelines.

Contraindications in national guidelines for vaginal breech delivery at term: Comparison, consensus, and controversy.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal mode of delivery for vaginal breech presentation remains a clinical dilemma. Planned vaginal delivery offers maternal advantages because it avoids major abdominal surgery and has no consequences for following pregnancies, while elective cesarean delivery proves advantageous for the neonate because adverse outcomes are less frequent. Patient selection for vaginal breech delivery is important based on the individual risk balance. A lack of consensus exists regarding the specific contraindications for vaginal breech delivery, largely due to limited scientific evidence. This systematic review aims to give an overview of contraindications for vaginal breech delivery, as presented in guidelines, analyze relevant literature, and offer evidence-based recommendations for the contraindications stated in the guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To identify national guidelines PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, NICE, UpToDate, and ClinicalKey were searched using two keywords: "breech presentation" and "vaginal delivery." We systematically reviewed the literature for existing evidence for contraindications for term vaginal breech delivery. The following databases were searched: PubMed (April 2024), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE (1947 to 2024). RESULTS: Our search identified eight guidelines that stated a total of 11 contraindications for vaginal breech delivery. Among these guidelines, agreement was limited, with the sole consensus in all guidelines on the contraindication of footling breech. Our comprehensive literature search yielded 43 articles discussing 14 potential contraindications. We found supportive evidence for 7 of 11 contraindications from the guidelines, with only substantial and satisfactory evidence for two contraindications. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study underscore the lack of consensus among national guidelines regarding contraindications for term vaginal breech delivery. Furthermore, we found a notable lack of substantial scientific evidence to support these contraindications. In light of these findings, we suggest a reduced list of contraindications in vaginal breech deliveries.

Outcomes in term breech birth according to intended mode of delivery-A Swedish prospective single-center experience of a dedicated breech birth team.

INTRODUCTION: The appropriate mode of delivery for breech babies is a topic of ongoing debate. After the publication of the Term Breech Trial in 2000, the proportion of breech babies delivered vaginally in Sweden rapidly dropped to 7% from 26%. In 2015, international guidelines changed to once again recommend offering vaginal breech deliveries in select cases. In 2017, a Swedish hospital established a dedicated Breech Team to provide safe vaginal breech deliveries according to the new guidelines. The aim of this study is to compare neonatal morbidity in the group planned for cesarean breech delivery with the group planned for vaginal breech delivery treated in accordance with the new guidelines. The study adds to the literature by providing insights into the consequences of reintroducing vaginal breech births in a high-resource health-care setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted at Södersjukhuset's maternity ward with 1067 women who gave birth to a single breech fetus at term. Outcomes were compared between the planned vaginal and planned cesarean delivery groups using intention-to-treat analysis and multivariate analysis to control for confounders. RESULTS: Out of the 1067 women, 78.9% were planned for cesarean delivery and 21.1% were planned for vaginal delivery. The planned vaginal group had a significantly greater risk for neonatal morbidity compared to the planned cesarean group (3.1% vs. 0.7%; OR 4.44, 95% CI 1.48-13.34). The risk difference remained significant after controlling for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Planned vaginal breech delivery was associated with an increased risk of neonatal mortality and short-term morbidity compared to planned cesarean breech delivery in accordance with the new guidelines. The potential risks and benefits of planned vaginal breech delivery should be carefully weighed against those of planned cesarean delivery.

Management of impacted fetal head at cesarean birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Despite increasing incidence of impacted fetal head at cesarean birth and associated injury, it is unclear which techniques are most effective for prevention and management. A high quality evidence review in accordance with international reporting standards is currently lacking. To address this gap, we aimed to identify, assess, and synthesize studies comparing techniques to prevent or manage impacted fetal head at cesarean birth prior to or at full cervical dilatation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Emcare, Embase and Cochrane databases up to 1 January 2023 (PROSPERO: CRD420212750016). Included were randomized controlled trials (any size) and non-randomized comparative studies (n ≥ 30 in each arm) comparing techniques or adjunctive measures to prevent or manage impacted fetal head at cesarean birth. Following screening and data extraction, we assessed risk of bias for individual studies using RoB2 and ROBINS-I, and certainty of evidence using GRADE. We synthesized data using meta-analysis where appropriate, including sensitivity analyses excluding data published in potential predatory journals or at risk of retraction. RESULTS: We identified 24 eligible studies (11 randomized and 13 non-randomized) including 3558 women, that compared vaginal disimpaction, reverse breech extraction, the Patwardhan method and/or the Fetal Pillow®. GRADE certainty of evidence was low or very low for all 96 outcomes across seven reported comparisons. Pooled analysis mostly showed no or equivocal differences in outcomes across comparisons of techniques. Although some maternal outcomes suggested differences between techniques (eg risk ratio of 3.41 [95% CI: 2.50-4.66] for uterine incision extension with vaginal disimpaction vs. reverse breech extraction), these were based on unreliable pooled estimates given very low GRADE certainty and, in some cases, additional risk of bias introduced by data published in potential predatory journals or at risk of retraction. CONCLUSIONS: The current weaknesses in the evidence base mean that no firm recommendations can be made about the superiority of any one impacted fetal head technique over another, indicating that high quality training is needed across the range of techniques. Future studies to improve the evidence base are urgently required, using a standard definition of impacted fetal head, agreed maternal and neonatal outcome sets for impacted fetal head, and internationally recommended reporting standards.

Mechanics of vaginal breech birth: Factors influencing obstetric maneuver rate, duration of active second stage of labor, and neonatal outcome.

BACKGROUND: We investigated possible parameters that could predict the need for obstetric maneuvers, the duration of the active second stage of labor (i.e., the duration of active pushing), and short-term neonatal outcome in vaginal breech births. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 268 successful singleton vaginal breech births in women without previous vaginal births from January 2015 to August 2022. Multivariable regression was used to investigate associations between maternal and fetal characteristics (including antepartum magnetic resonance (MR) pelvimetry) with obstetric maneuvers, the duration of active second stage of labor, pH values, and admission to the neonatal unit. Models for the prediction of obstetric maneuvers were built and internally validated. RESULTS: Obstetric maneuvers were performed in a total of 130 women (48.5%). A total of 32 neonates (11.9%) had to be admitted to the neonatal unit. The intertuberous distance (ITD) (p < 0.001), epidural analgesia (p < 0.001), and birthweight (p = 0.026) were associated with the duration of active second stage of labor. ITD (p = 0.028) and birthweight (p = 0.011) were also independently associated with admission to the neonatal unit, while pH values below 7.10 dropped significantly (p = 0.0034) if ITD was ≥13 cm. Furthermore, ITD (p < 0.001) and biparietal diameter (p = 0.002) were independent predictors for obstetric maneuvers. CONCLUSIONS: ITD is independently associated with the duration of active second stage of labor. Thus, it can predict suboptimal birth mechanics in the last stage of birth, which may lead to the need for obstetric maneuvers, lower arterial pH values, and admission to the neonatal unit. Consequently, MR pelvimetry gives additional information for practitioners and birthing people preferring a vaginal breech birth.

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) is not an independent risk factor for breech presentation among singleton term births in Vienna, Austria.

Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) such as in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) are still discussed critically, as there is no consensus on whether these treatments could be the cause of risk factors for obstetric problems such as breech presentation. The aim of this study was to test the association between ART and breech presentation among 11920 singleton term births taking place in Vienna from 2010 to 2020. In this single-centre medical record-based study, data concerning the conception mode (spontaneous versus IVF or ICSI), child presentation, birth mode, newborn sex and size as well as age, height, weight, and reproductive history of the mother were included. Three hundred twenty-six newborns (2.7%) were conceived by IVF or ICSI, and 527 newborns (4.4%) were delivered in breech presentation. Breech presentation occurred in 7.6% of IVF/ICSI children but only in 4.3% of spontaneously conceived children (P = 0.019). ART increased the crude risk of breech presentation significantly (OR = 1.67; 95% CI 1.71 - 2.38). After adjusting for maternal age, height, number of previous births, smoking, and newborn sex, however, ART had no longer a significant impact on the risk of breech presentation. In contrast, breech presentation was significantly associated with higher maternal age as well as a lower number of previous births, but not with ART. This study shows that the adverse outcomes of IVF and ICSI pregnancies may not be due to the ART treatment alone but might also be due to the mostly higher age and lower parity of the mothers using ART.

The influence of MRI-based pelvimetric measurements in mother's choice of delivery in fetal breech position.

INTRODUCTION: At term, about 3-4% of all singleton pregnancies present as breech. MRI-based pelvimetry is a valuable tool to support selection of adequate candidates for a trial-of-labor in women expecting term breech babies. Shared decision-making is playing an increasingly important role in obstetrics. Since the divergent existing knowledge of breech term delivery needs to be discussed with the pregnant woman, we examined the influence of MRI results on the shared decision-making process in women with term breech presentation. METHODS: Between 08/2021 and 12/2022, anamnestic and clinical parameters were collected from singleton pregnancies expecting term breech babies resulting in birth at the Hanover Medical School. After information, written consent and inclusion, clinical parameters, the course of birth and the maternal and fetal outcome were collected retrospectively. 32 women participated in a postpartum questionnaire study on inquiry. The subsequent acquisition of information and the arguments in the decision-making process were determined. In addition, the sense of security and self-determination was asked both before and during birth. RESULTS: 50% of the respondents had not decided for a mode of delivery before having MRI pelvimetry. After imaging and information, about the own pelvic dimensions and predictors for a successful vaginal birth, 80% of this subgroup decided to give birth vaginally. Over 40% of the collective descripted that they made a decision based on the result of MRI pelvimetry. None of the women felt to be insecure after having talked about the MRI results. The elective cesarean section group and the group of those who delivered vaginally were approximately equally highly satisfied with their feeling of self-determination of the birth mode. Overall, the study population had a very positive birth experience. The group of women who had delivered by elective cesarean showed a wider range in their assessment and appeared to perceive the experience more negative than the group of women who had a vaginal birth or emergency cesarean. Fetal and maternal outcomes did not differ between the groups. DISCUSSION: MRT pelvimetry measurements can be used as a predictor for a successful vaginal breech delivery. The additional information obtained from the MRI measurements can be used in the shared decision-making process to decide more easily on the mode of delivery while improving women's awareness and safety. A balanced education on rare and frequently adverse events of vaginal delivery and cesarean section and patient expectations about labor processes must be taken into account.

How to: a breech vaginal delivery before 25 weeks of gestation.

Delivery before 25 weeks of gestation has become a more frequent occurrence in our maternity units and can be a difficult obstetrical situation to manage when the fetus is breech. We describe a new obstetrical maneuver enabling vaginal birth of a breech fetus before 25 weeks of gestation. It enables the fetal mobile to be fully grasped and secured, thus facilitating passage through the genital tract.

Sonographic examination at the beginning of the second stage of labor predicts birth outcome in vaginally intended breech deliveries: a blinded prospective study.

PURPOSE: In order to spread competence in vaginal breech deliveries, it is necessary to develop new and easily applicable tools for birth progression and safety evaluation. Ultrasound is a useful and ubiquitously available tool with already documented value for birth progression observation. In deliveries out of breech presentation, an established ultrasound examination is missing. We determined the descent of the fetal buttocks in relation to the maternal pelvic inlet using intrapartum ultrasound. We evaluated these results in comparison to the clinical vaginal examination with the aim to establish an easily applicable method for birth outcome prediction. Therefore, we analyzed the predictive value of our examinations on birth outcome parameters, such as cesarean section rate, as well as fetal and maternal outcome parameters. METHODS: We performed a prospective blinded study on 106 mothers with vaginally intended breech delivery. At beginning of stage two in labor, the descent of the fetal buttocks into the mother's pelvic inlet was detected with transabdominal ultrasound and vaginal examination by different observers. PRIMARY OUTCOME VARIABLE: Cesarean section rate. Secondary outcome variables: rate of manual assistance in vaginal deliveries, birth duration, 5' APGAR score, umbilical arterial pH, maternal blood loss, and perineal injury. For non-parametric values, Wilcoxon's χ2 test was performed. In order to analyze the predictive value of our examination, lack-of-fit analysis was conducted. Reliability evaluation of the sonographic examination was done with a matched-pair analysis. RESULTS: Women with positive intrapartum ultrasound breech engagement sign (+ IPUBES) had a significantly lower rate of cesarean section in comparison with those with negative IPUBES (5/67; 7.5% vs. 18/39; 46.2%; p < 0.0001). The area under the ROC curve for the prediction of CS for negative IPUBES was 0.765 with a sensitivity of 78.3% and a specificity of 74.7%. Sonographic examination showed an excellent reliability in a matched-pair analysis comparing vaginal and sonographic examinations with a mean difference of 0.012 (SD ± 0.027, 95% CI - 0.014 to 0.065). Mean birth duration was significantly longer in deliveries with negative IPUBES (533 min vs. 440 min; p = 0.0011). Fetal and maternal outcome parameters were not significantly different between deliveries with positive and negative IPUBES. CONCLUSIONS: Sonographic evaluation of the fetal descent in relation to the mother's pelvic inlet screens reliably for emergency cesarean section. This newly presented method for birth progression observation might be a powerful tool for distribution of expertise in vaginal breech delivery and is able to give reference for clinical vaginal examination by obstetricians in training. TRAIL REGISTRY: Clinical trial. Date of registration: 13.03.2019; Date of initial participant enrollment: 20.03.2019; DRKS00016885; https://www.drks.de ; German clinical trials register.

Does overweight and obesity have an impact on delivery mode and peripartum outcome in breech presentation? A FRABAT cohort study.

PURPOSE: Obesity is a worldwide and growing issue affecting women in childbearing age, complicating surgical procedures as well as pregnancy. Through a reduction of not necessarily required cesarean deliveries-for instance in pregnancies with breech presentation-obesity mediated and surgery-associated morbidity might be contained. Date on the impact of maternal BMI in vaginally attempted breech delivery is not existing. To give insight into whether an elevated BMI leads to an increased perinatal morbidity in vaginally intended deliveries out of breech presentation, we analyzed delivery outcome of laboring women with a singleton baby in breech presentation with overweight and obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) in comparison to women with a BMI of below 25 kg/m2. METHODS: Based on data from January 2004 to December 2020, a cohort study was performed on 1641 women presenting with breech presentation at term (> 37 weeks). The influence of maternal BMI on perinatal outcome was analyzed with Chi2 testing for group differences and logistic regression analysis. Patients with a hyperglycemic metabolism were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Fetal morbidity was not different when patients with a BMI of ≥ 25 kg/m2 (PREMODA morbidity score 2.16%) were compared to patients with a BMI of below 25 kg/m2 (1.97%, p = 0.821). Cesarean delivery rates were significantly higher in overweight and obese women with 43.9% compared to 29.3% (p < 0.0001). BMI and cesarean delivery were significantly associated in a logistic regression analysis (Chi2 coefficient 18.05, p < 0.0001). In successful vaginal deliveries out of breech presentation, maternal perineal injury rates (vaginal birth in normal-BMI women 48.4%; vaginal birth in overweight and obese women: 44.2%; p = 0.273) and rates of manually assisted delivery (vaginal birth in normal-BMI women: 44.4%; vaginal birth in obese and overweight women: 44.2%; p = 0.958) were not different between BMI groups. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity and overweight are not associated with peripartum maternal or newborn morbidity in vaginally attempted breech delivery, if the patient cohort is thoroughly selected and vaginal breech delivery is in an upright maternal position. Reduction of cesarean delivery rates, especially in overweight and obese women might, have an important positive impact on maternal and newborn morbidity.

Quantification of suppressor effects on breech and action noise from AR-15 pattern firearms and its implications for the protection of human hearing.

Noise from firearms is well known to be harmful to human hearing. This problem has been addressed by various military units through the use of muzzle suppressors. However, as suppressor technology has advanced, shooters report hearing the mechanical action of gas-operated semi-automatic rifles (ArmaLite Rifle Model 15 style aka AR-15) as being louder than the suppressed muzzle noise. This study aims to evaluate if harmful noise is present in the shooter's ear, even when impulse noise emanating from the muzzle is suppressed. To characterize the impulse noise of the firearm action caused by the reciprocation of the bolt carrier group (BCG) and subsequent impact when it returns to battery (the forward locked position), the muzzle of a rifle was placed through a constructed plywood wall, and the noise of the action/breech was measured independently from the muzzle noise. This research finds that the impact of the BCG returning to battery (132 dBZ) has the potential to be harmful to the shooter's hearing even when the noise from the muzzle is effectively suppressed.

The risk of DDH between breech and cephalic-delivered neonates using Graf ultrasonography.

PURPOSE: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorder in infants. The most significant risk factors include female gender, breech presentation, left hip and family history. In this study, we utilized the Graf method at different time intervals to evaluate both breech-delivered and cephalic-born newborns. The objectives were to compare the incidence of DDH in cephalic and breech-delivered neonates and investigate whether the hip joints of neonates delivered in the breech position exhibit a distinct maturation pattern. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied prospectively 618 hip joints (309 newborns). Each hip joint was examined with the Graf method in four time periods as follows: Phase #1 (0-1 weeks), Phase #2 (1-4 weeks), Phase #3 (4-7 weeks), and Phase #4 (7-10 weeks). The α and ß angles for each hip joint were measured, and the hips were classified according to Graf classification. With our statistical analysis within the different phases, we were able to investigate potential variations in the maturation patterns between newborns delivered in the breech and cephalic delivery positions. RESULTS: A significant difference (at the 5% level) was observed in Phase 1 between breech and cephalic-delivered neonates (35.6-8.6%). This difference tended to decrease in next phases (13.6-1% in Phase 2, 2.5-0% in Phase 3 and 1.7-0% in Phase 4). A significant difference (at the 5% level) for cephalic-delivered neonates was also observed between Phase 1 and Phase 4 (8.5-0%), but the percentages were low. Additionally, the breech-delivered had extreme difference in incidence of DDH from Phase 1 to Phase 4 (35.6-11.9%, 2.5%, and 1.7%, respectively). CONCLUSION: It appears that there is an actual difference in the incidence of DDH between breech-delivered and cephalic-delivered neonates, although the difference may be less significant than previously considered. The majority of the breech-delivered neonates that were initially considered as pathological (Phase 1) are, in fact, healthy. This is ascertained in subsequent ultrasound examinations conducted in later phases (Phases 2-4), when the incidence of pathological cases decreases. This could be attributed to potential different maturation pattern between these groups.

The influence of vestibular system and fetal presentation on handedness, cognitive and motor development: A comparison between cephalic and breech presentation.

Genetics are undoubtedly implicated in the ontogenesis of laterality. Nonetheless, environmental factors, such as the intrauterine environment, may also play a role in the development of functional and behavioral lateralization. The aim of this study was to test the Left-Otolithic Dominance Theory (LODT; Previc, 1991) by investigating a hypothetical developmental pattern where it is assumed that a breech presentation, which is putatively associated with a dysfunctional and weakly lateralized vestibular system, can lead to weak handedness and atypical development associated with language and motor difficulties. We used the ALSPAC cohort of children from 7 to 10 years of age to conduct our investigation. Our results failed to show an association between the vestibular system and fetal presentation, nor any influence of the latter on hand preference, hand performance, or language and motor development. Bayesian statistical analyses supported these findings. Contrary to our LODT-derived hypotheses, this study offers evidence that fetal presentation does not influence the vestibular system's lateralization and seems to be a poor indicator for handedness. Nonetheless, we found that another non-genetic factor, prematurity, could lead to atypical development of handedness.

Effect of mode of delivery on perinatal outcome in severe preterm birth: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence on the effect of mode of delivery on perinatal outcome of fetuses born before 32 weeks' gestation. METHODS: MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the ClinicalTrials.gov registry and gray literature sources were searched, starting from the year 2000 to reflect contemporary practice in perinatal care. Non-randomized or randomized studies that included singleton fetuses without chromosomal abnormality or major congenital defect delivered vaginally or via Cesarean section were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. Primary outcomes were neonatal death, defined as death in the first 28 days of age, and survival to discharge. Secondary outcomes were other adverse perinatal events. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias. The overall quality of evidence for the outcomes was assessed according to GRADE. Summary odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated, and random-effects models were used for data synthesis. Subgroup analysis was performed for delivery before 28 weeks, delivery between 28 and 32 weeks and according to fetal presentation at delivery. RESULTS: A total of 27 retrospective studies (22 887 neonates) were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, all of which reported on singleton pregnancies. Among cases born before 28 weeks, vaginal delivery significantly increased the risk of neonatal death of fetuses with any type of presentation (n = 1496) (OR 1.87 (95% CI, 1.05-3.35); I2 = 65%, very low quality of evidence) and of fetuses with breech presentation (n = 733) (OR 3.55 (95% CI, 2.42-5.21); I2 = 21%, moderate quality of evidence). The odds of survival to discharge were significantly decreased among fetuses with breech presentation delivered before 28 weeks (n = 646) (OR 0.36 (95% CI, 0.24-0.54); I2 = 21%, low quality of evidence). Among breech fetuses born between 28 and 32 weeks, vaginal delivery increased the odds of perinatal death (intrapartum and neonatal) (n = 1581) (OR 3.06 (95% CI, 1.47-6.35); I2 = 0%, high quality of evidence). In non-cephalic fetuses born between 24 and 32 weeks, vaginal delivery decreased the odds of survival to discharge (n = 1030) (OR 0.28 (95% CI, 0.19-0.40); I2 = 0%, moderate quality of evidence). No significant effect on mortality of mode of delivery was observed in cephalic fetuses at any gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that vaginal delivery in severe preterm birth is associated with an increased risk of neonatal and perinatal death in breech fetuses, while no significant association was observed for cephalic fetuses. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries following breech compared to cephalic vaginal births.

INTRODUCTION: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) at the time of childbirth can lead to serious consequences including anal incontinence, dyspareunia, pain and rectovaginal fistula. These types of lesions and their incidence have been well studied after cephalic presentation deliveries, but no publications have specifically addressed this issue in the context of vaginal breech delivery. The goal of our study was to evaluate the incidence of OASIs following breech deliveries and compare it with cephalic presentation births. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study involving 670 women. Of these, 224 and 446 had a vaginal birth of a fetus in the breech (breech group) and cephalic (cephalic group) presentations respectively. Both groups were matched for birthweight (± 200 g), date of delivery (± 2 years) and vaginal parity. Main outcome of interest was to evaluate the incidence of OASIs following breech vaginal birth compared to cephalic vaginal births. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of intact perineum or first-degree tear, second-degree perineal tear and rates of episiotomies in each group. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in OASIs incidence between the breech and cephalic groups (0.9% vs. 1.1%; RR 0.802 (0.157; 4.101); p = 0.31). There were more episiotomies in the breech group (12.5% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.0012) and the rate of intact or first-degree perineum was similar in both groups (74.1% vs. 75.3%, p = 0.7291). A sub-analysis excluding patients with episiotomy and history of OASIs did not show any statistically significant difference either. CONCLUSION: We did not demonstrate a significant difference in the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries between women who had a breech vaginal birth compared to cephalic.

Do specific maternal sensations experienced in late pregnancy correlate to a breech presenting baby? Evaluation of a simple maternal questionnaire.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effectiveness of a structured questionnaire completed at 36 weeks gestation in predicting breech presentation. DESIGN: Questionnaire-based study. SETTING: Tertiary NHS Foundation Trust. PARTICIPANTS: Women attending for a universally offered 36-week fetal growth scan. INTERVENTION: Completion of a previously designed maternal questionnaire detailing sensation of fetal movements during the past week, immediately before a routine growth scan. RESULTS: Between September 01, 2018 and September 30, 2019, 2341 questionnaires were handed out and 2053 were returned. Analysis was performed in 1938 (94.4%) completed questionnaires. Recorded presentation was breech in 109 (5.6%), transverse/oblique in 15 (0.8%), and cephalic in 1814 (93.6%). Women "thinking their baby was breech" had a high positive likelihood ratio, at 11.8 (95% CI 7.4-19.1), but poor sensitivity (27.3%). "Feeling kicks low down or near the bladder" was sensitive for non-cephalic presentation (76.3%) but with poor specificity (48.9%). The questions "kicks low" ("no") (P = 0.013, aOR 2.18 [1.18-4.04]) and 'thinks cephalic ("no")' (P = 0.001, aOR 0.12 (0.04-0.43) were independent risk factors for a non-cephalic presentation. CONCLUSIONS: The questions posed in this questionnaire could aid the detection of breech presentation, but do not perform better than published data on palpation. Missing a breech presentation near term through palpation alone is well reported. Combining the concept of palpation to exclude breech presentation and these questions may help focus a clinician and improve both palpation skills and breech detection. As a minimum, a woman who believes her baby is breech should be taken seriously.

Breech specialist midwives and clinics in the OptiBreech Trial feasibility study: An implementation process evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Attendance of skilled and experienced professionals at breech births has been associated with a reduction in adverse perinatal outcomes. We aimed to determine whether United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS) sites could reliably provide attendants with OptiBreech training and/or advanced proficiency (intervention feasibility) and consistent care (fidelity) that meets women's needs (acceptability), with low neonatal admission rates (safety) and recruitment adequate to support a clinical trial (trial feasibility). METHODS: Mixed methods implementation evaluation was used. Settings were 13 services in England and Wales. Participants were 82 women requesting support for a vaginal breech birth (VBB) at term. Outcomes were descriptively analyzed. Twenty-one women were interviewed, and transcripts were analyzed using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Iterative analysis informed subsequent interviews and the ongoing process of implementation across sites. RESULTS: Although we initially suggested multidisciplinary teams, actively recruiting Trusts yielded services where VBB care was provided through a dedicated clinic, organized and delivered primarily by a lead midwife who functioned as a specialist. This model achieved 87.5% fidelity with the intervention's goal of ensuring the attendance of OptiBreech-trained professionals. Neonatal outcomes remained stable, with an admission rate of 5.5%. Women reported care from specialist midwives as highly acceptable, but the model is vulnerable without a strategic effort to develop additional proficient team members. CONCLUSIONS: Dedicated clinics coordinated by specialist midwives appear to be an acceptable and feasible implementation strategy to test the safety and effectiveness of proficient team care for VBB in a clinical trial. Back-up arrangements should be maintained while additional members of the team develop proficiency.